Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim ; 22(9): 815-7, 2003 Nov.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14612169

RESUMO

We report the case of a 47-year-old man who experienced a pulmonary embolism associated with a femoral thrombus after a traumatic intracranial haematoma and had caval interruption using a new generation endovascular percutaneous filter. A shock occurred soon after the procedure, associated with inferior cava system inflation related to a filter thrombosis. This is a rare complication since the cessation of surgical cava interruptions. The situation became stable after intensive volume expansion. This report underlines the risk of complication associated to vena cava interruption despite the use of new generation filters and the significance of mechanical measures in prevention of thrombosis when anticoagulants are contraindicated.


Assuntos
Choque/etiologia , Trombose/etiologia , Filtros de Veia Cava/efeitos adversos , Hemorragia Cerebral Traumática/complicações , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Substitutos do Plasma/uso terapêutico , Embolia Pulmonar/etiologia
2.
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim ; 9(3): 285-8, 1990.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2372156

RESUMO

The effect of an oral effervescent formulation combining 200 mg cimetidine and 1.8 g sodium citrate on gastric pH and volume were studied in patients undergoing caesarean section. Seventy-four patients undergoing elective (group 1) or emergency caesarean section (group 2) were included. Before entering the operating theater (5 to 60 min before intubation), they were given the tablet dissolved in 15 ml of water. Induction and maintenance of anaesthesia were carried out with conventional techniques. The patient's gastric content was aspirated just after endotracheal intubation, and before extubation. its pH and volume were measured at both times. Mean pH was similar in the two groups after intubation (6.07 +/- 1.13 in group 1; 5.52 +/- 1.14 in group 2) and before extubation (6.32 +/- 1.08 vs. 5.85 +/- 1.02 respectively). Gastric pH was therefore greater than 2.5 in all 74 patients at both times. Mean volumes of gastric content after intubation were greater in group 2 (32.7 +/- 23.9 ml vs. 21.6 +/- 15.8 ml; p less than 0.02). However, just before extubation, these were similar (15.0 +/- 15.4 ml in group 1, 20.1 +/- 14.9 ml in group 2). The percentage of patients in the 2 groups with gastric volumes greater than 25 ml at the time of intubation were not significantly different (29.7% vs. 45.9% respectively). No patient was at risk of developing pneumonitis in case of aspiration (gastric content pH less than 2.5 and volume greater than 25 ml), either during endotracheal intubation or extubation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Assuntos
Anestesia Obstétrica , Antiácidos/uso terapêutico , Cimetidina/uso terapêutico , Citratos/uso terapêutico , Pneumonia Aspirativa/prevenção & controle , Administração Oral , Adulto , Antiácidos/administração & dosagem , Cesárea , Cimetidina/administração & dosagem , Citratos/administração & dosagem , Ácido Cítrico , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Determinação da Acidez Gástrica , Suco Gástrico/análise , Humanos , Gravidez
3.
Br J Anaesth ; 64(4): 503-6, 1990 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2334627

RESUMO

One hundred and forty-seven patients undergoing elective or emergency Caesarean section under general anaesthesia were allocated randomly to three groups: group 1 (n = 28) received no premedication; group 2 (n = 58) received 0.3-molar sodium citrate 15 ml (sodium citrate 1.16 g); group 3 (n = 61) received effervescent cimetidine-sodium citrate combination (cimetidine 400 mg with sodium citrate 0.9 g) after entering the operating room. Gastric pH was measured at tracheal intubation (pH1) and extubation (pH2). Mean pH1 and mean pH2 values in group 1 were, respectively, 2.25 (SD 1.35) and 2.83 (1.64). Mean pH1 and pH2 values in group 2 were, respectively, 4.38 (1.44) and 4.57 (1.51). In group 3 mean pH1 and pH2 values were, respectively, 5.07 (1.13) and 5.37 (1.30). Percentages of patients with pH1 less than or equal to 2.5 in groups 1, 2 and 3 were, respectively, 75, 13.8 and 1.6. Percentages of patients with pH2 less than or equal to 2.5 in groups 1, 2 and 3 were 50, 10.3 and 1.6, respectively.


Assuntos
Anestesia Geral , Anestesia Obstétrica , Cesárea , Pneumonia Aspirativa/prevenção & controle , Pré-Medicação , Adulto , Antiácidos/uso terapêutico , Cimetidina/administração & dosagem , Cimetidina/uso terapêutico , Citratos/administração & dosagem , Citratos/uso terapêutico , Ácido Cítrico , Combinação de Medicamentos , Avaliação de Medicamentos , Emergências , Feminino , Determinação da Acidez Gástrica , Humanos , Gravidez
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa