[Management of arterial hypertension]. / Management der arteriellen Hypertonie.

Arterial hypertension is one of the most frequent diseases in the western world and is one of the three most important risk factors for heart diseases. The 2013 guidelines of the European Societies of Hypertension and Cardiology (ESH/ESC) provide a clear action plan for evidence-based diagnostics and therapeutic measures in hypertensive subjects and simplify target blood pressures across various patient groups. Non-pharmacological options play a central role in the treatment of arterial hypertension. The indications for drug therapy arise from three criteria including the level of hypertension, risk profile of the patient, as well as response to non-pharmacological therapy. For the first choice monotherapy five substance groups are available: diuretics, beta blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin (AT) 1 receptor antagonists and calcium antagonists. By combination therapy, the responder rate can be significantly increased with respect to a normalization of blood pressure. A true treatment resistance, in which the therapeutic goal is not reached in spite of a triple combination with maximum dosage, is extremely rare. Further treatment options are combinations of four drug classes and changes of medication. Hypertensive emergencies require a rapid intervention; nevertheless, the magnitude of blood pressure lowering can greatly vary depending on the individual clinical picture.

[New ESH/ESC guidelines on arterial hypertension : what is new and what indications remain for renal denervation?]. / Neue ESH/ESC-Leitlinien für die arterielle Hypertonie : Was ist neu, und welche Indikation bleibt für die renale Denervierung?

Arterial hypertension is one of the most common diseases in the western world and one of the most important risk factors for other cardiovascular diseases. Despite widespread therapeutic options, there is still a large proportion of patients with uncontrolled hypertension. The new European guidelines on hypertension give clear lines of action for diagnosis and treatment sorted into appropriate evidence levels based on current scientific data. Such evidence is still unclear for renal denervation so that no clear recommendations can be given.

The anticoagulant effect of heparin during radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients taking apixaban or rivaroxaban.

PURPOSE: Measuring the anticoagulant effect of heparin during radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients taking apixaban and rivaroxaban is challenging, since the activated coagulation time (ACT) does not seem to reflect the true anticoagulant activity of these drugs. We therefore evaluated coagulation properties of apixaban and rivaroxaban during RFA by different coagulation assays to better monitor periprocedural hemostasis. METHODS: The study included 90 patients (61 ± 12 years) with atrial fibrillation who underwent RFA procedures. Patients received 20 mg rivaroxaban (n = 73) once or 5 mg apixaban (n = 17) twice daily 4 weeks prior to the procedure. During RFA, unfractionated heparin i.v. was given to maintain an ACT of 250-300 s. Blood samples were taken before and 10, 60, and 360 min after heparin administration. RESULTS: Heparin displayed a lower anti-Xa activity in rivaroxaban-treated patients compared to apixaban-treated patients. In contrast, D-dimer and prothrombin fragment F1+2 plasma levels indicated a higher activation of the coagulation cascade in apixaban/heparin than in rivaroxaban/heparin patients. This discordant coagulative state measured in vitro had no clinical impact in terms of bleeding or thromboembolic complications. CONCLUSION: We found different biochemical responses to rivaroxaban/heparin and apixaban/heparin during RFA. Precaution is necessary when monitoring periprocedural hemostasis in DOAC patients to avoid mismanagement.

Erythropoietin-induced progenitor cell mobilisation in patients with acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and restenosis.

Erythropoietin improves myocardial function and enhances re-endothelialisation. Aim of this study was to analyse progenitor cell mobilisation and restenosis in patients from the Regeneration of Vital Myocardium in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction by Erythropoietin (REVIVAL-3) study. Patients with STEMI undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were randomly assigned to Epoetin beta (EPO) (n=68) or placebo (n=70). Drug-eluting stents (DES) were utilised in 93% of patients receiving EPO and in 95% of patients receiving placebo (p=0.83). Serial venous blood samples were drawn; CD133+ progenitor cells were quantified by four-colour flow cytometry and cytokines interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 and tumour necrosis factor (TNF) alpha were analysed by cytometric bead array. Forty-eight hours after PCI a significant increase in CD133+ progenitor cells was observed in the EPO group. Yet, no differences in plasma cytokines were found. Quantitative coronary angiography after six months revealed an increase in segment diameter stenosis in the EPO group (32 ± 19% vs. 26 ± 14%, p=0.046). However, this increase in neointima generation was not associated with progenitor cell mobilisation. EPO in patients with STEMI treated with PCI is associated with an increase in diameter stenosis that is not associated with circulating progenitor cells.

Tissue Factor-Factor VIIa complex induces cytokine expression in coronary artery smooth muscle cells.

OBJECTIVE: Within atherosclerotic lesions Tissue Factor (TF)-Factor VIIa (FVIIa) not only contributes to thrombotic events but also alters vascular remodeling through enhancement of migration. Moreover, the TF-FVIIa-FXa complex activates protease-activated receptors (PAR). TF/FVIIa/PAR-2 signaling has also been shown to promote proliferation and metastasis of tumor cells. Since coagulation factors promote inflammation which plays a major role during atherosclerosis as well as tumor metastasis this study sought to investigate the effects of FVIIa on the inflammatory response in vascular cells. METHODS/RESULTS: FVIIa induces interleukin-8 (IL-8) and IL-6 in primary smooth muscle cells (SMC), which was correlated to the expression of TF and PAR-2 as shown by immunoassay and qRT-PCR. The effect was dose-dependent and required TF, the proteolytic activity of FVIIa and PAR-2. Secondary effects of downstream coagulation factors were excluded. No proinflammatory FVIIa effect was observed in endothelial cells (EC) and mononuclear cells (MNC), expressing either TF or PAR-2. In atherosclerotic lesions mRNA expression of PAR-1, PAR-2 and IL-8 was elevated compared to healthy vessels indicating a role for PAR-1 and PAR-2 signaling in atherosclerosis. CONCLUSION: In addition to the procoagulant and promigratory role of the TF-FVIIa complex we identify a proinflammatory role of FVIIa in human SMC dependent on expression of TF and PAR-2 that provides yet another link between coagulation and inflammation.