Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 25
Filtrar
1.
Paediatr Child Health ; 22(1): 13-16, 2017 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29483789

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A majority of children presenting with sepsis do not receive adequate fluid resuscitation and have a delay in antibiotic administration despite recommendations from the Surviving Sepsis Campaign. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association of measuring a complete set of five vital signs in the emergency department (ED) with recognition and treatment of septic children presenting to the ED. METHODS: Records of 218 patients aged 1 month to 17 years treated between February 2011 and December 2011 in a single academic centre with clinical criteria of sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock were retrospectively evaluated. The presence or absence of complete vital signs was analyzed in relation to timing of fluid resuscitation, and if antibiotics were given in the first hour of medical evaluation. RESULTS: Seventy-six per cent of children who had all five vital signs measured in the ED received fluid resuscitation in the first hour after medical evaluation as opposed to 61% of those who had an incomplete set of vital signs (P<0.04). Twenty per cent of children who had all five vital signs measured received antibiotics in the first hour as opposed to 9% in children who had fewer vital signs measured (P<0.02). CONCLUSION: In our study population, the measurement of all vital signs in the ED, including blood pressure, was associated with faster administration of antibiotics and improved compliance with existing fluid bolus recommendations, which may have been the result of better recognition of sepsis in children through vital signs measurement.


L'effet de la mesure des signes vitaux pour dépister et traiter les enfants atteints de sepsis. HISTORIQUE ET OBJECTIFS: La majorité des enfants ayant un sepsis ne reçoivent pas de solutés de réanimation et doivent attendre avant de se faire administrer des antibiotiques, malgré les recommandations de la Surviving Sepsis Campaign. La présente étude visait à évaluer l'association entre la mesure de l'ensemble des cinq signes vitaux à la salle d'urgence (SU) et le dépistage et le traitement des enfants atteints de sepsis qui s'y présentaient. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Les dossiers de 218 patients de 11 mois à 17 ans traités entre février et décembre 2011 dans un seul centre universitaire en raison de critères cliniques de sepsis, de grave sepsis ou de choc septique ont fait l'objet d'une évaluation rétrospective. Les chercheurs ont analysé le lien entre la présence ou l'absence de tous les signes vitaux et le moment d'administrer des solutés de réanimation et ont vérifié si des antibiotiques avaient été administrés dans l'heure suivant l'évaluation médicale. RÉSULTATS: Au total, 76 % des enfants dont les cinq signes vitaux avaient été mesurés à la SU avaient reçu des solutés de réanimation dans l'heure suivant leur évaluation médicale, par rapport à 61 % de ceux dont les signes vitaux n'avaient pas tous été mesurés (P<0,04). De plus, 20 % des enfants dont les cinq signes vitaux avaient été mesurés à la SU avaient reçu des antibiotiques dans l'heure suivant leur évaluation médicale, par rapport à 9 % de ceux dont les signes vitaux n'avaient pas tous été mesurés (P<0,02). CONCLUSION: Au sein de la population à l'étude, la mesure de tous les signes vitaux en SU, y compris la tension artérielle, s'associait à une administration plus rapide d'antibiotiques et à une meilleure compliance aux recommandations sur le bolus de liquide, ce qui peut être attribuable à un meilleur dépistage du sepsis chez les enfants grâce à la mesure des signes vitaux.

2.
Ann Surg ; 262(6): 1115-22, 2015 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25243544

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether minor thoracic injuries (MTIs) relate to subsequent functional limitations. BACKGROUND: Approximately 75% of patients with an MTI are discharged after an emergency department (ED) visit, whereas significant functional limitations can occur in the weeks that follow. METHODS: A 19 months' prospective cohort study with a 90-day follow-up was conducted at 4 university-affiliated EDs. Patients 16 years and older with an MTI were assessed at initial ED visit, 7, 14, 30, and 90 days after injury. Functional outcome was measured using the SF-12 scale. General linear model were used to assess outcome. RESULTS: A total of 482 patients were included, of whom 127 (26.3%) were 65 or older. Overall, 147 patients (30.5%) presented with at least 1 rib fracture and 59 subjects (12.2%) with delayed hemothorax. At 90 days, 22.8% of patients still had severe or moderate disabilities on global physical health score. Patients with solely delayed hemothorax and no rib fracture had the lowest global physical health score (46.4 vs 61.1, P < 0.01, effect size =  -2.60) than patients with simple MTI. Generally, functional limitations also increase with increments of number of rib fracture detected on radiograph. Outcomes were not different among patients 65 years or older when compared to their younger counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective study of MTIs, severe to moderate disabilities were present in nearly 1 patient out of 5 at 90 days. The presence of delayed hemothorax and the number of rib fracture were associated with increased functional limitations after a MTI.


Assuntos
Avaliação da Deficiência , Traumatismos Torácicos/fisiopatologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Seguimentos , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Hemotórax/etiologia , Hemotórax/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alta do Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Fraturas das Costelas/complicações , Fraturas das Costelas/fisiopatologia , Traumatismos Torácicos/complicações , Índices de Gravidade do Trauma , Adulto Jovem
3.
Ann Emerg Med ; 61(1): 27-32.e3, 2013 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22841173

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We evaluate the association between triage levels assigned using the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale and surrogate markers of validity for real-life children triaged in multiple emergency departments (EDs). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study evaluating the triage assessment and outcomes of all children presenting to 12 pediatric EDs, all of which are members of the Pediatric Emergency Research Canada group, during a 1-year period (2010 to 2011). Anonymous data were retrieved from the ED computerized databases. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of children hospitalized for each triage level. Other outcomes were ICU admission, proportion of patients who left without being seen by a physician, and length of stay in the ED. Evaluation of all children visiting these EDs during 1 year was expected to provide more than 1,000 patients in each triage category. RESULTS: A total of 550,940 children were included. Pooled data demonstrated hospitalization proportions of 61%, 30%, 10%, 2%, and 0.9% for patients in Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale levels 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. There was a strong association between triage level and admission to the ICU, probability of leaving without being seen by a physician, and length of stay. CONCLUSION: The strong association between triage level and multiple markers of severity in 12 Canadian pediatric EDs suggests validity of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale for children.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Gravidade do Paciente , Triagem/métodos , Adolescente , Canadá , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Bases de Dados Factuais , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Pediátricos , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Lactente , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Triagem/estatística & dados numéricos
4.
Ann Emerg Med ; 60(6): 726-31, 2012 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22542306

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Patients admitted to emergency departments (EDs) for minor thoracic injuries are possibly at risk of delayed pneumonia. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of delayed pneumonia post-minor thoracic injury and the associated risk factors. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter cohort study was conducted in 4 Canadian EDs, from November 2006 to November 2010. All consecutive patients aged 16 years and older with minor thoracic injury who were discharged from the ED were screened for eligibility. Uniform clinical and radiologic evaluations were performed on the initial ED visit and were repeated at weeks 1 and 2. Relative risk analyses quantified incidence with comparison by age, sex, smoking status, alcohol intoxication, pulmonary comorbidity, ability to cough atelectasis, pain level, and number of rib fractures. RESULTS: Of the 1,057 participants recruited, 347 (32.8%) had at least 1 rib fracture, 87 (8.2%) had asthma, and 36 (3.4%) had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Only 6 patients (0.6%; 95% confidence interval 0.24% to 1.17%) developed pneumonia during the follow-up period. The relative risk for patients with preexistent pulmonary disease and radiologically proven rib fractures was 8.6 (P=.045; 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 70.9). Sex, smoking habit, initial atelectasis, ability to cough, and alcohol intoxication were not significantly associated with delayed pneumonia. CONCLUSION: This prospective cohort study of nonhospitalized patients with minor thoracic injuries revealed a low incidence of delayed pneumonia. Nonetheless, our results support tailored follow-up for asthmatic or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with rib fracture.


Assuntos
Pneumonia/etiologia , Fraturas das Costelas/complicações , Traumatismos Torácicos/complicações , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Canadá/epidemiologia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Pneumopatias/complicações , Masculino , Pneumonia/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo
5.
Ann Emerg Med ; 60(1): 71-7.e3, 2012 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22305329

