Positional Relations of the Cervical Vagus Nerve Revisited.

OBJECTIVES: The cervical part of the vagus nerve (CVN) has become an important target for stimulation therapy to treat epilepsy and psychiatric conditions. For this purpose, the CVN is visualized in the carotid sheath, assuming it to be localized dorsomedially between the carotid artery (CA) and the internal jugular vein (JV). The aim of our morphological study was therefore to revisit the CVN relationships to the CA and JV, hypothesizing it to have common variations to this classical textbook anatomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Positional relations of the CVN, CA and JV were investigated in the carotid sheath of 35 cadavers at the C3 to C6 level. Positional relations of the CVN, CA and JV were documented on the basis of a 3 × 3 chart. RESULTS: Eighteen different arrangements of the CVN, CA and JV were observed. The typical topographic relationship of the CVN dorsomedially between the CA and JV was only found in 42% of all cases. The CVN was located dorsally or (dorso-)laterally to the CA in 80% and dorsally or (dorso-)medially of the JV in 96% of all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Classical textbook anatomy of the CVN is only present in a minority of cases. Positional variations in contrast to textbook anatomy are considerably more frequent than previously described, which might be a hypothetical morphological explanation for the lack of efficacy or side effects of CVN stimulation. Furthermore, the position of the CVN relative to the internal jugular vein is more consistent than to the CA.

Human vagus nerve branching in the cervical region.

BACKGROUND: Vagus nerve stimulation is increasingly applied to treat epilepsy, psychiatric conditions and potentially chronic heart failure. After implanting vagus nerve electrodes to the cervical vagus nerve, side effects such as voice alterations and dyspnea or missing therapeutic effects are observed at different frequencies. Cervical vagus nerve branching might partly be responsible for these effects. However, vagus nerve branching has not yet been described in the context of vagus nerve stimulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Branching of the cervical vagus nerve was investigated macroscopically in 35 body donors (66 cervical sides) in the carotid sheath. After X-ray imaging for determining the vertebral levels of cervical vagus nerve branching, samples were removed to confirm histologically the nerve and to calculate cervical vagus nerve diameters and cross-sections. RESULTS: Cervical vagus nerve branching was observed in 29% of all cases (26% unilaterally, 3% bilaterally) and proven histologically in all cases. Right-sided branching (22%) was more common than left-sided branching (12%) and occurred on the level of the fourth and fifth vertebra on the left and on the level of the second to fifth vertebra on the right side. Vagus nerves without branching were significantly larger than vagus nerves with branches, concerning their diameters (4.79 mm vs. 3.78 mm) and cross-sections (7.24 mm2 vs. 5.28 mm2). DISCUSSION: Cervical vagus nerve branching is considerably more frequent than described previously. The side-dependent differences of vagus nerve branching may be linked to the asymmetric effects of the vagus nerve. Cervical vagus nerve branching should be taken into account when identifying main trunk of the vagus nerve for implanting electrodes to minimize potential side effects or lacking therapeutic benefits of vagus nerve stimulation.