Addressing Misinformation About the Canadian Breast Screening Guidelines.

Screening mammography has been shown to reduce breast cancer mortality by 41% in screened women ages 40-69 years. There is misinformation about breast screening and the Canadian breast screening guidelines. This can decrease confidence in screening mammography and can lead to suboptimal recommendations. We review some of this misinformation to help radiologists and referring physicians navigate the varied international and provincial guidelines. We address the ages to start and stop breast screening. We explore how these recommendations may vary for specific populations such as patients who are at increased risk, transgender patients and minorities. We identify who would benefit from supplemental screening and review the available supplemental screening modalities including ultrasound, MRI, contrast-enhanced mammography and others. We describe emerging technologies including the potential use of artificial intelligence for breast screening. We provide background on why screening policies vary across the country between provinces and territories. This review is intended to help radiologists and referring physicians understand and navigate the varied international and provincial recommendations and guidelines and make the best recommendations for their patients.

COVID-19: Safe Guidelines for Breast Imaging During the Pandemic.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, breast imaging must be performed using safe practices. Balancing the need to avoid delays in the diagnosis of breast cancer while avoiding infection requires careful attention to personal protective equipment and physical distancing and vigilance to maintain these practices. The Canadian Society of Breast Imaging/Canadian Association of Radiologists guideline for breast imaging during COVID-19 is provided based on priority according to risk of breast cancer and impact of delaying treatment. A review of the best practices is presented that allow breast imaging during COVID-19 to maximize protection of patients, technologists, residents, fellows, and radiologists and minimize spread of the infection. The collateral damage of delaying diagnosis of breast cancer due to COVID-19 should be avoided when possible.

Post-Vacuum-Assisted Stereotactic Core Biopsy Clip Displacement: A Comparison Between Commercially Available Clips and Surgical Clip.

PURPOSE: The placement of localization clips following percutaneous biopsy is a standard practice for a variety of situations. Subsequent clip displacement creates challenges for imaging surveillance and surgical planning, and may cause confusion amongst radiologists and between surgeons and radiologists. Many causes have been attributed for this phenomenon including the commonly accepted "accordion effect." Herein, we investigate the performance of a low cost surgical clip system against 4 commercially available clips. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 2112 patients who underwent stereotactic vacuum-assisted core biopsy followed by clip placement between January 2013 and June 2016. The primary performance parameter compared was displacement >10 mm following vacuum-assisted stereotactic core biopsy. Within the group of clips that had displaced, the magnitude of displacement was compared. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in displacement among the clip types (P < .0001) with significant pairwise comparisons between pediatric surgical clips and SecureMark (38% vs 28%; P = .001) and SenoMark (38% vs 27%; P = .0001) in the proportion displaced. The surgical clips showed a significant magnitude of displacement of approximately 25% greater average distance displaced. CONCLUSIONS: As a whole, the commercial clips performed better than the surgical clip after stereotactic vacuum-assisted core biopsy suggesting the surrounding outer component acts to anchor the central clip and minimizes clip displacement. The same should apply to tomosynthesis-guided biopsy.

Canadian Radiologists Do Not Support Screening Mammography Guidelines of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.

PURPOSE: The study sought to determine screening mammography recommendations that radiologists in Canada promote to average-risk patients and family or friends, and do or would do for themselves. METHODS: An online survey was delivered from February 19, 2014, to July 11, 2014. Data included radiologists' recommendations for mammography and their personal screening habits based on gender. The 3 radiologists' cohorts were women ≥40 years of age, women <40 years of age, and men. The distribution of responses for each question was summarized, and proportions for the entire group and individual cohorts were computed. RESULTS: Of 402 surveys collected, 97% (299 of 309) radiologists recommended screening every 1-2 years, 62% (192 of 309) starting ≥40 years of age and 2% (5 of 309) recommended screening every 2-3 years for women 50-74 years of age. Recommendations were similar for family and friends: 96% (294 of 305) recommended screening every 1-2 years, 66% (202 of 305) recommended screening every 1-2 years for women ≥40 years of age, and 2% (5 of 305) recommended screening every 2-3 years. For women radiologists ≥40 years of age, 76% (48 of 63) underwent screening every 1-2 years and started at 40 years of age, 76% (16 of 21) female radiologists <40 years of age would undergo screening ≥40 years of age, 100% every 1-2 years, and 90% (151 of 167) male radiologists would undergo screening every 1-2 years, with 71% (120 of 169) beginning at 40 years of age. CONCLUSION: The majority of Canadian radiologists recommend screening mammography every 1-2 years for average-risk women ≥40 years of age, whether they are patients or family and friends.

"Do unto others as you would have them do unto you": breast imagers' perspectives regarding screening mammography for others and for themselves--do they practice what they preach?

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine the screening recommendations that breast radiologists promote to average-risk patients and family or friends and do or would follow for themselves. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey of breast radiologists in the United States collected data regarding their personal and practice backgrounds, their recommendations to others for mammography and clinical and self-breast examination, and their personal screening habits based on respondent sex. The radiologists were divided into three cohorts: women 40 years old or older (group 1), women younger than 40 years (group 2), and men (group 3). The distribution of responses for each question was summarized, and proportions of total radiologists and cohorts were computed. RESULTS: Four hundred eighty-seven surveys were collected. None of the radiologists recommended biennial mammography for patients ages 50-74 years, 98% (477/487) recommended yearly mammography for patients 40 years old and older, and 99% (470/476) recommended yearly mammography for family and friends 40 years old and older. The most common reasons for variance were institutional policy or provider preferences. In group 1, 96% (191/198) have yearly mammography. In group 2, 100% (83/83) have or will have yearly mammography at age 40 years and beyond. In group 3, 97% (171/176) would have yearly mammography at age 40 years and beyond if they were women. Overall, 97% (445/457) of radiologists have or would have yearly mammography at age 40 years and beyond. CONCLUSION: Nearly all (98%) of the radiologists recommend yearly mammography for average-risk women 40 years old and older and were consistent in that they "practice what they preach." Because radiologists diagnose all stages of breast cancer, their personal convictions should influence providers, patients, and the public when considering the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force screening guidelines.

Fasting insulin and endogenous hormones in relation to premenopausal breast density (Canada).

PURPOSE: Mammographic breast density (BD) is associated with increased risk of breast cancer. This study asks which circulating metabolic and reproductive biomarkers are associated with BD, particularly dense breast area, in premenopausal women not taking exogenous hormones. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, 299 premenopausal women aged 40-49 completed questionnaires, provided a fasting blood sample, had height, weight, percentage body fat, waist and hip measurements taken, and attended a screening mammogram. Multivariate linear regression was used to calculate adjusted means for percentage BD, absolute dense and non-dense area, across categories of covariates, adjusted for day of menstrual cycle, age, parity, body mass index, percentage body fat, and ethnicity. RESULTS: Fasting insulin levels were inversely associated, and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 1 levels directly associated with percentage BD, but lost statistical significance after multivariate adjustment. Sex hormone-binding globulin levels were directly associated with percentage BD, still significant after multivariate adjustment (p = 0.03). A significant inverse dose-response association was observed between progesterone levels and dense area (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Breast density in premenopausal women seems unrelated or inversely related to insulin resistance, levels of insulin-like growth factor 1 and its binding proteins, and levels of sex steroids; therefore, the mechanism by which radiodensity on a mammogram is related to breast cancer risk remains unclear.

Flat ductal intraepithelial neoplasia 1A diagnosed at stereotactic core needle biopsy: is excisional biopsy indicated?

