Contralateral training effects of low-intensity blood-flow restricted and high-intensity unilateral resistance training.

PURPOSE: Determine whether unilateral low-intensity blood-flow restricted (LIBFR) exercise is as effective as high-intensity (HI) resistance training for improving contralateral muscle strength. METHODS: Thirty healthy adults (20-30 years) were randomly allocated to the following dynamic plantar-flexion training interventions: HI [75% of one-repetition maximum (1RM), 4 sets, 10 reps] and LIBFR [20% of 1RM, 4 sets, 30 + 15 + 15 + 15 reps]. Evoked V-wave and H-reflex recruitment curves, as well as maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) and panoramic ultrasound assessments of the trained and untrained soleus muscles were obtained pre-training, post-4 weeks of training and post-4 weeks of detraining. RESULTS: Both interventions failed to increase contralateral MVC and muscle cross-sectional area (CSA). Yet, contralateral rate of torque development (RTD) was enhanced by both regimens (12-26%) and this was accompanied by heightened soleus EMG within the first milliseconds of the rising torque-time curve (14-22%; p < 0.05). These improvements were dissipated after detraining. Contralateral adaptations were not accompanied by changes in V-wave or H-reflex excitability. Conversely, LIBFR and HI elicited a similar magnitude of ipsilateral increase in MVC, RTD and CSA post-training (10-18%). Improvements in V-wave amplitude and soleus EMG were limited to the trained leg assigned to LIBFR training (p < 0.05). While gains in strength and CSA remained preserved post-4 weeks of detraining, this did not occur with RTD. CONCLUSION: Since gains in RTD were similar between interventions, our findings indicate that both training regimens can be used interchangeably for improving contralateral rapid torque production. Ultimately, this may be beneficial in circumstances of limb immobilization after injury or surgery.

Sex differences in soleus muscle H-reflex and V-wave excitability.

NEW FINDINGS: What is the central question of this study? How do H-reflex and V-wave excitability compare between men and women engaging in similar levels of physical activity?  What is the main finding and its importance? H-reflex excitability is lower in women than in men because of their greater level of antagonist co-activation during sustained plantar flexion isometric exercise. In addition, supraspinal drive is similar between men and women independently of their differences in H-reflex excitability and antagonist muscle co-activation. ABSTRACT: We compared H-reflex and V-wave excitability between men and women engaging in similar levels of physical activity. We also explored whether differences in antagonist muscle co-activation between sexes might partially explain sexual dimorphism in the excitability of the H-reflex and V-wave. Fifty-seven young participants were included (29 men: 21.7 ± 2.3 years; 28 women: 22.4 ± 3.3 years). Soleus M- and H-recruitment curves were constructed on a tonic background muscle activation. V-waves were elicited during maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). Besides being stronger than women, men achieved greater Hmax /Mmax values and presented a steeper slope of the ascending limb of the H-reflex recruitment curve (P < 0.05). The current intensity required to elicit Hmax was lower for men (P < 0.05). The co-activation of the tibialis anterior muscle during the sustained plantar flexions was greater in women (ratio between tibialis and soleus normalized EMG: 20.5 vs. 8.3%, P < 0.05). Covariance analysis showed that sexual dimorphism in H-reflex excitability was dissipated when controlling for antagonist co-activation. V-wave normalized amplitude was similar between sexes even after controlling for the effects of Hmax /Mmax and antagonist co-activation as covariates. Thus, women exhibit lower H-reflex excitability than men and this is dependent on their higher level of antagonist muscle co-activation. While sex differences in antagonist co-activation persist during MVCs, this is not the case for V-wave normalized amplitude. Thus, although the efficacy of the transmission between Ia afferent fibres to α-motoneurons is lower in women because of a greater level of antagonist co-activation, our findings are consistent with similar supraspinal drive between sexes.