Changes in seizure frequency and anti-seizure medication therapy during pregnancy and one year postpregnancy.

Seizure control in women with epilepsy (WWE) during pregnancy is a vital concern. The aim of this study was to compare changes in seizure frequency and anti-seizure medication (ASM ) therapy in WWE in a real-world setting over three epochs (prepregnancy, pregnancy, and postpregnancy). We screened WWE who were pregnant between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2020 from the epilepsy follow-up registry database of a tertiary hospital in China. We reviewed and collected follow-up data for the following time periods: 12 months before pregnancy (epoch 1), throughout pregnancy and the first 6 weeks postpartum (epoch 2), and from 6 weeks to 12 months postpartum (epoch 3). Seizures were classified into two categories: tonic‒clonic/focal to bilateral tonic‒clonic seizures and non-tonic‒clonic seizures. The main indicator was the seizure-free rate over the three epochs. Using epoch 1 as a reference, we also compared the percentage of women with an increased seizure frequency, as well as changes in ASM treatment, in epochs 2 and 3. Ultimately, 271 eligible pregnancies in 249 women were included. The seizure-free rates in epoch 1, epoch 2, and epoch 3 were 38.4%, 34.7%, and 43.9%, respectively (P = 0.09). The top three ASMs used in the three epochs were lamotrigine, levetiracetam, and oxcarbazepine. Using epoch 1 as a reference, the percentages of women with increased frequencies of tonic‒clonic/focal to bilateral tonic‒clonic seizures in epoch 2 and epoch 3 were 17.0% and 14.8%, respectively, while the percentages of women with an increased frequency of non-tonic‒clonic seizures in epoch 2 and epoch 3 were 31.0% and 21.8% (P = 0.02). The percentage of women whose ASM dosages were increased in epoch 2 was higher than that in epoch 3 (35.8% vs. 27.3%, P = 0.03). The seizure frequency during pregnancy may not differ significantly from that during prepregnancy and postpregnancy if WWE are treated according to the guidelines.

External validation of the AntiEpileptic Drug Monitoring in PREgnancy (EMPiRE) model for predicting seizures in pregnant women with epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: The AntiEpileptic Drug Monitoring in PREgnancy (EMPiRE) model is the only available tool for predicting seizures in pregnant women with epilepsy (WWE) using anti-seizure medications (ASMs); however, its predictive performance requires validation. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive ability of this model in pregnant Chinese WWE and its potential usefulness in clinical practice. METHODS: Data of the EMPiRE model were derived from the EMPiRE study, a prospective multicenter cohort study that recruited women on ASM monotherapy (lamotrigine, carbamazepine, phenytoin or levetiracetam) or polytherapy (lamotrigine with either carbamazepine, phenytoin or levetiracetam). Based on the applicable population of the EMPiRE model, we evaluated 280 patients registered in the Wenzhou Epilepsy Follow-up Registry Database from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2020. A total of 158 eligible patients were included in the validation cohort. We collected data on the baseline characteristics of patients, eight predictors of the EMPiRE model and outcome events. The outcome was the occurrence of tonic-clonic or non-tonic-clonic seizures at any time in pregnancy up to 6 weeks postpartum. We used the equation of the EMPiRE model to obtain the predicted probabilities of seizures. The predictive ability of the EMPiRE model was quantified by the C-statistic (scale 0-1, values > 0.5 show discrimination), GiViTI calibration test and decision curve analysis (DCA). RESULTS: Of 158 eligible patients, 96 patients (60.8%, 96/158) experienced one or more seizures at any time between pregnancy and 6 weeks postpartum. The EMPiRE model showed good discrimination with a C-statistic of 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-0.84). The GiViTI calibration belt showed that the predicted probabilities, which ranged from 16 to 96% (95% CI), were lower than the actual probabilities. DCA indicated that the highest net proportional benefit was obtained for predicted probability thresholds of 15-18% and 54-96%. CONCLUSIONS: The EMPiRE model could discriminate well between WWE with and without seizures during pregnancy and 6 weeks postpartum, but the risk of seizures may be underestimated. The limitations of the model for specific medication regimens may limit its real-world application. If the model is further improved, it will be incredibly valuable.

Comparison of the performance of suicide ideation scales in adult patients with epilepsy in China.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to evaluate and compare the performance of the Chinese version of the Suicide Ideation Scale-Current (SSI-C) and the Suicide Ideation Scale-Worst (SSI-W) as suicide ideation screening tools in patients with epilepsy (PWE). METHODS: A consecutive sample of Chinese adult PWE recruited from a tertiary hospital completed the SSI-C and SSI-W and the suicidality module of the Chinese version of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) Plus 5.0.0. RESULTS: A total of 260 consecutive PWE were recruited. The area under the curve (AUC) for the SSI-C was 0.831, and the optimal cutoff score was >1 (sensitivity 73%, specificity 91%); for the SSI-W, the AUC was 0.958, and the optimal cutoff score was >2 (sensitivity 94.6%, specificity 87.4%). The AUC for the SSI-W was larger than that for the SSI-C, and the two-factor structure was considered significant. CONCLUSION: Our results showed that the SSI-C and SSI-W had good validity as suicidal ideation screening tools in PWE in southern China and can be recommended for clinical suicidal ideation screening. The SSI-W is a better suicidal ideation screening tool than the SSI-C according to the results of our study.

Agmatine Alleviates Epileptic Seizures and Hippocampal Neuronal Damage by Inhibiting Gasdermin D-Mediated Pyroptosis.

Background: Epilepsy is a common neurological disease, and neuroinflammation is one of the main contributors to epileptogenesis. Pyroptosis is a type of pro-inflammatory cell death that is related to epilepsy. Agmatine, has anti-inflammatory properties and exerts neuroprotective effects against seizures. Our study investigated the effect of agmatine on the core pyroptosis protein GSDMD in the context of epilepsy. Methods: A chronic epilepsy model and BV2 microglial cellular inflammation model were established by pentylenetetrazole (PTZ)-induced kindling or lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation. H&E and Nissl staining were used to evaluate hippocampal neuronal damage. The expression of pyroptosis and inflammasome factors was examined by western blotting, quantitative real-time PCR, immunofluorescence and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Results: Agmatine disrupted the kindling acquisition process, which decreased seizure scores and the incidence of full kindling and blocked hippocampal neuronal damage. In addition, agmatine increased BV2 microglial cell survival in vitro and alleviated seizures in vivo by suppressing the levels of PTZ-induced pyroptosis. Finally, the expression of TLR4, MYD88, phospho-IκBα, phospho-NF-κB and the NLRP3 inflammasome was significantly upregulated in LPS-induced BV2 microglial cells, while agmatine suppressed the expression of these proteins. Conclusions: Our results indicate that agmatine affects epileptogenesis and exerts neuroprotective effects by inhibiting neuroinflammation, GSDMD activation, and pyroptosis. The inhibitory effect of agmatine on pyroptosis was mediated by the suppression of the TLR4/MYD88/NF-κB/NLRP3 inflammasome pathway. Therefore, agmatine may be a potential treatment option for epilepsy.

Validation of Predictive Models for Autoimmune Encephalitis-Related Antibodies to Cell-Surface Proteins Expressed in Neurons: A Retrospective Study Based in a Hospital.

Objective: Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) is a severe but treatable autoimmune disorder that is diagnosed by antibody (Ab) testing. However, it is unrealistic to obtain an early diagnosis in some areas since the Ab status cannot be immediately determined due to time and technology restrictions. In our study, we aimed to validate the Antibody Prevalence in Epilepsy and Encephalopathy (APE2) score among patients diagnosed with possible AE as a predictive model to screen AE patients with antibodies to cell-surface proteins expressed in neurons. Methods: A total of 180 inpatients were recruited, and antibodies were detected through serological and/or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) evaluations. The APE2 score was used to validate the predictive models of AE with autoantibodies. Results: The mean APE2 score in the Ab-positive cases was 7.25, whereas the mean APE2 score in the Ab-negative cases was 3.18 (P < 0.001). The APE2 score had a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve of 0.924 [P < 0.0001, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.875-0.973]. With a cutoff score of 5, the APE2 score had the best psychometric properties, with a sensitivity of 0.875 and a specificity of 0.791. Conclusion: The APE2 score is a predictive model for AE with autoantibodies to cell-surface proteins expressed in neurons and was validated and shown to have high sensitivity and specificity in our study. We suggest that such a model should be used in patients with a suspected diagnosis of AE, which could increase the detection rate of Abs, reduce testing costs, and help patients to benefit from treatment quickly.

Patient Preference for Antiepileptic Drugs Treatment in China: Evidence From the Discrete Choice Experiment.

Objective: Explore Chinese patients' risk-benefit preferences and willingness-to-pay (WTP) for antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) treatment through the discrete choice experiment (DCE). Method: Six attributes including the efficacy of AEDs, adverse reactions (digestive system, neuropsychic systems, and the effects on the fetus), dosing frequency and drug costs (to estimate patient WTP) were included in the DCE questionnaire based on results collected from literature reviews, expert consultation, and patient survey. The alternative-specific conditional logit model was used to analyze patient preference and WTP for each attribute and its level and to assess the sociodemographic impact and clinical characteristics. Results: A total of 151 valid questionnaires were collected. The result shows that five out of the six attributes are significant, except the dosing frequency. Among the six attributes, the efficacy of AEDs (10.0; 95% CI 8.9-11.1) is mostly concerned by patients, followed by the effects of AEDs on the fetus (8.9; 95% CI 7.7-10.1), duration of side effects in the neuropsychic system (4.9; 95% CI 3.7-6.0) and adverse reactions of the digestive system (3.2; 95% CI 1.5-4.2). The patients surveyed are willing to spend ¥ 1,246 (95% CI, ¥ 632- ¥ 1,861) per month to ensure 100% seizure control, and ¥ 1,112 (95% CI, ¥ 586-¥ 1,658) to reduce the risk of the drug affecting the fetus to 3%. Besides, it was found that personal characteristics including the intention for conception and AEDs treatment regimens have statistical significance. Conclusion: Improving the drug's efficacy and reducing its side effects are predominant considerations for patients with epilepsy in China, especially for those who are concerned about the seizure control and the drug effect on the fetus. This finding is useful to physicians and can encourage shared decision-making between the patients and their doctors in the clinic.