Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Clin Immunol ; 260: 109922, 2024 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38320737

RESUMO

IKAROS, encoded by IKZF1, is a tumor suppressor and a key hematopoietic transcription factor responsible for lymphoid and myeloid differentiation. IKZF1 mutations result in inborn errors of immunity presenting with increased susceptibility to infections, immune dysregulation, and malignancies. In particular, patients carrying IKZF1 gain-of-function (GOF) mutations mostly exhibit symptoms of immune dysregulation and polyclonal plasma cell proliferation. Herein, we describe seven new IKAROS GOF cases from two unrelated families, presenting with novel infectious, immune dysregulation and hematologic diseases. Two of the patients underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) due to poorly responsive complications. HCT was well-tolerated achieving full engraftment in both patients receiving reduced intensity, matched unrelated donor grafts, with no severe acute or chronic graft-vs-host-disease, and in remission from their diseases 2.5 and 4 years post-HCT, respectively. These results suggest that HCT is a valid and curative option in patients with IKAROS GOF disease and severe clinical manifestations.


Assuntos
Doenças Hematológicas , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Fator de Transcrição Ikaros , Humanos , Mutação com Ganho de Função , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante/métodos , Fator de Transcrição Ikaros/genética
2.
Blood Adv ; 7(17): 5038-5046, 2023 09 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37315169

RESUMO

Given the paucity of data surrounding the prognostic relevance of monoclonal paraprotein (M-protein) in marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), we sought to evaluate the impact of detecting M-protein at diagnosis on outcomes in patients with MZL in a large retrospective cohort. The study included 547 patients receiving first-line therapy for MZL. M-protein was detectable at diagnosis in 173 (32%) patients. There was no significant difference in the time from diagnosis to initiation of any therapy (systemic and local) between the M-protein and no M-protein groups. Patients with M-protein at diagnosis had significantly inferior progression-free survival (PFS) compared with those without M-protein at diagnosis. After adjusting for factors associated with inferior PFS in univariate models, presence of M-protein remained significantly associated with inferior PFS (hazard ratio, 1.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.20-2.54; P = .004). We observed no significant difference in the PFS based on the type or quantity of M-protein at diagnosis. There were differential outcomes in PFS based on the first-line therapy in patients with M-protein at diagnosis, in that, those receiving immunochemotherapy had better outcomes compared with those receiving rituximab monotherapy. The cumulative incidence of relapse in stage 1 disease among the recipients of local therapy was higher in the presence of M-protein; however, this did not reach statistical significance. We found that M-protein at diagnosis was associated with a higher risk of histologic transformation. Because the PFS difference related to presence of M-protein was not observed in patients receiving bendamustine and rituximab, immunochemotherapy may be a preferred approach over rituximab monotherapy in this group and needs to be explored further.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Linfoma , Humanos , Rituximab/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Linfoma/tratamento farmacológico
3.
J Hematol Oncol ; 16(1): 49, 2023 05 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37158890

RESUMO

Progression of disease within 24 months (POD24) from diagnosis in marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) was shown to portend poor outcomes in prior studies. However, many patients with MZL do not require immediate therapy, and the time from diagnosis-to-treatment interval can be highly variable with no universal criteria to initiate systemic therapy. Hence, we sought to evaluate the prognostic relevance of early relapse or progression within 24 months from systemic therapy initiation in a large US cohort. The primary objective was to evaluate the overall survival (OS) in the two groups. The secondary objective included the evaluation of factors predictive of POD24 and the assessment of cumulative incidence of histologic transformation (HT) in POD24 versus non-POD24 groups. The study included 524 patients with 143 (27%) in POD24 and 381 (73%) in non-POD24 groups. Patients with POD24 had inferior OS compared to those without POD24, regardless of the type of systemic therapy received (rituximab monotherapy or immunochemotherapy) at diagnosis. After adjusting for factors associated with inferior OS in the univariate Cox model, POD24 remained associated with significantly inferior OS (HR = 2.50, 95% CI = 1.53-4.09, p = 0.0003) in multivariable analysis. The presence of monoclonal protein at diagnosis and those who received first-line rituximab monotherapy had higher odds of POD24 on logistic regression analysis. Patients with POD24 had a significantly higher risk for HT compared to those without POD24. POD24 in MZL might be associated with adverse biology and could be used as an additional information point in clinical trials and investigated as a marker for worse prognosis.


Assuntos
Imunoterapia , Linfoma , Humanos , Rituximab/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais , Recidiva
4.
Cancer Genet ; 260-261: 18-22, 2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34808593

RESUMO

Richter transformation (RT) refers to the development of an aggressive lymphoma in patients with pre-existing chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL). It carries a poor prognosis secondary to poor response to therapy or rapid disease relapse. Currently there are no randomized trials to guide treatment. Therapeutic decisions are often influenced by the presence or absence of a clonal relationship between the underlying CLL/SLL and the new lymphoma given the poor prognosis of patients with clonally related RT. Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) can help to establish clonality while also detecting genomic complexity and clinically relevant genetic variants such as loss of CDKN2A and/or TP53. As a result, CMA has potential prognostic and therapeutic implications. For this study, CMA results from patients with Richter transformation were evaluated in paired CLL/SLL and transformed lymphoma samples. CMA revealed that 86% of patients had common aberrations in the two samples indicating evidence of common clonality. CMA was also useful in detecting aberrations associated with a poor prognosis in 71% of patients with RT. This study highlights the potential clinical utility of CMA to investigate the clonal relationship between CLL/SLL and RT, provide prognostic information, and possibly guide therapeutic decision making for patients with Richter transformation.


Assuntos
Cromossomos Humanos/genética , Células Clonais/química , Leucemia Linfocítica Crônica de Células B/genética , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/genética , Análise em Microsséries/métodos , Idoso , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Instabilidade Genômica , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos
5.
J Hematol Oncol ; 15(1): 96, 2022 07 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35842643

RESUMO

Ibrutinib is effective in the treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) with an overall response rate (ORR) of 48%. However, factors associated with response (or lack thereof) to ibrutinib in R/R MZL in clinical practice are largely unknown. To answer this question, we performed a multicenter (25 US centers) cohort study and divided the study population into three groups: "ibrutinib responders"-patients who achieved complete or partial response (CR/PR) to ibrutinib; "stable disease (SD)"; and "primary progressors (PP)"-patients with progression of disease as their best response to ibrutinib. One hundred and nineteen patients met the eligibility criteria with 58%/17% ORR/CR, 29% with SD, and 13% with PP. The median PFS and OS were 29 and 71.4 months, respectively, with no difference in PFS or OS based on the ibrutinib line of therapy or type of therapy before ibrutinib. Patients with complex cytogenetics had an inferior PFS (HR = 3.08, 95% CI 1.23-7.67, p = 0.02), while those with both complex cytogenetics (HR = 3.00, 95% CI 1.03-8.68, p = 0.04) and PP (HR = 13.94, 95% CI 5.17-37.62, p < 0.001) had inferior OS. Only primary refractory disease to first-line therapy predicted a higher probability of PP to ibrutinib (RR = 3.77, 95% CI 1.15-12.33, p = 0.03). In this largest study to date evaluating outcomes of R/R MZL treated with ibrutinib, we show that patients with primary refractory disease and those with PP on ibrutinib are very high-risk subsets and need to be prioritized for experimental therapies.


Assuntos
Linfoma de Zona Marginal Tipo Células B , Adenina/análogos & derivados , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Linfoma de Zona Marginal Tipo Células B/tratamento farmacológico , Linfoma de Zona Marginal Tipo Células B/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Piperidinas , Pirazóis/uso terapêutico , Pirimidinas/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa