RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence of blood pressure (BP) screening according to the 2017 American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) guidelines and differences according to social vulnerability indicators. STUDY DESIGN: We extracted electronic health record data from January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2018, from the largest healthcare system in Central Massachusetts. Outpatient visits for children aged 3-17 years without a prior hypertension diagnosis were included. Adherence was defined by the American Academy of Pediatrics guideline (≥1 BP screening for children with a body mass index [BMI] of <95th percentile) and at every encounter for children with a BMI of ≥95th percentile). Independent variables included social vulnerability indicators at the patient level (insurance type, language, Child Opportunity Index, race/ethnicity) and clinic level (location, Medicaid population). Covariates included child's age, sex, and BMI status, and clinic specialty, patient panel size, and number of healthcare providers. We used direct estimation to calculate prevalence estimates and multivariable mixed effects logistic regression to determine the odds of receiving guideline-adherent BP screening. RESULTS: Our sample comprised 19â695 children (median age, 11 years; 48% female) from 7 pediatric and 20 family medicine clinics. The prevalence of guideline-adherent BP screening was 89%. In our adjusted model, children with a BMI of ≥95th percentile, with public insurance, and who were patients at clinics with larger Medicaid populations and larger patient panels had a lower odds of receiving guideline-adherent BP screening. CONCLUSIONS: Despite overall high adherence to BP screening guidelines, patient- and clinic-level disparities were identified.
Assuntos
Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Hipertensão , Criança , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Pressão Sanguínea , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Massachusetts/epidemiologia , Atenção à Saúde , Disparidades em Assistência à SaúdeRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Integrating equity considerations into bicycle infrastructure, planning, and programming is essential to increase bicycling and reduce physical inactivity-related health disparities. However, little is known about communities' experiences with activities that promote equity considerations in bicycle infrastructure, planning, and programming or about barriers and facilitators to such considerations. The objective of this project was to gain in-depth understanding of the experiences, barriers, and facilitators that communities encounter with integrating equity considerations into bicycle infrastructure, planning, and programming. METHODS: We administered a web-based survey in 2022 to assess communities' experiences with 31 equity-focused activities in 3 areas: 1) community engagement, education, events, and programming (community engagement); 2) data collection, evaluation, and goal setting (data); and 3) infrastructure, facilities, and physical amenities (infrastructure). Respondents were people who represented communities in the US that participated in the League of American Bicyclists' Bicycle Friendly Community (BFC) Program. We then conducted 6 focus groups with a subset of survey respondents to explore barriers and facilitators to implementing equity-focused activities. RESULTS: Survey respondents (N = 194) had experience with a mean (SD) of 5.9 (5.7) equity-focused activities. Focus group participants (N = 30) identified themes related to community engagement (outreach to and engagement of underrepresented communities, cultural perceptions of bicycling, and funding and support for community rides and programs); data (locally relevant data); and infrastructure (political will, community design, and infrastructure). They described barriers and facilitators for each. CONCLUSION: Communities are challenged with integrating equity into bicycle infrastructure, planning, and programming. Multicomponent strategies with support from entities such as the BFC program will be required to make progress.
Assuntos
Ciclismo , Humanos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Grupos FocaisRESUMO
Despite the availability of COVID-19 vaccines for youth since 2021, vaccine hesitancy has resulted in suboptimal uptake. Public health campaigns that empower local youth ambassadors as trusted messengers who share their personal narratives related to getting vaccinated hold promise for promoting COVID-19 vaccination. We used a seven-step approach to develop, implement, and evaluate a youth-led ambassador campaign to promote COVID-19 vaccine uptake in communities experiencing COVID-19 disparities in Worcester, MA. The seven steps included (1) engaging with key partners; (2) determining a community of focus; (3) identifying trusted sources; (4) determining campaign components; (5) training the vaccine ambassadors; (6) disseminating the campaign; and (7) evaluating the campaign. We trained nine youth as vaccine ambassadors. Ambassadors were guided through self-reflection of motivations for COVID-19 vaccination and the resulting personal narratives became the campaign messaging. English/Spanish vaccine messages developed by youth ambassadors were disseminated through social media platforms (n = 3), radio (n = 2), local TV (n = 2), flyers (n = 2,086), posters (n = 386), billboards (n = 10), and local bus ads (n = 40). Qualitative youth feedback indicate participation in the campaign was a positive and empowering experience which reinforces the importance of engaging youth in public health messaging. Youth empowerment through personal narratives (and storytelling) holds promise for future public health campaigns.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To identify frequency and correlates of hypertension in a low income, ethnically diverse, sample of children as well as to assess parental awareness of hypertension. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included parent-child dyads (n = 228), from which physical measurements of the child, and parent reported survey measures were collected. Child's blood pressure percentile was determined via 2017 American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) clinical practice guidelines and categorized as normal (< 90th percentile), elevated (≥ 90th percentile to < 95th percentile), or hypertensive (≥ 95th percentile). Bivariate multinomial logistic regression models assessed the relative risk ratio for potential correlates of blood pressure categorization and frequency distribution of parental awareness of blood pressure status was examined. RESULTS: Median child age was 8.1 years (IQR 6.5-9.9). Half were female, 61.8% were Latino and 15.8% were Non-Latino Black. Median body mass index (BMI) percentile was 83.6 (IQR 58.4-97.1) and 31.6% exceeded the 95th percentile. AAP criteria for hypertension and elevated blood pressure were met by 30.7% and 14.3% of children respectively. After full adjustment, the relative risk of categorization as hypertensive versus normal increased by a factor of 1.16 (95% CI 1.02-1.3) per 10-unit increase in BMI percentile, and 0.86 (95% CI 0.74-1.0) per one-year increase in age. Less than five parents (redacted due to low sample size) reported their child having a history of high blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: In this low income, racially/ethnically diverse sample, we observed levels of hypertension and elevated blood pressure considerably higher than national estimates. However, in contrast, extremely low parental awareness was observed.
Assuntos
Hipertensão , Obesidade , Criança , Humanos , Feminino , Estados Unidos , Masculino , Prevalência , Estudos Transversais , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , PaisRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) updated its blood pressure (BP) screening guidelines in 2017 to emphasize body weight as a risk factor. We provide contemporary, nationally representative estimates of prevalence of elevated and hypertensive BP among US children and examine sociodemographic prevalence differences, accounting for the influence of weight. METHODS: We used cross-sectional data from children aged 8 to 17 years (N = 5,971; weighted N = 36,612,323) collected from 2011 through 2018 in 4 biennial cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Children's BP was categorized as normal, elevated, or hypertensive. Sociodemographic characteristics included were sex, age, race/ethnicity, family income, and education. Log binomial regression, with and without adjustment for weight (dichotomized at the 85th body mass index percentile), determined prevalence estimates and differences for elevated and hypertensive BPs with 95% CIs. RESULTS: In NHANES data collected from 2011 through 2018, 7.2% (95% CI, 6.3%-8.3%) of US children had elevated BP, and 3.8% (95% CI, 3.3%-4.5%) had hypertensive BP according to 2017 AAP guidelines. Differences in prevalence of weight-adjusted elevated BP indicated higher prevalence among children aged 16 to 17 years compared with children aged 8 to 9 years (prevalence difference, +6.3%; 95% CI, 3.2%-9.4%), among males compared with females (+4.6%; 95% CI, 2.7%-6.4%), and among non-Latino Black children compared with non-Latino White children (+4.0%; 95% CI, 2.2%-5.8%). Crude hypertensive BP prevalence was highest among children aged 8 to 9 years, male children, and Mexican American children. The only difference remaining after weight adjustment was among children aged 8 to 9 years and 13 to 15 years. CONCLUSION: Elevated BP was most prevalent among US children who were older, male, or non-Latino Black. Factors beyond inequalities in body weight may contribute to disparities in elevated BP.
