The impact of germline BRCA pathogenic variants in locally advanced, triple negative breast cancer treated with platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Whether germline BRCA (gBRCA) pathogenic variants (PV) affect prognosis of women with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and whether it has implications for treatment decisions in the neoadjuvant setting is unclear. METHODS: This is a retrospective two-center cohort study comprising all women with early stage TNBC who have completed genetic testing and were treated with neoadjuvant dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel and carboplatin. All eligible patients treated between 10.2014 and 3.2020 were included. Data on clinico-pathological, pathological response, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were evaluated. Differences in clinico-pathological features and outcomes were analyzed according to gBRCA status. RESULTS: Sixty-four women were included in the final analysis, of which 31 had gBRCA PV (gBRCA carriers) and 33 were gBRCA wild-type. Clinico-pathological characteristics were similar between both groups. The odds for pathological complete response (pCR) were significantly higher in gBRCA carriers (74.2%) compared to BRCA wild-type women (48.5%), p = 0.035. At a median follow-up of 30 months, gBRCA carriers had significantly favorable OS (HR = 8.64, 95% CI 1.08-69.21, p = 0.042). The difference in DFS did not reach statistical significance (HR = 7.4, 95% CI 0.91-60.27, p = 0.062). The favorable OS for gBRCA carriers remained significant in multivariate analysis (p = 0.029) and was noted regardless of pathological response (p = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Compared to wild-type, gBRCA carriers with locally advanced TNBC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy containing carboplatin had a higher pCR rate and better outcomes. These results strengthen the contention that gBRCA status should be considered when tailoring treatment decisions in women with locally advanced TNBC.

The Impact of Previous Therapy on Overall-Survival in Registration Clinical Trials for 1st Line Metastatic Breast Cancer.

AIM: To explore the impact of previous treatment on the efficacy of investigational new drugs in registration trials for 1st line metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS: Thirteen US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved indications for 1st line MBC between 1/2000-12/2023 were identified and their supporting publications were searched in the ClinicalTrials.gov and Google Scholar. Where available, hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for overall-survival (OS) were pooled into meta-analysis and the difference in the magnitude of OS benefit between treatment naïve and previously treated patients was analyzed. RESULTS: There was no difference in the magnitude of OS benefit between treatment-naïve and previously treated patients (HR=0.72 versus 0.80,p for difference=0.25). In indications for triple-negative BC, treatment-naïve patients had higher magnitude of OS benefit compared to previously treated patients (HR=0.53 versus 0.81,p=0.03). In indications for luminal disease, the magnitude of benefit was comparable between the subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: In trials supporting 1st line therapy for TNBC the magnitude of benefit is significantly higher in treatment naïve compared to previously treated patients. Our findings may represent a previously unrecognized bias, potentially over-estimating the benefit of triple-negative BC new drugs.