A Systematic Review of Clinical Applications of Anti-CD20 Radioimmunotherapy for Lymphoma.

PURPOSE: The clinical efficacy of anti-CD20 radioimmunotherapy (RIT) is due to a combination of extracellular mechanisms involving immune-mediated cytotoxicity, and intracellular mechanisms related to inhibition of CD20 signaling and DNA damage from ionizing radiation. In 2002, the first RIT was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with indolent B-cell follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The 2 approved agents, 90 Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan (90Y-IT, Zevalin, Acrotech Biopharma) and 131 I-tositumomab (131-IT, Bexxar, GlaxoSmithKline) both target CD20. The aim of this study was to review the clinical applications and supporting clinical trial data of anti-CD20 RIT for lymphoma. METHODS: A review of published articles and abstracts on the clinical efficacy and safety of 90Y-IT and iodine I 131 tositumomab was performed. RESULTS: The clinical efficacy and safety of anti-CD20 RIT have been demonstrated in numerous clinical trials and case series. Agents have produced significant responses in patients with follicular NHLs and in off-label applications. Importantly, RIT has demonstrated promising findings in high-risk lymphomas and heavily pretreated and refractory patient populations. Associated toxicity profiles are noted as tolerable, acceptable, and most often reversible. CONCLUSIONS: In the 2 decades since its approval, anti-CD20 RIT continues to demonstrate efficacy, particularly with a proportion of patients maintaining long-term remissions. The combination of prolonged efficacy, tolerability, and treatment convenience makes RIT a reasonable alternative to other systemic therapies. It is recommended that further research on RIT should focus on biomarkers of long-term response, pretargeting, and sequencing of RIT in the treatment course.

Mitigating time toxicity in lymphoma and multiple myeloma.

The concept of time toxicity in oncology refers to the presence of frequent healthcare-related interactions that can interfere with patient well-being. In this review, we examine several manifestations of time toxicity in non-Hodgkin lymphoma and multiple myeloma and discuss their impact on decision-making with patients. For example, time toxicity may influence the choice of chemoimmunotherapy versus lenalidomide-rituximab in follicular lymphoma. In myeloma, it may inform the optimal dosing schedule for proteasome inhibitors and bisphosphonates. In both malignancies, varying time toxicity profiles are a key distinction between chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies and bispecific antibodies. We outline the challenges with measuring time toxicity as a trial endpoint but discuss its importance as a consideration for patient care, both in standard-of-care settings and in clinical trials. Throughout the review, we highlight strategies to lower the time toxicity of therapies in lymphoma and myeloma without compromising their efficacy or patient safety.

Assessment for 11q and other chromosomal aberrations in large B-cell/high-grade B cell lymphomas of germinal center phenotype lacking BCL2 expression.

The WHO classifications of hematolymphoid malignancies have recognized several distinct entities within the large B cell lymphomas, including the more recently described high-grade B cell lymphoma with 11q aberration (HGBCL-11q). We utilized genomic array to assess for chromosome 11q abnormalities in a broad set of aggressive B cell lymphomas from 27 patients with a focus on younger adults. The findings suggest more frequent alterations of 11q in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL)/HGBCL-GC BCL2-, in comparison to cases of Burkitt lymphoma (BL) or DLBCL-GC BCL2+, and confirm a low genomic complexity score of BL. Variability identified in patterns of 11q alterations suggests genomic array studies may afford value over FISH testing as we continue to understand HGBCL-11q as a distinct entity, and interrogate cases of DLBCL/HGBCL-GC BCL2-.

Optimizing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma: The Impact of Intensive Chemomobilization.

Most transplant-eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients undergo autologous peripheral blood stem cell collection (PBSC) using G-CSF with on-demand plerixafor (G ± P). Chemomobilization (CM) can be used as a salvage regimen after G ± P failure or for debulking residual tumor burden ahead of autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Prior studies utilizing cyclophosphamide-based CM have not shown long-term benefits. At our center, intensive CM (ICM) using a PACE- or HyperCVAD-based regimen has been used to mitigate "excessive" residual disease based on plasma cell (PC) burden or MM-related biomarkers. Given the lack of efficacy of non-ICM, we sought to determine the impact of ICM on event-free survival (EFS), defined as death, progressive disease, or unplanned treatment escalation. We performed a retrospective study of newly diagnosed MM patients who collected autologous PBSCs with the intent to proceed immediately to ASCT at our center between 7/2020 and 2/2023. Patients were excluded if they underwent a tandem autologous or sequential autologous-allogeneic transplant, had primary PC leukemia, received non-ICM treatment (i.e., cyclophosphamide and/or etoposide), or had previously failed G ± P mobilization. To appropriately evaluate the impact of ICM among those who potentially could have received it, we utilized a propensity score matching (PSM) approach whereby ICM patients were compared to a cohort of non-CM patients matched on pre-ASCT factors most strongly associated with the receipt of ICM. Of 451 patients identified, 61 (13.5%) received ICM (PACE-based, n = 45; hyper-CVAD-based, n = 16). Post-ICM/pre-ASCT, 11 patients (18%) required admission for neutropenic fever and/or infection. Among 51 evaluable patients, the overall response rate was 31%; however, 46 of 55 evaluable patients (84%) saw a reduction in M-spike and/or involved free light chains. Among those evaluated with longitudinal peripheral blood flow cytometry (n = 8), 5 patients (63%) cleared circulating blood PCs post-ICM. Compared to patients mobilized with non-CM, ICM patients collected a slightly greater median number of CD34+ cells (10.8 versus 10.2 × 106/kg, P = .018). The median follow-up was 30.6 months post-ASCT. In a PSM multivariable analysis, ICM was associated with significantly improved EFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.30, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.67, P = .003), but not improved OS (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.10 to 1.44, P = .2). ICM was associated with longer post-ASCT inpatient duration (+4.1 days, 95% CI, 2.4 to 5.8, P < .001), more febrile days (+0.96 days, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.4, P < .001), impaired platelet engraftment (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.87, P = .031), more bacteremia (OR 3.41, 95% CI 1.20 to 9.31, P = .018), and increased antibiotic usage (cefepime: +2.3 doses, 95% CI 0.39 to 4.1, P = .018; vancomycin: +1.0 doses, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.8, P = .012). ICM was independently associated with improved EFS in a matched analysis involving MM patients with excessive disease burden at pre-ASCT workup. This benefit came at the cost of longer inpatient duration, more febrile days, greater incidence of bacteremia, and increased antibiotic usage in the immediate post-ASCT setting. Our findings suggest that ICM could be considered for a subset of MM patients, but its use must be weighed carefully against additional toxicity.

Autologous transplant vs. CAR-T therapy in patients with DLBCL treated while in complete remission.

In patients with relapsed DLBCL in complete remission (CR), autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) and CAR-T therapy are both effective, but it is unknown which modality provides superior outcomes. We compared the efficacy of auto-HCT vs. CAR-T in patients with DLBCL in a CR. A retrospective observational study comparing auto-HCT (2015-2021) vs. CAR-T (2018-2021) using the Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research registry. Median follow-up was 49.7 months for the auto-HCT and 24.7 months for the CAR-T cohort. Patients ages 18 and 75 with a diagnosis of DLBCL were included if they received auto-HCT (n = 281) or commercial CAR-T (n = 79) while in a CR. Patients undergoing auto-HCT with only one prior therapy line and CAR-T patients with a previous history of auto-HCT treatment were excluded. Endpoints included Progression-free survival (PFS), relapse rate, non-relapse mortality (NRM) and overall survival (OS). In univariate analysis, treatment with auto-HCT was associated with a higher rate of 2-year PFS (66.2% vs. 47.8%; p < 0.001), a lower 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (27.8% vs. 48% ; p < 0.001), and a superior 2-year OS (78.9% vs. 65.6%; p = 0.037). In patients with early (within 12 months) treatment failure, auto-HCT was associated with a superior 2-year PFS (70.9% vs. 48.3% ; p < 0.001), lower 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (22.8% vs. 45.9% ; p < 0.001) and trend for higher 2-year OS (82.4% vs. 66.1% ; p = 0.076). In the multivariable analysis, treatment with auto-HCT was associated with a superior PFS (hazard ratio 1.83; p = 0.0011) and lower incidence of relapse (hazard ratio 2.18; p < 0.0001) compared to CAR-T. In patients with relapsed LBCL who achieve a CR, treatment with auto-HCT is associated with improved clinical outcomes compared to CAR-T. These data support the consideration of auto-HCT in select patients with LBCL achieving a CR in the relapsed setting.