Principles for interactions with biopharmaceutical companies: the development of guidelines for patient advocacy organizations in the field of rare diseases.

BACKGROUND: Rare diseases are a global public health concern, affecting an estimated 350 million individuals. Only 5% of approximately 7000 known rare diseases have a treatment, and only about half have a patient advocacy organization. Biopharmaceutical companies face complex challenges in developing treatments for rare diseases. Patient advocacy organizations may play a major role by positively influencing research and development, clinical trials, and regulations. Thus, collaboration among patient advocacy organizations and industry is essential to bring new therapeutics to patients. METHODS: We identified an unmet need for guidelines on day-to-day decision-making by rare disease patient advocacy organizations when working with biopharmaceutical partners. We convened an Independent Expert Panel experienced in collaborations between patient advocacy organizations and biopharmaceutical companies (April 2017) to develop consensus guidelines for these relationships. The guidelines were based on an original version by the International Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva Association (IFOPA). The Expert Panel reviewed and broadened these to be applicable to all patient advocacy organizations. Comments on the draft Guidelines were provided first by Panel participants and subsequently by six independent experts from patient advocacy organizations and industry. RESULTS: The Panel comprised four experts from the rare disease community who lead patient advocacy organizations; three leaders who perform advocacy functions within biopharmaceutical companies; and two facilitators, both having leadership experience in rare diseases and industry. The finalized Guidelines consist of four main sections: Identification and Engagement With Companies, Patient Engagement and Patient Privacy, Financial Contributions, and Clinical Trial Communication and Support. The Guidelines address the daily considerations, choices, and consequences of patient advocacy organizations as they engage with biopharmaceutical companies, and offer recommendations for volunteer/paid leaders of the organizations on how to interact in a thoughtful, responsible, ethical way that engenders trust. CONCLUSIONS: These Guidelines recommend best practices and standards for interactions between patient advocacy organizations and industry that will ultimately have a positive effect on the development of novel treatments. Patient advocacy organizations will be provided free access to these Guidelines to help bring clarification to day-to-day decision-making around their interactions, and for use as a living document with the potential for regular revisions and updates.

The burden of familial chylomicronemia syndrome from the patients' perspective.

BACKGROUND: Familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS) is a rare, inherited lipid disorder characterized by high levels of plasma triglycerides and chylomicrons, which may cause life-threatening acute pancreatitis. Currently no FDA-approved treatment exists. Management is low-fat diet (<20g fat/day), which is difficult to maintain. With the restricted diet, triglycerides may remain elevated. We conducted discussions with patients and caregivers to better understand the burden of FCS from their perspectives. METHODS: A panel of FCS patients and caregivers was assembled to discuss and assess the clinical and psychosocial burden of FCS. RESULTS: Ten adults with FCS (median age 48 yr) and their spouses/caregivers were asked specific questions about their experiences living with FCS. Patients with FCS stated their symptoms were abdominal pain, nausea, diarrhea, constipation, bloating, and fatigue. Patients reported a median of 34 episodes of acute pancreatitis over their lifetimes; half of these led to hospitalizations, each with an average stay of 6.5 days. The psychosocial burden of FCS was primarily associated with the restricted diet, anxiety and stress of FCS. CONCLUSIONS: Living with FCS imposes a significant clinical and psychosocial burden on patients and caregivers, who reported reduced quality of life, limited employment opportunities, socialization and increased burden on family.