Development of the Depist'HTA® score to predict a rise in blood pressure during a self-testing session: PREDIC-HTA bakery survey.

The use of an automatic blood pressure monitor with the help of a protocol given by an e-health application allows self-testing of blood pressure without the help of a health professional. OBJECTIVE: Conduct a screening campaign for high blood pressure in artisanal bakeries in France and develop a score to predict the observation of an increase in blood pressure during self-testing. METHOD: Cross-sectional survey conducted in mainland France in 2018 using 1000 screening kits including a tablet, Predic'HTA® application and a connected electronic blood pressure monitor (BP Track, IHealth). Available for one week in 14,000 artisanal bakeries, in turn. Used in the workplace, on a voluntary basis, by bakery employees. Completion of a health questionnaire with an estimate of excessive salt consumption. Self-screening of 3 blood pressure measurements with centralization of data on a secure database for epidemiological analysis. The average of the last 2 measurements characterizes each subject. RESULTS: Full use of Predic'HTA® was obtained in 62.4% of users or 7502 subjects (44% under 35 years of age, 44% 35 to 54 years of age, 12% 55 years of age and over). Antihypertensive treatment was followed by 27% of those aged 55 and over and 1% of those under 35. Among untreated subjects, the prevalence of BP>140/90 was 21.1%, increasing with age (13%, 27%, 33%) and higher among men (27.2%) than among women (15.4%). With the parameters age, sex, weight, IMC, family history of high blood pressure, excessive salt consumption, previous intake of an antihypertensive drug, a score is calculated to associate a probability of having an BP >120/80 with self-screening. The ROC curve shows an AUC at 0.723 with a PPV at 91% and a NPV at 41%. The depist'HTA® score is available at www.depisthta.net CONCLUSION: Self-testing of blood pressure is possible with an electronic blood pressure monitor if a dedicated appliance is used at the same time. The development of the prediction score depist'HTA® for a blood pressure level>120/80 would be useful to target subjects who need to self-test their blood pressure in the short term.

A novel programme to evaluate and communicate 10-year risk of CHD reduces predicted risk and improves patients' modifiable risk factor profile.

AIMS: We assessed whether a novel programme to evaluate/communicate predicted coronary heart disease (CHD) risk could lower patients' predicted Framingham CHD risk vs. usual care. METHODS: The Risk Evaluation and Communication Health Outcomes and Utilization Trial was a prospective, controlled, cluster-randomised trial in nine European countries, among patients at moderate cardiovascular risk. Following baseline assessments, physicians in the intervention group calculated patients' predicted CHD risk and were instructed to advise patients according to a risk evaluation/communication programme. Usual care physicians did not calculate patients' risk and provided usual care only. The primary end-point was Framingham 10-year CHD risk at 6 months with intervention vs. usual care. RESULTS: Of 1103 patients across 100 sites, 524 patients receiving intervention, and 461 receiving usual care, were analysed for efficacy. After 6 months, mean predicted risks were 12.5% with intervention, and 13.7% with usual care [odds ratio = 0.896; p = 0.001, adjusted for risk at baseline (17.2% intervention; 16.9% usual care) and other covariates]. The proportion of patients achieving both blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol targets was significantly higher with intervention (25.4%) than usual care (14.1%; p < 0.001), and 29.3% of smokers in the intervention group quit smoking vs. 21.4% of those receiving usual care (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: A physician-implemented CHD risk evaluation/communication programme improved patients' modifiable risk factor profile, and lowered predicted CHD risk compared with usual care. By combining this strategy with more intensive treatment to reduce residual modifiable risk, we believe that substantial improvements in cardiovascular disease prevention could be achieved in clinical practice.

[Use of the EvalObs® adherence scale in an unselected French population of treated subjects with antihypertensive, hypolipemiants or oral antidiabetics medications: The FLAHS 2017 adherence survey]. / Utilisation de l'échelle d'observance EvalObs® dans une population de sujets traités pour une hypertension, une dyslipidémie ou un diabète : enquête FLAHS observance 2017.

OBJECTIVE: A Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is useful for diagnosing medication nonadherence and its validity has been evaluated using electronic pillbox as the gold standard. We have developed the EvaLobs® scale for use on paper or on smartphone and the aim of the study was to administrate the scale among FLAHS 2017 participants treated for an hypertension, a dyslipidemia or diabetes. In subjects treated with antihypertensive medications, participants completed the 6-item Girerd Scale and EvaLobs®. METHODS: The French League Against Hypertension Survey (FLAHS) are carried out by self-questionnaire sent by mail to individuals from the French Kantar Health sampling frame (representative panel of the population living in metropolitan France). In 2017, FLAHS was conducted in 4783 subjects aged 35 and over. The EvaLobs® has a scale from 0 to 15 and the use instruction is "how many days have you taken the drug in the past 15 days". A score>12 indicates a "good compliance". The 6-item Girerd scale was also completed. "Good adherence" was determined for a score of 0 to 2 and "nonadherence" for a score of 3 or more. The agreement between EvaLobs® and the 6-item Girerd scale was evaluated in treated hypertensives. RESULTS: The survey included 4783 subjects with 1308 treated hypertensives, 942 subjects treated with lipid-lowering drugs and 405 subjects treated with anti-diabetics. EVALOBS® indicates "Good adherence" in 96% of subjects and the 6 questions questionnaire indicates "good adherence" in 95% of subjects. An excellent agreement is noted in 93.8%. An EvaLobs® score indicating nonadherence or an absence of response to EvaLobs® is observed in 3.6% [CI 95, 2.5-4.7] of hypertensives, in 6.0% [CI 95, 3.9-8.1] of diabetics and in 8.2% [CI 95, 6.5-9.9] of dyslipidemic patients. CONCLUSION: In the population living in France and in unselected patients treated for metabolic disease or hypertension, non-adherence is lowest for antihypertensive medications and highest for statins. EvaLobs®, which shows good agreement with an adherence questionnaire, is a quick and simple tool for assessing adherence. The smartphone app EvaLobs® is available for free on Google play and the Apple store.

The repercussion of stopping reimbursement of olmésartan on antihypertensive drugs prescription and blood pressure control of treated hypertensive patients in France.

OBJECTIVE: Since January 2017, olmesartan-based treatments are no longer reimbursed by French health insurance. Health authorities have recommended switch to one of the "many effective, better tolerated and reimbursed alternatives". The objective of this study was to evaluate the consequences on the prescription of antihypertensive drugs in France and to evaluate the blood pressure control of treated hypertensive patients after the switch from olmesartan to another Angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). METHODS: To evaluate antihypertensive prescriptions, the French League Against Hypertension Survey (FLAHS) was conducted in 2007, 2012 and 2017 by self-questionnaire sent by mail to a representative panel of the population living in metropolitan France aged 35 years and over. Antihypertensive treatments were grouped by pharmacological class. To evaluate blood pressure control in hypertensive patients treated with olmesartan alone or in combination, 3 home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) were performed. The first and the second were performed without modification of the dose of olmesartan. The third was performed 1 month after the switch to another ARB. RESULTS: Antihypertensive prescriptions changed between 2007 and 2017. Beta-blockers decreased between 2007 and 2012 and then increased slightly. Between 2012 and 2017, ARB and diuretics decreased and ACE inhibitors (ACE-I) and calcium antagonist (CA) drugs increased. Blood pressure control was assessed in 82 hypertensive patients aged 63±11 years treated with olmesartan. The difference in SBP/DBP between the first 2 self-measurements was -0.96/-0.83mmHg. After therapy switch, the 3rd self-measurement showed an increase in SBP/DBP of 3.4/1.2mmHg. In the subgroup of olmesartan-treated controlled hypertensive patients, the switch to another ARB lead to uncontrolled hypertension for 20% of patients with a 12.1mmHg increase in SBP. CONCLUSION: With the halt of reimbursement of olmesartan, there was a decrease in the prescription of ARB in France. When olmersartan was replaced by another ARB, a worse blood pressure control was observed in treated hypertensive patients. The cessation of the reimbursement of olmesartan has had consequences on the treatment of hypertension in France.

L-arginine improves endothelium-dependent vasodilation in hypercholesterolemic humans.

Endothelium-dependent vasodilation is impaired in hypercholesterolemia, even before the development of atherosclerosis. The purpose of this study was to determine whether infusion of L-arginine, the precursor of the endothelium-derived relaxing factor, nitric oxide, improves endothelium-dependent vasodilation in hypercholesterolemic humans. Vascular reactivity was measured in the forearm resistance vessels of 11 normal subjects (serum LDL cholesterol = 2.76 +/- 0.10 mmol/liter) and 14 age-matched patients with hypercholesterolemia (serum LDL cholesterol = 4.65 +/- 0.36 mmol/liter, P < 0.05). The vasodilative response to the endothelium-dependent vasodilator, methacholine chloride, was depressed in the hypercholesterolemic group, whereas endothelium-independent vasodilation, induced by nitroprusside, was similar in each group. Intravenous administration of L-arginine augmented the forearm blood flow response to methacholine in the hypercholesterolemic individuals, but not in the normal subjects. L-arginine did not alter the effect of nitroprusside in either group. D-arginine had no effect on forearm vascular reactivity in either group. It is concluded that endothelium-dependent vasodilation is impaired in hypercholesterolemic humans. This abnormality can be improved acutely by administration of L-arginine, possibly by increasing the synthesis of endothelium-derived relaxing factor.

[Diabetes prevention in hypertensive patients]. / Prevention du diabète chez l'hypertendu.

Hypertension and type-2 diabetes are frequently observed concomitantly in a same patient. There are possibilities to delay the onset of type-2 diabetes, especially in patients already managed for hypertension. Trials on renin-angiotensin blockers show that compared to other drug therapies, there is a lower incidence of diabetes in patients treated by an ACE-inhibitor or an Angiotensin 11 antagonist and the benefit can be estimated at 22% (relative risk at 0.78 with a confidence interval from 0.74 to 0.83). A higher risk of occurrence of type-2 diabetes is particularly noted in those under beta-blocking therapy combined to diuretics. In ALLHAT, the comparison of a thiazide diuretic, an ACE-inhibitor and a calcium antagonist showed that the incidence of new cases of diabetes was the highest in the diuretic group and the lowest in the ACE-inhibitor group. Hypertensive patients under calcium antagonists presented an incidence in between the two other groups. According to a recent hypothesis, the insulin-resistance decrease as a consequence of renin-angiotensin system blocking is related to the recruitment of pre-adipocytes. The NAVIGATOR and ONTARGET trials will probably confirm the preliminary results obtained in this topic. Their results are expected within the 2 next years.

[Number and use of home blood pressure devices in France in 2004 and 2006 (FLAHS 2006)]. / Possession et usage des appareils d'automesure en France en 2004 et 2006. Enquête FLAHS 2006.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the number and the using modalities of devices for home blood pressure (HBP) measurements in the French population in 2006 and to evaluate the trend of these data over the past two Years. METHODS: The French League Against Hypertension Surveys have been performed both in 2004 and 2006 (FLAHS-2006) by an independent company (TNS-SOFRES) within a representative sample of French population older than 35 and living in metropolitan France. The surveys involved 3707 and 3389 subjects, respectively. A questionnaire evaluating ownership, kind and using modalities of HBP device was given. Subjects who declared taking an antihypertensive medication were classified as treated hypertensive patients. The data from the INSEE census performed in1999 allowed for an estimate of the total number of HBP devices owned by French people. RESULTS: In 2006, 19% of the French population above the age of 35 years owned a HBP device, a rate reaching 36% in treated hypertensives versus 11% in the rest of the population (p<0.001). In 2004, the ownership rates were 24% and 7%, respectively. It could be estimated that about 6 million HBP devices were owned by French people in 2006, meaning an increase of 2 million devices, as compared with 2004 survey. 53% of BP devices were equipped with an arm cuff in 2006, versus 33% only, in 2004. Device purchase has been made in 2006 either in a pharmacy (39%), or in a hypermarket (7%), or through the web (3%); they were given as a gift in 39%. Device use was indicated as regular by 30% of hypertensive patients and 23% of the rest of the people. Giving up was observed in 7% and 15%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In 2006, about 6 million HBP devices are owned by French people; the rate of treated hypertensives owning a HBP device is 1/3. The huge increase in the number of HBP devices from 2004 to 2006 suggests that the recommendations of the French "Haute Autorité de Santé" as well as the national programs about HBP measurement have had a real impact on the use of this technique in France.

[Prevalence of sleep apnea in men with metabolic syndrome and controlled hypertension]. / Prévalence et déterminants du syndrome d'apnée du sommeil chez des hommes ayant un syndrome métabolique et une hypertension artérielle contrôlée.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal obesity and high blood pressure (HBP) are known to be associated with sleep apnea syndrome (SAS). Resistant hypertension commonly leads physicians to prescribe a sleep record because the prevalence of SAS is high in patients with resistant hypertension. Data on the prevalence of SAS in patients with treated and controlled hypertension are lacking. Moreover, while the metabolic syndrome (MS) and insulin resistance frequently occur in association with SAS, few studies have evaluated the prevalence of SAS in patients with MS. Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) is often proposed to identify patients at high risk for sleep disorders and for which a sleep record should be prescribed. The reliability of this test to identify SAS has not been studied in patients with MS. OBJECTIVES: (i) To assess the prevalence of SAS in men with MS, (ii) to study the relationship between controlled hypertension and SAS in patients with MS, (iii) to assess the reliability of the ESS to diagnose SAS in patients with MS. METHODS: Among 135 men hospitalized for MS, the 125 who had no history of SAS were systematically evaluated by a nocturnal polygraphy was systematically performed in the 125 men without known SAS at the admission. An excessive daytime sleepiness was assessed by the ESS. Results of analyses in patients with controlled HBP (<130/85 mmHg with antihypertensive drug(s), n=41) were compared with those in patients with normotension (<130/85 mmHg without treatment, n=32). RESULTS: The prevalence of SAS (apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) >or=15/h) in men with MS was 44% in the whole population, 28.1% in the subgroup of patients with normotension and 61.0% in patients with treated and controlled HBP. A severe SAS (AHI >or=30/h) was respectively present in 6.3% and 34.1% of patients with normotension and controlled HTA (p<0.01). Compared with patients without SAS, those with SAS displayed higher blood pressure and BMI. Logistic regression analysis showed that controlled HTA was a determinant of SAS which persisted after adjustment for BMI. As suggested by the ROC curve, the ESS is not a good tool to identify patients with SAS. With a threshold of 11/24 the positive and negative values of this scale were of 0.20 and 0.47. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of SAS is high in men with MS. The ESS does not identify patients who should undergo a nocturnal record. Because a severe SAS is found in nearly one third of patients with MS and controlled HBP, we suggest that a nocturnal record should be systematically proposed to these patients irrespective of the degree of daytime sleepiness assessed by questionnaires.

[Treatment of hypertension in Guadeloupe (FWI) in 2005: Pretrahguad study]. / Traitements médicamenteux et non médicamenteux chez l'hypertendu en Guadeloupe en 2005 : enquête PRETRAHGUAD.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate life style and drug therapy for treatment of hypertension in Guadeloupe (FWI) in 2005, and to compare the data with those obtained in a similar study realised in France metropolitan population in 2004. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of a sample of 509 subjects selected as being representative of the Guadeloupe population for age (35 years and above), gender, socioeconomic status, and place of living. Subjects who declare to take an antihypertensive medication were classified as treated hypertensive patients. A questionnaire evaluating changes in life style during the last year (physical activities, quality of food consumption, smoking, and alcohol habits) was administered by phone. RESULTS: In 2005, 32% of the population above the age of 35 years was treated for hypertension, corresponding to an estimate of 51,230 subjects. Hypertensive subjects experienced: a weight loss of more than 3 kg in 29 vs 25% in the general population, an increased in fruits and vegetables consumption in 29 vs 46%, a decreased in cheese (11 vs 8%), pork-butchery (23 vs 16%) and alcohol consumption (10 vs 6%). The percentage of subjects who increased their physical activities was not different in the two groups (24 vs 25%). We observed a larger use of diuretics and ACE-I/ARBs prescribed as combined drugs. The most frequent drug prescribed as single drug is calcium antagonist. When the patients are receiving at least two medications or more (41%), combined treatment is found with high frequency (75%). CONCLUSION: Changes in life style were more often applied by the subjects treated for hypertension that by the general population. The dominating place that occupies today fixed-dose combination drugs indicates a change of the therapeutic practices. When comparing with FLAHS study concerning the French metropolitan population, diuretics and calcium antagonist are more often prescribed in Guadeloupe, in witch 90% of the population is Afro-Caribbean.

Effects of carotid baroreceptor stimulation on retinal arteriole remodeling evaluated with adaptive optics camera in resistant hypertensive patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Baroreceptor activation therapy (BAT) leads to a decrease in blood pressure (BP) in patients affected by resistant hypertension (RH) by reducing sympathetic outflow. This study aimed at evaluating the effects of BAT on RH patients' retinal arteriolar microvasculature, a territory devoid of adrenergic innervation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five patients defined as affected by RH after excluding secondary causes of hypertension and based on number of antihypertensive treatments, underwent the implantation of Barostim™ neo™. Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) were assessed by office and 24-hours ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). Adaptive Optics Camera RTX1® (ImagineEye, Orsay, France) was used to measure wall thickness (WT), internal diameter (ID), wall cross-sectional area (WCSA) and wall-to-lumen ratio (WLR). A cohort of 21 not-controlled hypertensive patients matched for age, gender and follow-up time, undergoing standard-antihypertensive therapy changes, was selected as a control group. SBP and DBP were assessed by office and home BP monitoring (HBPM). Evaluations were performed at baseline and after 6 months mean follow-up. RESULTS: Office SBP decreased by 9.7±12.3% and 29.7±12.4% in standard-therapy and BAT group respectively, while office DBP decreased by 7.6±17.4% and 14.8±15.7%. Concerning ABPM/HBPM, a mean reduction of both SBP and DBP of 7.9±11% was observed for the standard-therapy while a reduction of 15.8±10.5% and 15.8%±5.3% was observed for SBP and DBP respectively in BAT group. While in the standard-therapy group a significant reduction in WLR (-5.9%) due to both ID increase (+2.3%) and WT reduction (-5.7%) was observed, without changes in WCSA (-0.3%), RH patients had a significant reduction in WCSA (-12.1%), due to a trend in both WT and ID reduction (-6.5% and -1.7% respectively), without significant changes in WLR (-2%). CONCLUSION: While a reverse eutrophic remodeling was observed in patients undergoing a standard-antihypertensive treatment, hypotrophic changes were found in RH patients undergoing BAT. Despite the lack of adrenergic receptors on retinal vessels, chronic baroreflex stimulation may exert an effect on retinal microvasculature in RH patients by more systemic than local mechanisms.

[Development of a risk calculator for drug compliance in treated hypertensives: The FLAHS Compliance Calculator]. / Mise au point d'un calculateur du risque d'inobservance aux traitements antihypertenseurs chez des hypertendus traités : le calculateur FLAHS Observance.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the determinants of non-compliance with antihypertensive treatments among participants in the FLAHS 2015 survey and to develop a risk calculator for drug compliance in a hypertensive population. METHODS: The FLAHS surveys are carried out by self-questionnaire sent by mail to individuals from the TNS SOFRES (representative panel of the population living in metropolitan France) sampling frame. In 2015, FLAHS was performed in subjects aged 55years and older. Using the Girerd questionnaire, the "perfect observance" was determined for a score of 0 and "nonobservance" for a score of 1 or higher. A Poisson regression was conducted in univariate and multivariate to estimate risk ratios for each determinant. A non-compliance risk calculator is constructed from multivariate analysis. A Poisson regression was performed in univariate and multivariate to estimate risk ratios. For each sex, a probability table is produced from the equation of the multivariate analysis and then the calculation of a nonobservance probability ratio (PR) using the profile with the best probability as a reference. Each subject is then classified into one of the three classes of risk of non-compliance: low (PR <1.5), high (PR>=2) and intermediate (PR>=1.5 and <2). RESULTS: The survey included 6379 subjects and analysis based on 2370 treated hypertensives. The onset of treatment was less than 2years in 7% of subjects and the median follow-up duration of treatment was 10years. Perfect compliance was observed in 64% of subjects. Independent determinants of non-compliance are: male sex, young age, number of antihypertensive tablet, treatment for a metabolic disease (diabetes, dyslipidemia), presence of other chronic illness, secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. To get the risk class of nonobservance a web page is available at http://www.comitehta.org/flahs-observance-hta/. CONCLUSION: The development of the FLAHS Compliance Test is a tool whose use is possible during an office visit. Its free availability for French doctor will be one of the actions undertaken as part of the "call for action for adherence in hypertension" proposed by the French League Against Hypertension in 2017.

[Home blood pressure monitoring in addition to office blood pressure determination is useful in patients with systolic hypertension before their inclusion into a drug trial]. / L'automesure tensionnelle en complément de la mesure de consultation est utile pour l'inclusion dans un essai clinique de sujets avec une HTA systolique.

OBJECTIVE: In patients with uncontrolled systolic hypertension, to estimate the value of home blood pressure monitoring in addition to office blood pressure for inclusion in a trial. METHODS: 80 patients with systolic hypertension, defined as SBP > or =140 mmHg and pulse pressure > or =60 mmHg, were treated for 4 weeks with a thiazide diuretic at usual dose (25 mg HCTZ or 1.5 mg indapamide or methyclothiazide 5 mg). Blood pressure was measured using an automatic monitor (Omron M6) at office and at home in the 3 days prior the visit. Subjects with an uncontrolled hypertension were included in the second part of the trial only if there fulfilled inclusion criteria: office SBP > or =140 mmHg and home SBP > or =135 mmHg (mean of 18 measurements obtained on 3 consecutive days) and office pulse pressure > or =60 mmHg. RESULTS: After 4 weeks with diuretic treatment, 62% of patients fulfilled 3 criteria and were included in the second part of the trial. It was observed 76% of patients with office SBP > or =140 mmHg, 72% with office pulse pressure > or =60 mmHg and 70% with both office SBP and PP criteria. However, only 67% of patients had home SBP > or =135 mmHg. Discrepancy between office and home SBP was observed and subjects with a white coat hypertension was noticed in 14% and masked hypertension in 5%. CONCLUSION: If patients with systolic hypertension have to be included into a drug trial because there are uncontrolled, home blood pressure monitoring in addition to office blood pressure is a very useful criteria for inclusion because misclassifications due to white coat or masked hypertension is frequent in these patients.

[Assessement of home blood pressure with a monitor including MAM technology: comparison with the standard monitor]. / Relevé d'automesure utilisant un autotensiomètre incluant la technologie MAM: avec la méthode de référence.

OBJECTIVES: To compare two periods of three days of home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) using two different monitors with one including MAM (microlife average mode) technology. METHODS: In 152 hypertensive subjects referred to hypertension specialists, a self-measurement of blood pressure was performed sequentially with an Omron M6 (arm cuff, A/A, BHS validation) or Microlife BP-3AC1 with the MAM technology. Each patient recorded home blood pressure during two periods of 3 days with 3 measures in the morning and 3 in the evening. Order for use of each monitor was randomised. BP values were reported on a standardized document. RESULTS: In this population, aged 60 +/- 14 years, with 57% of men and a mean blood pressure of 150 +/- 21/84 +/- 21 mmHg, the home blood pressure values were 141.5 +/- 18.7/79.9 +/- 9.6 mmHg with the OMRON monitor and 138.2 +/- 17.1/79.9 +/- 10.1 mmHg with the Microlife monitor. Values between the two monitors differed about 5 mmHg for the mean SBP and about 2.8 mmHg for the mean DBP. The mean HBPM values does not differ between the two methods for more than 2.5 mmHg, 5 mmHg, 10 mmHg and 15 mmHg in 29%, 49%, 80% and 90% for SBP and in 42%, 76%, 94% and 98% for DBP respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For most of patients, mean SBP/DBP obtained with home blood pressure Measurement during three days are comparable when using monitor operated with MAM technology or not.

[Self monitoring of blood pressure in Guadeloupe in 2005 results of the PRETRAHGUAD enquiry]. / Utilisation des appareils d'automesure tensionnelle en Guadeloupe en 2005: enquête PRETRAHGUAD.

The object of this enquiry was to estimate the number of self monitoring devices for blood pressure measurement in Guadeloupe in 2005 and to determine how they were used. The enquiry included 509 patients aged over 35 years and living in Guadeloupe meeting the inclusion criteria of PRETRAHGUAD: PREvalence et TRAitement de Hypertension en GUADeloupe. The enquiry was made by Qualistat, a survey institute. Designed as a survey, it was based on the two degree quota method. It was carried out by telephone by CATI (Computer Assisted Telephone Inquiry) networked computer programming by ten operators trained by experts of the HTA-GWAD organisation. In addition to questions on socio-demographic background and biometric parameters, the operators also asked about observance of antihypertensive treatment, the ownership of a self monitoring blood pressure device and its usage. A subject who said he took a treatment validated as antihypertensive was considered to be a "treated hypertensive". The results indicate that in 2005, in Guadeloupe, 32% of the population over 35 years of age were treated hypertensives, making a total of 51,230 individuals. Forty three percent of treated hypertensives and 19% of other subjects admitted to having used a self monitoring blood pressure device. Twenty six percent of the study population owned a device. Of the estimated total of 43,220 devices in circulation, nearly half of them were wrist devices. Regular usage (at least once per month) was declared by 73% of hypertensive and 46% of other subjects. Out of the total population, the medical practitioner had spoken of self monitoring of blood pressure to his patients and had incited only 18% to carry it out. The authors conclude that, in 2005, one third of adults over 35 years of age were treated for hypertension and 43% of treated hypertensives owned a self monitoring blood pressure device. The incitation by medical practitioners to use this method of self monitoring remained modest. This technique would seem to be little used by medical practitioners although the patients have started to equip themselves with the device.

[Impact of the ExSel(®) test administration on the excessive salt consumption in hypertensive patients followed in general practice]. / Conséquences de la réalisation du test ExSel(®) sur la consommation excessive de sel chez des patients hypertendus suivis en médecine générale.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of the Exsel(®) test administration on salt intake in hypertensive subjects followed in general practice. METHOD: In a group practice of general practitioners in the Île-de-France, the ExSel(®) test http://www.comitehta.org/testez-vous/consommez-vous-du-sel-en-exces-test-exsel/ was administered to 329 outpatients. The questionnaire was filled in the waiting room and then commented by the doctor. In patients treated for hypertension, 24hours urinary Na was prescribed after the consultation. Excessive salt consumption (ESC) was defined as a urinary Na≥200mmol/day. RESULTS: The population included subjects aged on average 57 years with 43 % of hypertensive patients. According Exsel(®), an ESC was suspected in 36 % of patients and was more common in treated hypertensive patients (44 %; [36-52]) in hypertensive men (57 %; [46-68]) than among non-hypertensive (31 %; [24-38]) and non hypertensive women (18 % [11-25]). Urinary Na has been finally performed by 63 % of subjects and 24hours excretion was 157±56mmol in men and 123±39mmol in women. After this 24hours urinary sodium evaluation, subsequent to ExSel(®) test, ESC frequency was lower among men (19 %) and very low among women (5 %). CONCLUSION: To estimate the ESC, the ExSel(®) test is easily performed in general practice while 24hours urinary sodium is more difficult to obtain. Achieving an ExSel(®) test was accompanied by a decrease in the frequency of excessive salt consumers with a greater effect in women.

[Determinants of controlled hypertension in patients treated with antihypertensive drugs in France: The French League Against Hypertension Survey (FLAHS 2015)]. / Déterminants de l'hypertension artérielle contrôlée chez les sujets traités par antihypertenseurs en France : enquête FLAHS 2015.

OBJECTIVE: The FLASH 2015 survey sought the determinants of hypertension control in subjects treated with antihypertensive drugs in France. METHOD: Sending self-administered questionnaire by mail to a representative sample of the population living in metropolitan France (MetaScope basis, TNS Sofres, France). Patients who declare taking antihypertensive drugs are considered treated hypertensives. A home blood pressure monitoring during 3 days was asked in subjects owing a blood pressure monitor and the average of 18 measurements was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 6379 subjects aged 55 and older were included with 2814 (44.1%) treated with antihypertensive drugs. Home blood pressure was obtained from 1455 subjects including 882 (60.6%) treated. SBP/DBP are 129.3±13.5/75.5±9.0mmHg and are higher in treated subjects in each age category. BP<135/85 was observed in 55.4% and BP<140/90 in 71.7%. Determinants of BP control (<135/85) are the number of measurement for averaging (18 measures over 3 days vs 3 measurements on a morning; 55.4%/44.3%), age (55-64 years vs 80 years old; 57.6%/49.1%), gender (women vs men; 60.3%/50.1%), BMI (<25 vs >30; 63.1%/46.1%). In the 80 and older, a SBP<145 was observed in 74.7% of subjects. The control was 61% when considering an SBP/DBP<135/85 in 55-79 years and SBP<145 among 80 and older. CONCLUSION: The control of hypertension evaluated by home blood pressure on a representative population living in metropolitan France is estimated at between 44.3% and 74.7% and several determinants influence the control of blood pressure like age, gender and BMI.

Retinal arteriolar remodeling evaluated with adaptive optics camera: Relationship with blood pressure levels.

AIM: To research a retinal arterioles wall-to-lumen ratio or lumen diameter cut-off that would discriminate hypertensive from normal subjects using adaptive optics camera. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One thousand and five hundred subjects were consecutively recruited and Adaptive Optics Camera rtx1™ (Imagine-Eyes, Orsay, France) was used to measure wall thickness, internal diameter, to calculate wall-to-lumen ratio (WLR) and wall cross-sectional area of retinal arterioles. Sitting office blood pressure was measured once, just before retinal measurements and office blood pressure was defined as systolic blood pressure>=140mmHg and diastolic blood pressure>=90mmHg. ROC curves were constructed to determine cut-off values for retinal parameters to diagnose office hypertension. In another population of 276 subjects office BP, retinal arterioles evaluation and home blood pressure monitoring were obtained. The applicability of retinal WLR or diameter cut-off values were compared in patients with controlled, masked, white-coat and sustained hypertension. RESULTS: In 1500 patients, a WLR>0.31 discriminated office hypertensive subjects with a 0.57 sensitivity and 0.71 specificity. Lumen diameter<78.2µm discriminated office hypertension with a 0.73 sensitivity and a 0.52 specificity. In the other 276 patients, WLR was higher in sustained hypertension vs normotensive patients (0.330±0.06 vs 0.292±0.05; P<0.001) and diameter was narrower in masked hypertensive vs normotensive subjects (73.0±11.2 vs 78.5±11.6µm; P<0.005). CONCLUSION: A WLR higher than 0.31 is in favour of office arterial hypertension; a diameter under<78µm may indicate a masked hypertension. Retinal arterioles analysis through adaptive optics camera may help the diagnosis of arterial hypertension, in particular in case of masked hypertension.

Management of resistant hypertension: expert consensus statement from the French Society of Hypertension, an affiliate of the French Society of Cardiology.

To improve the management of resistant hypertension, the French Society of Hypertension, an affiliate of the French Society of Cardiology, has published a set of eleven recommendations. The primary objective is to provide the most up-to-date information based on the strongest scientific rationale and that is easily applicable to daily clinical practice. Resistant hypertension is defined as uncontrolled blood pressure on office measurements and confirmed by out-of-office measurements despite a therapeutic strategy comprising appropriate lifestyle and dietary measures and the concurrent use of three antihypertensive agents including a thiazide diuretic, a renin-angiotensin system blocker (ARB or ACEI) and a calcium channel blocker, for at least 4 weeks, at optimal doses. Treatment compliance must be closely monitored, as must factors that are likely to affect treatment resistance (excessive dietary salt intake, alcohol, depression, drug interactions and vasopressor drugs). If the diagnosis of resistant hypertension is confirmed, the patient should be referred to a hypertension specialist to screen for potential target organ damage and secondary causes of hypertension. The recommended treatment regimen is a combination therapy comprising four treatment classes, including spironolactone (12.5-25 mg per day). In the event of a contraindication or a non-response to spironolactone, or if adverse effects occur, a ß-blocker, an α-blocker, or a centrally acting antihypertensive drug should be prescribed. Because renal denervation is still undergoing assessment for the treatment of hypertension, this technique should only be prescribed by a specialist hypertension clinic.

Association between local pulse pressure, mean blood pressure, and large-artery remodeling.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to determine the respective influences of local pulse pressure and mean blood pressure on arterial remodeling in humans at 2 arterial sites: a central, predominantly elastic artery (the common carotid artery) and a peripheral muscular artery (the radial artery). METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-three healthy subjects and 124 never-treated hypertensive patients were included in the study. Intima-media thickness and internal diameter of the carotid and radial arteries were noninvasively determined with high-definition echo-tracking devices. Pulse pressure was measured locally with applanation tonometry. Multivariate regression models including mean blood pressure and local pulse pressure were established in the whole population. Carotid internal diameter and intima-media thickness were strongly influenced (P<0.0001) by carotid pulse pressure but not by mean blood pressure or brachial pulse pressure, independently of age and sex. Radial artery internal diameter was correlated with age but not with mean blood pressure or radial pulse pressure. Radial artery intima-media thickness was correlated with mean blood pressure (P<0.001) but not with radial pulse pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Carotid pulse pressure was a strong independent determinant of carotid artery enlargement and wall thickening, whereas mean blood pressure and brachial pulse pressure were not, indicating the prominent influence of local pulsatile mechanical load on arterial remodeling. These relationships were observed at the site of an elastic artery but not at the site of a muscular artery, suggesting the contribution of cyclic stretching to the pulse pressure-induced arterial remodeling.

Regression of radial artery wall hypertrophy and improvement of carotid artery compliance after long-term antihypertensive treatment in elderly patients.

OBJECTIVES: The present study was designed to assess whether a diuretic- or an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-based treatment can reduce arterial wall hypertrophy of a distal muscular medium-sized artery--the radial artery--and the stiffness of a proximal large elastic artery--the common carotid artery. BACKGROUND: Large-artery wall thickness and stiffness are increased during sustained essential hypertension and contribute to the increased risk of complications. Whether antihypertensive treatment can normalize the wall hypertrophy of conducting arteries has not yet been determined. METHODS: Seventy-seven elderly hypertensive patients were randomized to receive 9 months of double-blind treatment with perindopril (2 to 8 mg/day) or the diuretic combination of hydrochlorothiazide (12.5 to 50 mg/day) plus amiloride (1.25 to 5 mg/day) after a 1-month placebo washout period. If systolic blood pressure remained at >160 mm Hg after 5 months, chlorthalidone or atenolol was added, respectively. Arterial variables, including radial artery mass and common carotid artery compliance, were calculated from noninvasive measurements of internal diameter and wall thickness with the use of high resolution echo-tracking systems at baseline and after 5 and 9 months. RESULTS: During treatment, blood pressure and arterial variables changed to the same extent in both groups. After a 9-month treatment, systolic, diastolic and pulse pressures and radial artery wall thickness, mass and thickness/radius ratio decreased significantly (p < 0.01), whereas carotid compliance increased (p < 0.001). The decrease in radial artery thickness/radius ratio after a 9-month treatment was significantly related to the reduction in pulse pressure (p < 0.01), whereas the improvement in carotid compliance was related to the reduction in mean arterial pressure (p < 0.01). In healthy subjects and untreated hypertensive patients, radial artery diameter, wall thickness and thickness/radius ratio and carotid artery compliance did not change significantly during a 9-month observation period. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that in elderly hypertensive patients, both angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor- and diuretic combination-based treatments can reduce radial artery wall hypertrophy and improve carotid artery compliance.