Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
J Electrocardiol ; 43(6): 673-5, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20888001

RESUMO

Right ventricular lead perforation is a rare but serious and potentially life-threatening complication of pacemaker or defibrillator lead implantation. This report describes a patient with Brugada syndrome in whom the diagnosis of asymptomatic right ventricular perforation by an implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead was detected 12 days after implantation, thanks to a report from home monitoring system. The patient was admitted to our institution, where the lead was explanted and replaced. This case illustrates the potential lifesaving benefit of the home monitoring system in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator.


Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis/efeitos adversos , Eletrodos Implantados/efeitos adversos , Traumatismos Cardíacos/etiologia , Traumatismos Cardíacos/cirurgia , Ventrículos do Coração/lesões , Ferimentos Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Ferimentos Penetrantes/etiologia , Síndrome de Brugada/complicações , Síndrome de Brugada/prevenção & controle , Remoção de Dispositivo , Ventrículos do Coração/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Ferimentos Penetrantes/cirurgia
2.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 110(5): e371-e373, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32376356

RESUMO

In this paper we describe a case of a rapidly growing pseudoaneurysm of the aortic arch occurring after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection that was successfully treated with an off-the-shelf, single-branch, dual-module aortic arch endovascular stent graft. The main module, which has a side-branch for the innominate artery, was implanted in the aortic arch and in the descending thoracic aorta. The second module was deployed in the ascending aorta and connected to the main module through a proprietary interlocking system. Final angiography showed complete exclusion of the pseudoaneurysm and good patency of the supraaortic vessels.


Assuntos
Falso Aneurisma/cirurgia , Aorta Torácica/cirurgia , Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/métodos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Stents , Idoso , Falso Aneurisma/diagnóstico por imagem , Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Masculino
3.
J Cardiovasc Transl Res ; 9(3): 223-229, 2016 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26992718

RESUMO

The benefits of total arterial (TAR) versus conventional (CR) revascularization are controversial in the higher-risk cohort of elderly patients. Taking for granted its benefit on long-term survival, we evaluated the effect of TAR on safety (death, myocardial infarction, and stroke) of patients undergoing CABG. Between 2000 and 2009, 487 patients >75 years underwent isolated CABG at our institution (150 TAR and 337 CR). Patients with arterial free-grafts were excluded. After propensity matching, the outcomes of 131 TAR and 127 CR patients were compared. TAR patients had lower incidence of post-operative myocardial infarction (p = 0.025) and stroke (p = 0.005). They also experienced shorter intensive care unit (p = 0.046) and ward stay (p = 0.028), lower output of TnI (p = 0.035), and less wound complications (leg included) (p = 0.0001), while mortality was comparable (p = 0.57). In our cohort of elderly patients with multivessel disease, TAR was associated with lower rates of myocardial infarction, stroke, and shorter hospital stay.


Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana/cirurgia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/efeitos adversos , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/mortalidade , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/mortalidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Infarto do Miocárdio/etiologia , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Cicatrização
4.
J Cardiovasc Transl Res ; 8(7): 431-7, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26374143

RESUMO

We sought to examine the efficacy in preventing surgical site infection (SSI) in cardiac surgery, using two different incise drapes (not iodine-impregnated and iodine-impregnated). A cost analysis was also considered. Between January 2008 and March 2015, 5100 consecutive cardiac surgery patients, who underwent surgery in our Institute, were prospectively collected. A total of 3320 patients received a standard not iodine-impregnated steri-drape (group A), and 1780 patients received Ioban(®) 2 drape (group B). We investigated, by a propensity matched analysis, whether the use of standard incise drape or iodine-impregnated drape would impact upon SSI rate. Totally, 808 patients for each group were matched for the available risk factors. Overall incidence of SSI was significantly higher in group A (6.5 versus 1.9 %) (p = 0.001). Superficial SSI incidence was significantly higher in group A (5.1 vs 1.6 %) (p = 0.002). Deep SSI resulted higher in group A (1.4 %) than in group B (0.4 %), although not significantly (p = 0.11). Consequently, the need for vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy use resulted 4.3 % in group A versus 1.2 % in group B (p = 0.001). Overall costs for groups A and B were 12.494.912 € and 11.721.417 €, respectively. The Ioban(®) 2 offered totally 773.495 € cost savings compared to standard steri-drape. Ioban 2 drape assured a significantly lower incidence of SSI. Additionally, Ioban(®) 2 drape proved to be cost-effective in cardiac surgery.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/instrumentação , Iodo , Campos Cirúrgicos , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício , Eficiência , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Tratamento de Ferimentos com Pressão Negativa , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Estudos Prospectivos , Análise de Regressão , Fatores de Risco , Campos Cirúrgicos/economia , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Cicatrização
5.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 77(5): 1607-14, 2004 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15111151

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) is an uncommon procedure. The use of biological vs mechanical prostheses in TVR has pros and cons. Therefore, we debate the choice between the different types of valves by means of a meta-analysis of studies of the last decade. METHODS: The heading "tricuspid valve replacement and (bio* or mec*)" was used to retrieve studies from Medline, Current Contents, and Embase. Eight out of 11 studies met the preset strict criteria: intra-institutional comparison of results of biological or mechanical TVR. Survival of hospital-discharged patients was recalculated to reduce the effect of unbalanced perioperative risk factors on overall survival. Hazard ratio was obtained from actuarial survival graphics comparison and at-risk groups, according to the method described by Parmar. If missing, the number of patients at risk was approximated assuming constant and noninformative censoring. Hazard pooling was done according to study heterogeneity. Bioprostheses were assumed as the gold standard and mechanical prostheses assumed as the challenging device. Therefore, a hazard more than 1 pointed to a higher risk of mechanical prostheses. Our 1998 study was updated for this analysis. RESULTS: In this study, 1,160 prostheses and 6,046 follow-up years were analyzed. The pooled survival hazard ratio of mechanical prostheses versus bioprostheses was 1.07 (0.84 to 1.35, p = 0.60). The pooled freedom from reoperation hazard ratio was 1.24 (0.67 to 2.31, p = 0.67). Pooled survival differences were trivial, favoring mechanical prostheses at 1 (-0.04%) and 15 years (-1.1%) and favoring bioprostheses (+1.8%) at 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: There is not a gold standard in tricuspid prostheses replacement. Prosthetic choice is left to the surgeon's clinical judgment, taking into consideration each patient's characteristics and needs.


Assuntos
Bioprótese , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas , Valva Tricúspide/cirurgia , Feminino , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/mortalidade , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reoperação , Análise de Sobrevida
6.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg ; 19(1): 70-5, 2014 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24722512

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Sternal wound dehiscence (SWD) after cardiac surgery is a rare but serious condition associated with considerable costs and morbidity. We sought to evaluate the results of the introduction of vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy in the management of sternal wound dehiscence, compared with those of previous conventional treatments. METHODS: We retrospectively collected 7148 patients who underwent cardiac surgery at our institution between January 2002 and June 2012. A total of 152 (2.1%) patients had a sternal wound dehiscence: 107 were treated with conventional treatments (Group A) and 45 were managed with VAC therapy (Group B). Patients were stratified according to preoperative risk factors and type of sternal wound dehiscence (superficial or deep; infected or not) and compared by means of a propensity-matched analysis. A cost analysis was also performed. RESULTS: Forty-five patients of each group matched for all preoperative risk factors and type of sternal wound dehiscence. SWD-related mortality rate was significantly lower in Group B (11 vs 0%; P = 0.05). Incidence of mediastinitis (P < 0.0001), sepsis (P = 0.04), delayed SWD infection (P = 0.05), other complication (P = 0.05), surgical sternal revision (P = 0.04) and surgical superficial revision (P < 0.0001) were all significantly lower in Group B. Mean patient cost was 31 106€ in Group A and 24 383€ in Group B, thus achieving a mean saving of 6723€ per patient. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, the use of VAC therapy for the management of SWD was considerably effective in decreasing mortality (SWD related), incidence of complications and need for surgical procedures; thus, leading to a significant reduction of costs.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/efeitos adversos , Tratamento de Ferimentos com Pressão Negativa , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Esternotomia/efeitos adversos , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória , Idoso , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/mortalidade , Redução de Custos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Incidência , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Mediastinite/microbiologia , Mediastinite/terapia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tratamento de Ferimentos com Pressão Negativa/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/patologia , Pontuação de Propensão , Reoperação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Sepse/microbiologia , Sepse/terapia , Esternotomia/economia , Esternotomia/mortalidade , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/microbiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/terapia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
BMJ Case Rep ; 20112011 Sep 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22679259

RESUMO

A 53-year-old man with a high-risk cardiovascular profile presented to the emergency department for a subacute myocardial infarction with signs and symptoms suggesting impending myocardial rupture. The case seemed to be resolved by an early successful surgical intervention. At 6-month follow-up, after repeated cycles of cardiac rehabilitation, the echocardiography revealed a pseudo-aneurysm of the apex and a left-to-right shunt through an inter-ventricular septum defect. The patient needed a new surgical intervention to repair this unexpected complication.


Assuntos
Ruptura Cardíaca Pós-Infarto/cirurgia , Angiografia Coronária , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Ecocardiografia , Ruptura Cardíaca Pós-Infarto/diagnóstico por imagem , Ruptura Cardíaca Pós-Infarto/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/complicações , Infarto do Miocárdio/diagnóstico por imagem , Recidiva
9.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) ; 9(6): 615-21, 2008 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18475131

RESUMO

We report a case of acute coronary syndrome in a patient with suspect Marfan syndrome, 25 days after emergent modified Bentall-De Bono intervention for acute type I peripartum aortic dissection. She was admitted to our intensive care unit because of unstable angina, caused by critical blood flow reduction in a large portion of the myocardium, according to the severity of the symptoms and the electrocardiographic alterations. Coronary angiography showed a sub-occlusive stenosis of the left main coronary artery as a result of the dissection extension to the coronary ostium. Because of the high risk related to heart surgery, the patient was successfully treated by unprotected angioplasty and drug-eluting stent positioning. Short- and mid-term outcomes were favourable. Subsequent tests confirmed the diagnosis of Marfan syndrome. After 2 years of follow-up, the patient remains asymptomatic and in good health. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a successful percutaneous intervention of the left main coronary artery in a patient with Marfan syndrome who had already undergone ascending aortic root and valve replacement by the Bentall-De Bono procedure for acute dissection.


Assuntos
Aneurisma Aórtico/cirurgia , Dissecção Aórtica/cirurgia , Síndrome de Marfan/complicações , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda , Adulto , Angioplastia , Angiografia Coronária , Feminino , Humanos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Stents
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa