Prescription of Sulphonylureas among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Italy: Results from the Retrospective, Observational Multicentre Cross-Sectional SUSCIPE (Sulphonyl_UreaS_Correct_Internal_Prescription_Evaluation) Study.

INTRODUCTION: Recent guidelines for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) provide evidence supporting limited use of sulphonylureas (SUs), especially in specific risk patient categories, yet data from national registries still suggest their widespread use. The aim of this study was to investigate characteristics of patients with diabetes treated with SUs and quantify the proportion of patients that met the recommendations for use of SUs by recent guidelines and of those presenting characteristics representing an inappropriate prescription risk (IPR). METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study in patients with T2DM receiving treatment with SUs (as monotherapy or in combination with another diabetes therapy) was conducted between 2017 and 2018 in 22 outpatient diabetes clinics across Italy. Exclusion criteria were type 1 diabetes, diabetes mellitus secondary to other conditions, and presence of severe/life-threatening diseases. RESULTS: A total of 510 patients with T2DM (306 men, 204 women; mean age ± standard deviation 69.8 ± 9.3 years) who were receiving treatment with a SU (as monotherapy or in combination therapy) were assessed in the study. Overall, 70.6% [n = 360; 95% confidence interval (CI) 66.4%, 74.5%] were assessed to have an IPR. Of these, approximately half presented one factor for risk of inappropriate prescription, and 27 and 10.6% presented two and three factors, respectively. In terms of factors contributing to the total burden of risk of inappropriate treatment with SUs, 37.5% (95% CI 33.2%, 41.8%) of all patients were obese; 33.3% (95% CI 29.3%, 37.6%)] were aged ≥ 75 years; 18.6% (95% CI 15.3%, 22.3%) had a history of cardiovascular disease; 14.1% (95% CI 11.2%, 17.4%) had chronic renal insufficiency; 1.8% (95% CI 0.8%, 3.3%) had a history of severe hypoglycemia; 1.8% (95% CI 0.8%; 3.3%) had cognitive impairment; and 2.4% (95% CI 1.2%, 4.1%) had a risky occupation. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study provide evidence of a high rate of inappropriate SU prescription risk among patients with T2DM, especially among those with overweight/obesity, older age, history of cardiovascular disease, and hypoglycemia.

A placebo-controlled double-blind randomized trial of the use of combined l-carnitine and l-acetyl-carnitine treatment in men with asthenozoospermia.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of combined l-carnitine and l-acetyl-carnitine therapy in infertile males with oligo-astheno-teratozoospermia. DESIGN: Placebo-controlled double-blind randomized trial. SETTING: University tertiary referral center. PATIENT(S): Sixty infertile patients (aged 20-40 years) with the following baseline sperm selection criteria: concentration, 10 to 40 x 10(6)/mL; forward motility, <15%; total motility, 10% to 40%; and atypical forms, <80%. Fifty-six patients completed the study. INTERVENTION(S): Patients were submitted to a combined treatment of l-carnitine (2 g/d) and l-acetyl-carnitine (1 g/d) or of placebo; the study design was 2 months' wash-out, 6 months of therapy or of placebo, and 2 months' follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Variation in the semen parameters that were used for patient selection. RESULT(S): Even though increases were seen in all sperm parameters after combined carnitine treatment, the most significant improvement in sperm motility (both forward and total) was present in patients who had lower initial absolute values of motile sperm (<4 x 10(6) forward or <5 x 10(6) total motile spermatozoa per ejaculate). CONCLUSION(S): Combined treatment with l-carnitine and l-acetyl-carnitine in a controlled study of efficacy was effective in increasing sperm motility, especially in groups with lower baseline levels.

Testicular tumors as a possible cause of antisperm autoimmune response.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the presence of antisperm antibodies in testicular cancer patients 1 month after orchiectomy and before radiotherapy or chemotherapy. DESIGN: Clinical study. SETTING: Department of andrology and seminology at a university hospital. PATIENT(S): One hundred ninety patients with testicular cancer. INTERVENTION(S): Determination of semen parameters and autoimmune reaction evaluated on the sperm surface and in blood serum. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Autoimmune reaction on the sperm surface by the direct immunobead test (IBT), and in blood serum by the indirect IBT and the gelatin agglutination test (GAT), was evaluated 1 month after orchiectomy and before beginning chemotherapy or radiotherapy. RESULT(S): Of the 190 patients, 11 (5.8%) were positive for antisperm antibody by GAT. On indirect IBT, 3 of the 11 GAT-positive patients were positive to IgG class only, with values of 22%, 24%, and 40%. Of the 11 GAT-positive patients, 4 showed no antibody bound to the sperm surface, and 3 were positive to IgG class only (28%, 21%, and 38%), with binding exclusively on the tail. Direct IBT could not be performed in the remaining 4 patients. CONCLUSION(S): Our data support the hypothesis that testicular cancer might not be a possible cause of antisperm autoimmunization and infertility.