Assuntos
Hipertensão , Pressão Sanguínea , Índice de Massa Corporal , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Masculino , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Prevalência , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Clinicians currently do not reliably adhere to antibiotic treatment guidelines, resulting in unnecessary patient exposure to broad-spectrum antimicrobials. Our objective is to determine whether a treatment intervention for the management of nonpurulent skin and soft tissue infections increases clinician adherence and improves patient outcomes. METHODS: Between January 1 and December 31, 2017, patients presenting to 2 emergency departments (EDs) and who had received a diagnosis of a nonpurulent skin and soft tissue infection were enrolled and assigned to a pre- or postintervention cohort with a treatment intervention implemented on June 1. Primary outcomes were percentage of ED providers following the guidelines and percentage of patients admitted to the hospital. Secondary outcomes were patient self-reported treatment failure and hospital readmission. RESULTS: There were 1,360 patients, 665 in the preintervention and 695 in the postintervention cohorts. After algorithm implementation, guideline adherence increased (43.0% versus 55.1%; P<.001) and number of patients admitted to the hospital declined (36.5% versus 12.0%; P<.001). In addition, patients reported fewer treatment failures (26.8% versus 16.5%; P=.02) and fewer readmissions (22.3% versus 12.7%; P=.013). After multivariate adjustment, guideline adherence increased by 22% (adjusted relative risk [RR] 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10 to 1.37), whereas hospital admissions were reduced by 26% (adjusted RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.87). In addition, the risks of treatment failure and readmission were reduced by 46% (adjusted RR 0.64; 95% CI 0.43 to 0.97) and 45% (adjusted RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.87), respectively. CONCLUSION: Among patients with a nonpurulent skin and soft tissue infection, implementing an easy-to-follow treatment algorithm can reduce unnecessary antibiotic exposure by increasing clinician guideline adherence while reducing patient treatment failure rates.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana/efeitos dos fármacos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Prescrição Inadequada/prevenção & controle , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Algoritmos , Feminino , Humanos , Prescrição Inadequada/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estudos Prospectivos , Infecções dos Tecidos Moles/microbiologia , Falha de TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To describe adherence to the American Academy of Pediatrics' (AAP) 2017 clinical practice guidelines for follow-up after high blood pressure (BP) screening by pediatric and family medicine providers in a Massachusetts health care system and to assess differences in receipt of follow-up according to child- and clinic-level factors. METHODS: Electronic health record data were analyzed for children aged 3 to 17years who had an outpatient primary care visit during 2018 with a high BP screening (according to AAP guidelines). We classified AAP guideline adherent follow-up as BP follow-up within 6months after an elevated finding (+2-week buffer) and within 2weeks after a hypertensive finding (+2-week buffer). Differences in receipt of guideline adherent follow-up by child- and clinic-level factors were assessed via multilevel mixed effects logistic regression models. RESULTS: The median age of the 4563 included children was 12years and 43% were female. Overall, guideline adherent follow-up was received by 17.7% of children within the recommended time interval; 27.4% for those whose index BP was elevated and 5.4% for those whose index BP was hypertensive. Modeling revealed older children and those belonging to clinics with more providers, smaller patient panels, and smaller proportion of Medicaid patients were more likely to receive adherent follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Few children received guideline adherent BP follow-up and most differences in adherence were related to clinic resources. System-level interventions are needed to improve BP follow-up.
Assuntos
Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Hipertensão , Criança , Humanos , Feminino , Estados Unidos , Adolescente , Masculino , Seguimentos , Hipertensão/terapia , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Massachusetts , Atenção à SaúdeRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Innovative strategies are needed to improve pediatric COVID-19 vaccination rates. We describe the process for developing a clinic-based intervention, CONFIDENCE, to improve pediatric COVID-19 vaccine uptake and present results of our beta-test for feasibility and acceptability. METHOD: CONFIDENCE included communication training with providers, a poster campaign, and parent-facing educational materials. We assessed feasibility and acceptability through interviews and measured preliminary vaccine intention outcomes with a pre-post parent survey. Interviews were analyzed using rapid qualitative methods. We generated descriptive statistics for variables on the parent survey and used Fisher's exact test to assess pre-post differences. RESULTS: Participating providers (n = 4) reported high levels of feasibility and acceptability. We observed positive trends in parents' (n = 69) reports of discussing vaccination with their provider and the parental decision to accept COVID-19 vaccination. DISCUSSION: Our next steps will be to use more rigorous methods to establish the efficacy and effectiveness of the CONFIDENCE intervention.
Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Humanos , Criança , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Pais/educação , Inquéritos e Questionários , VacinaçãoRESUMO
We explored patterns of COVID-19 vaccination across pediatric visit types using electronic health record data from 7/1/2021 through 7/25/2022 in a pediatric safety-net clinic. We generated frequencies and descriptive statistics for patient demographic and vaccine administration variables. Analyses were stratified into age subgroups of 5-to-11-year-olds and 12- to-17-year-olds. 1,409 children received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine and 2,197 doses were administered in this first year of vaccine delivery. Most vaccines given were first doses in the series (45%), followed by second doses (38%), and then booster doses (17%). First doses tended to be given at well-child (42%) or nurse visits (48%), while second doses were almost entirely given at nurse visits (87%) and booster doses at well-child visits (58%). Efforts to optimize COVID-19 vaccination could leverage clinic workflow systems to provide reminder prompts for vaccination for scheduling future doses and identify strategies to facilitate vaccination at non-well child visits, particularly for booster doses.
RESUMO
Adolescence is a critical period for establishing habits and engaging in health behaviors to prevent future cancers. Rural areas tend to have higher rates of cancer-related morbidity and mortality as well as higher rates of cancer-risk factors among adolescents. Rural primary care clinicians are well-positioned to address these risk factors. Our goal was to identify existing literature on adolescent cancer prevention in rural primary care and to classify key barriers and facilitators to implementing interventions in such settings. We searched the following databases: Ovid MEDLINE®; Ovid APA PsycInfo; Cochrane Library; CINAHL; and Scopus. Studies were included if they reported on provider and/or clinic-level interventions in rural primary care clinics addressing one of these four behaviors (obesity, tobacco, sun exposure, HPV vaccination) among adolescent populations. We identified 3,403 unique studies and 24 met inclusion criteria for this review. 16 addressed obesity, 6 addressed HPV vaccination, 1 addressed skin cancer, and 1 addressed multiple behaviors including obesity and tobacco use. 10 studies were either non-randomized experimental designs (n = 8) or randomized controlled trials (n = 2). The remaining were observational or descriptive research. We found a dearth of studies addressing implementation of adolescent cancer prevention interventions in rural primary care settings. Priorities to address this should include further research and increased funding to support EBI adaptation and implementation in rural clinics to reduce urban-rural cancer inequities.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Skin and soft tissue abscesses are commonly treated in emergency departments (ED). The use of bedside ultrasound may improve patient outcomes. The primary objective of this study was to examine the relationship between ultrasound use and risk of treatment failure in ED patients treated for abscesses. METHODS: In this multi-center observational study, we reviewed medical records of adult patients evaluated for abscesses. Demographics, infection characteristics, treatments rendered, use of ultrasound (for diagnosis and/or treatment) and follow-up data were collected from electronic medical record review. Treatment failure, the primary outcome, was defined as any surgical intervention after the initial ED visit. Multivariable logistic regression tested whether incision and drainage utilizing ultrasound was associated with reduced treatment failure. RESULTS: We identified 609 patients diagnosed with abscesses over a 22-month period. Of them 75% were treated with incision and drainage, 55% had an ultrasound and 15% failed treatment. Multi-variable analysis demonstrated an 8% probability of failure with ultrasound plus incision and drainage, 14% with blind incision and drainage and 25% without incision and drainage. Individuals with incision and drainage performed were 50% less likely to fail treatment (RR 0.53, 95%CI 0.35-0.81) and 70% less likely to fail treatment (RR 0.30, 95%CI 0.18-0.51) with ultrasound and incision and drainage. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ultrasound in diagnosing and or/treating patients with abscesses in the ED is associated with decreased treatment failure risk when utilized with incision and drainage. Consideration of ultrasound use in other studies which assess treatment methods in relation to patient outcomes may be warranted.
RéSUMé : OBJECTIF: Les abcès de la peau et des tissus mous sont couramment traités dans les services d'urgence (SU). L'utilisation de l'échographie au chevet du patient peut améliorer les résultats des patients. L'objectif principal de cette étude était d'examiner la relation entre l'utilisation de l'échographie et le risque d'échec du traitement chez les patients des urgences traités pour des abcès. MéTHODES: Dans cette étude d'observation multicentrique, nous avons examiné les dossiers médicaux des patients adultes évalués pour les abcès. Les données démographiques, les caractéristiques de l'infection, les traitements rendus, l'utilisation de l'échographie (pour le diagnostic et/ou le traitement) et les données de suivi ont été recueillies à partir de l'examen des dossiers médicaux électroniques. L'échec du traitement, le critère de jugement principal, a été défini comme toute intervention chirurgicale après la visite initiale au service d'urgence. Une régression logistique multivariable a permis de vérifier si l'incision et le drainage par ultrasons étaient associés à une réduction de l'échec du traitement. RéSULTATS: Nous avons identifié 609 patients diagnostiqués avec des abcès sur une période de 22 mois. Parmi eux, 75 % ont été traités par incision et drainage, 55% ont eu une échographie et 15 % ont échoué le traitement. L'analyse multivariée a démontré une probabilité d'échec de 8 % avec échographie plus incision et drainage, 14 % avec incision et drainage aveugle et 25 % sans incision et drainage. Les personnes chez qui l'on a pratiqué une incision et un drainage avaient 50 % moins de risques d'échouer le traitement (RR 0,53, 95 % IC 0,35-0,81) et 70 % moins de risques d'échouer le traitement (RR 0,30, 95 % IC 0,18-0,51) avec l'échographie et l'incision et le drainage. CONCLUSIONS: L'utilisation de l'échographie pour le diagnostic et/ou le traitement des patients atteints d'abcès aux urgences est associée à une diminution du risque d'échec du traitement lorsqu'elle est utilisée avec l'incision et le drainage. Il peut être justifié d'envisager l'utilisation de l'échographie dans d'autres études qui évaluent les méthodes de traitement en fonction des résultats pour les patients.
Assuntos
Abscesso , Drenagem , Abscesso/diagnóstico por imagem , Abscesso/cirurgia , Adulto , Drenagem/métodos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Humanos , Falha de Tratamento , Ultrassonografia/métodosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between caregiver-perceived neighborhood safety and pediatric asthma severity using a cross-sectional, nationally representative sample. STUDY DESIGN: Using data from the 2017-2018 National Survey of Children's Health, children aged 6-17 years with primary caregiver report of a current asthma diagnosis were included (unweighted N = 3209; weighted N = 3,909,178). Perceived neighborhood safety, asthma severity (mild vs. moderate/severe), demographic, household, and health/behavioral covariate data were collected from primary caregiver report. Poisson regression with robust error variance was used to estimate the association between perceived neighborhood safety and caregiver-reported pediatric asthma severity. RESULTS: Approximately one-third of children studied had moderate/severe asthma. A total of 42% of children with mild asthma and 52% of children with moderate/severe asthma identified as Hispanic or non-Hispanic Black. Nearly 20% of children with mild asthma and 40% of children with moderate/severe asthma were from families living below the federal poverty level (FPL). Children living in neighborhoods perceived by their caregiver to be unsafe had higher prevalence of moderate/severe asthma compared to those in the safest neighborhoods (adjusted prevalence ratio: 1.34; 95% confidence interval: 1.04-1.74). This association was found to be independent of race/ethnicity, household FPL, household smoking, and child's physical activity level after adjusting for covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Children living in neighborhoods perceived by their caregiver to be unsafe have higher prevalence of moderate or severe asthma. Further investigation of geographic context and neighborhood characteristics that influence childhood asthma severity may inform public health strategies to reduce asthma burden and improve disease outcomes.
Assuntos
Asma , Saúde da Criança , Adolescente , Asma/diagnóstico , Cuidadores , Criança , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Características da Vizinhança , Características de ResidênciaRESUMO
Vaccine hesitancy is a long-standing public health issue. The present work describes parental perceptions of COVID-19 vaccination for 5- to 11-year-old children, to aid in vaccination efforts. Parents of 5- to 11-year-old children residing in Worcester, Massachusetts, were recruited through community partner outreach to participate in semi-structured focus groups. Focus groups were conducted via Zoom in English (n = 4) and Spanish (n = 3) with a total of 67 parents. Rapid qualitative analysis was used. Most participants were female and of Hispanic ethnicity. Themes included: (1) Trusted sources and influential types of information (e.g. personal COVID-19 vaccine stories from peers and healthcare providers), (2) Motivations for vaccination: health (i.e. protecting children, families, and communities from COVID-19), (3) Motivations for vaccination: social, emotional, and educational (i.e. mitigating related negative effects of COVID-19), (4) Drivers of vaccine hesitancy (e.g. frustration, uncertainty, and confusion), (5) Differentiating vaccine acceptance, hesitancy, and resistance, (6) Needed information. Although this context may be unique to parents of 5- to 11-year-old children from Central Massachusetts, especially those who may be Spanish-speaking, or of Hispanic ethnicity, this work reinforces the need for effective and persistent communication to combat vaccine hesitancy. In describing parents' perceptions toward COVID-19 vaccination in their 5- to 11-year-old children, we contextualize vaccine hesitancy and highlight opportunities for existing evidence-based communication strategies to increase vaccine confidence and uptake in pediatric populations.
Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Criança , Humanos , Feminino , Pré-Escolar , Masculino , Grupos Focais , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Pais , VacinaçãoRESUMO
We explored perspectives of clinicians in central and western Massachusetts about efforts to vaccinate pediatric patients against COVID-19 as well as best practices and challenges for vaccine delivery. We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews (n = 16) with family practice and pediatric clinicians between late October and early December 2021. Our interviews addressed: process for vaccination and vaccine promotion, parental receptivity to COVID-19 vaccination, receptivity to other pediatric vaccines, resources needed to support vaccine promotion, and best practices developed to encourage hesitant parents. Using a multi-prong recruitment strategy we invited clinicians to participate in telephone interviews, which were audio-recorded and transcribed. We used rapid qualitative analysis to produce summary templates for each interview which were ultimately combined into a matrix summary. The majority of participants (n = 10) were offering the vaccine in their own clinics, while the remainder cited challenges related to staffing, logistics, and space that prevented them from offering the vaccine. Clinicians reported parents fall into three groups: vaccine-accepting, hesitant but potentially accepting, and refusers. Strategies they identified that worked to encourage hesitant parents were sharing personal vaccine stories, acknowledging parents' fears about the vaccine, and being persistent with the most hesitant parents. Yet resources are needed including educational materials and training in how to have these conversations. While challenges related to staffing and space will be difficult to overcome for clinics to be able to offer vaccination on-site, our results highlight the importance of developing effective messaging strategies and training clinicians in how to integrate them into routine practice.
RESUMO
A disproportionate burden of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic is being shouldered by members of racial and ethnic minorities and socially disadvantaged communities. Structural and social determinants of health have been recognized as key contributors to the inequalities observed. Racism, a major structural determinant of health that patterns related social determinants of health, in the USA, warrants further investigation. In this perspective piece we provide an overview of the historical context of racism, followed by preliminary findings from the ongoing COVIDStory study-a cross-sectional study addressing perceptions of COVID-19 and COVID-19 research-that highlights the experiences of non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic identifying adult participants, residing in Worcester Massachusetts, during the COVID-19 pandemic. We then discuss these findings in the context of current and past research considering racism and relevant social determinants of health. Our study results suggest that racism and its residuals (residential segregation, economic insecurity, discrimination, bias, and vigilance) are modern challenges for non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic participants, and these findings are supported by the existing literature. It is our hope that this perspective piece provides additional evidence for action on structural and social determinants affecting the health of minoritized people, especially those living in Massachusetts.
RESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: COVID-19 is a major concern for the health and wellbeing of individuals worldwide. As COVID-19 cases and deaths continue to increase in the USA, aging Black and Hispanic populations have emerged as especially at-risk for increased exposure to COVID-19 and susceptibility to severe health outcomes. The current review discusses the weathering hypothesis and the influence of social inequality on the identified health disparities. RECENT FINDINGS: Aging minoritized populations have endured structural and social inequality over the lifecourse. Consequently, these populations experience weathering, a process that results in physiological dysregulation due to stress associated with persistent disadvantage. Through weathering and continued inequity, aging minoritized populations have an increased risk of exposure and poor health outcomes from COVID-19. SUMMARY: Current literature and available data suggests that aging minoritized persons experience high rates of COVID-19 morbidity and mortality. The current review hypothesizes and supports that observed disparities are the result of inequalities that especially affect Black and Hispanic populations over the lifecourse. Future efforts to address these disparities should emphasize research that supports governments in identifying at-risk groups, providing accessible COVID-19-related information to those groups, and implementing policy that addresses the structural and social inequities that perpetuate current COVID-19 disparities.
RESUMO
Background: Policy, systems, and environmental (PSE) approaches can sustainably improve healthy eating (HE) and physical activity (PA) but are challenging to implement. Community health improvement plans (CHIPs) represent a strategic opportunity to advance PSEs but have not been adequately researched. The objective of this study was to describe types of HE and PA strategies included in CHIPs and assess strategies designed to facilitate successful PSE-change using an established framework that identifies six key activities to catalyze change. Methods: A content analysis was conducted of 75 CHIP documents containing HE and/or PA PSE strategies, which represented communities that were identified from responses to a national probability sample of US local health departments (<500,000 residents). Each HE/PA PSE strategy was assessed for alignment with six key activities that facilitate PSE-change (identifying and framing the problem, engaging and educating key people, identifying PSE solutions, utilizing available evidence, assessing social and political environment, and building support and political will). Multilevel latent class analyses were conducted to identify classes of CHIPs based on HE/PA PSE strategy alignment with key activities. Analyses were conducted separately for CHIPs containing HE and PA PSE strategies. Results: Two classes of CHIPs with PSE strategies emerged from the HE (n = 40 CHIPs) and PA (n = 43 CHIPs) multilevel latent class analyses. More CHIPs were grouped in Class A (HE: 75%; PA: 79%), which were characterized by PSE strategies that simply identified a PSE solution. Fewer CHIPs were grouped in Class B (HE: 25%; PA: 21%), and these mostly included PSE strategies that comprehensively addressed multiple key activities for PSE-change. Conclusions: Few CHIPs containing PSE strategies addressed multiple key activities for PSE-change. Efforts to enhance collaborations with important decision-makers and community capacity to engage in a range of key activities are warranted.