OBJECTIVE: This study correlates ductal intraepithelial neoplasia (DIN) 1A diagnosed at stereotactic spring core needle biopsy (CNB) or vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) with the subsequent surgical histologic results or long-term follow-up imaging findings to predict the likelihood of upgrade to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Stereotactic imaging-guided CNBs and VABs were performed principally for assessment of microcalcifications seen on mammography. DIN 1A diagnoses made at CNB or VAB were correlated with subsequent excisional biopsy results or imaging follow-up. Patients were included only if there was no concomitant CNB or VAB diagnosis of DIN 1B, atypical lobular hyperplasia, lobular carcinoma in situ or DCIS, papillary lesion, or invasive carcinoma. Surgical biopsy results were obtained for 239 patients. Upgrade was defined as a diagnosis of DCIS or invasive carcinoma at surgery. Patients who did not undergo surgical excision were followed with imaging. RESULTS: An upgrade rate of 4.2% (10 lesions in 239 patients) is reported. The remaining samples (229/239) had a surgical diagnosis of DIN 1A or DIN 1B, lobular carcinoma in situ, or a benign finding with no atypia. CONCLUSION: The upgrade rate of DIN 1A diagnosed at CNB or VAB was 4.2%. These results indicate it may be reasonable to avert immediate surgery in favor of short-term imaging follow-up.

Hypertension education and screening in African American churches.

A major disparity among African Americans is undiagnosed and uncontrolled hypertension. This exploratory study examined hypertension education and screening activities of 45 African American churches. A cross-sectional telephone survey was used to interview church representatives with knowledge of their church's health activities. Most churches (87%) offered at least 1 activity and 40% offered all 4 (i.e., screenings, materials, talks, health-fairs) within 2 years of the interview. Larger churches and those with an active health ministry offered more activities. More information about resources, program ideas, and collaborators was desired. Research is needed to examine factors that act as barriers and facilitators to implementing church based programs and to examine the effectiveness of these programs in reducing hypertension.

Sustaining success for Black nursing students.

Of the estimated 5.2 million nurses across the United States of America, only 6 % identify as Black or African American. Increasing the number of Black Registered Nurses (RNs) can benefit society by improving the well-documented healthcare disparities. Black students continue to report negative experiences in nursing school that contribute to difficulty in nursing education programs. Nursing programs struggle to adequately support Black students so that they are successful in their quest to become RNs. Often when students are unsuccessful, faculty focus attention on the student's failed strategies, as opposed to examining possible programmatic and faculty failures. The purposes of this article are to describe challenges Black students may face and to present practical strategies focused on the programmatic and faculty improvements that are needed to foster success. Strategies such as using root cause analyses, use of academic care coordinators, academic success teams, and intentional faculty development can be used to facilitate success for Black nursing students. Addressing programmatic and faculty issues may improve Black students' success in nursing programs.

The Impact of Dense Breasts on the Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis: A Review and Options for Supplemental Screening.

The purpose of breast cancer screening is to find cancers early to reduce mortality and to allow successful treatment with less aggressive therapy. Mammography is the gold standard for breast cancer screening. Its efficacy in reducing mortality from breast cancer was proven in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted from the early 1960s to the mid 1990s. Panels that recommend breast cancer screening guidelines have traditionally relied on the old RCTs, which did not include considerations of breast density, race/ethnicity, current hormone therapy, and other risk factors. Women do not all benefit equally from mammography. Mortality reduction is significantly lower in women with dense breasts because normal dense tissue can mask cancers on mammograms. Moreover, women with dense breasts are known to be at increased risk. To provide equity, breast cancer screening guidelines should be created with the goal of maximizing mortality reduction and allowing less aggressive therapy, which may include decreasing the interval between screening mammograms and recommending consideration of supplemental screening for women with dense breasts. This review will address the issue of dense breasts and the impact on the stage of breast cancer at the time of diagnosis, and discuss options for supplemental screening.

Breast Cancer Detection Using Multimodal Time Series Features From Ultrasound Shear Wave Absolute Vibro-Elastography.

In shear wave absolute vibro-elastography (S-WAVE), a steady-state multi-frequency external mechanical excitation is applied to tissue, while a time-series of ultrasound radio-frequency (RF) data are acquired. Our objective is to determine the potential of S-WAVE to classify breast tissue lesions as malignant or benign. We present a new processing pipeline for feature-based classification of breast cancer using S-WAVE data, and we evaluate it on a new data set collected from 40 patients. Novel bi-spectral and Wigner spectrum features are computed directly from the RF time series and are combined with textural and spectral features from B-mode and elasticity images. The Random Forest permutation importance ranking and the Quadratic Mutual Information methods are used to reduce the number of features from 377 to 20. Support Vector Machines and Random Forest classifiers are used with leave-one-patient-out and Monte Carlo cross-validations. Classification results obtained for different feature sets are presented. Our best results (95% confidence interval, Area Under Curve = 95%±1.45%, sensitivity = 95%, and specificity = 93%) outperform the state-of-the-art reported S-WAVE breast cancer classification performance. The effect of feature selection and the sensitivity of the above classification results to changes in breast lesion contours is also studied. We demonstrate that time-series analysis of externally vibrated tissue as an elastography technique, even if the elasticity is not explicitly computed, has promise and should be pursued with larger patient datasets. Our study proposes novel directions in the field of elasticity imaging for tissue classification.

The randomized trial of mammography screening that was not-A cautionary tale.

Two randomized trials were conducted in Canada in the 1980s to test the efficacy of breast cancer screening. Neither of the trials demonstrated benefit. Concerns were raised regarding serious errors in trial design and conduct. Here we describe the conditions that could allow subversion of randomization to occur and the inclusion of many symptomatic women in a screening trial. We examine anomalies in data where the balance would be expected between trial arms. "Open book" randomization and performance of clinical breast examination on all women before allocation to a trial arm allowed women with palpable findings to be mis-randomized into the mammography arm. Multiple indicators raising suspicion of subversion are present including a large excess in poor-prognosis cancers in the mammography trial arm at prevalence screen. Personnel described shifting of women from the control group into the mammography group. There is compelling evidence of subversion of randomization in Canadian National Breast Screening Study. Mis-randomization of even a few women with advanced breast cancer could markedly affect measured screening efficacy. The Canadian National Breast Screening Study trials should not influence breast screening policies.

Errors in Conduct of the CNBSS Trials of Breast Cancer Screening Observed by Research Personnel.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate why the Canadian National Breast Screening Study (CNBSS) did not show mortality reduction with mammography. This study explored long-standing concerns related to the validity of the randomization process, methods of recruiting women to participate in the trials, and training of the staff working in the CNBSS. METHODS: Surviving former CNBSS personnel, whose roles involved direct recruitment, enrollment, randomization, clinical examination, image interpretation, and management of patients in the CNBSS were interviewed. Individuals were contacted and consented to provide firsthand accounts of daily operations and adherence to research protocols via standardized questions. Consistency of observational data with quantitative results from the CNBSS trials was evaluated. RESULTS: Eleven of 28 (39.3%) staff confirmed that women with preexisting symptoms of breast cancer were systematically recruited at some centers; 57.1% (16/28) confirmed that personnel performing screening in CNBSS had very limited training and experience; 39.3% (11/28) verified that imaging equipment was often substandard; 50% (14/28) indicated that mammography image quality was generally poor; and 28.6% (8/28) corroborated that in some cases surgeons were unwilling to perform biopsies or surgeries for women with suspicious abnormalities found only on screening mammography that lacked a palpable correlate. CONCLUSION: These firsthand accounts provide new information confirming that the CNBSS did not consistently and rigorously assess the true efficacy of screening mammography. The staff accounts clarify reasons why the CNBSS results were outliers compared with the six other randomized trials of screening mammography and should not be used as credible scientific evidence to inform health policy.