RESUMO
Objectives: This study aimed to: (1) evaluate pre- and in-hospital mortality for moderate-to-severe TBI in the U.S. by injury type (blunt vs. penetrating) and (2) estimate annual regression-adjusted mortality from 2008-2014.Methods: Data were analyzed from the National Trauma Data Bank (N=247,648). Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed by injury type to assess changes in mortality between study periods (early period: 2008-2010; late period: 2011-2014) and to estimate annual regression-adjusted mortality. Mortality odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated.Results: Total observed mortality was 18.8%. After covariate adjustment, patients in the late period had an increased odds of prehospital mortality compared to patients in the early period for blunt (OR: 4.69; 95%CI: 4.41-4.98) and penetrating trauma (OR: 4.71; 95%CI: 4.39-5.06). In contrast, patients in the late period had a decreased odds of in-hospital mortality compared to patients in the early period for blunt (OR: 0.95; 95%CI: 0.91-0.98) and penetrating trauma (OR: 0.92; 95%CI: 0.85-0.98).Conclusions: The decreasing in-hospital mortality trend is consistent with previous literature. Additional research is warranted to validate the observed increase in prehospital mortality and to identify best practices that can improve prehospital outcomes for patients with moderate-to-severe TBI.
Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas , Ferimentos Penetrantes , Bases de Dados Factuais , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Razão de Chances , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
The effectiveness of opiate treatment programs (OTPs) can be significantly influenced by co-occurring substance use, yet there are no standardized guidelines for assessing the influence of co-occurring substance use on treatment outcomes. In this review, we aim to provide an overview on the status of the assessment of co-occurring substance use during participation in OTPs in the United States. We searched 4 databases-MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, PsychINFO, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)-from database inception to November 2018 to select relevant publications on OTPs that assessed participants' co-occurring substance use. We used a standardized protocol to extract study, intervention, and co-occurring substance use characteristics. Methodological quality was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. Of the 3,219 titles screened, 614 abstracts and 191 full-text original publications were assessed, leaving 85 eligible articles. Co-occurring substance use was most often assessed during opioid treatments using combined (pharmacological and behavioral) (n = 57 studies) and pharmacological (n = 25 studies) interventions. Cocaine, alcohol, marijuana, and benzodiazepines were frequently measured, while amphetamines and tobacco were rarely assessed. Great variation existed between studies in the timing and measurement of co-occurring substance use, as well as definitions for substances and polysubstance/polydrug use. Inconsistencies in the investigation of co-occurring substance use make comparison of results across studies challenging. Standardized measures and consensus on research on co-occurring substance use is needed to produce the evidence required to develop personalized treatment programs for persons using multiple substances and to inform best-practice guidelines for addressing polydrug use during participation in OTPs.
Assuntos
Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias , Humanos , Cooperação do Paciente , Pacientes Desistentes do Tratamento , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados UnidosRESUMO
This systematic review describes the influence of co-occurring substance use on the effectiveness of opiate treatment programs. MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, PsychINFO, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were searched from database inception to November 28, 2018, to identify eligible opioid treatment studies in the United States that assessed the relationship between co-occurring substance use and treatment outcome (i.e., opioid abstinence and treatment retention). A total of 34 eligible studies were included. Overall, co-occurring substance use was associated with negative treatment outcomes regardless of intervention type. However, patterns varied by substance and intervention type. In particular, co-occurring use of cocaine or marijuana with opioids was associated with reduced treatment retention and opioid abstinence regardless of intervention type. Co-occurring use of amphetamines, compared with no use or reduced use of amphetamines, decreased treatment retention. Co-occurring use of alcohol was both positively and negatively associated with treatment outcomes. One study reported a significant positive association between sedative use and opioid abstinence. Generally, findings suggest that combined interventions reported better health outcomes compared with pharmacological or behavioral intervention studies alone. The findings of this review emphasize the need to comprehensively study and address co-occurring substance use to improve opiate treatment programs.
Assuntos
Tratamento de Substituição de Opiáceos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias , Humanos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Background: Postpartum visits are a necessary continuum of medical care for women who are diagnosed with depression during pregnancy. However, postpartum care utilization is typically lower in populations who face adverse events and it is unclear to what extent having depression during pregnancy may compromise postpartum visit follow-up. Our study examined the association between severity of prenatal depression and postpartum care utilization among women on Medicaid. Materials and Methods: Data from a university-based, nonprofit managed care organization (2008-2012) were analyzed (N = 846). Prenatal depression severity and postpartum care utilization were determined using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes, from medical claims records. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression was conducted. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Results: The majority (64.2%) of women received a mild/moderate prenatal depression diagnosis and 52.5% of the total sample attended their postpartum care visit. After adjusting for confounders, we found decreased odds of postpartum care utilization among women with less severe diagnoses. Women with a mild/moderate prenatal depression diagnosis were 12% less likely to attend the postpartum care visit compared with women with a severe prenatal depression diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.65-1.19). However, this finding was not statistically significant. Conclusions: Our study did not yield evidence of a statistically significant relationship between prenatal depression severity and postpartum visit attendance among a sample of Medicaid beneficiaries. Additional research is needed to assess the association between prenatal depression severity and postpartum care use to enhance continuity of services for Medicaid-insured women into the postpartum period.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recent evidence suggests that there are numerous benefits to scheduling postpartum visits as early as 3â¯weeks post-delivery. However, findings are not conclusive due to methodological limitations. This report discusses the unique aspects of a randomized controlled trial's (RCT) design, intervention, and strategies to maintain participant retention. METHODS: This study was a four-year, prospective, open-label RCT conducted at the Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center. Women who recently delivered a healthy, full-term baby vaginally, were randomized to receive a 3-4 or 6-8â¯weeks postpartum appointment and were followed for 18â¯months. RESULTS: A total of 364 women participated in this study. A large proportion of women were retained in the study as demonstrated by the high completion rates at the 18-month follow-up interview (Total sample: 87.6%; 3-4â¯weeks group: 88.0%; 6-8â¯weeks group: 87.3%). Similarly, high adherence to the protocol-directed postpartum visit schedule was reported in the overall study sample (79.7%), as well as in the 3-4 (70.5%) and 6-8 (90.0%) week postpartum groups. CONCLUSION: The study design offered unique features which ensured excellent participant completion and adherence rates, despite the presence of hard-to-track women who typically do not return for their postpartum visits.
Assuntos
Agendamento de Consultas , Cooperação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Período Pós-Parto , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Projetos de Pesquisa , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In the United States, major depressive disorder affects one in five women aged 20-40 years. During these childbearing years, depression can negatively impact maternal behaviors that are crucial for infant growth and development. This study examined the relationship between prepregnancy depression and breastfeeding duration by maternal age. METHODS: Data from Phase 7 (2012-2013) of the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (N=62,483) were analyzed. Prepregnancy depression was dichotomized while breastfeeding duration was categorized as never breastfed, breastfed 8 weeks or less, and breastfed more than 8 weeks. Maternal age was a significant effect modifier; therefore, results were stratified by maternal age. Multinomial logistic regression was used to obtain odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: For women aged 20-24, 25-29, and 30-34 years with prepregnancy depression, the odds of never breastfeeding and breastfeeding 8 weeks or less were significantly higher than in women with no history of prepregnancy depression. Notably, among women aged 25-29 with prepregnancy depression, the odds of never breastfeeding and breastfeeding 8 weeks or less were 93% (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.93, 95% CI =1.57-2.37) and 65% (AOR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.37-1.99) higher compared to women with no history of prepregnancy depression, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Having a history of poor mental health before pregnancy may increase the likelihood of premature breastfeeding cessation. A woman's mental health status before pregnancy should be considered in reproductive and prenatal care models. Efforts should be made to understand challenges women of specific age groups face when trying to breastfeed.
Assuntos
Aleitamento Materno/estatística & dados numéricos , Depressão Pós-Parto/epidemiologia , Depressão/epidemiologia , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Adulto , Aleitamento Materno/psicologia , Estudos Transversais , Depressão/psicologia , Depressão Pós-Parto/etiologia , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Idade Materna , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/psicologia , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Approximately 90% of mothers with a primary C-section have a subsequent C-section. To date, research has demonstrated that primary C-sections are associated with breastfeeding noninitiation. However, it is unknown if this association persists after the primary C-section. Furthermore, literature has shown a differing relationship between breastfeeding initiations by marital status. Due to the high proportion of women who give birth while unmarried, investigating differences by marital status will add a significant contribution to breastfeeding literature. This study investigates the association between repeat C-section and breastfeeding initiation within marital status groups using a nationally representative cross-sectional survey. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from the 2004 to 2011 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System were analyzed. The sample was restricted to women with a previous singleton live birth who had C-section and whose infant was alive at the time of interview (N = 34,854). Multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to obtain crude and adjusted odds ratio (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: After adjusting for potential confounders, married women who had a repeat C-section were 2.2 times (AOR = 2.16, 95% CI = 1.69-2.77) more likely to never breastfeed compared to women with vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC). Similarly, the odds of breastfeeding noninitiation were 76% (AOR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.47-2.12) higher among women with a repeat C-section compared to women with VBAC. No significant associations were exhibited among nonmarried women. CONCLUSIONS: Enhanced educational programs and counseling support may be needed to help families cope with delivery challenges and resulting stressors that may reduce their desire to initiate breastfeeding in the postpartum period.
Assuntos
Aleitamento Materno/estatística & dados numéricos , Recesariana/estatística & dados numéricos , Estado Civil/estatística & dados numéricos , Comportamento Materno/psicologia , Mães , Nascimento Vaginal Após Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Aleitamento Materno/psicologia , Recesariana/psicologia , Comportamento de Escolha , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Promoção da Saúde , Humanos , Fenômenos Fisiológicos da Nutrição do Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Mães/psicologia , Mães/estatística & dados numéricos , Razão de Chances , Cuidado Pós-Natal , Medição de Risco , Apoio Social , Nascimento Vaginal Após Cesárea/psicologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Georgia has the eighth-highest state rate of incarceration and fourth-highest number of prisoners in the country. Aside from receiving a dental examination at intake to assess oral health needs, there are no efforts to determine the barriers and determinants that contribute to the presenting oral health status of Georgia's state prisoners. Also, there is no prerelease planning to establish a health care home for prisoners being released back into the community to continue oral health care services in an effort to support successful reentry.This study assessed the barriers that impact N=98 female inmates' access to oral health care, prior to incarceration, within Georgia's prison system using a 21-item survey developed by a division of an academic institution and administered by the staff of a state department. Majority of the survey respondents reported that they do not have a regular dental provider (83%), lack insurance coverage (66%), and had their last dental visit more than a year ago because they did not have money for service or treatment (64%). The data collected from this study will be utilized to inform future project efforts to both reduce costs and increase access to oral health care for Georgia's uninsured and underinsured, and especially the incarcerated and reentry populations.