Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 52
Filtrar
1.
Cerebrovasc Dis ; 49(1): 110-118, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32097908

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In patients with suspected stroke, brain imaging is recommended in the acute phase for appropriate management and treatment. Both computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are considered reasonable choices for initial brain imaging. When both techniques are available, choosing one or the other might be associated with specific factors related either to patients, stroke symptoms, and severity or management organization. METHODS: The study was performed within the STROKE 69 database, a population-based cohort of all adult patients with suspected stroke admitted in one of the emergency departments (ED), primary stroke center, or stroke center of the Rhône County, from November 2015 to December 2016. Patients were included if they were admitted within 24 h following either symptom onset or last known normal. To identify factors potentially associated with the choice of initial brain imaging, a multivariate logistic regression was performed. RESULTS: Among the 3,244 patients with suspected stroke enrolled in the STROKE69 cohort, 3,107 (95.8%) underwent brain imaging within the first 24 h after admission. Among those 74.6% underwent CT as initial imaging while 25.4% had an MRI. In multivariate analyses, several factors were associated with a lower probability of having an MRI as initial brain imaging versus CT. These were either patient characteristics: older age (>80 years old, OR 0.39 [95% CI 0.28-0.54]), preexisting disability (OR 0.55 [95% CI 0.36-0.84]), use of anticoagulants (OR 0.52 [95% CI 0.33-0.81]), stroke characteristics: stroke of unknown onset (OR 0.42 [95% CI 0.31-0.58]) or factors associated with overall management: onset-to-door time (>6 h, OR 0.38 [95% CI 0.23-0.60]), initial admission to ED (OR 0.02 [95% CI 0.02-0.04]) or intensive care unit (OR 0.01 [95% CI 0.001-0.08]), personal transport (OR 0.66 [95% CI 0.45-0.96]), and admission during working hours (OR 0.65 [95% CI 0.51-0.84]). CONCLUSIONS: Besides CT or MRI availability, a number of other parameters could influence the choice of first imaging in case of stroke suspicion. These are related to patient characteristics, type of stroke symptoms, and type of organization.


Assuntos
Angiografia Cerebral , Comportamento de Escolha , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Imagem de Perfusão , Padrões de Prática Médica , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Seleção de Pacientes , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia
2.
J Emerg Med ; 59(4): 542-552, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32739129

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Epinephrine effectiveness and safety are still questioned. It is well known that the effect of epinephrine varies depending on patients' rhythm and time to injection. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the association between epinephrine use during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) care and patient 30-day (D30) survival. METHODS: Between 2011 and 2017, 27,008 OHCA patients were included from the French OHCA registry. We adjusted populations using a time-dependent propensity score matching. Analyses were stratified according to patient's first rhythm. After matching, 2837 pairs of patients with a shockable rhythm were created and 20,950 with a nonshockable rhythm. RESULTS: Whatever the patient's rhythm (shockable or nonshockable), epinephrine use was associated with less D30 survival (odds ratio [OR] 0.508; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.440-0.586] and OR 0.645; 95% CI 0.549-0.759, respectively). In shockable rhythms, on all outcomes, epinephrine use was deleterious. In nonshockable rhythms, no difference was observed regarding return of spontaneous circulation and survival at hospital admission. However, epinephrine use was associated with worse neurological prognosis (OR 0.646; 95% CI 0.549-0.759). CONCLUSIONS: In shockable and nonshockable rhythms, epinephrine does not seem to have any benefit on D30 survival. These results underscore the need to perform further studies to define the optimal conditions for using epinephrine in patients with OHCA.


Assuntos
Reanimação Cardiopulmonar , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar , Epinefrina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Pontuação de Propensão , Sistema de Registros , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Stroke ; 49(2): 405-411, 2018 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29321338

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A suboptimal number of ischemic stroke patients eligible for thrombolysis actually receive it, partly because of extended inhospital delays. We developed a comprehensive program designed for emergency unit staff and evaluated its effectiveness for reducing intrahospital times and improving access to thrombolysis. METHODS: We conducted a randomized stepped-wedge controlled trial in 18 emergency unit. The sequentially implemented training intervention, targeting emergency physicians and nurses, was based on specifically designed videos and interactive simulation workshops on intrahospital management optimization. The effectiveness was assessed on intrahospital times and thrombolysis proportion. During the study period, all consecutive patients with confirmed ischemic stroke and no contraindications to thrombolysis were included. RESULTS: A total of 328 patients were enrolled in the control group and 363 in the intervention group. Mean age was 73.6 years. Overall thrombolysis proportion was 34.2% in the intervention group versus 25.6% in the control group (adjusted odds ratio, 1.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.01), thrombolysis proportion within 4 hours 30 minutes almost doubled (adjusted odds ratio, 1.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-2.73). Although imaging-to-stroke unit time was significantly decreased in the intervention group (39 versus 53 minutes; P=0.03), median door-to-imaging and door-to-needle times were not different between groups (P=0.70 and P=0.40, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: An interactive and multifaceted training program targeting emergency professionals was significantly associated with an increased access to thrombolysis, especially within 4 hours and 30 minutes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02814760.


Assuntos
Antifibrinolíticos/uso terapêutico , Isquemia Encefálica/tratamento farmacológico , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapêutico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Feminino , Hospitais , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Trombolítica/métodos , Fatores de Tempo , Tempo para o Tratamento , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
J Emerg Med ; 54(3): 295-301, 2018 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29273461

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Even if age is not considered the key prognostic factor for survival in cardiac arrest (CA), some studies question whether cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the elderly could be futile. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe differences in out-of-hospital CA survival rates according to age stratification based on the French National CA registry (RéAC). The second objective was to analyze the differences in resuscitation interventions according to age. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study based on data extracted from the RéAC. All 18,249 elderly patients (>65 years old) with non-traumatic CA recorded between July 2011 and March 2015 were included. Patients' ages were stratified into 5-year increments. RESULTS: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was started significantly more often in younger patients (p = 0.019). Ventilation and automated external defibrillation by bystanders were started without any difference between age subgroups (p = 0.147 and p = 0.123, respectively). No difference in terms of rate of external chest compressions or ventilation initiation was found between the subgroups (p = 0.357 and p = 0.131, respectively). Advanced cardiac life support was started significantly more often in younger patients (p = 0.023). Total CPR duration, return of spontaneous circulation, and survival at hospital admission and at 30 days or hospital discharge decreased significantly with age (p < 10-3). The survival decrease was linear, with a loss of 3% survival chances each 5-year interval. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that survival in older persons decreased linearly by 3% every 5 years. However, this diminished rate of survival could be the consequence of a shorter duration and less advanced life support.


Assuntos
Fatores Etários , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/mortalidade , Ressuscitação/normas , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , França , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Ressuscitação/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos
5.
Circulation ; 132(3): 182-93, 2015 Jul 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26092673

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Targeted temperature management is recommended after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Whether advanced internal cooling is superior to basic external cooling remains unknown. The aim of this multicenter, controlled trial was to evaluate the benefit of endovascular versus basic surface cooling. METHODS AND RESULTS: Inclusion criteria were the following: age of 18 to 79 years, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest related to a presumed cardiac cause, time to return of spontaneous circulation <60 minutes, delay between return of spontaneous circulation and inclusion <240 minutes, and unconscious patient after return of spontaneous circulation and before the start of cooling. Exclusion criteria were terminal disease, pregnancy, known coagulopathy, uncontrolled bleeding, temperature on admission <30°C, in-hospital cardiac arrest, immediate need for extracorporeal life support or hemodialysis. Patients were randomized between 2 cooling strategies: endovascular femoral devices (Icy catheter, Coolgard, Zoll, formerly Alsius; n=203) or basic external cooling using fans, a homemade tent, and ice packs (n=197). The primary end point, that is, favorable outcome evaluated by survival without major neurological damage (Cerebral Performance Categories 1-2) at day 28, was not significantly different between groups (odds ratio, 1.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.93-2.16; P=0.107). Improvement in favorable outcome at day 90 in favor of the endovascular group did not reach significance (odds ratio, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.96-2.35; P=0.07). Time to target temperature (33°C) was significantly shorter and target hypothermia was more strictly maintained in the endovascular than in the surface group (P<0.001). Minor side effects directly related to the cooling method were observed more frequently in the endovascular group (P=0.009). CONCLUSION: Despite better hypothermia induction and maintenance, endovascular cooling was not significantly superior to basic external cooling in terms of favorable outcome. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00392639.


Assuntos
Temperatura Corporal , Gerenciamento Clínico , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Hipotermia Induzida/métodos , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/terapia , Idoso , Procedimentos Endovasculares/mortalidade , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Hipotermia Induzida/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/diagnóstico , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/mortalidade , Estudos Prospectivos , Método Simples-Cego , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências
6.
Rev Infirm ; (211): 41-3, 2015 May.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26145698

RESUMO

The occurrence of a death in the out-of-hospital environment is often brutal and the reactions of the deceased's family and friends, unprepared for this event, can be unpredictable. After the technical procedures have been carried out and within a limited period of intervention, the caregivers, and in particular the nurse of the mobile emergency and intensive care service, must provide the family and friends with support enabling them to begin the grieving process. To help the caregivers in this mission, a pedagogical tool remains to be developed.


Assuntos
Morte , Enfermagem em Emergência , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Relações Profissional-Família , Atitude Frente a Morte , Humanos
7.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; 18(4): 511-9, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24877567

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is an important public health issue with an estimated incidence of 50,000 cases per year in France. Community survival rates for OHCA are still low (approximately 5%). An effective, recognized way to study, assess, and improve OHCA care is to create a standard-format database. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work is to present the French OHCA registry (RéAC). METHODS: RéAC is a secure, web-based data management system that was initiated in 2009 and deployed nationally in June 2012. The main goal of this registry is to improve the care and survival rate of OHCA patients. The survey form is in compliance with the requirements of French organizations and is organized in accordance with the Utstein universal style. RéAC provides real-time statistical analyses and enables all French mobile emergency and resuscitation services (MERS) to assess and improve their professional OHCA care practices. RESULTS: In June 2012, the RéAC was nationally opened for all French MERSs. In June 2013, 221 of a possible 320 MERS participated in the RéAC. A total of 15,944 OHCA have been collected (14,939 cases closed with follow-up monitoring). The current rate of inclusion is approximately 1,500 cases per month. Since August 2012, the inclusion rate has increased by 9.5% per month, while the participation rate has increased by 9% per month. The first results show that the population is mainly male (65.4%) and the mean age is 65 ± 19 years. On MERS arrival, 73.5% of the patients were in asystole. The rates of return of spontaneous circulation, survival to hospital admission, and 30-day survival are low (respectively 21.1%, 17.2%, 4.6%). Of those who survived 30 days, 84.0% had a good neurological recovery. CONCLUSIONS: The RéAC registry is a reliable observation tool to improve public health management of OHCA. It provides relevant information to adapt or to develop diagnosis, treatments, and prognostic resources. Moreover, it enables the development of targeted awareness programs for the unique purpose of increasing the survival rates of OHCA patients.


Assuntos
Serviços Médicos de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Ressuscitação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , França , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/mortalidade , Taxa de Sobrevida
8.
Ann Surg ; 258(1): 178-83, 2013 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23478519

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to compare mortality outcomes between patients treated at a trauma center in France and matched patients in the United States. BACKGROUND: Although trauma systems in France and the United States differ significantly in prehospital and inhospital management, previous comparisons have been challenged by the lack of comparable data. METHODS: Coarsened exact matching identified matching patients between a single center trauma database from Lyon, France, and the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) of the United States. Moderate to severely injured [injury severity score (ISS) > 8] adult patients (age ≥ 16) presenting alive to level 1 trauma centers from 2002 to 2005 with blunt or penetrating injuries were included. After matching patients, multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine difference in mortality between patients in Lyon and the NTDB. RESULTS: A total of 1043 significantly injured patients were presented to the Lyon center. Matching eligible patients with complete records were sought from 219,985 patients in the NTDB. The unadjusted odds of mortality at the Lyon center was 2.5 times higher than that of the NTDB [95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.18-2.98]. However, the Lyon center received patients with higher ISS, lower Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), and lower systolic blood pressure (SBP) (all P < 0.001). After 1:1 matching, 858 patient pairs were produced, and the odds of mortality became equivalent [odds ratio (OR) = 1.3, 95% CI = 0.91-1.73]. Similar results were found in multiple subset analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Trauma patients admitted to a single French trauma center had an equal chance of survival compared with similarly injured patients treated at US trauma centers.


Assuntos
Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Ressuscitação/normas , Centros de Traumatologia/organização & administração , Ferimentos e Lesões/mortalidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise de Regressão , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
10.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 71(2): 484-495, 2023 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36317929

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Emergency Departments (ED) have seen an increasing number of older patients who are mostly referred following a call to the Emergency Medical Services (EMS). Long waiting times in settings, which are not designed to meet older patients' needs, may increase the risk of hospital-acquired complications. Unnecessary visits should therefore be avoided as much as possible. The objective of the study was to evaluate whether a program to provide geriatric knowledge and tools to the dispatching physicians of the EMS could decrease ED referrals of older patients. METHODS: Design: Before-and-after study with two 6-month periods before and after intervention. PARTICIPANTS: All calls received by a dispatching physician of the Rhône EMS from 8 am to 6 pm concerning patients aged 75 years or above during the study period. INTERVENTION: A program consisting of training dispatching physicians in the specific care of older patients and the developing, with a multidisciplinary team, of specific tools for dispatching physicians. OUTCOME: Proportion of ED referrals of patients aged 75 years or above after a call to the EMS. RESULTS: A total of 2671 calls to the Rhône EMS were included corresponding to 1307 and 1364 patients in the pre-and post-intervention phases, respectively. There was no significant difference in the proportion of referrals to the ED between the pre-intervention (61.7%) and the post-intervention (62.8%) phases (p = 0.57). Contact of the patients with their General Practitioner (GP) in the month preceding the call was associated with a 22% reduced probability of being referred to an ED. CONCLUSIONS: No beneficial effect of the intervention was demonstrated. This strategy of intervention is probably not effective enough in such time-constraint environment. Other strategies with a specific parallel dispatching of geriatric calls by geriatricians should be tested to avoid these unnecessary ED referrals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials NCT02712450.


Assuntos
Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Médicos , Humanos , Idoso , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Geriatras
12.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 92(3): 553-560, 2022 03 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34797815

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Traumatic cardiac arrests (TCAs) are associated with high mortality and the majority of deaths occur at the prehospital scene. The aim of the present study was to assess, in a prehospital physician-led emergency medical system, the factors associated with sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in TCA, including advanced life procedures. The secondary objectives were to assess factors associated with 30-day survival in TCA, evaluate neurological recovery in survivors, and describe the frequency of organ donation among patients experiencing a TCA. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of all TCA patients included in the French nationwide cardiac arrest registry from July 2011 to November 2020. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors independently associated with ROSC. RESULTS: A total of 120,045 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests were included in the registry, among which 4,922 TCA were eligible for analysis. Return of spontaneous circulation was sustained on-scene in 21.1% (n = 1,037) patients. Factors significantly associated with sustained ROSC were not-asystolic initial rhythms (pulseless electric activity (odds ratio [OR], 1.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.40-2.35; p < 0.001), shockable rhythm (OR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.12-2.98; p = 0.016), spontaneous activity (OR, 3.66; 95% CI, 2.70-4.96; p < 0.001), and gasping at the mobile medical team (MMT) arrival (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.02-1.94; p = 0.042). The MMT interventions significantly associated with ROSC were as follows: intravenous fluid resuscitation (OR, 3.19; 95% CI, 2.69-3.78; p < 0.001), packed red cells transfusion (OR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.84-3.51; p < 0.001), and external hemorrhage control (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.31-2.30; p < 0.001). Among patients who survived (n = 67), neurological outcome at Day 30 was favorable (cerebral performance categories 1-2) in 72.2% cases (n = 39/54) and 1.4% (n = 67/4,855) of deceased patients donated one or more organ. CONCLUSION: Sustained ROSC was frequently achieved in patients not in asystole at MMT arrival, and higher ROSC rates were achieved in patients benefiting from specific advanced life support interventions. Organ donation was somewhat possible in TCA patients undergoing on-scene resuscitation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and epidemiologic, Level III.


Assuntos
Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/mortalidade , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/terapia , Retorno da Circulação Espontânea , Reanimação Cardiopulmonar , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Prognóstico , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida
13.
Eur J Emerg Med ; 29(1): 63-69, 2022 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34908000

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Adrenaline is recommended during cardio-pulmonary resuscitation. The optimal dose remains debated, and the effect of lower than recommended dose is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome of patients treated with the recommended, lower or higher cumulative doses of adrenaline. DESIGN, SETTINGS, PARTICIPANTS: Patients were included from the French National Cardiac Arrest Registry and were grouped based on the received dose of adrenaline: recommended, higher and lower dose. OUTCOME MEASURES AND ANALYSIS: The primary endpoint was good neurologic outcome at 30 days post-OHCA, defined by a cerebral performance category (CPC) of less than 3. Secondary endpoints included return of spontaneous circulation and survival to hospital discharge. A multiple propensity score adjustment approach was performed. MAIN RESULTS: 27 309 patients included from July 1st 2011 to January 1st 2019 were analysed, mean age was 68 (57-78) years and 11.2% had ventricular fibrillation. 588 (2.2%) patients survived with a good CPC score. After adjustment, patients in the high dose group had a significant lower rate of good neurologic outcome (OR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.5-0.7). There was no significant difference for the primary endpoint in the lower dose group (OR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.7-1.1). There was a lower rate of survival to hospital discharge in the high-dose group vs. standard group (OR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.5-0.6). CONCLUSION: The use of lower doses of adrenaline was not associated with a significant difference on survival good neurologic outcomes at D30. But a higher dose of adrenaline was associated with a lower rate of survival with good neurological outcomes and poorer survival at D30.


Assuntos
Reanimação Cardiopulmonar , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar , Idoso , Epinefrina , Humanos , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Pontuação de Propensão , Sistema de Registros
14.
N Engl J Med ; 359(1): 21-30, 2008 Jul 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18596271

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: During the administration of advanced cardiac life support for resuscitation from cardiac arrest, a combination of vasopressin and epinephrine may be more effective than epinephrine or vasopressin alone, but evidence is insufficient to make clinical recommendations. METHODS: In a multicenter study, we randomly assigned adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest to receive successive injections of either 1 mg of epinephrine and 40 IU of vasopressin or 1 mg of epinephrine and saline placebo, followed by administration of the same combination of study drugs if spontaneous circulation was not restored and subsequently by additional epinephrine if needed. The primary end point was survival to hospital admission; the secondary end points were return of spontaneous circulation, survival to hospital discharge, good neurologic recovery, and 1-year survival. RESULTS: A total of 1442 patients were assigned to receive a combination of epinephrine and vasopressin, and 1452 to receive epinephrine alone. The treatment groups had similar baseline characteristics except that there were more men in the group receiving combination therapy than in the group receiving epinephrine alone (P=0.03). There were no significant differences between the combination-therapy and the epinephrine-only groups in survival to hospital admission (20.7% vs. 21.3%; relative risk of death, 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97 to 1.05), return of spontaneous circulation (28.6% vs. 29.5%; relative risk, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.06), survival to hospital discharge (1.7% vs. 2.3%; relative risk, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.02), 1-year survival (1.3% vs. 2.1%; relative risk, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.02), or good neurologic recovery at hospital discharge (37.5% vs. 51.5%; relative risk, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.81 to 2.06). CONCLUSIONS: As compared with epinephrine alone, the combination of vasopressin and epinephrine during advanced cardiac life support for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest does not improve outcome. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00127907.)


Assuntos
Reanimação Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Epinefrina/uso terapêutico , Parada Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Vasoconstritores/uso terapêutico , Vasopressinas/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Quimioterapia Combinada , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/organização & administração , Feminino , Seguimentos , França , Parada Cardíaca/mortalidade , Parada Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Risco , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
15.
BMC Infect Dis ; 11: 236, 2011 Sep 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21896188

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) within the first 48 hours of intensive care unit (ICU) stay has been poorly investigated. The objective was to estimate early-onset VAP occurrence in ICUs within 48 hours after admission. METHODS: We analyzed data from prospective surveillance between 01/01/2001 and 31/12/2009 in 11 ICUs of Lyon hospitals (France). The inclusion criteria were: first ICU admission, not hospitalized before admission, invasive mechanical ventilation during first ICU day, free of antibiotics at admission, and ICU stay ≥ 48 hours. VAP was defined according to a national protocol. Its incidence was the number of events per 1,000 invasive mechanical ventilation-days. The Poisson regression model was fitted from day 2 (D2) to D8 to incident VAP to estimate the expected VAP incidence from D0 to D1 of ICU stay. RESULTS: Totally, 367 (10.8%) of 3,387 patients in 45,760 patient-days developed VAP within the first 9 days. The predicted cumulative VAP incidence at D0 and D1 was 5.3 (2.6-9.8) and 8.3 (6.1-11.1), respectively. The predicted cumulative VAP incidence was 23.0 (20.8-25.3) at D8. The proportion of missed VAP within 48 hours from admission was 11% (9%-17%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates underestimation of early-onset VAP incidence in ICUs, if only VAP occurring ≥ 48 hours are considered to be hospital-acquired. Clinicians should be encouraged to develop a strategy for early detection after ICU admission.


Assuntos
Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Estatísticos , Estudos Prospectivos
16.
Air Med J ; 30(3): 134-9, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21549285

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to assess concurrent mechanical stresses from shock, vibration, and noise to which a critically ill neonate is exposed during emergency transfer. METHODS: For neonates transported by a French specialized emergency medical service, we measured and analyzed 27 physical parameters recorded during typical transport by ambulance and by helicopter. The noninvasive sensors were placed to allow better representation of the exposure of the newborn to the physical constraints. RESULTS: Based on 10 hours of transport by ambulance and 2 hours by helicopter, noise, whole body vibration, rate of turn, acceleration, and pitch were extracted as the five most representative dynamic harshness indicators. A helicopter produces a higher-level but more stable (lower relative dispersion) whole body dynamic exposure than an ambulance, with a mean noise level of 86 ± 1 dBA versus 67 ± 3 dBA, mean whole body vibration of 1 ± 0.1 meter per second squared (m/s(2)) versus 0.4 6 0.2 m/s(2), and acceleration of 1 6 0.05 m/s(2) versus 0.4 6 0.1 m/s(2). A ground ambulance has many more dynamic effects in terms of braking, shock, and impulsive noise than a helicopter (1 impulsive event per 2 minutes vs. 1 per 11 minutes). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show significant exposure of the sick neonate to both stationary and impulsive dynamic physical stressors during transportation, particularly in a ground ambulance. The study suggests opportunities to reduce physical stressors during neonatal transport.


Assuntos
Resgate Aéreo , Automóveis , Estresse Fisiológico/fisiologia , Vibração/efeitos adversos , França , Humanos , Recém-Nascido
17.
Eur J Emerg Med ; 28(1): 50-57, 2021 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32925479

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) between comparable female and male OHCA cohorts in a large nationwide registry. METHODS: This was a national multicentre retrospective, case-control propensity score-matched study based on French National Cardiac Arrest Registry data from 1 July 2011 to 21 September 2017. Female and male survival rates at D30 were compared. RESULTS: At baseline 66 395 OHCA victims were included, of which 34.3% were women. At hospital admission, survival was 18.2% for female patients and 20.2% for male patients [odds ratio (OR), 1.138 (1.092-1.185)]; at 30 days, survival was 4.3 and 5.9%, respectively [OR, 1.290 (1.191-1.500)]. After matching (14 051 patients within each group), female patients received less advanced life support by mobile medical team (MMT), they also had a longer no-flow duration and shorter resuscitation effort by MMT than male patients. However, 15.3% of female patients vs. 9.1% of male patients were alive at hospital admission [OR, 0.557 (0.517-0.599)] and 3.2 vs. 2.6% at D30 [OR, 0.801 (0.697-0.921)], with no statistically significant difference in neurological outcome [OR, 0.966 (0.664-1.407)]. CONCLUSIONS: In this large nationwide matched OHCA study, female patients had a better chance of survival with no significant difference in neurological outcome. We also noticed that female patients received delayed care with a shorter resuscitation effort compared to men; these complex issues warrant further specific investigation. Encouraging bystanders to act as quickly as possible and medical teams to care for female patients in the same way as male patients should increase survival rates.


Assuntos
Reanimação Cardiopulmonar , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/terapia , Pontuação de Propensão , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida
18.
Chest ; 160(1): 139-147, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34116828

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Among patients successfully resuscitated after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), 10% to 15% evolve toward brain death (BD), thus becoming potential organ donors. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is it possible to establish a score for early estimation of BD risk after OHCA? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The BD after cardiac arrest (BDCA) score was developed from data available within 24 hours after OHCA from two OHCA trials: Cyclosporine in Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation and Erythropoietin After OHCA. The BDCA score was then validated in another large prospective multicenter data set. The main outcome was the occurrence of BD. Independent prognostic covariates for BD were identified using a binomial two-stage adaptive least absolute shrinkage and selection operator procedure. RESULTS: The development cohort included 569 patients alive 24 hours after OHCA, among whom 84 (14.8%) experienced BD. Independent predictors of BD used to build the BDCA score were being female (4 points), nonshockable rhythm (24 points), cardiac cause of OHCA (-6 points), neurological cause of OHCA (45 points), natremia at 24 hours (natremia in millimoles per liter minus 140 points), and vasoactive drug at admission (4 points) and at 24 hours (6 points). The area under the curve (AUC) of the BDCA score was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.77-0.86), and the discrimination value in the validation cohort (n = 487) was consistent (AUC, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.76-0.86). In the validation cohort, BD occurred in 4.0%, 20.4%, and 67.7% of patients with scores of < 20, 20 to 50, and > 50, respectively. INTERPRETATION: The BDCA score allows early detection of patients with a high probability of experiencing BD, which may help increase organ donation after OHCA. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01595958, and ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00999583; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.


Assuntos
Morte Encefálica/diagnóstico , Reanimação Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Diagnóstico Precoce , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/terapia , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos
19.
Crit Care Med ; 38(3): 831-7, 2010 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20068467

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Prehospital triage of trauma patients is of paramount importance because adequate trauma center referral improves survival. We developed a simple score that is easy to calculate in the prehospital phase. DESIGN: Multicenter prospective observational study. SETTING: Prehospital physician-staffed emergency system in university and nonuniversity hospitals. INTERVENTIONS: We evaluated 1360 trauma patients receiving care from a prehospital mobile intensive care unit in 22 centers in France during 2002. The association of prehospital variables with in-hospital death was tested using logistic regression, and a simple score (the Mechanism, Glasgow coma scale, Age, and Arterial Pressure [MGAP] score) was created and compared with the triage Revised Trauma Score, Revised Trauma Score, and Trauma Related Injury Severity Score. The model was validated in 1003 patients from 2003 through 2005. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Four independent variables were identified, and each was assigned a number of points proportional to its regression coefficient to provide the MGAP score: Glasgow Coma Scale (from 3-15 points), blunt trauma (4 points), systolic arterial blood pressure (>120 mm Hg: 5 points, 60 to 120 mm Hg: 3 points), and age <60 yrs (5 points). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of MGAP was not significantly different from that of the triage Revised Trauma Score or Revised Trauma Score, but when sensitivity was fixed >0.95 (undertriage of 0.05), the MGAP score was more specific and accurate than triage Revised Trauma Score and Revised Trauma Score, approaching those of Trauma Related Injury Severity Score. We defined three risk groups: low (23-29 points), intermediate (18-22 points), and high risk (<18 points). In the derivation cohort, the mortality was 2.8%, 15%, and 48%, respectively. Comparable characteristics of the MGAP score were observed in the validation cohort. CONCLUSION: The MGAP score can accurately predict in-hospital death in trauma patients.


Assuntos
Pressão Sanguínea/fisiologia , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/métodos , Escala de Coma de Glasgow/estatística & dados numéricos , Triagem/métodos , Ferimentos e Lesões/mortalidade , Ferimentos e Lesões/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , França , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores de Risco , Centros de Traumatologia , Índices de Gravidade do Trauma , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa