Daptomycin pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients receiving continuous venovenous hemodialysis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate daptomycin pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients receiving continuous venovenous hemodialysis to develop dosing recommendations. DESIGN: Prospective, open-label pharmacokinetic study. SETTING: : Intensive care units located within a teaching medical center. PATIENTS: Eight adults with known/suspected Gram-positive infections receiving continuous venovenous hemodialysis and daptomycin. INTERVENTIONS: Daptomycin at 8 mg/kg intravenously over 30 mins. Serial blood and effluent samples were collected over the next 48 hrs. Daptomycin protein binding was determined by equilibrium dialysis. Daptomycin continuous venovenous hemodialysis transmembrane clearance was determined by dividing daptomycin effluent by serum concentrations and multiplying by mean effluent production rate for each subject. Equations describing a two-compartment, open-pharmacokinetic model were fitted to each subject's daptomycin concentration-time data and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by standard methods. Serum concentration-time profiles were simulated for two daptomycin regimens (8 mg/kg every 48 hrs and 4 mg/kg every 24 hrs). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 7.7 ± 0.6 mg/kg (mean ± sd) of daptomycin was administered, resulting in an observed peak concentration of 81.2 ± 19.0 µg/mL. Daptomycin steady-state volume of distribution (0.23 ± 0.14 L/kg) and free fraction (17.5% ± 5.0%) were increased in critically ill subjects receiving continuous venovenous hemodialysis compared with previous values reported in healthy volunteers. Daptomycin transmembrane clearance (6.3 ± 2.9 mL/min) accounted for more than half of total clearance (11.3 ± 4.7 mL/min). Simulations demonstrated 8 mg/kg daptomycin every 48 hrs would result in higher peak (88.8 ± 20.0 µg/mL vs. 53.0 ± 12.3 µg/mL) and lower trough concentrations (7.2 ± 5.2 µg/mL vs. 12.3 ± 5.1 µg/mL) than 4 mg/kg every 24 hrs. CONCLUSIONS: Daptomycin at 8 mg/kg every 48 hrs in critically ill patients receiving continuous venovenous hemodialysis resulted in good drug exposure, achieved high peak concentrations to maximize daptomycin's concentration-dependent activity, and resulted in trough concentration that would minimize the risk of myopathy. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT00663403.

Telavancin and hydroxy propyl-beta-cyclodextrin clearance during continuous renal replacement therapy: an in vitro study.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Telavancin is a lipoglycopeptide antimicrobial agent which has been approved in Europe and has been recently FDA approved in the United States. Telavancin's parenteral solution contains hydroxy propyl-beta -cyclodextrin (HP-beta -CD) to enhance its solubility. The disposition of telavancin and HP-beta -CD during continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRT ) has not been previously reported. METHODS: The transmembrane clearances (CLtm ) of telavancin and HP-beta -CD during continuous hemofiltration and hemodialysis were assessed using an in vitro bovine blood model with AN69 and polysulfone hemodiafilters at varying ultrafiltrate and dialysate flow rates (1, 2, 3, & 6 l/hr). RESULTS: The mean telavancin sieving coefficient ranged from 0.25 to 0.31 during continuous hemofiltration. At all ultrafiltration rates, no differences were observed in telavancin CLtm between the two hemodiafilter types. For continuous hemodialysis, mean telavancin saturation coefficients ranged from 0.10 to 0.43 and CLtm tended to be higher for the polysulfone hemodiafilter than the AN69 hemodiafilter, especially at higher flow rates. Mean HP-beta -CD sieving coefficients ranged from 0.63 to 1.03 and saturation coefficients from 0.63 to 1.38, resulting in a CLtm that was similar to ultrafiltrate and dialysate flow rates. CONCLUSION: Telavancin CLtm is dependent on hemodiafilter type, dialysate and ultrafiltration rates. CRRT with high ultrafiltrate or dialysate rates may result in sufficient telavancin clearance to alter telavancin dosing. HP-beta -CD clearance by continuous hemodialysis or continuous hemofiltration is substantial and may be sufficient to prevent HP-beta -CD accumulation in subjects receiving CRRT . Pharmacokinetic studies conducted in patients receiving CRRT and telavancin are needed to confirm these in vitro findings.