RESUMO
Very elderly population constitutes an increasingly larger proportion of patients admitted for acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Notably, age represents both a proxy of frailty and an exclusion criterion in clinical randomized trials, which probably contributes to lack of data and undertreatment of real-world elderly patients. The aim of the study is to describe patterns of treatment and outcome of very elderly patients with ACS. All consecutive patients aged ≥ 80 years old (yo) admitted between January 2017 and December 2019 with ACS were included. The primary endpoint was in-hospital occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as the composite of cardiovascular death, new onset cardiogenic shock, definite/probable stent thrombosis, and ischemic stroke. The secondary endpoints were in-hospital incidence of Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) major/minor bleedings, contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN), six-month all-cause mortality, and unplanned readmission. One hundred ninety-three patients (mean age 84.1 ± 3.5 yo, 46% females) were included, of whom 86 (44.6%), 79 (40.9%), and 28 (14.5%) presented with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and unstable angina (UA), respectively. The vast majority of patients received an invasive strategy, with 92.7% undergoing coronary angiography and 84.4% to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Aspirin was administered to 180 (93.3%) patients, clopidogrel to 89 (46.1%) patients, and ticagrelor to 85 (44%) patients. In-hospital MACE occurred in 29 patients (15.0%), whereas 3 (1.6%) and 12 patients (7.2%) experienced in-hospital TIMI major and TIMI minor bleeding, respectively. Of the overall population, 177 (91.7%) were discharged alive. After discharge, 11 patients (6.2%) died of all-cause death, whereas 42 patients (23.7%) required a new hospitalization within six months. Invasive strategy of ACS in elderly patients seems safe and effective. Six-month new hospitalization appears inevitably related to age.
Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda , Infarto do Miocárdio , Infarto do Miocárdio sem Supradesnível do Segmento ST , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Feminino , Humanos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Masculino , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/diagnóstico , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/terapia , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/complicações , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Infarto do Miocárdio/complicações , Clopidogrel/efeitos adversos , Aspirina/efeitos adversos , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Hemorragia/epidemiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio sem Supradesnível do Segmento ST/diagnóstico , Infarto do Miocárdio sem Supradesnível do Segmento ST/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is implicated in the pathogenesis of a number of medical conditions but to date only one official position paper related to left circulation thromboembolism has been published. This interdisciplinary paper, prepared with the involvement of eight European scientific societies, reviews the available evidence and proposes a rationale for decision making for other PFO-related clinical conditions. In order to guarantee a strict evidence-based process, we used a modified grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) methodology. A critical qualitative and quantitative evaluation of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures was performed, including assessment of the risk/benefit ratio. The level of evidence and the strength of the position statements were weighed and graded according to predefined scales. Despite being based on limited and observational or low-certainty randomised data, a number of position statements were made to frame PFO management in different clinical settings, along with suggestions for new research avenues. This interdisciplinary position paper, recognising the low or very low certainty of existing evidence, provides the first approach to several PFO-related clinical scenarios beyond left circulation thromboembolism and strongly stresses the need for fresh high-quality evidence on these topics.
Assuntos
Doença da Descompressão , Forame Oval Patente , Transtornos de Enxaqueca , Tromboembolia , Doença da Descompressão/terapia , Forame Oval Patente/complicações , Forame Oval Patente/terapia , Humanos , Síndrome , Tromboembolia/etiologia , Tromboembolia/prevenção & controleAssuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/métodos , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Seleção de Pacientes , Volume Sistólico/fisiologia , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Feminino , Seguimentos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/etiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/complicações , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/fisiopatologia , Desenho de Prótese , Estudos Retrospectivos , Função Ventricular Direita/fisiologiaRESUMO
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a common complication of diseases affecting the left heart, mostly found in patients suffering from heart failure. Left atrial hypertension is the initial driver of post-capillary PH. However, several mechanisms may lead in a subset of patients to structural changes in the pulmonary vessels with development of a pre-capillary component. The right ventricle may be frequently affected, leading to right ventricular failure and a worse outcome. The differential diagnosis of PH associated with left heart disease vs pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is challenging in patients with cardiovascular comorbidities, risk factors for PAH and/or a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Multidimensional clinical phenotyping is needed to identify patients in whom hemodynamic confirmation is deemed necessary, that may be completed by provocative testing in the cath lab. In contrast with PAH, management of PH associated with left heart disease should focus on the treatment of the underlying condition. There is currently no approved therapy for PH associated with left heart disease: some PAH-specific treatments have led to an increase in adverse events in these patients.
Assuntos
Cardiopatias , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Hipertensão Pulmonar , Humanos , Hipertensão Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Hipertensão Pulmonar/etiologia , Hipertensão Pulmonar/terapia , Volume Sistólico , Função Ventricular Esquerda , Insuficiência Cardíaca/complicações , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess changes in mitral regurgitation (MR) severity after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). BACKGROUND: Existing data on MR after TAVI are contradictory. METHODS: Thirty-five patients with MR graded ≥ 2+ were followed after undergoing TAVI with either the Edwards Sapien or CoreValve device. Echocardiography was performed the week before and 3 months after the procedure. MR was graded on a scale of 0 to 4+, classified as organic or functional, and the effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) and MR index were calculated. RESULTS: At baseline, MR was graded 4+ in 4 (11.4%) patients, 3+ in 10 (28.6%), and 2+ in 21 (60%). At follow-up, MR was graded at 3+ in 4 (11.4%) patients, 2+ in 8 (22.9%), and 1+ in 19 (54.3%); 4 (11.4%) exhibited no MR. EROA (24.4 ± 11.5 mm(2) pre-TAVI vs. 11.2 ± 10.3 mm(2) post-TAVI, P < 0.001) and MR index (1.9 ± 0.3 pre-TAVI vs. 1.3 ± 0.7 post-TAVI, P < 0.001) were reduced with TAVI, independent of the etiology. MR decreased by at least 1 grade in 28 (80%) patients, with a reduction ≥2 grades in 10 (28.6%) patients; no patient showed a worsened condition. Subgroup analyses showed that the reduction in MR was significant in patients treated with the Edwards Sapien device but not in patients treated with the CoreValve device. CONCLUSIONS: This multiparametric echocardiographic evaluation showed that MR improved significantly after TAVI and that this result may be related to the type of valve implanted.
Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Ecocardiografia/métodos , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/diagnóstico por imagem , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/complicações , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/complicações , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the safety and feasibility of in-hospital sacubitril/valsartan initiation after clinical stabilization in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) and reduced ejection fraction (EF). METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter observational study included patients admitted for ADHF in 2 Italian centers between February 2017 and January 2022. Feasibility was evaluated by assessing the proportion of patients discharged on sacubitril/valsartan. Key safety endpoints were the incidences of adverse events during hospitalization and during follow-up planned at 1 month, 3-6 months and 12-18 months after discharge. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-two patients were included. Median age was 71 (60-78) years, 78% male, 63% New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III at admission with a median left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) of 25% (20-30). During hospitalization, 94 (77%) patients were treated with intravenous diuretics, 39 (32%) with inotrope/vasopressor, 51 (42%) with continuous positive airway pressure ventilation and 7 (6%) were assisted with an intra-aortic balloon pump. Median time from hospitalization to sacubitril/valsartan initiation was 4 (2-7) days. Sacubitril/valsartan was started at a dosage of 12/13 mg in 52 (43%) patients, 24/26 mg in 61 (50%) patients and 49/51 mg in 8 (7%) patients. Overall, 111 (91%) patients were discharged on sacubitril/valsartan. At 12-18-month follow-up, the vast majority of patients were still on sacubitril/valsartan therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital initiation of sacubitril/valsartan treatment in real-world ADHF patients may be a safe and feasible treatment option.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Neprilisina , Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Feminino , Neprilisina/farmacologia , Neprilisina/uso terapêutico , Volume Sistólico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Tetrazóis/efeitos adversos , Função Ventricular Esquerda , Resultado do Tratamento , Valsartana/uso terapêutico , Valsartana/farmacologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Aminobutiratos/efeitos adversos , Compostos de Bifenilo/uso terapêutico , Compostos de Bifenilo/farmacologia , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
The incidence of left ventricular thrombosis (LVT) after acute myocardial infarction has declined significantly in recent decades, thanks to advances in the field of revascularization and antithrombotic therapy. Despite oral anticoagulation, embolic events are the most feared complication of LVT. From a pathophysiological point of view, the development of LVT depends on Virchow's triad, that is, endothelial damage caused by myocardial infarction, blood stasis due to left ventricular dysfunction, and hyper-coagulability determined by inflammation. The diagnostic modalities of LVT include transthoracic echocardiography preferably implemented by contrast administration, and cardiac magnetic resonance. Most thrombi develop in the first 2 weeks after acute myocardial infarction, so the role of systematic screening with short to medium term repeated imaging appears limited. Vitamin K antagonists remain the cornerstone of therapy, since the effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants remains to be established. Only weak evidence supports the routine use of prophylactic anticoagulant therapy, even in high-risk patients.
Assuntos
Cardiopatias , Infarto do Miocárdio , Trombose , Humanos , Infarto do Miocárdio/complicações , Ventrículos do Coração/diagnóstico por imagem , Trombose/etiologia , Trombose/prevenção & controle , Coração , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Patients with pulmonary embolism are a heterogeneous population and, after the acute phase and the first 3-6 months, the main issue is whether to continue, and hence how long and at what dose, or to stop anticoagulation therapy. In patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE), direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are the recommended treatment (class I, level of evidence B in the latest European guidelines), and in most cases, an "extended" or "long-term" low-dose therapy is warranted. This paper aims to provide a practical management tool to the clinician dealing with pulmonary embolism follow-up: from the evidence behind the most used exams (D-dimer, ultrasound Doppler of the lower limbs, imaging tests, recurrence and bleeding risk scores), and the use of DOACs in the extended phase, to six real clinical scenarios with the relative management in the acute phase and at follow-up. Lastly, a practical algorithm is shown to deal with anticoagulation therapy in the follow-up of VTE patients in a simple, schematic, and pragmatic way.
Assuntos
Embolia Pulmonar , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamento farmacológico , Seguimentos , Embolia Pulmonar/tratamento farmacológico , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Recidiva , Administração OralRESUMO
Aim: To evaluate sex difference in culprit plaque features at optical coherence tomography (OCT) and major adverse cardiovascular events at follow-up. Patients and methods: We analyse data from the OCT-FORMIDABLE (OCT-Features Of moRphology, coMposItion anD instABility of culprit and pLaquE in acute coronary syndrome [ACS] patients) registry. A total of 285 patients (20%, 58 females) were included. Results: Females with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction showed a longer ruptured area of the plaque (8.6 ± 7.6 vs 4.6 ± 5.4; p = 0.003) and a major necrotic core macrophage infiltration (43 vs 17%; p = 0.017). Females with non-ST segment elevation-ACS had less lipidic plaques (62 vs 80%; p = 0.04). No between-group sex differences in major adverse cardiovascular events emerged at follow-up (5 vs 9%; p = 0.88 in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction group and 19 vs 15%; p = 0.6 in non-ST segment elevation-ACS group). At multivariate analysis, female sex was not a major risk of plaque rupture (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.59, CI: 0.44-5.67; p = 0.48). Conclusion: Female sex seems to have no significant impact. ClincalTrial. gov registration number: NCT02486861.
Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/diagnóstico , Vasos Coronários/diagnóstico por imagem , Placa Aterosclerótica/diagnóstico , Sistema de Registros , Tomografia de Coerência Óptica/métodos , Idoso , Eletrocardiografia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
AIMS: Surgical aortic valve replacement has been the treatment of choice for patients with aortic valve disease before the arrival of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVI), although limited by degeneration of the bioprosthesis. "Redo" intervention itself is burdened by high risk of complications and valve-in-valve (ViV) TAVI could be a valid strategy of redo for patients with comorbidities. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two independent reviewers screened all studies investigating patients undergoing ViV TAVI. Mortality at 30 days and at 1 year was the primary end point. Of 286 studies identified, 26 articles were included in this review with a total of 1448 patients. Median age was 78.8 years, 57.7% male. Median STS score and Logistic EuroSCORE were 9.4% and 31.3% respectively. Stenosis (45%) was the leading cause of prosthesis failure. Transfemoral approach was preferred (76%), with a prevalence of balloon expandable valves (73.3%). Mean follow up was 376 days. Overall and cardiovascular mortality at 30 days was 6.5% and 5.5% respectively, while at 1 year it was 14.5% and 8.9% respectively. At meta-regression analysis study year (p < .001), Logistic EuroSCORE (p < .01) and valve diameter ≤ 21 mm (p < .05) at 30 days, and stenosis as reason for failure (p = .05) at 1 year were identified as possible predictors of survival. CONCLUSIONS: ViV TAVI offers a valid strategy to treat high risk patients with a failure of bioprosthesis with satisfying results in terms of short and mid-term mortality. Future studies are needed to find predictors of long term survival and outcomes in lower risk patients.
Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica , Bioprótese , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter , Idoso , Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Bioprótese/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Fatores de Risco , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/efeitos adversos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The association between prior stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has not been well explored. We evaluated the impact of prior stroke/TIA on this specific patient population. We conducted an international multicenter study including 15 401 patients with ACS from the Bleeding Complications in a Multicenter Registry of Patients Discharged With Diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome registry. They were divided into 2 groups: patients with and without prior stroke/TIA. The primary end point was death at 1-year follow-up. Prior stroke/TIA was associated with higher rate of 1-year death (8.7% vs 3.4%; P < .001). It was an independent predictor of 1-year death even after adjustment for confounding variables (odds ratio, 1.705; 95% confidence interval, 1.046-2.778; P = .032). Besides, patients with prior stroke/TIA had significantly increased 1-year reinfarction (5.6% vs 3.8%, P = .015), in-hospital bleeding (8.7% vs 5.8%, P < .001), and 1-year bleeding (5.2% vs 3.0%, P < .001). No difference of antithrombotic therapies or dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) types on outcomes was observed in patients with prior stroke/TIA. Prior stroke/TIA was associated with higher 1-year death for patients with ACS who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. No benefits or harms were observed with different antithrombotic therapies or DAPT types in these patients.
Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/cirurgia , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/complicações , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/complicações , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/mortalidade , Idoso , Causas de Morte , Feminino , Humanos , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/tratamento farmacológico , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: For patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), it is unclear whether angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) are associated with reduced mortality, particularly with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The goal of this study was to determine the association between ACEI/ARB and mortality in ACS patients undergoing PCI, with and without reduced LVEF. METHODS: Data from the BleeMACS registry were used. The endpoint was 1-year all-cause mortality. The prognostic value of ACEI/ARB was tested after weighting by survival-time inverse probability and after adjustment by Cox regression, propensity score, and instrumental variable analysis. RESULTS: Among 15 401 ACS patients who underwent PCI, ACEI/ARB were prescribed in 75.2%. There were 569 deaths (3.7%) during the first year after hospital discharge. After multivariable adjustment, ACEI/ARB were associated with lower 1-year mortality, ≤ 40% (HR, 0.62; 95%CI, 0.43-0.90; P=.012). The relative risk reduction of ACEI/ARB in mortality was 46.1% in patients with LVEF ≤ 40%, and 15.7% in patients with LVEF> 40% (P value for treatment-by-LVEF interaction=.008). For patients with LVEF> 40%, ACEI/ARB was associated with lower mortality only in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (HR, 0.44; 95%CI, 0.21-0.93; P=.031). CONCLUSION: The benefit of ACEI/ARB in decreasing mortality after an ACS in patients undergoing PCI is concentrated in patients with LVEF ≤ 40%, and in those with LVEF> 40% and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. In non-ST-segment elevation-ACS patients with LVEF> 40%, further studies are needed to assess the prognostic impact of ACEI/ARB.
Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/terapia , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Enzima Conversora de Angiotensina/uso terapêutico , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Sistema Renina-Angiotensina/efeitos dos fármacos , Volume Sistólico/fisiologia , Função Ventricular Esquerda/fisiologia , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/mortalidade , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Pontuação de Propensão , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this prospective study was to validate an echocardiographic protocol derived from 5 HeartWare left ventricular assist device (HVAD) patients for the noninvasive evaluation of right atrial pressure (RAP) and left atrial pressure (LAP) in HVAD patients. BACKGROUND: Echocardiography is an invaluable tool to optimize medical treatment and pump settings and also for troubleshooting residual heart failure. Little is known about the echocardiographic evaluation of hemodynamic status in HVAD patients. METHODS: Right heart catheterization and Doppler echocardiography were performed in 35 HVAD patients. Echocardiography-estimated RAP (eRAP) was assessed using inferior vena cava diameter, hepatic venous flow analysis, and tricuspid E/e' ratio. Echocardiography-estimated LAP was assessed using E/A ratio, mitral E/e' ratio, and deceleration time. RESULTS: eRAP and estimated LAP significantly correlated with invasive RAP and LAP (respectively, r = 0.839, p < 0.001, and r = 0.889, p < 0.001) and accurately detected high RAP and high LAP (respectively, area under the curve 0.94, p < 0.001, and area under the curve 0.91, p < 0.001). High eRAP was associated with high LAP (area under the curve 0.92, p < 0.001) and correlated with death or hospitalization at 180 days (odds ratio: 8.2; 95% confidence interval: 1.1 to 21.0; p = 0.04). According to estimated LAP and eRAP, patients were categorized into 4 hemodynamic profiles. Fifteen patients (43%) showed the optimal unloading profile (normal eRAP and normal wedge pressure). This profile showed a trend toward a lower risk for adverse cardiac events at follow-up (odds ratio: 0.2; 95% confidence interval: 0.1 to 1.0; p = 0.05) compared with other hemodynamic profiles. CONCLUSIONS: Doppler echocardiography accurately estimated hemodynamic status in HVAD patients. This algorithm reliably detected high RAP and LAP. Notably, high RAP was associated with high wedge pressure and adverse outcome. The benefit of noninvasive estimation of hemodynamic status in the clinical management of patients with left ventricular assist devices needs further evaluation.
Assuntos
Função do Átrio Esquerdo , Função do Átrio Direito , Pressão Atrial , Ecocardiografia Doppler em Cores , Ecocardiografia Doppler de Pulso , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas , Implantação de Prótese/instrumentação , Função Ventricular Esquerda , Idoso , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico por imagem , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Desenho de Prótese , Implantação de Prótese/efeitos adversos , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Chronic liver disease is a known risk factor for perioperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Very little data exist about such patients treated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Our objective was to evaluate early and late clinical outcomes in a large cohort of patients with liver disease undergoing TAVR and to determine predictive factors of mortality among these patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: This multicenter study collected data from 114 patients with chronic liver disease who underwent TAVR in 12 institutions. Perioperative and long-term outcomes were compared with a cohort of 1118 patients without liver disease after a propensity score-matching analysis (114 matched pairs). In-hospital mortality and vascular and bleeding complications were similar between matched groups. Acute kidney injury was more common in liver disease group (30.8% versus 13.5%; P=0.010). Although cardiovascular mortality was similar between groups (9.4% versus 6.5%; P=0.433) at 2-year follow-up, noncardiac mortality was higher in the liver group (26.4% versus 14.8%; P=0.034). Lower glomerular filtration rate (hazard ratio, 1.10, for each decrease of 5 mL/min in estimated glomerular filtration rate; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.17; P=0.005) and Child-Pugh class B or C (hazard ratio, 3.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.47-6.56; P=0.003) were the predictors of mortality in patients with chronic liver disease, with a mortality rate of 83.2% at 2-year follow-up in patients with both factors (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min and Child-Pugh B or C). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggested that TAVR is a feasible treatment for severe aortic stenosis in patients with early-stage liver disease or as bridge therapy before a curative treatment of the hepatic condition. Patients with Child-Pugh class B-C, especially in combination with renal impairment, had a very low survival rate, and TAVR should be carefully considered to avoid a futile treatment. These results may contribute to improve the clinical decision-making process and management in patients with liver disease.
Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Cirrose Hepática/mortalidade , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagem , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/mortalidade , Canadá , Doença Crônica , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Europa (Continente) , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Cirrose Hepática/diagnóstico , Cirrose Hepática/terapia , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores de Tempo , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/efeitos adversos , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/mortalidade , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Bleeding is an independent risk factor of mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). BleeMACS project focuses on long-term bleeding events after hospital discharge, thus we evaluated gender-related differences in post-discharge bleeding among patients with ACS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We investigated 13,727 ACS patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention and discharged on dual antiplatelet therapy (either with clopidogrel or prasugrel/ticagrelor). Endpoint was defined as intracranial bleeding or any other bleeding leading to hospitalization and/or red blood transfusion. RESULTS: Post-discharge bleeding was reported more frequently in females as compared with males (3.7% vs. 2.7%, log-rank Pâ¯=â¯0.001). Females (nâ¯=â¯3165, 23%) were older compared to men (69.0 vs. 61.5â¯years, Pâ¯<â¯0.001) and with more comorbidities. Hence, in multivariate analysis female sex was not identified as an independent risk factor of bleeding (HR 1.012, CI 0.805 to 1.274, Pâ¯=â¯0.816). Administration of newer antiplatelet agents compared to clopidogrel was associated with over twofold greater bleeding rate in females (7.3% vs. 3.5%, log-rank Pâ¯=â¯0.004), but not in males (2.6% vs. 2.7%, log-rank Pâ¯=â¯0.887). Differences among females remained significant after propensity score matching (7.2% vs 2.4%, log-rank Pâ¯=â¯0.020) and multivariate analysis confirmed that newer antiplatelet agents are independent risk factor for bleeding only in women (HR 2.775, CI 1.613 to 4.774, Pâ¯<â¯0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Bleeding events occurred more frequently in women, but female sex itself was not independent risk factor. Administration of newer antiplatelet agents was identified as independent risk factor of bleeding after hospital discharge in female gender, but not in male patients.
Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Feminino , Identidade de Gênero , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/farmacologia , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The prevalence and outcome of patients with cancer that experience acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have to be determined. METHODS AND RESULTS: The BleeMACS project is a multicentre observational registry enrolling patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention worldwide in 15 hospitals. The primary endpoint was a composite event of death and re-infarction after one year of follow-up. Bleedings were the secondary endpoint. 15,401 patients were enrolled, 926 (6.4%) in the cancer group and 14,475 (93.6%) in the group of patients without cancer. Patients with cancer were older (70.8±10.3 vs. 62.8±12.1 years, P<0.001) with more severe comorbidities and presented more frequently with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction compared with patients without cancer. After one year, patients with cancer more often experienced the composite endpoint (15.2% vs. 5.3%, P<0.001) and bleedings (6.5% vs. 3%, P<0.001). At multiple regression analysis the presence of cancer was the strongest independent predictor for the primary endpoint (hazard ratio (HR) 2.1, 1.8-2.5, P<0.001) and bleedings (HR 1.5, 1.1-2.1, P=0.015). Despite patients with cancer generally being undertreated, beta-blockers (relative risk (RR) 0.6, 0.4-0.9, P=0.05), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (RR 0.5, 0.3-0.8, P=0.02), statins (RR 0.3, 0.2-0.5, P<0.001) and dual antiplatelet therapy (RR 0.5, 0.3-0.9, P=0.05) were shown to be protective factors, while proton pump inhibitors (RR 1, 0.6-1.5, P=0.9) were neutral. CONCLUSION: Cancer has a non-negligible prevalence in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, with a major risk of cardiovascular events and bleedings. Moreover, these patients are often undertreated from clinical despite medical therapy seems to be protective. Registration:The BleeMACS project (NCT02466854).
Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros , Medição de Risco , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/complicações , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/cirurgia , Idoso , Ásia/epidemiologia , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/complicações , América do Norte/epidemiologia , Prevalência , América do Sul/epidemiologia , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: A poor ability of recommended risk scores for predicting in-hospital bleeding has been reported in elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). No study assessed the prediction of post-discharge bleeding in the elderly. The new BleeMACS score (Bleeding complications in a Multicenter registry of patients discharged with diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome), was designed to predict post-discharge bleeding in ACS patients. We aimed to assess the predictive ability of the BleeMACS score in elderly patients. METHODS: We assessed the incidence and characteristics of severe bleeding after discharge in ACS patients aged ≥ 75 years. Bleeding was defined as any intracranial bleeding or bleeding leading to hospitalization and/or red blood transfusion, occurring within the first year after discharge. We assessed the predictive ability of the BleeMACS score according to age by Fine-Gray proportional hazards regression analysis, calculating receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the area under the ROC curves (AUC). RESULTS: The BleeMACS registry included 15,401 patients of whom 3,376/15,401 (21.9%) were aged ≥ 75 years. Elderly patients were more commonly treated with clopidogrel and less often treated with ticagrelor or prasugrel. Of 3,376 elderly patients, 190 (5.6%) experienced post-discharge bleeding. The incidence of bleeding was moderately higher in elderly patients (hazard ratio [HR], 2.31, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.92-2.77). The predictive ability of the BleeMACS score was moderately lower in elderly patients (AUC, 0.652 vs. 0.691, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Elderly patients with ACS had a significantly higher incidence of post-discharge bleeding. Despite a lower predictive ability in older patients, the BleeMACS score exhibited an acceptable performance in these patients.
Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/cirurgia , Clopidogrel/efeitos adversos , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Hemorragias Intracranianas/induzido quimicamente , Alta do Paciente , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversos , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/diagnóstico , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Ásia/epidemiologia , Brasil/epidemiologia , Canadá/epidemiologia , Transfusão de Eritrócitos , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Hemorragias Intracranianas/diagnóstico , Hemorragias Intracranianas/epidemiologia , Hemorragias Intracranianas/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Cloridrato de Prasugrel/efeitos adversos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Sistema de Registros , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Ticagrelor/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Accurate 1-year bleeding risk estimation after hospital discharge for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) may help clinicians guide the type and duration of antithrombotic therapy. Currently there are no predictive models for this purpose. The aim of this study was to derive and validate a simple clinical tool for bedside risk estimation of 1-year post-discharge serious bleeding in ACS patients. METHODS: The risk score was derived and internally validated in the BleeMACS (Bleeding complications in a Multicenter registry of patients discharged with diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome) registry, an observational international registry involving 15,401 patients surviving admission for ACS and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from 2003 to 2014, engaging 15 hospitals from 10 countries located in America, Europe and Asia. External validation was conducted in the SWEDEHEART population, with 96,239 ACS patients underwent PCI and 93,150 without PCI. RESULTS: Seven independent predictors of bleeding were identified and included in the BleeMACS score: age, hypertension, vascular disease, history of bleeding, malignancy, creatinine and hemoglobin. The BleeMACS risk score exhibited a C-statistic value of 0.71 (95% CI 0.68-0.74) in the derivation cohort and 0.72 (95% CI 0.67-0.76) in the internal validation sample. In the SWEDEHEART external validation cohort, the C-statistic was 0.65 (95% CI 0.64-0.66) for PCI patients and 0.63 (95% CI 0.62-0.64) for non-PCI patients. The calibration was excellent in the derivation and validation cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: The BleeMACS bleeding risk score is a simple tool useful for identifying those ACS patients at higher risk of serious 1-year post-discharge bleeding. ClinicalTrials.govIdentifier: NCT02466854.
Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/diagnóstico , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/epidemiologia , Hemorragia/diagnóstico , Hemorragia/epidemiologia , Alta do Paciente/tendências , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Suécia/epidemiologiaRESUMO
AIMS: The benefit of complete or incomplete percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with myocardial infarction and multivessel disease remains debated. The aim of our study was to compare a complete vs. a "culprit only" revascularisation strategy in patients with myocardial infarction distinguishing the different clinical subsets (STEMI and NSTEMI) and to provide one-year clinical outcome from the "real-life" BleeMACS (Bleeding complications in a Multicenter registry of patients discharged with diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome) registry. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a multicentre study including all patients with myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary disease included in the BleeMACS (Bleeding complications in a Multicenter registry of patients discharged with diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome) registry. They were divided into two groups, complete revascularisation (CR) and incomplete revascularisation (IR). The primary endpoint was the death rate at one-year follow-up. Secondary endpoints were in-hospital repeat myocardial infarction (re-AMI), in-hospital heart failure (HF), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and myocardial infarction at one year. Four thousand five hundred and twenty patients were included in our analysis, with a diagnosis of STEMI in 67.7% and NSTEMI in 32.3%. CR was performed in 27.2% and 42.4%, respectively. At univariate analysis, in-hospital and one-year outcomes were similar between CR and IR in STEMI patients (all p-values >0.05). In NSTEMI patients, CR was associated with a lower one-year death rate (4.5% vs. 8.5%; p=0.002), re-AMI (3.7% vs. 6.6%; p=0.016) and MACE (8.1% vs. 13.9%; p=0.001). After propensity score matching, CR also reduced events in STEMI patients, including one-year mortality (5.3% vs. 13.8%; p<0.001), re-AMI (4.9% vs. 17.4%; p<0.001) and MACE (8.5% vs. 24.6%; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This multicentre retrospective registry showed the benefit of CR in terms of reduction of one-year mortality in patients with myocardial reinfarction and multivessel coronary disease. Randomised controlled trials including functional evaluation of the lesions should be performed to confirm our results.
Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/cirurgia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/cirurgia , Vasos Coronários/cirurgia , Infarto do Miocárdio/cirurgia , Revascularização Miocárdica , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/diagnóstico , Idoso , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Revascularização Miocárdica/métodos , Recidiva , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMO
AIMS: There is uncertainty on which stenting approach confers the best long-term outlook for unprotected left main (ULM) bifurcation disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a non-randomized, retrospective study including all consecutive patients with 50% stenosis of the left main involving at least 1 of the arteries stemming from the left main treated with drug-eluting stents (DES) in 9 European centers between 2002 and 2004. Patients were divided into two groups: those treated with provisional stentings vs. those treated with two stent strategy. The outcomes of interest were 10-year rates of target lesion revascularization (TLR), major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and their components (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction [MI], or repeat revascularization), along with stent thrombosis (ST). A total of 285 patients were included, 178 (62.5%) in the provisional stenting group and 87 (37.5%) in the two stent group. After 10 years, no differences in TLR were found at unadjusted analysis (19% vs 25%, p>0.05) nor after propensity score matching (25% vs 28%, p>0.05). Similar rates of MACE (60% vs 66%, p>0.05), death (34% vs 43%, p>0.05), MI (9% vs 14%, p>0.05) and ST were also disclosed at propensity-based analysis. CONCLUSION: Even after 10 year follow-up, patients treated with provisional stenting on left main showed comparable rates of target lesion revascularization compared to two stent strategy.