Vacuum-assisted excision: a safe minimally invasive option for benign phyllodes tumor diagnosis and treatment-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Synopsis: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing surgical excision with percutaneous ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted excision (US-VAE) for the treatment of benign phyllodes tumor (PT) using local recurrence (LR) as the endpoint. Objective: To determine the frequency of local recurrence (LR) of benign phyllodes tumor (PT) after ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted excision (US-VAE) compared to the frequency of LR after surgical excision. Method: A systematic review and meta-analysis [following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standard] was conducted by comparing LR in women older than 18 years treated for benign PT by US-VAE compared with local surgical excision with at least 12 months of follow-up. Studies were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase. The pooled effect measure used was the odds ratio (OR) of recurrence. Results: Five comparative prospective or retrospective observational studies published between January 1, 1992, and January 10, 2022, comparing surgical excision with percutaneous US-VAE for LR of benign PT met the selection criteria. Four were retrospective observational cohorts, and one was a prospective observational cohort. A total of 778 women were followed up. Of them, 439 (56.4%) underwent local surgical excision, and 339 (43.6%) patients had US-VAE. The median age of patients in the five studies ranged from 33.7 to 39 years; the median size ranged from 1.5 cm to 3.0 cm, and the median follow-up ranged from 12 months to 46.6 months. The needle gauge ranged from 7G to 11G. LR rates were not statically significant between US-VAE and surgical excision (41 of 339 versus 34 of 439; OR 1.3; p = 0.29). Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that using US-VAE for the removal of benign PT does not increase local regional recurrence and is a safe minimally invasive therapeutic option. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022309782.

A phase II randomized clinical trial to assess toxicity and quality of life of breast cancer patients with hypofractionated versus conventional fractionation radiotherapy with regional nodal irradiation in the context of COVID-19 crisis.

Purpose: This study, conducted during the COVID-19 crisis, primarily aimed to compare the acute toxicity between conventional fractionated radiation therapy (CF-RT) with hypofractionated radiation therapy (HF-RT) among patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy in whom breast or chest wall and regional nodal irradiation (RNI) were indicated. The secondary endpoints were both acute and subacute toxicity, cosmesis, quality of life, and lymphedema features. Methods: In this open and non-inferiority randomized trial, patients (n = 86) were randomly allocated 2:1 in the CF-RT arm (n = 33; 50 Gy/25 fractions ± sequential boost [10 Gy/5 fractions]) versus the HF-RT arm (n = 53; 40 Gy/15 fractions ± concomitant boost [8 Gy/15 fractions]). Toxic effects and cosmesis evaluation used the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03 (CTCAE) and the Harvard/National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP)/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) scale. For the patient-reported quality of life (QoL), the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the breast cancer-specific supplementary questionnaire (QLQ-BR23) were used. Lymphedema was assessed by comparing volume differences between the affected and contralateral arms using the Casley-Smith formula. Results: Grade 2 and grade 3 dermatitis were lower with HF-RT than with CF-RT (28% vs. 52%, and 0% vs. 6%, respectively; p = 0.022). HF-RT had a lower rate of grade 2 hyperpigmentation (23% vs. 55%; p = 0.005), compared to CF-RT. No other differences in overall rates of physician-assessed grade 2 or higher and grade 3 or higher acute toxicity between HF-RT and CF-RT were registered. There was no statistical difference between groups regarding cosmesis, lymphedema rate (13% vs. 12% HF-RT vs. CF-RT; p = 1.000), and functional and symptom scales, during both the irradiation period and after 6 months of the end of treatment. The results revealed that the subset of patients up to 65 years or older did not show a statistical difference between both arm fractionation schedules (p > 0.05) regarding skin rash, fibrosis, and lymphedema. Conclusion: HF-RT was non-inferior to CF-RT, and moderate hypofractionation showed lower rates of acute toxicity, with no changes in quality-of-life outcomes. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT40155531.

Practical Prediction Model for Ovarian Insufficiency after Radiation.

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to develop a useful mathematical model that predicts the age at which premature ovarian insufficiency might occur after teletherapy radiation. A diagnosis of premature or early menopause has physical and psychological consequences, so women may need support and long-term medical follow-up. METHODS: To correlate ovarian radiation dose with ovarian function, we used the formula described by Wallace et al.: √g(z) = 10(2-0,15z), where "g(z)" and "z" represent oocyte survival rate and the radiation dose (in Gray), respectively. By simulating different ages and doses, we observed a pattern that could be used to simplify the relationship between radiation dose and remaining time of ovarian function. RESULTS: We obtained a linear function between ovarian radiation dose and loss of ovarian function (LOF) that is the percentage of decrease in the time to the ovarian failure compared with the time expected for a woman at the same age without irradiation exposition. For patients < 40 years old and with ovarian radiation doses < 5 Gy, the equation LOF = 2.70 + (11.08 x Dose) can be applied to estimate the decrease in time to premature ovarian insufficiency. CONCLUSION: The present study reports a practicable theoretical method to estimate the loss of ovarian function. These findings can potentially improve the management and counseling of young women patients submitted to radiotherapy during their reproductive years.

OBJETIVO: O presente estudo teve como objetivo desenvolver um modelo matemático útil que prediz a idade na qual a insuficiência ovariana prematura pode ocorrer após a radioterapia externa (teleterapia). O diagnóstico de menopausa prematura ou precoce tem consequências físicas e psicológicas; portanto, as mulheres podem precisar de apoio e acompanhamento médico de longo prazo. MéTODOS: Para correlacionar a dose de radiação ovariana com a função ovariana, foi usada a fórmula descrita por Wallace et al.: √g(z) = 10(2-0,15z), na qual "g(z)" e "z" representam a taxa de sobrevivência do oócito e a dose de radiação (em Gray), respectivamente. Ao simular diferentes idades e doses, observamos um padrão que poderia ser usado para simplificar a relação entre a dose de radiação e o tempo restante da função ovariana. RESULTADOS: Obtivemos uma função linear entre a dose de radiação ovariana e a perda da função ovariana (LOF, na sigla em inglês) que é a porcentagem de diminuição no tempo até a falência ovariana em relação ao tempo esperado para uma mulher da mesma idade sem exposição à radiação. Para pacientes < 40 anos de idade e com doses de radiação ovariana < 5 Gy, a equação LOF = 2,70 + (11,08 x Dose) pode ser aplicada para estimar a redução no tempo até a insuficiência ovariana. CONCLUSãO: O presente estudo relata um método teórico viável para estimar a perda da função ovariana. Estes achados podem melhorar potencialmente o manejo e o aconselhamento de pacientes jovens submetidas à radioterapia durante seus anos reprodutivos.

Practical Prediction Model for Ovarian Insufficiency after Radiation / Modelo prático de predição para insuficiência ovariana após radiação

Abstract Objective The present study aimed to develop a useful mathematical model that predicts the age at which premature ovarian insufficiency might occur after teletherapy radiation. A diagnosis of premature or early menopause has physical and psychological consequences, so women may need support and long-term medical follow-up. Methods To correlate ovarian radiation dose with ovarian function, we used the formula described by Wallace et al.: √g(z) = 10(2-0,15z), where "g(z)" and "z" represent oocyte survival rate and the radiation dose (in Gray), respectively. By simulating different ages and doses, we observed a pattern that could be used to simplify the relationship between radiation dose and remaining time of ovarian function. Results We obtained a linear function between ovarian radiation dose and loss of ovarian function (LOF) that is the percentage of decrease in the time to the ovarian failure compared with the time expected for a woman at the same age without irradiation exposition. For patients <40 years old and with ovarian radiation doses < 5 Gy, the equation LOF = 2.70 + (11.08 × Dose) can be applied to estimate the decrease in time to premature ovarian insufficiency. Conclusion The present study reports a practicable theoretical method to estimate the loss of ovarian function. These findings can potentially improve the management and counseling of young women patients submitted to radiotherapy during their reproductive years.

Resumo Objetivo O presente estudo teve como objetivo desenvolver um modelo matemático útil que prediz a idade na qual a insuficiência ovariana prematura pode ocorrer após a radioterapia externa (teleterapia). O diagnóstico de menopausa prematura ou precoce tem consequências físicas e psicológicas; portanto, as mulheres podem precisar de apoio e acompanhamento médico de longo prazo. Métodos Para correlacionar a dose de radiação ovariana com a função ovariana, foi usada a fórmula descrita por Wallace et al.: √g(z) = 10(2-0,15z), na qual "g(z)" e "z" representam a taxa de sobrevivência do oócito e a dose de radiação (em Gray), respectivamente. Ao simular diferentes idades e doses, observamos um padrão que poderia ser usado para simplificar a relação entre a dose de radiação e o tempo restante da função ovariana. Resultados Obtivemos uma função linear entre a dose de radiação ovariana e a perda da função ovariana (LOF, na sigla em inglês) que é a porcentagem de diminuição no tempo até a falência ovariana em relação ao tempo esperado para uma mulher da mesma idade sem exposição à radiação. Para pacientes<40 anos de idade e com doses de radiação ovariana < 5 Gy, a equação LOF = 2,70 + (11,08 × Dose) pode ser aplicada para estimar a redução no tempo até a insuficiência ovariana. Conclusão O presente estudo relata um método teórico viável para estimar a perda da função ovariana. Estes achados podem melhorar potencialmente o manejo e o aconselhamento de pacientes jovens submetidas à radioterapia durante seus anos reprodutivos.