Modifications of CD4 T cells, CD4/CD8 ratio and serum levels of soluble CD14 in HIV-HCV-coinfected patients after sustained HCV response induced by direct-acting antiviral agents: influence of liver cirrhosis.

To analyze the modifications of CD4 T cell, CD4/CD8 ratio, and serum levels of soluble CD14 (sCD14) in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients after treatment with direct anti-HCV antiviral agents. Consecutive cases of HIV/HCV-coinfected patients, attended at the University Hospital, who achieved sustained virological responses with interferon-free hepatitis C antiviral drugs, were analyzed. Thirty-five percent of patients (n = 39) had been diagnosed with liver cirrhosis. The evaluation criteria were changes in CD4 T-cell counts and percentages and inflammation (measured by serum sCD14 levels) or immune activation indexes (determined by CD4/CD8 ratio) from beginning anti-HCV therapy to 12 months later. One hundred twelve patients were included (87% male; median age, 54 years; median time from the infection diagnosis, 22 years; previous drug users, 87%). Significant increases in CD4 T cell count and percentage were detected only in individuals without liver cirrhosis. No significant differences in CD4/CD8 ratios or sCD14 levels were observed in patients with or without cirrhosis. The proportion of patients with less than 500 CD4 T cell/mm3 before therapy who achieved more than 500 CD4 T cell/mm3 after it increased only in the group without liver cirrhosis. The finding that CD4 T cell count and percentage were improved only in patients without liver cirrhosis supports the idea that treatment against HCV in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients is needed in the early phases of liver disease.

Antibiotic use and outcome in patients with negative blood cultures, a new target population for antimicrobial stewardship interventions: A prospective multicentre cohort (NO-BACT).

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the appropriateness of antimicrobial treatment and the risk factors for mortality in patients with negative blood cultures (BC), in order to evaluate whether this population would be a suitable target for antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions. METHODS: A multicentre prospective cohort study of patients with negative BC in three Spanish hospitals between October 2018 and July 2019 was performed. The main endpoints were the appropriateness of antimicrobial treatment (evaluated by two investigators according to local guidelines) and 30-day mortality. Cox-regression was performed to estimate the association between variables and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Of 1011 patients in whom BC was obtained, these were negative in 803 (79%) and were included; 30-day mortality was 9% (70 patients); antibiotic treatment was considered inappropriate in 299 (40%) of 747 patients evaluated at day 2, and in 266 (46%) of 573 at day 5-7. The variables independently associated with increased risk of 30-day mortality were higher age (HR 1.05; 95% CI 1.03-1.07), neoplasia (HR 2.73; 95% CI 1.64-4.56), antibiotic treatment in the 48 h prior to BC extraction (HR 2.06; 95% CI 1.23-3.43) and insufficient antibiotic coverage at day 2 after BC obtainment (HR 2.35; 95% CI 1.39-4.00). Urinary, catheter and biliary sources of infection were associated with lower risk (HR 0.40; 95% CI 0.20-0.81). CONCLUSIONS: Antimicrobial treatment is frequently inappropriate among patients with negative BC; insufficient antibiotic coverage at day 2 was associated with mortality. These results suggest that patients with negative BC are a suitable population for AS interventions. SUMMARY: Antimicrobial treatment in patients with negative blood culture was frequently inappropriate, and inappropriate coverage at day 2 was associated with increased risk of death. These data support the consideration of this population as a potential target for antimicrobial stewardship interventions.

[Direct-acting oral anticoagulants in antiphospholipid syndrome: A systematic review]. / Anticoagulantes de acción directa en el síndrome antifosfolípido. Revisión sistemática.

The objective of the systematic review is to analyze the efficacy of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in the prophylaxis of thrombosis in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). We searched for clinical trials, cohort studies and meta-analyses published from January 1, 2012 to September 30, 2022. Articles that analyzed the efficacy of DOAC in the prevention of thrombosis recurrence, with or without comparison with antivitamin K (VKA) drugs, were selected. DOACs, specifically rivaroxaban and apixaban, were significantly less effective than VKAs in preventing recurrence of thrombosis in patients with APS and prior arterial thrombosis or the concomitant presence of two or three different antiphospholipid antibodies. The proportion of patients with severe bleeding as side effect are similar in those treated with DOAC and with VKA. The results argue against the use of DOAC in the treatment of patients with thrombotic APS.

Predictors of inappropriate antimicrobial prescription: Eight-year point prevalence surveys experience in a third level hospital in Spain.

Antibiotic stewardship programs (ASP) have already demonstrated clinical benefits. We aimed to describe the Point Prevalence Surveys (PPS) methodology implemented in our hospital as an efficient tool to guide ASP strategies. Annually repeated PPS were conducted from 2012 to 2019 at a 750-bed university hospital in South Spain. Key quality indicators and inappropriateness of antimicrobial treatment, defined strictly according to local guidelines, were described. Variables associated with inappropriate treatment were identified by bi/multivariable analysis. A total of 1,600 patients were included. We found that 49% of the prescriptions were inappropriate due to unnecessary treatment (14%), not first line drug recommended (14%), inadequate drug according to microbiological results (9%), unsuitable doses (8%), route (3%) or duration (7%). Samples collection presented a significant protective effect together with sepsis presentation at onset and intensive care unit admission. However, age, receiving an empirical treatment and an unknown or urinary source of the infections treated were independent risk factors for inappropriateness. Site and severity of infection were documented in medical charts by prescribers (75 and 61% respectively). PPS may allow identifying the main risk factors for inappropriateness. This simple methodology may be useful for ASP to select modifiable factors to be prioritized for targeted interventions.