Unveiling Distribution of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Matched Placenta-Serum Tetrads: Novel Implications for Birth Outcome Mediated by Placental Vascular Disruption.

The placenta is pivotal for fetal development and maternal-fetal transfer of many substances, including per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs). However, the intraplacental distribution of PFASs and their effects on placental vascular function remain unclear. In this study, 302 tetrads of matched subchorionic placenta (fetal-side), parabasal placenta (maternal-side), cord serum, and maternal serum samples were collected from Guangzhou, China. Eighteen emerging and legacy PFASs and five placental vascular biomarkers were measured. Results showed that higher levels of perfluorooctanoic (PFOA), perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), and chlorinated polyfluorinated ether sulfonic acids (Cl-PFESAs) were detected in subchorionic placenta compared to parabasal placenta. There were significant associations of PFASs in the subchorionic placenta, but not in the serum, with placental vascular biomarkers (up to 32.5%) and lower birth size. Birth weight was negatively associated with PFOA (ß: -103.8, 95% CI: -186.3 and -21.32) and 6:2 Cl-PFESA (ß: -80.04, 95% CI: -139.5 and -20.61), primarily in subchorionic placenta. Mediation effects of altered placental angiopoietin-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 were evidenced on associations of adverse birth outcomes with intraplacental PFOS and 8:2 Cl-PFESA, explaining 9.5%-32.5% of the total effect. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to report on differential intraplacental distribution of PFASs and placental vascular effects mediating adverse birth outcomes and provides novel insights into the placental plate-specific measurement in PFAS-associated health risk assessment.

Effect of types of placenta previa on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a 10-year retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Through this study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of different types of placenta previa (PP) on maternal and neonatal outcomes. METHODS: This study was conducted in The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University and Tongji Hospital between January 2009 and 2019. PP was traditionally classified into four types, namely low-lying placenta, marginal, partial, and complete PP. Previous studies have classified PP into two types, namely low-lying placenta and PP. Based on our clinical experience, we proposed the classification of PP into three types, for the first time, which included low-lying placenta, "marpartial" (marginal and partial) PP, and complete PP. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the effects of different types of PP on maternal and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 4490 singleton pregnancies were complicated with PP. In the four-classification method, compared with women with low-lying placenta, women with complete PP had a risk of placenta accrete spectrum disorders, postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), hemorrhagic shock, severe PPH, blood transfusion, hysterectomy, puerperal infection, preterm labor, NICU admission, and low birth weight. There was no difference in maternal and neonatal outcomes between marginal and partial PP, except for increased chances of preterm labor and low birth weight in partial PP. In the two-classification method, PP was the risk factor for most of the adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, compared with low-lying placenta. CONCLUSION: Complete PP and low-lying placenta were associated with the highest and lowest risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes, respectively, whereas clinically similar outcomes were observed between marginal and partial PP. The three-classification of PP may be practical from the clinical perspective.

Effect of previous placenta previa on outcome of next pregnancy: a 10-year retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: To determine the effects of previous placenta previa on the maternal and neonatal outcomes of the next pregnancy. METHODS: This 10-year retrospective cohort study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, between January 2009 and 2018. We retrospectively analyzed the effects of a previous singleton pregnancy in women with and without placenta previa on the outcomes of the subsequent pregnancy. To control for confounders, we used multiple logistic regression models. RESULTS: A total of 57,251 women with singleton pregnancies gave birth during the 10-year study period. Among them, 6070 women had two consecutive births. For the first pregnancy, 1603 women delivered by cesarean delivery and 4467 by vaginal delivery. Among women with a history of cesarean delivery, placenta previa was an independent risk factor for hemorrhage (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.25, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-4.62), placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders (aOR: 4.11, 95% CI: 1.68-10.06), and placenta previa (aOR: 6.24, 95% CI: 2.85-13.67) during the subsequent pregnancy. Puerperal infection, blood transfusion, and perinatal outcomes did not significantly differ between women with a history of placenta previa and women without this history. Among women with a history of vaginal delivery, placenta previa increased the risk of PAS disorders (aOR: 5.71, 95% CI: 1.81-18.03) and placenta previa (aOR: 4.14, 95% CI: 1.07-16.04) during the subsequent pregnancy. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of hemorrhage, blood transfusion, puerperal infection, and perinatal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Women with a history of placenta previa are at risk for adverse outcomes such as postpartum hemorrhage, PAS disorders, and placenta previa in the subsequent pregnancy.

Development, validation, and clinical utility of a risk prediction model for recurrent preeclampsia.

OBJECTIVES: We aim to establish a predictive model for recurrent preeclampsia. METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records from three hospitals between 2010 and 2021 was conducted. The study included women who had two consecutive singleton deliveries at the same hospital, with the first delivery complicated by preeclampsia. A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed using a training cohort, and subsequently cross-validated and tested using an independent cohort. The model's performance was assessed in terms of discrimination and calibration, and its clinical utility was evaluated using decision curve analysis (DCA). RESULTS: Among 296 405 deliveries, 694 women met the inclusion criteria, with 151 (21.8%) experiencing recurrent preeclampsia. The predictive model incorporated 10 risk factors from previous preeclampsia, including gestational weeks with elevated blood pressure, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), pericardial effusion, heart failure, limb edema, serum creatinine, white blood cell count, low platelet counts within one week before delivery, SBP on the first postpartum day, and postpartum antihypertensive use. Additionally, one risk factor from the index pregnancy was included, which was antihypertensive use before 20 weeks. The model demonstrated better discrimination, calibration, and a net benefit across a wide range of recurrent preeclampsia risk thresholds. Furthermore, the model has been translated into a clinical risk calculator, enabling clinicians to calculate individualized risks of recurrent preeclampsia. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that a predictive tool utilizing routine clinical and laboratory factors can accurately estimate the risk of recurrent preeclampsia. This predictive model has the potential to facilitate shared decision-making by providing personalized and risk-stratified care.

Comparing the severity of second preeclampsia with first preeclampsia: a multicenter retrospective longitudinal cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Compare the clinical severity of second preeclampsia with the first preeclampsia. METHODS: This retrospective longitudinal cohort study was conducted in three teaching hospitals in Guangzhou, where there were a total of 296 405 deliveries between 2010 and 2021. Two consecutive singleton deliveries complicated with preeclampsia were included. Clinical features, laboratory results within 1 week before delivery, and maternal and neonatal outcomes of both deliveries were collected. Univariate analyses were made using paired Wilcoxon tests and McNemar tests. Multivariable logistic regression and generalized linear models were performed to assess the association of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes with second preeclampsia. RESULTS: A total of 151 women were included in the study. The mean maternal age was 28 and 33 years for the first and second deliveries, respectively. The proportion of preventive acetylsalicylic acid use was 4.6% for the first delivery and 15.2% for the second delivery. No significant differences were observed in terms of blood pressure on admission, gestational weeks of admission and delivery, application of perinatal antihypertensive agents, rates of preterm delivery, and severe features between the two occurrences. However, the rates of heart disease, edema, and admission to the ICU were lower, and hospital stays were shorter in the second preeclampsia compared with the first preeclampsia. Sensitivity analysis conducted among women who did not use preventive acetylsalicylic acid yielded similar results. After adjusting for potential confounding variables, the occurrence of second preeclampsia was associated with significantly decreased risks of heart disease, edema, complications, and admission to the NICU, with odds ratios ranging between 0.157 and 0.336. CONCLUSION: Contrary to expectations, the second preeclampsia did not exhibit worse manifestations or outcomes to the first occurrence. In fact, some clinical features and outcomes appeared to be better in the second preeclampsia.

Risk factors for recurrence of gestational diabetes mellitus in southern Chinese women: a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: Predictors of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) recurrence (GDMR) was determined in southern Chinese women. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 376 women with GDM who had two consecutive singleton deliveries at our hospital between January 2014 and October 2020 were enrolled in the current study. We retrospectively compared the clinical characteristics, fasting plasma glucose level (FPG-1), and oral glucose tolerance test-1h-1 and -2h-1 (OGTT 1hr-1: 1-h post-load glucose level during the first pregnancy and OGTT 2hr-1: 2-h post-load glucose level during the first pregnancy) for the first pregnancy between patients in the GDMR group (n = 166) and the non-GDMR group (n = 210). RESULTS: The incidence of GDMR in the study population was 44.15%. During the first pregnancy, women in the GDMR group had significantly higher OGTT 1h-1, OGTT 2h-1, and FPG-1 + OGTT 1h + 2h-1 compared to the non-GDMR group. When the threshold of the FPG-1 + OGTT 1h + 2h-1 level in the first pregnancy was > 23.6 mmol/L, the specificity for predicting GDMR was 0.85, the sensitivity was 0.45, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) was 0.70, indicating a 70% probability of predicting GDMR in the next pregnancy. Logistic regression analysis showed that patients with a combined abnormal FPG-1 + OGTT 1h + 2 h-1 level had a 10-fold increased risk for GDMR in subsequent pregnancies than patients with normal indicators (OR: 10.542, 95% CI: 3.097-35.881; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The OGTT 1h-1 and OGTT 2h-1 are independent risk factors for GDMR in southern Chinese women. Women with an FPG-1 + OGTT 1h + 2h-1 threshold level > 23.6 mmol/L in the first pregnancy had a 10-fold greater probability of developing GDMR in the second pregnancy than women in the non-GDMR group.

Risk factors of obstetric admissions to the intensive care unit: An 8-year retrospective study.

The aim of this study was to identify risk factors among obstetric patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).The study was conducted in Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University during January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2016. A total of 44,817 pregnant women ≥20 weeks of gestational age were scanned. Demographic characteristics, perinatal outcomes, and risk factors among participants were analyzed.A number of factors (21) were more prevalent in the ICU admission group. The greatest for admission to the ICU occurred with amniotic fluid embolism, heart disease, acute fatty liver, and referral for care. The incidence of postpartum hemorrhage, hysterectomy, organ failure, and method of delivery differed significantly between groups (P < .05). Adverse neonatal outcome differed significantly between groups (P < .05).Complications of pregnancy are risk factors for referral to the ICU and may increase risk for unexpected outcomes among mothers and neonates.