Evaluation of Highly Porous Dental Implants in Postablative Oral and Maxillofacial Cancer Patients: A Prospective Pilot Clinical Case Series Report.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of new porous tantalum trabecular metal (PTTM)-enhanced titanium dental implants used for the prosthodontic rehabilitation of postablative cancer patients. First-year interim results of a prospective clinical case series are presented. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 25 PTTM-enhanced titanium implants were placed in both maxillas and mandibles of 6 patients, who met specific inclusion criteria. Resonance frequency analysis was conducted, and implant stability was recorded in Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) values at implant placement and after 2, 4, 6, and 12 months of functional loading. Bone levels were calculated by digitally measuring the distance from the implant shoulder to the first bone-to-implant on periapical radiographs taken at surgery and after 2, 4, 6, and 12 months of functioning. RESULTS: Cumulative implant survival was 100% (n = 25/25). At implant placement and the 2-, 4-, 6- and 12-month monitoring appointments, mean ISQ values were 72.14 ± 5.61 (range = 50-81), 64.39 ± 8.12 (range = 44-74), 74.26 ± 7.14 (range = 44-74), 76.84 ± 7.65 (range = 60-83), and 78.13 ± 4.14 (range = 64-84), respectively, and mean crestal marginal bone loss was 0.19 ± 0.25, 0.22 ± 0.4, 0.3 ± 0.46, and 0.57 ± 0.62 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PTTM-enhanced dental implants were clinically effective in the prosthetic rehabilitation of postoncological patients. Larger long-term follow-up studies will help to evaluate clinical efficacy of PTTM dental implants.

Survival of dental implants in patients with oral cancer treated by surgery and radiotherapy: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the survival of dental implants placed after ablative surgery, in patients affected by oral cancer treated with or without radiotherapy. METHODS: We collected data for 34 subjects (22 females, 12 males; mean age: 51 ± 19) with malignant oral tumors who had been treated with ablative surgery and received dental implant rehabilitation between 2007 and 2012. Postoperative radiation therapy (less than 50 Gy) was delivered before implant placement in 12 patients. A total of 144 titanium implants were placed, at a minimum interval of 12 months, in irradiated and non-irradiated residual bone. RESULTS: Implant loss was dependent on the position and location of the implants (P = 0.05-0.1). Moreover, implant survival was dependent on whether the patient had received radiotherapy. This result was highly statistically significant (P < 0.01). Whether the implant was loaded is another highly significant (P < 0.01) factor determining survival. We observed significantly better outcomes when the implant was not loaded until at least 6 months after placement. CONCLUSIONS: Although the retrospective design of this study could be affected by selection and information biases, we conclude that a delayed loading protocol will give the best chance of implant osseointegration, stability and, ultimately, effective dental rehabilitation.

Juvenile idiopathic/rheumatoid arthritis and orthognatic surgery without mandibular osteotomies in the remittent phase.

BACKGROUND: Orthognathic treatment of patients with juvenile idiopathic/rheumatoid arthritis is still controversial. Mandibular procedures may result in relapse and further condylar resorption and pain. Maxillary osteotomies and genioplasty may be effective for the correction of malocclusion and for aesthetics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five patients with juvenile idiopathic/rheumatoid arthritis with severe temporomandibular joint (TMJ) involvement underwent orthognathic surgery with a simultaneous Le Fort I osteotomy and advancement genioplasty. The age of the patients at the time of surgery ranged between 17 and 29 years (mean, 21.75 years). The patients were under follow-up for a minimum of 8 months after surgery, and measurements were performed using Dolphin 3D imaging. RESULTS: All 5 patients have an improved occlusion and improved facial aesthetics. The mean mandible rotation advancement was 5.6 mm (range, 4 to 7 mm). The mean posteroanterior face height ratio (S-Go/N-Me) after surgery was 63.9 (range, 62.9 to 65.8). No exacerbation of the juvenile rheumatoid arthritis was encountered as a result of the surgical procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Le Fort I osteotomy with impaction and advancement genioplasty are effective procedures for occlusal and aesthetic correction of juvenile idiopathic/rheumatoid patients. Mandibular procedures may evoke further condylar resorption with pain and functional impairment of the TMJ.

Retrospective review of 78 rehabilitated head and neck postoncological patients: a new classification method.

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have been published about the prosthetic rehabilitation of the postoncological maxillo-facial patient, but the guidelines that emerge lack a correlation between the anatomical classification of the treated site, which generally is preparatory upon surgery, and the type of prosthetic rehabilitation appropriate to the new anatomical and functional condition. With this correlation, it would be possible to obtain a multidisciplinary and predictable therapeutic process, able to identify from the beginning the best type of prosthetic rehabilitation. METHODS: The authors analyzed a sample of 78 patients treated in the Maxillofacial Surgery Unit of "Sapienza" University of Rome for a tumor of the head and neck area, and at a later stage prosthetically rehabilitated in the years from 2010 to 2013 in the Prosthetic Rehabilitation Unit of the same University because of the consequences of the ablative surgery. After having analyzed data concerning the treatment of the maxillofacial tumor, Authors classified the kind of prosthetic rehabilitation. Removable prosthesis was chosen in 18 cases, while implant (or teeth)-supported rehabilitation was performed in 60 cases. RESULTS: Authors correlated the kind of surgical reconstruction to the prosthetic rehabilitation performed. In the maxilla removable prosthesis was chosen in 8 cases, while implant supported rehabilitation was performed in 18 cases. In the mandible 10 cases were rehabilitated through a removable prosthesis and 42 through a teeth or implant supported prosthesis. CONCLUSIONS: It is evident the need to perform a careful evaluation of the patient, in order to identify the best possible prosthetic rehabilitation.