Cost-effectiveness of two breast biopsy procedures: surgical biopsy versus vacuum-assisted biopsy.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of two breast biopsy procedures: surgical biopsy and vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between November 2008 and September 2009, 200 patients with suspicious breast lesions underwent biopsy procedures at our radiology department: 100 underwent VAB and 100 underwent surgical biopsy. 66 lesions were sampled under sonographic guidance, 109 under mammographic guidance and 25 under magnetic resonance guidance. RESULTS: All procedures were successfully completed. No significant differences in diagnostic efficacy were found between the biopsy procedures. Surgical biopsy has a higher unit cost compared with VAB. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis emphasises the benefits of VAB compared with surgical biopsy in terms of both cost-effectiveness, and less invasiveness from a psychological and aesthetic point of view.

Value of the correct diagnostic pathway through conventional imaging (mammography and ultrasound) in evaluating breast disease.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the role of the correct diagnostic pathway through conventional imaging in evaluating breast disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six hundred patients aged between 35 and 75 years were enrolled in the study. All patients underwent detailed history and clinical examination, ultrasound (US) and mammography. US scans were repeated after mammography. All suspicious lesions were studied by cytological and histological characterisation and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. RESULTS: The first US scan showed 147 solid lesions, 67 lesions characterised by posterior acoustic shadowing and 193 areas of heterogeneous echostructure. The second US scan, performed after mammography, confirmed 123/147 solid nodular lesions, 53/67 lesions characterised by posterior acoustic shadowing and 183/193 areas of heterogeneous echostructure; it also showed 13 nodular lesions not seen on the first scan and two cases of nodular lesions with irregular calcifications. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience suggests that US not performed in conjunction with mammography gives rise to incorrect diagnostic interpretations (either false positive or false negative results). The detection rate of the US scan performed after mammography increases from 4.16% to 5.5%.

Anatomical and functional evaluation of the myocardium in patients with acute coronary syndrome (NSTEMI) using MR imaging.

PURPOSE: The aim of our study was to evaluate the role of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in identifying the location and extent of acute ischaemic injury to predict reversibility and distinguish areas of acute from chronic ischaemia in patients with acute coronary syndrome non- ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 22 patients with NSTEMI acute coronary syndrome confirmed by coronary angiography (CA). We studied ventricular function indices and segmental changes in wall thickness and kinetics by cine-MR imaging sequences. Subsequently, we evaluated myocardial wall oedema with T2-weighted black-blood short-tau inversion recovery turbo spin echo (T2 BB-STIRTSE) sequences and identified areas of myocardial necrosis using T1-weighted turbo field-echo inversion recovery (T1 TFE-IR) sequences after contrast material administration. RESULTS: The results obtained with the single sequences were as follows: T2 BB-STIR-TSE: 96.8% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 99.7% negative predictive value, 99.7% positive predictive value; T1 TFE-IR: 45.8% sensitivity, 96.9% specificity, 92.3% negative predictive value, 90.3% positive predictive value; systolic wall thickening: 87.5% sensitivity, 91.8% specificity, 98.7% negative predictive value, 50% positive predictive value, 91.4% accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the sequences used for evaluating oedema and assessing viability allow for precise localisation and differentiation of areas of acute and chronic ischaemia by quantifying the possible mismatch between ischaemia and necrosis.