Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Eixos temáticos
Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Reg Anesth Pain Med ; 46(4): 344-349, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33051238

RESUMO

Scapular fractures are very rare, and those requiring surgical interventions are even rarer. Most scapula surgeries are done under general anesthesia with or without the regional anesthesia (RA) technique as an adjunct. Since scapular innervation is complicated, a thorough review of the relevant anatomy is warranted. In this RAPM educational article, we aimed to summarize the target nerves and blocks needed to optimize analgesia or even to provide surgical anesthesia for scapula surgeries. In this review, we are describing an algorithmic "identify-select-combine" approach, which enables the anesthesiologist to understand detailed innervation of the scapula and to obtain a procedure-specific RA technique. Procedure-specific RA would probably be the way forward for defining future RA practices.


Assuntos
Analgesia , Anestesia por Condução , Humanos , Dor , Manejo da Dor , Escápula
2.
Spine J ; 21(11): 1873-1880, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34171466

RESUMO

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Postoperative experience plays a vital role in patient recovery and does not depend on the type and quality of the surgical procedure alone. Non-opioid therapies have become part of the multimodal analgesic regimen for better pain control and reduced opioid-related side effects. Most recently evolved among these are the regional anesthetic techniques, such as the thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block and the erector spinae (ESP) block. PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of ultrasound-guided (US) ESP block for postoperative analgesia after a single level lumbar spine fusion surgery compared with conventional (opioid-based) multimodal postoperative analgesia. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, controlled, and double-blinded clinical trial. PATIENT SAMPLE: A 100 consecutive patients requiring single-level lumbar spinal fusion procedure were randomized into two groups- block (multimodal analgesia with US-ESP) and control (only multimodal analgesia) groups. OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic and surgical data, intra-operative blood loss, duration of surgery, total opioid consumption (TOC) and amount of muscle relaxants used were assessed. Postoperatively, the Numeric pain Rating Scale(NRS), Modified Observer's assessment of Alertness and/or Sedation Scale (MOASS) and Patient satisfaction scores were recorded every 2 hours for the first 6 hours followed by every 6 hours for 24 hours. Continuous variables were analyzed using Student's t-test, and categorical variables were analyzed using either the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. p-value < .05 was considered statistically significant. METHODS: Patients in both groups underwent the identical protocol for pre-emptive analgesia and induction of anesthesia. Patients in the block group received the US-ESP block after induction and positioning, followed by the multimodal analgesia, while the control group received only the multimodal analgesia. RESULTS: Both groups had identical demographic backgrounds and surgical profile. TOC for 24 hours following induction was significantly lower in the block group than the control group (105.0 ± 15.15 vs 158.00 ± 23.38mcg; p < .001). The total muscle relaxant consumption during surgery was also significantly less in the block group than the control group (51.90 ± 3.17 vs 57.70 ± 5.90; p < .001). The intra-operative blood loss was significantly less (p < .001) in the block group (303.00 ± 86.55 ml) than the control group (437.00 ± 116.85 ml). Compared to the block group, the control group's pain score (NRS) was significantly higher in the first 48 hours following surgery. The MOASS score was significantly lower in the control group (4.46 ± 0.50 vs 3.82 ± 0.82; p < .001) in the immediate postoperative period. The satisfaction score was significantly higher in the block group than the control group (9.52 ± 0.65 vs 8.22 ± 0.79; p < .001). CONCLUSION: The employed US-ESP block for single-level lumbar fusion surgery is an effective component of multimodal analgesia for reducing blood loss, total opioid consumption, and related side effects with a significant reduction of postoperative pain and higher patient satisfaction.


Assuntos
Bloqueio Nervoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Humanos , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção
3.
A A Pract ; 14(14): e01365, 2020 Dec 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33449538

RESUMO

A 40-year-old healthy male patient underwent open reduction and internal fixation with screws and plate for a comminuted fracture of the right scapula under ultrasound-guided "scapular block" with optimal sedation. We coined the term "scapular block" for an innovative combination of previously described regional anesthesia techniques to cover all dermatomes, myotomes, and osteotomes involved in scapula surgery. It is a combination of 5 target blocks (selective superior trunk block, selective supraclavicular nerve block, subclavian perivascular block, suprascapular nerve block, and erector spinae plane block) via 3 approaches (interscalene, supraclavicular, and paraspinal).


Assuntos
Anestesia por Condução , Bloqueio do Plexo Braquial , Adulto , Anestesia Local , Humanos , Masculino , Músculos Paraespinais , Escápula/diagnóstico por imagem , Escápula/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa