RESUMO
BACKGROUND: 0.05% Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG; Irrisept [IrriMax]) is a commercial wound irrigation solution approved by the Food and Drug Administration that has seen recent adoption in the field of prosthetic urology; however, no study has evaluated whether 0.05% CHG is compatible with the minocycline-rifampin-impregnated surface (InhibiZone) of the AMS 700 penile prosthesis (Boston Scientific). AIM: To evaluate whether 0.05% CHG alters the antibiotic efficacy of the minocycline-rifampin-impregnated penile prosthesis surface. METHODS: Discs (8 mm) were taken by a punch biopsy (Sklar) from sterile penile prosthesis reservoirs whose surfaces had been impregnated with rifampin and minocycline. Discs (n = 10) were suspended in 0.05% CHG, vancomycin and gentamicin, or normal saline for 2 minutes to simulate intraoperative irrigation. Discs were then rinsed in normal saline to remove any unbound solution and incubated with methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus for 48 hours. Adherent surface bacteria were suspended by shaking in a 0.3% Tween 20 solution, serially diluted, plated onto 3M PetriFilms, and counted. Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion assays were conducted to generalize findings across various organisms. OUTCOMES: Outcomes included (1) bacterial adherence to the implant surface measured as bacterial counts (in colony-forming units per milliliter) and (2) bacterial growth reduction measured as zones of inhibitions (in millimeters). RESULTS: Incubation of implant surfaces in 0.05% CHG did not alter recovered bacterial counts as compared with normal saline and vancomycin/gentamycin. Similarly, within a single bacterial species, 0.05% CHG and vancomycin/gentamycin did not alter zone-of-inhibition measurements in Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion studies. CLINICAL TRANSLATION: This study demonstrates in vitro that 0.05% CHG may be used directly on the minocycline-rifampin-impregnated surface without altering the antibiotic efficacy of the coating. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: Strengths include that this is the first study to evaluate if 0.05% CHG affected the minocycline-rifampin-impregnated surface. Limitations include the use of in vitro studies, which serve as a proxy for in vivo practices and may not be entirely accurate or translatable in a clinical setting. CONCLUSION: 0.05% CHG does not alter the antimicrobial activity of the minocycline-rifampin-impregnated surface as compared with vancomycin/gentamycin and normal saline in vitro; however, its efficacy in clinical practice remains to be evaluated.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Clorexidina , Minociclina , Prótese de Pênis , Rifampina , Clorexidina/análogos & derivados , Clorexidina/farmacologia , Clorexidina/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Minociclina/farmacologia , Minociclina/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Rifampina/farmacologia , Rifampina/administração & dosagem , Irrigação Terapêutica/métodos , Gentamicinas/farmacologia , Gentamicinas/administração & dosagem , Vancomicina/farmacologia , Vancomicina/administração & dosagem , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/farmacologia , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/administração & dosagemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) (0.05%) has recently been suggested as both a dip for the hydrophilic surface and an irrigation solution in the setting of penile prosthesis (PP) surgery. AIM: The study sought to compare the antimicrobial efficacy of 0.05% CHG with vancomycin and gentamicin (VG) antibiotics as dip and/or irrigation solutions in the setting of a hydrophilic PP surface in vitro. METHODS: Sterile PPs with a hydrophilic coating were obtained. A series of experiments were performed to evaluate the efficacy of normal saline (NS), 0.05% CHG, or VG as dip and/or irrigation solutions to reduce methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus adhesion to PP surfaces. The 8-mm discs from PPs were incubated in 105 colony-forming units/mL of methicillin-sensitive S aureus for 48 hours, plated, and counted. Disc-diffusion tests were conducted by suspending 6-mm discs for 2 minutes in NS, 0.05% CHG, or VG, then placing them coated side down onto plates streaked with the following organisms: methicillin-sensitive S aureus, S epidermidis, Enterococcus, and Escherichia coli. After 24 hours of growth, zones of inhibition were measured. OUTCOMES: We found average bacterial counts (colony-forming units/mL) and zones of inhibition (mm) following a series of treatment protocols of PP discs. RESULTS: PP discs dipped in VG reduced bacterial adhesion to the implant surface >0.05% CHG (~5.5 log vs ~1.5 log; P < .01). Discs irrigated with either 0.05% CHG or NS removed all dip solution adsorbed to the hydrophilic surface, allowing bacterial growth. VG irrigation adsorbed to the hydrophilic surface even after 0.05% CHG or NS dips, reducing bacterial adherence (~3 log). Dipping and irrigating discs with VG was most effective in reducing adherent bacteria (~5.5 log) and was the only irrigation that showed antimicrobial activity. CLINICAL TRANSLATION: VG, when used both as a prophylactic dip and as an intraoperative irrigation solution for hydrophilic penile implant surfaces, has improved efficacy to 0.05% CHG and NS. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: This is the first study to compare the use of VG, 0.05% CHG, and NS as prophylactic dips and intraoperative irrigations for hydrophilic penile implant surfaces. Limitations include the use of in vitro studies, which serve as a proxy for in vivo practices and may not be entirely accurate nor translatable clinically. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the superior efficacy of VG as a combined dip and irrigation solution for hydrophilic penile implant surfaces compared with 0.05% CHG.