The contribution of itch and skin severity improvements to the Dermatology Life Quality Index in patients with atopic dermatitis in baricitinib phase III trials.

With data from three monotherapy baricitinib phase III randomized clinical trials (RCTs), we conducted a posthoc mediator analysis to assess whether changes in itch or skin severity mediated the treatment effect over placebo on changes in health-related quality of life. In this analysis, baricitinib demonstrated significant improvement in the Dermatology Life Quality Index for which itch mediated approximately half of the changes at weeks 4 and 16.

Baricitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: Results from a randomized monotherapy phase 3 trial in the United States and Canada (BREEZE-AD5).

BACKGROUND: Baricitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase 1/Janus kinase 2 inhibitor, is being studied for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in adults. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of baricitinib monotherapy in a North American phase 3 trial (BREEZE-AD5/NCT03435081) of adults with moderate-to-severe AD who responded inadequately or were intolerant to topical therapy. METHODS: Patients (N = 440) were randomized 1:1:1 to once-daily placebo or baricitinib (1 mg or 2 mg). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving ≥75% reduction in the Eczema Area and Severity Index at week 16. A key secondary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving a validated Investigator Global Assessment for AD score of 0 (clear)/1(almost clear) with ≥2-point improvement. RESULTS: At week 16, the proportion of patients achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index was 8%, 13%, and 30% (P < .001, 2 mg vs placebo) and those with a validated Investigator Global Assessment for AD score of 0/1 were 5%, 13%, and 24% (P < .001, 2 mg vs placebo) for placebo, baricitinib 1 mg, and baricitinib 2 mg, respectively. Safety findings were similar to those of other baricitinib AD studies. LIMITATIONS: Short-term clinical trial results may not be generalizable to real-world settings. CONCLUSION: Baricitinib was efficacious for patients with moderate-to-severe AD with no new safety findings over 16 weeks.

Comparison of real-world treatment patterns among patients with psoriasis prescribed ixekizumab or secukinumab.

BACKGROUND: Real-world data on treatment patterns associated with use of interleukin-17A inhibitors in psoriasis are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To compare treatment patterns between ixekizumab or secukinumab users in clinical practice. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study included patients with psoriasis aged ≥18 years treated with ixekizumab or secukinumab between March 1, 2016, and May 31, 2018 in IBM MarketScan (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY) databases. Inverse probability of treatment weighting and multivariable models were used to address cohort imbalances and estimate the risks of nonpersistence (60-day gap), discontinuation (≥90-day gap), switching, and the odds of adherence. RESULTS: The study monitored 645 ixekizumab users for 13.7 months and 1152 secukinumab users for 16.3 months. Ixekizumab users showed higher persistence rate (54.8% vs 45.1%, P < .001) and lower discontinuation rate (37.8% vs 47.5%, P < .001) than secukinumab. After multivariable adjustment, ixekizumab users had lower risks of nonpersistence (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.95) and discontinuation (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.70-0.96), and higher odds of high adherence to treatment measured by a medication possession ratio ≥80% (hazard ratio, 1.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.60). The risk of switching was similar between cohorts. LIMITATIONS: Disease severity and clinical outcomes were unavailable. CONCLUSION: Ixekizumab users demonstrated longer drug persistence, lower discontinuation rate and risk of discontinuation, higher likelihood of adherence, and similar risk of switching compared with secukinumab users in clinical practices.

Ixekizumab treatment and the impact on SF-36: results from three pivotal phase III randomised controlled trials in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

PURPOSE: To assess improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) with ixekizumab treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. METHODS: Adults with plaque psoriasis were enrolled in phase III, double-blind, randomised, controlled trials (UNCOVER-1, UNCOVER-2, or UNCOVER-3). All 3 protocols included a 12-week, placebo-controlled induction period; UNCOVER-2 and UNCOVER-3 also had an active-control group (50 mg etanercept) during induction. After induction, patients in UNCOVER-1 and UNCOVER-2 entered a 48-week withdrawal (maintenance) period (Weeks 12-60), during which Week-12 sPGA (0,1) responders were rerandomized to receive placebo, or 80 mg ixekizumab every 4 weeks (Q4W) or 12 weeks. As a secondary objective, HRQoL was measured by the generic Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form-36 (SF-36) at baseline and Weeks 12 and 60. Changes in mean SF-36 Physical and Mental Component Summary (PCS and MCS) and domain scores and proportions of patients reporting improvements ≥ minimal important differences in SF-36 scores were compared between groups. RESULTS: At Week 12, ixekizumab-treated patients (both dose groups in UNCOVER-1, -2, and -3) reported statistically significantly greater improvements in mean SF-36 PCS and MCS and all 8 SF-36 domain scores versus placebo. Further, more ixekizumab-treated patients than placebo-treated patients reported at least minimal treatment responses in SF-36 PCS and MCS scores and domain scores. Overall improvements in SF-36 PCS and MCS scores were maintained through Week 60. CONCLUSIONS: Ixekizumab-treated patients reported statistically significant improvements in HRQoL at 12 weeks that persisted through 1 year.

Nail Psoriasis Does Not Affect Skin Response to Ixekizumab in Patients With Moderate-To-Severe Psoriasis.

Background: Presence of nail psoriasis in patients with plaque psoriasis may be an indicator of greater disease severity. Previously, patients with nail psoriasis have had delayed skin clearance after treatment compared to patients without nail psoriasis. Objective: This post-hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy of ixekizumab in clearance of plaque psoriasis in patients with and without nail psoriasis. Methods: Data were integrated from two phase 3 clinical trials (UNCOVER-2 and UNCOVER-3; N=2570) to assess skin response over 12 weeks of treatment with subcutaneous placebo, etanercept, or ixekizumab in patients with and without nail psoriasis. Nail response was assessed using Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) and skin response was assessed as the percentage of patients achieving 75%, 90%, or 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75, PASI 90, PASI 100) or a score of 0 or 1 on the static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA 0 or 0,1). Results: From baseline to week 12, progressive improvement in psoriasis occurred with ixekizumab and etanercept treatment; however, significantly more patients with nail psoriasis than without mild PASI 75 at weeks 8 and 12 and sPGA (0,1) at week 12 with ixekizumab. Significantly more patients with severe nail psoriasis than mild achieved PASI 75 at weeks 8 and 12 with ixekizumab. Conclusion: Patients with and without nail psoriasis responded well to ixekizumab. The presence of nail psoriasis did not negatively affect skin clearance in patients treated with ixekizumab. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01597245, NCT01646177 J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(8):741-746. doi:10.36849/JDD.2020.5116.

Ixekizumab treatment shows a neutral impact on cardiovascular parameters in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: Results from UNCOVER-1, UNCOVER-2, and UNCOVER-3.

BACKGROUND: The impact of ixekizumab treatment for psoriasis on cardiovascular-related parameters in patients is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To investigate cardiovascular-related parameters in patients with psoriasis treated with ixekizumab. METHODS: In phase 3 trials, patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis were randomized and treated with placebo, ixekizumab, or etanercept during the induction period (weeks 0-12; UNCOVER-1, UNCOVER-2, and UNCOVER-3). At week 12, responders were rerandomized to receive placebo or ixekizumab through the maintenance period (weeks 12-60; UNCOVER-1 and UNCOVER-2). Laboratory measures (fasting lipid profiles, glucose level, or high-sensitivity C-reactive protein [hsCRP] level), weight, blood pressure, and electrocardiograms were obtained through 60 weeks. RESULTS: Baseline parameters were within normal ranges with the exception of elevated triglyceride and hsCRP levels. After maintenance dosing, no significant changes were observed versus placebo for total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglyceride, apolipoprotein A1, apolipoprotein B, or fasting glucose levels or for systolic/diastolic blood pressure at 60 weeks. Importantly, low-density lipoprotein-to-high-density lipoprotein ratios remained stable during the induction and maintenance periods. HsCRP concentrations were significantly reduced versus placebo at 12 weeks and remained reduced at 60 weeks, although not significantly. Although transient changes were observed for some parameters during the induction period, these changes did not persist into the maintenance period. LIMITATIONS: A lack of echocardiogram evaluations. CONCLUSIONS: Ixekizumab had a neutral impact on cardiovascular-related parameters in patients with psoriasis.

Maintenance of skin clearance with ixekizumab treatment of psoriasis: Three-year results from the UNCOVER-3 study.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is a chronic disease that may require long-term treatment. Ixekizumab (IXE), which is a high-affinity monoclonal antibody that selectively targets interleukin 17A, is an approved therapy for patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of IXE through 156 weeks from the UNCOVER-3 study in patients who were treated with the recommended dose regimen (160 mg of IXE at week 0, 80 mg every 2 weeks up to week 12, and 80 mg every 4 weeks thereafter). METHODS: Patients randomized to IXE every 2 weeks, IXE every 4 weeks, etanercept twice weekly, or placebo were switched to IXE every 4 weeks during the long-term extension period. Efficacy data were summarized by using the as-observed, multiple imputation, and modified nonresponder imputation methods. RESULTS: At week 156, 80.5% of patients had achieved at least a 75% improvement from baseline in their Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) score, 66.0% had achived at least a 90% improvement from baseline in their PASI score, and 45.1% had achieved a 100% improvement from baseline in their PASI score with use of the modified nonresponder imputation method, and 97.2% and 86.2% of patients had achived at least a 75% improvement from baseline in their PASI score with use of the as-observed and multiple imputation methods, respectively. Similar response rates were observed in patients with baseline scalp, nail, or palmoplantar involvement. No new safety signals were identified through year 3. LIMITATIONS: No placebo or active comparison after week 12. CONCLUSION: IXE sustained high responses with clearance of skin and nail lesions, with no new safety concerns through 3 years.

Real-world health outcomes in adults with moderate-to-severe psoriasis in the United States: a population study using electronic health records to examine patient-perceived treatment effectiveness, medication use, and healthcare resource utilization.

BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding real-world health outcomes data among US psoriasis patients, but electronic health records (EHR) that collect structured data at point-of-care may provide opportunities to investigate real-world health outcomes among psoriasis patients. Our objective was to investigate patient-perceived treatment effectiveness, patterns of medication use (duration, switching, and/or discontinuation), healthcare resource utilization, and medication costs using real-world data from psoriasis patients. METHODS: Data for adults (≥18-years) with a dermatology provider-given diagnosis of psoriasis from 9/2014-9/2015 were obtained from dermatology practices using a widely used US dermatology-specific EHR containing over 500,000 psoriasis patients. Disease severity was captured by static physician's global assessment and body surface area. Patient-perceived treatment effectiveness was assessed by a pre-defined question. Treatment switching and duration were documented. Reasons for discontinuations were assessed using pre-defined selections. Healthcare resource utilization was defined by visit frequency and complexity. RESULTS: From 82,621 patients with psoriasis during the study period, patient-perceived treatment effectiveness was investigated in 2200 patients. The proportion of patients reporting "strongly agree" when asked if their treatment was effective was highest for biologics (73%) and those reporting treatment adherence (55%). In 16,000 patients who received oral systemics and 21,087 patients who received biologics, median treatment duration was longer for those who received biologics (160 vs. 113 days, respectively). Treatment switching was less frequent among patients on systemic monotherapies compared to those on combination therapies. The most common reason for discontinuing biologics was loss of efficacy; the most common reason for discontinuing orals was side effects. In 28,754 patients, higher disease severity was associated with increased healthcare resource utilization (increased visit frequency and complexity). When compared between treatment groups (n = 10,454), healthcare resource utilization was highest for phototherapy. Annual medication costs were higher for biologics ($21,977) than oral systemics ($3413). CONCLUSIONS: Real-world research using a widely implemented dermatology EHR provided valuable insights on patient perceived treatment effectiveness, patterns of medication usage, healthcare resource utilization, and medication costs for psoriasis patients in the US. This study and others utilizing EHRs for real-world research may assist clinical and payer decisions regarding the management of psoriasis.

Cost Per Additional Responder Associated With Ixekizumab and Etanercept in the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Newer psoriasis treatments can achieve greater levels of efficacy than older systemic therapies; however, current psoriasis costs are substantial. We sought to estimate costs per additional responder associated with ixekizumab and etanercept, versus placebo, using efficacy data from phase 3 clinical trials (UNCOVER-2 and UNCOVER-3). METHODS: In UNCOVER-2/UNCOVER-3, patients received subcutaneous placebo, etanercept 50 mg twice weekly (BIW), or ixekizumab one 80 mg injection every 2 weeks (Q2W) after a 160-mg starting dose. Twelve-week induction-phase Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100 response rates for ixekizumab, etanercept, and placebo were obtained from pooled data from the overall and United States (US) subgroup intention-to-treat (ITT) populations, and used to calculate numbers needed to treat (NNTs) to achieve one additional PASI 75, PASI 90, or PASI 100 response for ixekizumab Q2W and etanercept BIW versus placebo. Twelve-week drug costs per patient were calculated based on the UNCOVER-2/UNCOVER-3 dosing schedule and wholesale acquisition costs. Mean costs per additional responder for PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100 for each treatment versus placebo were calculated for pooled UN-COVER-2/UNCOVER-3 overall and US subgroup ITT populations. RESULTS: Pooled overall ITT population: costs per additional PASI 75, PASI 90, or PASI 100 responder were US $37,540, US $46,299, or US $80,710 for ixekizumab Q2W and US $57,533, US $120,720, or US $404,695 for etanercept BIW, respectively. US subgroup ITT population: costs per additional PASI 75, PASI 90, or PASI 100 responder were US $38,165, US $49,740, or US $93,536 for ixekizumab Q2W and US $69,580, US $140,881, or US $631,875 for etanercept BIW, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Twelve-week costs per additional responder were lower for ixekizumab Q2W than for etanercept BIW across all levels of clearance (PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100) in the pooled UNCOVER-2/UNCOVER-3 overall and US subgroup ITT populations.

Impact of ixekizumab on psoriasis itch severity and other psoriasis symptoms: Results from 3 phase III psoriasis clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Itch is a prevalent symptom of psoriasis that impacts quality of life. OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe improvements in itch severity, skin pain, and bothersomeness of skin appearance caused by psoriasis among patients who received ixekizumab, etanercept, or placebo in three 12-week, phase III clinical trials (UNCOVER-1, -2, and -3). METHODS: The itch numeric rating scale evaluated psoriasis itch severity in all 3 trials. Skin pain was assessed by skin pain visual analog scale. Bothersomeness because of redness/discoloration, thickness, and scaling/flaking was assessed with the Psoriasis Skin Appearance Bothersomeness instrument. Psoriasis skin appearance bothersomeness and skin pain were assessed at baseline and week 12; itch numeric rating scale score was assessed at baseline and weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12. RESULTS: Patients who received ixekizumab demonstrated statistically significant improvements (P < .001) in itch severity, reduction in skin pain, and degree of bothersomeness compared with those who received etanercept or placebo. Clinically meaningful improvements in itch severity were achieved as early as week 1. LIMITATIONS: Longer-term evaluations of psoriasis symptom improvement with ixekizumab treatment are needed. CONCLUSION: After treatment with ixekizumab, patients reported fast, significant, and clinically meaningful improvements in itch severity and other psoriasis-related symptoms such as skin pain and skin appearance bothersomeness.

Ixekizumab Is Effective in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis With Significant Nail Involvement: Results From UNCOVER 3.

BACKGROUND: Ixekizumab, a monoclonal antibody that selectively targets interleukin-17A, has been established as safe and effective in 3 Phase 3 trials for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. The lifetime incidence of psoriatic nail disease is 80%-90% of patients, and approximately 50% of patients with psoriasis have nail involvement.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The design of UNCOVER-3, a Phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled trial that evaluated the efficacy and safety of ixekizumab for moderate to severe psoriasis, has been published previously. Patients were randomized to receive blinded placebo, etanercept (50 mg twice weekly) or 80 mg ixekizumab every 2 weeks (IXEQ2W) or every 4 weeks (IXEQ4W) for 12 weeks. At week 12, all patients were assigned to open-label ixekizumab 80 mg every 4 weeks through week 60. In this 60-week post hoc subset analysis, we evaluated only those patients with significant baseline nail involvement, defined as fingernail NAPSI ≥16 and at least 4 fingernails involved.
RESULTS: Ixekizumab Q2W or Q4W resulted in greater improvement in nail psoriasis than placebo or etanercept by week 12 of administration, as measured by percent NAPSI reduction (IXEQ2W 39% improvement, IXEQ4W 40%, etanercept 28%, placebo -4.7%). At week 24, significantly more patients receiving ixekizumab exhibited no signs of nail involvement (IXEQ2W/Q4W 34%, IXEQ4W/Q4W 30%). Similar gains were observed at 60 weeks in all treatment groups.
CONCLUSION: Ixekizumab led to improvement in fingernail psoriasis by week 12 compared with placebo. Continued improvement in fingernail psoriasis with ixekizumab was observed, with >50% of patients achieving complete fingernail psoriasis resolution (NAPSI=0) at week 60.

