Prosthetic Valve Thrombosis in the Acute Phase of the Stroke: Relevance of Detection and Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND: Stroke may be the first symptom of prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT); therefore, rapid diagnosis and therapy are crucial. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence, main predictors, and long-term clinical evolution of patients with PVT in the acute phase of stroke. METHODS: We studied consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients with prosthetic heart valves who underwent emergent transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) during a 5-year period. Two groups were defined depending on the presence of PVT (PVT or non-PVT groups). Baseline characteristics, TEE findings, and international normalized ratios (INRs) at the stroke event were registered. Follow-up visits and TEE control examinations were performed. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were registered. TEE was performed within the first week in 85% of patients (n = 57). PVT was diagnosed in 41.8% of cases (n = 28). Clinical severity and baseline INR level showed no differences when the PVT and non-PVT groups were compared. The presence of PVT was associated with the mitral valve location as compared with the aortic valve location (75% versus 25%, P = .003), the presence of spontaneous echocontrast (64.3% versus 35.9%, P = .022), and low ejection fraction (66.7% versus 32.7%, P = .019). The PVT group showed a trend toward higher percentage of recurrence (10.7% versus 2.5%, P = .102) in the follow up period (mean follow-up 25 months). CONCLUSIONS: The detection of PVT in the acute stroke phase was relevant, as the stroke recurrence rate was considerable. Therefore, all patients with prosthetic heart valve should undergo emergent TEE.

Predictors of cardiovascular outcomes after surgery in severe tricuspid regurgitation: clinical, imaging and hemodynamic prospective study.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a prevalent valve disease with a high mortality rate. Current guidelines do not define specific thresholds at which patients should be considered for surgery or percutaneous procedures. Thus, patients are usually referred for intervention at a late stage of the disease. This study aimed to assess predictors of cardiovascular outcomes in a prospective cohort of patients with severe TR referred for surgery. METHODS: This was an observational, prospective, nonrandomized study. All patients underwent surgery for severe TR based on current clinical guidelines. Complete anamnesis, blood test, echocardiogram, cardiovascular magnetic resonance and right and left catheterization were performed. Patients were followed up in the outpatient department and a combined endpoint (hospitalization for heart failure and cardiovascular mortality) was registered. RESULTS: Forty-three consecutive patients were included (age: 66.9 ± 9.6 years, 67.4% female). Tricuspid annuloplasty was performed in all patients. After a median follow-up of 38 months, 12 patients (27.9%) showed the combined endpoint and 7 (16.3%) died. Above all clinical, blood and imaging data, the indexed right ventricular end-diastolic volume constituted the best predictor of the combined endpoint (HR, 1.1; P = .02) and cardiovascular mortality (HR, 1.1; P = .05). Furthermore, indexed right ventricular end-diastolic volume was associated with TR recurrence after surgery, with no impact on clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe TR referred for surgery, right ventricular remodeling assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance constituted the best independent predictor of cardiovascular outcomes at follow-up.

Familial clustering of bicuspid aortic valve and its relationship with aortic dilation in first-degree relatives.

OBJECTIVE: Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most common congenital heart disease. This study aimed to determine the prevalence rate of BAV in first-degree relatives (FDR) and the inheritance pattern according to different morphotypes and aortic dilation. METHODS: BAV probands were consecutively studied at eight tertiary referral centres. After sequential screening, FDR were included in the study. The BAV morphotype, aortic dilation and aortic phenotype were assessed by transthoracic echocardiography. RESULTS: Seven hundred and twenty-four FDR of 256 BAV probands agreed to undergo family screening. The prevalence of BAV was 6.4% in FDR (9.2% in men, 3.5% in women, p=0.002). Aortic dilation was diagnosed in 9.6% of FRD with tricuspid aortic valves (TAV), with a root phenotype in 2.7% and tubular in 6.9% and more frequently in the presence of arterial hypertension (OR 4.48; CI 95% 2.51 to 7.99; p=0.0001) and valvular regurgitation (OR 5.87, CI 95% 1.37 to 25.16; p=0.025). The heritability (h2 ) of BAV was highly significant (0.47; p=0.002); however, no concordance was observed among valve morphotypes. Aortic dilation heritability was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: The BAV prevalence rate in FDR was low (6.4%) but aortic dilation was observed in 9.6% of FDR with TAV. The heritability of BAV was high without concordance in valve morphotypes, and aortic dilation heritability was not observed. Patients with BAV should be made aware of its familial pattern.

Multimodality Assessment of Ascending Aortic Diameters: Comparison of Different Measurement Methods.

BACKGROUND: Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have been widely used to monitor aortic diameters, with no consensus as to the best measurement approach. Thus, the aim of this study was to establish the best measurement methods by two-dimensional (2D) TTE, MDCT, and MRI to achieve comparable aortic diameters. METHODS: One hundred forty patients with severe aortic valvular disease or aortic dilatation were prospectively evaluated using 2D TTE and MDCT (n = 70) or MRI (n = 70). The aorta was measured at three different levels: sinuses of Valsalva, sinotubular junction, and ascending aorta. Three different measurements were made by 2D TTE-inner edge to inner edge, leading edge to leading edge (L-L), and outer edge to outer edge-and then compared with the inner edge-to-inner edge and outer edge-to-outer edge measurements of cusp-to-cusp and cusp-to-commissure diameters by MDCT or MRI. Inter- and intraobserver variability was analyzed. RESULTS: Aortic diameters by 2D TTE, MDCT, and MRI showed excellent inter- and intraobserver variability using all conventions. Significant underestimation was observed of all aortic diameters assessed by 2D TTE using the inner edge-to-inner edge convention compared with those obtained by MDCT or MRI (P < .0001). However, excellent accuracy was observed by 2D TTE when the L-L convention was used and compared with the internal diameter by MDCT and MRI (mean differences, 0.6 ± 2.6 mm [P = .158] for MDCT and 0.4 ± 3.5 mm [P = .852] for MRI). Cusp-to-cusp diameters were slightly larger than cusp-to-commissure diameters. The diameter by 2D TTE using the L-L convention correlated best with the noncoronary cusp-to-right coronary cusp diameter determined by both MDCT and MRI. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic root and ascending aortic diameters measured by 2D TTE using the L-L convention showed accurate and reproducible values compared with internal diameters assessed by MDCT or MRI. This approach permits a multimodality follow-up of patients with aortic diseases and avoids disparities in measurements obtained by different conventions.

Neurological damage after transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared with surgical aortic valve replacement in intermediate risk patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The risk of neurological damage following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) vs. surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in severe aortic stenosis patients deemed to be at intermediate surgical risk is unknown. In this target population, the degree of neurological damage was compared using brain diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) and cognitive testing. METHODS: Forty-six consecutive patients undergoing TAVI (78.0 ± 8.3 years; STS score 4.4 ± 1.7) and 37 patients undergoing SAVR (78.9 ± 6.2 years, STS score 4.7 ± 1.7) were compared. DW-MRI was performed in 67 patients (40 in TAVI vs. 27 in SAVR group) within the first 15 days post-procedure. A cognitive assessment was performed at baseline and at 3 months follow-up. The occurrence of potential cognitive impairment post-intervention was determined using the reliable change index (RCI). RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable in TAVI and SAVR groups except for the presence of severe calcified aorta, which occurred more frequently in the TAVI group [17 (37 %) vs. 0 (0 %), p < 0.001]. Three patients presented a clinical stroke: 1 (2.2 %) in TAVI group vs. 2 (5.4 %) in SAVR group, (p = 0.58). No differences were observed in the rate of acute ischemic cerebral lesions detected by DWI in patients undergoing TAVI vs. SAVR [18 (45 %) in TAVI vs. 11 (40.7 %) in SAVR, adjusted OR 0.95; 95 % CI 0.25-3.65; p = 0.94]. TAVI was associated with a lower number of DWI lesions (adjusted OR 0.54; 95 % IC 0.37-0.79; p = 0.02). An older age was a predictor of the occurrence of acute lesions (OR 1.13; 95 % CI 1.03-1.23; p = 0.01), and the use of vitamin-K antagonist therapy had a protective effect (OR 0.25; 95 % CI 0.07-0.92; p = 0.037) regardless the type of intervention. Overall no significant changes were observed in global cognitive scores post-intervention (p = 0.23). The RCI showed mild cognitive decline in nine patients undergoing TAVI (26.4 %) and in six patients in the SAVR group (30.0 %) (p = 0.96). There was no association between the number and total volume of lesions and the occurrence of cognitive decline (CC Spearman 0.031, p = 0.85 and -0.011, p = 0.97, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: TAVI and SAVR were associated with a similar rate of acute silent ischemic cerebral lesions in intermediate risk patients. Although acute lesions occurred very frequently in both strategies, their cognitive impact was not clinically relevant.

