Wada difference a day makes: interpretive cautions regarding same-day injections.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether memory scores after second intracarotid amobarbital procedure (IAP) injections are affected by the time between the first and second injections. METHODS: Sixty-two patients received their second IAP injection on the day after the first injection. Forty-three other patients received the second injection on the same day as the first injection. Both groups underwent similar IAP protocols and memory assessments, except for the timing of the second injection. RESULTS: The second IAP memory scores in the two-day group were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than those in the one-day group. Timing of second injection was a significant correlate of second memory scores, but amobarbital dosage, first IAP memory score, and pre-IAP measures of memory and intelligence were not significant correlates. CONCLUSION: One-day and two-day IAP protocols do not result in similar memory scores after the second injection. Nineteen percent of a subset of patients in the one-day protocol were misclassified, in terms of IAP memory ratings, because of the deleterious effect of having both injections on the same day. It is recommended that correction scores be considered, for some patients who receive two IAP injections on one day, to approximate what the second IAP memory score would have been had the second injection occurred on a second day.

Cognitive outcome after cardiac operations. Relationship to intraoperative computerized electroencephalographic data.

Cardiopulmonary bypass frequently causes new postoperative neuropsychologic deficits. To assess whether these deficits could be predicted or limited, we monitored 29 patients receiving bypass intraoperatively with an on-line computerized electroencephalograph. We hypothesized that the 15 patients whose cerebral perfusion pressure was adjusted on the basis of this electroencephalographic data would have fewer postoperative deficits than the 14 patients whose pressure was monitored on the basis of systemic pressure. The results showed that new postoperative cognitive deficits in both groups were less prevalent than in previous studies, but there was not a significant difference in outcomes between the two groups. The intraoperative electroencephalographic records correlated with surgical, but not neuropsychologic, outcome. It is concluded that careful attention to intraoperative cerebral perfusion pressure may decrease the prevalence of postoperative neuropsychologic complications, but that the use of a computerized electroencephalograph does not necessarily contribute to an improved outcome.

Deficits in delayed memory following cerebral malaria: a case study.

Cerebral malaria is a common disease, but there have not been any reports or investigations of long-term neurological or neuropsychological outcome. We present a case in which severe deficits in delayed memory and naming ability are observed 10 years after the patient contracted cerebral malaria. Neuropsychological testing and medical imaging are both consistent with temporal lobe/hippocampal dysfunction, which corroborates earlier animal research that cerebral malaria is particularly likely to lead to interrupted blood circulation in this area.

Language outcome following multiple subpial transection for Landau-Kleffner syndrome.

Landau-Kleffner syndrome is an acquired epileptic aphasia occurring in normal children who lose previously acquired speech and language abilities. Although some children recover some of these abilities, many children with Landau-Kleffner syndrome have significant language impairments that persist. Multiple subpial transection is a surgical technique that has been proposed as an appropriate treatment for Landau-Kleffner syndrome in that it is designed to eliminate the capacity of cortical tissue to generate seizures or subclinical epileptiform activity, while preserving the cortical functions subserved by that tissue. We report on the speech and language outcome of 14 children who underwent multiple subpial transection for treatment of Landau-Kleffner syndrome. Eleven children demonstrated significant postoperative improvement on measures of receptive or expressive vocabulary. Results indicate that early diagnosis and treatment optimize outcome, and that gains in language function are most likely to be seen years, rather than months, after surgery. Since an appropriate control group was not available, and that the best predictor of postoperative improvements in language function was that of length of time since surgery, these data might best be used as a benchmark against other Landau-Kleffner syndrome outcome studies. We conclude that multiple subpial transection may be useful in allowing for a restoration of speech and language abilities in children diagnosed with Landau-Kleffner syndrome.

Responses to perceived unethical practices in clinical neuropsychology: ethical and legal considerations.

Neuropsychologists often review the work of colleagues who have performed a neuropsychological evaluation. At times, these reviews may cause one to believe that a colleague acted in an unethical manner. However, it is often unclear whether the situation warrants contacting the colleague or filing a complaint. This article provides examples of potential unethical practices in neuropsychology, and then reviews the relevant ethical principles and legal precedents concerning the obligations and possible risks of reporting perceived unethical practices of a colleague. The paper concludes with a series of recommendations and options as to when and how one should proceed in such situations.

Performance of compensation seeking and non-compensation seeking samples on the Victoria symptom validity test: cross-validation and extension of a standardization study.

Previous research suggests that the Victoria Symptom Validity Test (VSVT) is effective in confirming or disconfirming the validity of a patient's reported cognitive impairments. We sought to cross-validate the findings of the VSVT standardization study, and to determine cut-off scores that are most efficient in discriminating our samples of compensation-seeking patients, primarily with mild traumatic brain injury (CS; n = 53), and non-compensation seeking patients with intractable seizures (NCS; n = 30). All patients in the NCS sample scored in the "valid" range on the VSVT difficult memory items, compared to only 58.5% of the CS sample. We also identified VSVT measures and cut-off scores maximally efficient in discriminating these samples. This study confirms previous research that non-compensation seeking patients do well on the VSVT, but that many compensation seeking patients perform poorly on this measure.

Significance of unilateral ear extinction on the dichotic listening test.

The association between unilateral ear extinction on the dichotic listening test and the lateralization of epileptogenic foci was examined in a sample of 49 seizure patients undergoing preoperative evaluation for epilepsy surgery. Results from patients who were left hemisphere dominant for speech indicated that right ear impairment was always predictive of a unilateral left hemisphere focus, but left ear extinction was associated with unilateral lesions of either hemisphere. In this patient sample, dichotic listening performance reflected an interaction of both lateralized foci and hemispheric preference of language processing. Implications concerning clinical use of the dichotic listening test are discussed.