J Drugs Dermatol. 2016;15(8):958-961.

Inadequate response and treatment patterns in adults diagnosed with atopic dermatitis and treated with topical therapy.

BACKGROUND: Treatment for atopic dermatitis (AD) is complex, particularly in patients with inadequate response to topical therapies. Currently, there is little clinical guidance for the treatment of these patients. METHODS: A real-world retrospective study utilizing electronic medical records (EMR) and administrative claims data selected patients with AD between January 01 2016 and June 30 2018. Patients had a written prescription for a topical therapy (first observed script = index date) and no prior systemic treatment. Disease severity at index, follow-up treatment response and prescriptions patterns were assessed. A subset of patients linked to claims was evaluated for treatment patterns. RESULTS: We identified 137,214 adult topical-treated AD patients with no prior systemic therapy. Among the 16,035 patients with available Physician Global Assessment (PGA) at index, 8169 (50.9%) had the moderate-to-severe disease. Among these patients, 60% had an inadequate response to topical therapy. Of 4475 patients linked to claims, 13.0% had claims for systemic therapy during follow-up, most initiated systemic steroids (95.2%), and oral immunosuppressants and biologics were initiated in 3.3% and 3.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In this real-world study, inadequate response to topical therapy among moderate-to-severe AD patients was high and initiation of systemic treatment was low which suggests a need for additional AD-indicated systemic treatment options in this patient population.

US health care utilization and costs in adult patients with atopic dermatitis by disease severity.

BACKGROUND: Although previous studies have reported the economic burden of atopic dermatitis (AD) in adults, updates are needed using more current data and measure of disease severity. OBJECTIVE: To describe the health care resource utilization (HCRU) and associated costs in US adults diagnosed with AD overall and by disease severity. METHODS: This real-world retrospective study identified adults aged at least 18 years who received a clinical diagnosis of AD in a dermatology electronic medical record (EMR) database between 2016 and 2018 (first record = index date), which was linked to an administrative claims database. Patients were required to have an AD diagnostic code and at least 6 months of continuous enrollment in medical and pharmacy benefits before and after the index date. Baseline severity was assessed using the Physician Global Assessment score closest to the index date. Inpatient and outpatient services, visits to specialists and its seasonality, treatment use, and associated annual direct health care costs were reported using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Annual all-cause direct health care costs were $10,474 per patient per year and primarily driven by outpatient visits and pharmacy use. Compared with patients with clear to mild disease, more AD patients with severe disease had at least 1 dermatology (73.0% vs 58.5%) and allergy/immunology office visit (16.0% vs 5.5%) and AD-related medications (90.0% vs 64.3%). All-cause total annual costs in patients with severe disease ($23,242) were significantly higher than in patients with clear to mild disease ($8,936; P = 0.0002). Little seasonal variation in dermatology office visits was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Significant economic burden primarily driven by outpatient and pharmacy utilization was observed in AD patients, which increased with disease severity. DISCLOSURES: This work was sponsored by Eli Lilly and Company. Gorritz and Wade are employees of IQVIA, which was contracted by Eli Lilly and Company to conduct this study and develop the manuscript. Wang was employed by IQVIA at the time of this study. Malatestinic and Goldblum are employees and stockholders of Eli Lilly and Company. Boytsov was an employee of Eli Lilly at the time of this research.

The current treatment landscape in adult atopic dermatitis in the United States: results from a cross-sectional real-world study.

BACKGROUND: This study describes the current treatment landscape in adult atopic dermatitis (AD), overall and by disease severity. METHODS: Adult patients with an AD diagnosis in dermatology-specific electronic medical records during 2018 were identified and linked to an administrative claims database. Disease severity was determined using Physician's Global Assessment (PGA). Written and dispensed prescriptions, within and between class cycling for AD therapies occurring in 2018 were assessed. RESULTS: In total, 4,364 patients were included. Among patients with available PGA, 43.2% had clear-to-mild, 37.3% had moderate, and 19.6% had severe disease. Most patients (71.0%) had written prescriptions for topical therapies only in 2018. Among the patients with claims for topical therapies alone, 80.7% used topical corticosteroids only. Within and between class cycling was observed in 33.7% and 12.8% of topical users, respectively. In patients with systemic therapy (40.6%), nearly 84.9% also used topical therapy, 25.8% cycled within systemic drug classes, and 24.8% cycled between systemic drug classes. Overall, cycling was more prevalent in patients with more severe disease. CONCLUSION: Cycling within and between both topical and systemic drug classes was more common in patients with more severe disease, indicating difficulty of managing these patients and highlighting a need for more treatment options.

Assessment of the benefit of achieving complete versus almost complete skin clearance in psoriasis: a patient's perspective.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is characterized by thick and scaly plaques. The Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and Physician Global Assessment (PGA) can be used to define its severity. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of complete clearance of skin versus almost clear skin across various disease measures. METHODS: Data were collected in a survey of US dermatologists and patients with psoriasis from November 2016-January 2017. Dermatologists completed a 6-point PGA (0 = clear skin, 1 = almost clear skin). Patients completed the DLQI and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire (WPAI). Patients with clear and almost clear skin were compared using analysis of covariance for continuous variables, and multivariate logistic regression analysis for categorical variables. RESULTS: Data for 99 and 160 patients with clear and almost clear skin, respectively, were included in the analyses. Patients with clear skin reported less frequent and lower intensity itching, lower total DLQI score (indicating better health-related quality of life), and less impairment of overall work productivity than patients with almost clear skin (all: p < 0.05). LIMITATIONS: Limitations relating to general survey methodology. CONCLUSION: Patients perceived a meaningful difference between clear and almost clear skin. Clear skin is now a realistic treatment target with newer biologics approved in psoriasis.

Disease response and patient-reported outcomes among initiators of ixekizumab.

OBJECTIVES: There is limited real-world evidence on using ixekizumab in psoriasis patients. Therefore, we characterized patients with psoriasis initiating ixekizumab and report 6-month changes in disease and patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: Adult patients with psoriasis who initiated ixekizumab and completed a 6-month follow-up visit were enrolled from the Corrona Psoriasis Registry. Disease characteristics and outcomes were assessed at ixekizumab initiation. Outcomes included the mean 6-month change in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), body surface area (BSA), Investigator Global Assessment (IGA), and IGA*BSA. RESULTS: From baseline to follow-up in all patients (n = 136), means decreased for IGA*BSA (-45.5) and BSA (-12.4), and a higher % achieved an absolute PASI ≤ 5 (84.6%), BSA 0-3 (72.1%), and IGA 0/1 (50.7%). Within stratified groups, means decreased for PASI <12 for IGA*BSA (-21.1) and BSA (-6.3); PASI≥12 for IGA*BSA (-94.8) and BSA (-24.6); weight <100 kg for IGA*BSA (-45.1) and BSA (-12.4); weight ≥100 kg for IGA*BSA (-46.2) and BSA (-12.3); concomitant PsA for IGA*BSA (-56.0) and BSA (-15.3); and in no concomitant PsA for IGA*BSA (-36.9) and BSA (-10.0). CONCLUSIONS: We provide real-world evidence on the benefits of ixekizumab for treating psoriasis, regardless of baseline disease severity, weight, or concomitant PsA.

The direct and indirect costs of adult atopic dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis is considered a childhood illness, and the direct and indirect health care burden of atopic dermatitis in adults is not fully understood. OBJECTIVE: To measure the direct and indirect costs of atopic dermatitis among adults in 2018. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compared commercial and Medicare-insured adults with atopic dermatitis in 2018 with directly matched (1:3) adults without atopic dermatitis. Atopic dermatitis prevalence was reported. Health care utilization, direct health care costs, and work loss data were compared between cohorts. This analysis was repeated for adults with atopic dermatitis in 2016 and 2017. RESULTS: 31,164 adults with atopic dermatitis in 2018 were identified and directly matched (1:3) to controls. Adults with atopic dermatitis had greater utilization of outpatient services, outpatient pharmacy services, and short-term disability benefits than controls. Unadjusted annual health care costs in 2018 were $4,979 higher for adults with atopic dermatitis ($14,603) than for the matched controls ($9,624), driven by outpatient services and pharmacy. Findings were supported by analyses of adults from 2016 and 2017 and multivariable analyses. One limitation of this study was that patients with mild cases of atopic dermatitis may not seek medical treatment and may be underrepresented in the study cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The direct health care and indirect (short-term disability) health care costs of atopic dermatitis present a significant health care burden among the adult population. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Eli Lilly and Company. Employees of Eli Lilly were involved in the planning, execution, and interpretation of the study. Pierce is employed by Eli Lilly and Company. Boytsov and Goldblum were employed by Eli Lilly and Company Health at the time this research was conducted. Manjelievskaia and Brouillette are employed by IBM Watson Health, which received funding from Eli Lilly and Company to conduct this study. Bonafede and Onyekwere were employed at IBM Watson Health at the time this research was conducted.

Ixekizumab treatment patterns and healthcare utilization and costs for patients with psoriasis.

Objectives: To describe ixekizumab treatment patterns, all-cause healthcare utilization, and costs among psoriasis patients.Methods: Adults diagnosed with psoriasis having ≥1 ixekizumab claim were selected from MarketScan® databases between March 01, 2016 and July 31, 2017. Patients were continuously enrolled for ≥6 months prior and ≥3 months after the index date (first ixekizumab claim) and followed until inpatient death, end of enrollment, or end of data. Treatment patterns included persistence, switching, and re-initiation. All-cause utilization and costs were reported per-patient-per-month (PPPM).Results: 801 patients (mean age 49 years; 55.8% male; median follow-up 201 days) were included. Among all patients, 87.4% were persistent (mean (median) duration 86 (75) days) Of the 12.6% of patients who discontinued ixekizumab, 11.9% re-initiated and 6.9% switched treatments. Mean (median) time to switching was 208 (206) days. Mean number of all-cause inpatient admissions and physician office visits PPPM were 0.01 and 0.72, respectively. Mean total cost PPPM was $8,371, of which pharmacy comprised $7,792. Ixekizumab costs, $7,079, occurred primarily during induction and were paid predominantly by health plans ($6,810 [96.2%]).Conclusion: Most (87.4%) ixekizumab users remained persistent during follow-up. Pharmacy was the primary driver of total healthcare costs, with the majority covered by health plans and <4% as patient out-of-pocket expense.

Psoriasis Severity Assessment Combining Physician and Patient Reported Outcomes: The Optimal Psoriasis Assessment Tool.

INTRODUCTION: Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) assessment is complex and time-consuming. A simpler assessment measure more sensitive to changes in symptom severity and predictive of patients' quality of life (Dermatology Life Quality Index, DLQI) is needed. This study aims to evaluate the Optimal Psoriasis Assessment Tool (OPAT) as an alternative to PASI. METHODS: This integrated analysis of three UNCOVER trials (NCT01474512, NCT01597245, and NCT01646177) randomized patients (N = 3866) with moderate-to-severe psoriasis to subcutaneously administered ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W or Q4W, or placebo or etanercept 50 mg Q2W. Pearson correlations were computed for clinical and patient-reported measures with PASI and DLQI. RESULTS: As the correlations with PASI and BSA were high and not much higher when adding severity, body surface area (BSA) was used for the clinical measure. BSA was the main measure influencing OPAT. Week 12 regression analyses results showed that PASI had a higher correlation with BSA combined with patient assessments than with BSA alone. Sensitivity analyses were also completed for PASI 75 and 90. For DLQI, correlations with the combined measures were even stronger than with BSA alone. A comprehensive model selection procedure was conducted, which illustrated that the two-term models are preferred. CONCLUSION: The OPAT is a simple and time-saving alternative to PASI. It can be derived using BSA and patient-reported assessments having strong correlation with PASI and moderate correlation with DLQI.

Understanding characteristics of patients newly initiating ixekizumab: findings from the Corrona Psoriasis Registry.

Background: Real-world data on patients newly initiating ixekizumab is limited. Our study describes the characteristics of patients who initiated ixekizumab and other biologics for psoriasis treatment in North American dermatological practices. Materials & methods: Characteristics of patients ascertained at registry enrollment are described via means and frequencies. Results: Compared with other biologic initiators, ixekizumab initiators had: longer disease duration (17.1 vs 15.1 years); more were considered least severe by body surface area (33 vs 26%); moderate-to-severe by IGA (56 vs 48%); were biologic-experienced (80 vs 52%); obese (54 vs 47%); and experienced greater impact in work productivity (5.3 vs 2.9%) versus other biologic initiators. Conclusion: Psoriasis patients initiating ixekizumab had more severe disease, biologic experience, and worse patient-reported outcomes than those initiating other biologics.