High Cardiac Troponin Levels in Infants with Acute SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Prospective Comparative Study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the specific role of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in inducing elevation of marker of myocardial injury in infants with acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, multicentric 3-arm comparative study (March 2020 through March 2022) enrolling 152 infants hospitalized for COVID-19, 79 children with acute infections other than SARS-CoV-2, and 71 healthy controls. Determination of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) levels was the primary outcome. RESULTS: The proportion of children with hs-cTn values above the upper limit of normal (44 [28.9%]), as well as with a 3-fold increased value (20 [13.2%]) were significantly higher in the COVID-19 group than those in both control groups. The risk of presenting a 3-fold increased hs-cTn value was higher in children with SARS-CoV-2 infection compared with either healthy children (OR, 5.23; 95% CI, 1.19-23.02) or those with other infections (OR, 11.89; 95% CI, 1.56-89.79). In children with COVID-19, hs-cTn elevation was associated with neither clinical nor biochemical characteristics, nor perinatal risk factors, but with an age of <3 months (P < .001). After adjustment for age, sex, and underlying clinical conditions, elevated hs-cTn was independently associated with COVID-19 in a multivariable regression model. All children showed a progressive reduction of hs-cTn until normalization over time, without clinical, ECG, or echocardiographic manifestations up to 1 year of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Infants with acute SARS-CoV-2 infection may show a subclinical and transient alteration of myocardial injury markers, especially in the first months of life. hs-cTn levels normalized during follow-up and were not associated with cardiac functional impairment; nevertheless, long-term consequences are unknown and should be followed carefully.

Prebiotics in the management of pediatric gastrointestinal disorders: Position paper of the ESPGHAN special interest group on gut microbiota and modifications.

Prebiotics are substrates that are selectively utilized by host microorganisms conferring a health benefit. Compared to probiotics there are few studies with prebiotics in children. Most studies have been performed using infant formula supplemented with prebiotics, while add-on prebiotic supplementation as prevention or treatment of childhood gastrointestinal disorders has rarely been reported. The aim of this position paper was to summarize evidence and make recommendations for prebiotic supplementation in children with gastrointestinal diseases. Recommendations made are based on publications up to January 1, 2023. Within the scope of the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition Special Interest Group on Gut Microbiota and Modifications, as in our previous biotic recommendations, at least two randomized controlled clinical trials were required for recommendation. There are some studies showing benefits of prebiotics on selected outcomes; however, we cannot give any positive recommendations for supplementing prebiotics in children with gastrointestinal disorders.

Reevaluating the FDA's warning against the use of probiotics in preterm neonates: A societal statement by ESPGHAN and EFCNI.

The recent advisory issued by the United States Food and Drug Administration, cautioning against the routine administration of probiotics in preterm neonates, has sparked a lively debate within the scientific community. This commentary presents a perspective from members of the Special Interest Group on Gut Microbiota and Modifications within the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) and other authors who contributed to the ESPGHAN position paper on probiotics for preterm infants, as well as representatives from the European Foundation for the Care of Newborn Infants. We advocate for a more nuanced and supportive approach to the use of certain probiotics in this vulnerable population, balancing the demonstrated benefits and risks.

Aetiology, risk factors and microbiota composition in children with prolonged diarrhoea: A prospective case-controlled cohort study.

AIM: Prolonged diarrhoea (ProD) refers to acute-onset diarrhoea that persists for longer than 1 week. As the aetiology, risk factors and management are poorly defined, we prospectively enrolled children hospitalised in a high-income setting to assess these outcomes and investigate the potential role of gut microbiota. METHODS: All children aged 30 days to 14 years admitted for acute-onset diarrhoea lasting 7-14 days were included. Children consecutively admitted in the same period for acute diarrhoea (AD) served as controls. High-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons was used to analyse stool samples from a subset of patients and healthy controls. RESULTS: Sixty-eight with ProD and 104 with AD were enrolled. Intestinal infections were the main aetiology of diarrhoea in both groups (ProD 92.9% vs. AD 97.8%). ProD children showed a higher prevalence of bacterial infections compared to AD (30.8% vs. 8.9%, p = 0.024). Neither age, host-related factors, nor microbiome alterations were specifically linked to ProD. However, ProD children had a more severe initial clinical presentation than AD. CONCLUSION: ProD is often the result of an unusually severe intestinal infection that runs a course longer than expected but generally resolves without further problems. No specific management or therapies should be undertaken in most cases.

Acute Infectious Diarrhea.

Acute infectious diarrhea (AID) is one of the most common diseases in pediatric age with relevant burden both in high and in low-income countries. Thanks to their direct action on enterocyte functions and indirect actions on the mucosal and systemic immune system and on intestinal microbiome, probiotics are an ideal intervention to treat AID in childhood. However, their efficacy is strictly related to strains and indications, and practitioners should take this information into account in clinical practice. This chapter summarizes the main mechanisms of action of probiotics in AID, with a focus on proof of efficacy supporting their use in prevention and treatment of childhood AID. The use of selected strains in appropriate doses is strongly recommended by guidelines of AID, based on compelling proofs of efficacy and safety. At present, therapy with probiotics of AID is probably the strongest indication for probiotic use in medicine. Their role in prevention of AID is however questionable in healthy population, whereas it should be considered in at-risk population. Evidence for prevention of diarrhea in day-care centers and communities is lacking, but consistent evidence supports efficacy in prevention of hospital acquired diarrhea. Finally, this chapter presents novelties on this topic, in particular the role of rotavirus immunization on probiotics effectiveness and the effect of probiotics and postbiotics on Covid-associated diarrhea.Overall: AID is the most convincing area for probiotic use in children with gastrointestinal disorders, and effective strains should be used early on after onset of symptoms.

Pertussis outbreak in neonates and young infants across Italy, January to May 2024: implications for vaccination strategies.

Since January 2024, Italy experiences a pertussis outbreak, primarily affecting neonates and unvaccinated infants at high risk of severe complications and mortality; 11 major paediatric centres noted 108 hospitalisations and three deaths by 10 May. The outbreak reflects increased circulation of Bordetella pertussis and non-adherence to immunisation recommendations during pregnancy. Public health interventions, including maternal immunisation, vaccination of infants as early as possible and post-exposure prophylaxis, are critical for reducing the burden of pertussis and preventing further mortality.

Dalbavancin for Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections in Pediatrics: Insights from Continuation Therapy Experience.

Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI) are marked by substantial morbidity, frequent need for hospitalization, and long courses of intravenous antibiotic therapy. Herein, we report four cases of pediatric patients admitted for ABSSSI and managed with a combination antibiotic regimen incorporating dalbavancin: a second-generation lipoglycopeptide active against Gram-positive bacteria, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. In our experience, particularly in a setting with a high methicillin-resistance rate, dalbavancin demonstrated safety and efficacy, simplifying ABSSSI management in childhood. Its prolonged half-life enables a single-dose administration regimen, offering potential solutions to numerous challenges encountered in pediatric care, such as extended hospital stays, difficulties in securing and maintaining vascular access, lack of pediatric-specific drug indications, and limited availability of suitable oral formulations.

Long-COVID in children: An exploratory case-control study from a bio-psycho-social perspective.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine psychosocial differences between children with Long-COVID Syndrome (LCS) and two control groups (i.e., children who did not have COVID-19 and children who had previously had COVID-19 but did not develop LCS) from a bio-psycho-social and psychosomatic perspective. To classify children in these three groups, we examined the percentage of children meeting criteria for LCS, the type, frequency, perceived severity of symptoms, and their prevalence compared with children who never had SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: Data were collected from 198 Italian mothers of children aged 4 to 13 years using a cross-sectional web-based case-control survey. Of these, 105 were mothers of children who had contracted SARS-CoV-2 and 94 were mothers of children who had previously had COVID-19. Information was collected on the type and frequency of symptoms commonly referred to as "Long-COVID symptoms" and psychosocial dimensions (i.e., maternal and child health anxiety, COVID-19 anxiety, adjustment, and child deprivation). Descriptive analyses, chi-square tests, Student's T-Test, and analyses of variance were performed. RESULTS: 29 children (15% of the total sample) developed LCS, mostly in the neurological/neuropsychiatric domain (59%), and of mild intensity. Regarding psychosocial and psychological dimensions, maternal health anxiety, child deprivation, and fear of SARS-CoV-2 infection differed between groups, with the first two dimensions higher in children with LCS than in controls and the latter lower in children with LCS than in controls. CONCLUSION: This study sheds light on the need of integrating a psychosocial approach into the medical care of children with LCS and their caregivers.