[Predictive factors of abnormal dynamic intraventricular gradient after valve replacement in severe aortic stenosis]. / Aparición de gradiente dinámico intraventricular después de la sustitución valvular aórtica en pacientes con estenosis aórtica severa.

INTRODUCTION: Dynamic intraventricular gradients (DIG) after valve replacement in severe aortic stenosis have been reported, although the incidence of DIG and clinical signs are still poorly understood.Aim. To evaluate the incidence of DIG)and determine risk factors and associated morbimortality. PATIENTS AND METHOD: One hundred nine consecutive patients with severe aortic valve stenosis undergoing valve replacement were studied prospectively by echocardiography to detect the postoperative appearance of DIG, defined as a maximum flow velocity >/= 2.5 m/s. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (14.9%) developed postoperative DIG. Significant differences between the patients with or without DIG were found for ventricular diameter (left end-diastolic ventricular diameter (LEDVD) 43.2 vs. 47.7 mm, respectively, p < 0.001; left end-systolic ventricular diameter (LESVD) 21 vs. 29 mm, p < 0.001); left ventricular mass index (165 vs. 193 g/m(2), p < 0.05); mean aortic valve gradient (68 vs. 59 mmHg, p < 0.01),; ejection fraction (73 vs. 61%, p < 0.001). No significant differences were found with respect to ventricular wall thicknesses (septal 16.3 vs. 15.7; posterior 14.37 vs. 14.62), the presence of aortic insufficiency, or other postoperative factors (anemia, inotropic agents, etc.). CONCLUSIONS: DIG after aortic valve replacement to treat severe stenosis is not unusual (15%). DIG is usually found at a midventricular location, close to the septum. In patients with postoperative DIG the most common associated factors were small LEDVD, high ejection fractions and ratios of intraventricular septal to posterior wall ratios, high valve gradients and small left ventricular masses. Preoperative echocardiography can identify patients with a higher risk of developing DIG after aortic valve replacement.

Aparición de gradiente dinámico intraventricular después de la sustitución valvular aórtica en pacientes con estenosis aórtica severa / Predictive Factors of Abnormal Dynamic Intraventricular Gradient After Valve Replacement in Severe Aortic Stenosis

Introducción. Se conoce la existencia de un gradiente dinámico intraventricular (GDI) en el postoperatorio de recambio valvular aórtico, aunque se desconoce la incidencia del mismo, así como los factores determinantes de su presentación. Objetivos. Determinar la incidencia de aparición de GDI, así como los posibles factores predictivos y la existencia de morbimortalidad asociada a este proceso. Pacientes y método. Se ha realizado un estudio prospectivo mediante ecocardiografía-Doppler en 109 pacientes con estenosis aórtica valvular severa sometidos consecutivamente a recambio valvular y se ha valorado la aparición durante el período postoperatorio de GDI, definido por una velocidad máxima superior a 2,5 m/s.Resultados. Se observó la aparición de GDI durante el postoperatorio en 16 pacientes (14,9 por ciento del total). Se encontraron diferencias significativas entre los pacientes que desarrollaron o no GDI con respecto a los diámetros ventriculares: diámetro telediástolico del ventrículo izquierdo (DTDVI) de 43,2 frente a 47,7 mm, respectivamente; p < 0,001; diámetro telesistólico del ventrículo izquierdo (DTSVI) de 21 frente a 29 mm; p < 0,001, el índice de masa del VI de 165 frente a 193 g/m2; p < 0,05; el gradiente medio transvalvular de 68 frente a 59 mmHg; p < 0,01; y la fracción de eyección de 73 frente a 61 por ciento; p < 0,001. No se encontraron diferencias significativas en cuanto al grosor de las paredes ventriculares (TIV de 16,3 frente a 15,7; PP de 14,37 frente a 14,62), ni en la existencia de insuficiencia aórtica, ni en otros factores clínicos postoperatorios (anemización, fármacos inotrópicos, etc.).Conclusiones. Durante el postoperatorio del recambio valvular por estenosis aórtica severa aparece GDI en un número no despreciable de pacientes (15 por ciento). Habitualmente su localización es mesoventricuar. Los factores asociados a esta aparición de gradiente intraventricular fueron: DTDVI pequeños, fracciones de acortamiento altas, fracciones de eyección elevadas, relación tabique interventricular/pared posterior (TIV/PP) elevada, gradiente valvular elevado y masa del ventrículo izquierdo pequeña. El ecocardiograma preoperatorio permite identificar a los pacientes con riesgo de presentar GDI (AU)