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The aims of the study are to measure both the interrater agreement of nurses using the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale in children and the validity of the scale as measured by the correlation between triage level and proxy markers of severity. METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter study of the reliability and construct validity of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale in 9 tertiary care pediatric emergency departments (EDs) across Canada during 2009 to 2010. Participants were a sample of children initially triaged as Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale level 2 (emergency) to level 5 (nonurgent). Participants were recruited immediately after their initial triage to undergo a second triage assessment by the research nurse. Both triages were performed blinded to the other. The primary outcome measures were the interrater agreement between the 2 nurses and the association between triage level and hospitalization. Secondary outcome measures were the association between triage level and health resource use and length of stay in the ED. RESULTS: A total of 1,564 patients were approached and 1,464 consented. The overall interrater agreement was good, as demonstrated by a quadratic weighted κ score of 0.74 (95% confidence interval 0.71 to 0.76). Hospitalization proportions were 30%, 8.3%, 2.3%, and 2.2% for patients triaged at levels 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. There was also a strong association between triage levels and use of health care resources and length of stay. CONCLUSION: The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale demonstrates a good interrater agreement between nurses across multiple pediatric EDs and is a valid triage tool, as demonstrated by its good association with markers of severity.


Assuntos
Índices de Gravidade do Trauma , Triagem/métodos , Adolescente , Canadá , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Pediátricos , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Lactente , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Estudos Prospectivos , Análise de Regressão , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Método Simples-Cego
6.
J Public Health (Oxf) ; 32(1): 38-43, 2010 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19638395

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is the most common infectious cause of death in childhood in developed countries. This disease may cause severe disability or death if a patient is sub-optimally managed. An audit was performed in Australia of all 2005-06 notified IMD cases to elicit correctable issues. METHODS: Over the 2 year period, 24 cases were notified in the Hunter New England Health area. These cases were reviewed by an expert panel to highlight key correctable issues in recognition and management of IMD. RESULTS: The 24 patients were aged between 1 month and 70 years. Thirteen (54%) were children and 14 (58%) were women. Six (25%) cases developed complications, two being severe (one death, one limb amputations). These patients had risk factors for IMD. The emergency department average delay between assessment and administration of antibiotics was 57.8 min. CONCLUSION: There were avoidable factors identified in both patients with a poor outcome. Length of delay in initiating antibiotic therapy has been associated with poor outcome, thus the delay in our series is of concern. The audit highlighted many potentially correctable issues in the medical, laboratory and public health management of IMD cases.


Assuntos
Gerenciamento Clínico , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/organização & administração , Infecções Meningocócicas/terapia , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/organização & administração , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Austrália , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Auditoria Médica , Infecções Meningocócicas/diagnóstico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
7.
Can Fam Physician ; 56(3): e117-24, 2010 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20228291

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To review the management and follow-up of patients with minor thoracic injuries (MTI) treated by emergency or primary care physicians. DESIGN: A multicentre, retrospective study. SETTING: Three university-affiliated emergency departments of the metropolitan region of Quebec city, Que. PARTICIPANTS: Patients older than 16 years of age with suspected or proven rib fractures following traumatic events. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Differences in admission and discharge proportions and disposition management following MTI. RESULTS: Four hundred and forty-seven charts were analyzed. Only 23 patients (5.2%) were admitted during the study period. Admission and discharge proportions were significantly different among the 3 surveyed hospitals, ranging from 1.3% to 15.2% (P < or = .001). There were no recommendations of follow-up noted in most (53.5%) of the charts and there were no differences after hospital stratification. Planned follow-up visits were scheduled for 5.7% of discharged patients. Being older than 65 years of age or having multiple rib fractures had no influence on management and follow-up recommendations. Eighty-two patients (18.6%) had unplanned follow-up visits in the emergency department, with inadequate pain relief as the principal reason for consultation (56.1%). There was no significant difference after stratification for age and type of analgesia. Other clinically significant delayed complications were recorded in 8.3% of all MTI patients. CONCLUSION: The proportion of patients admitted for rib fractures was lower than the expected 25%, based on previous publications, and varied across surveyed hospitals. A very low proportion of patients was offered planned follow-up visits or even any follow-up recommendations in view of possible delayed complications and disabilities. Further studies are needed to identify predictors of delayed MTI complications and enhance appropriate use of follow-up resources.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Traumatismos Torácicos/terapia , Adolescente , Fatores Etários , Canadá , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas das Costelas/diagnóstico , Fraturas das Costelas/epidemiologia , Traumatismos Torácicos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
8.
Res Involv Engagem ; 6: 54, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32974050

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patient engagement could improve the quality of primary care practices. However, we know little about effective patient engagement strategies. We aimed to assess the acceptability and feasibility of embedding advisory councils of clinicians, managers, patients and caregivers to conduct patient-oriented quality improvement projects in primary care practices. METHODS: Using a participatory action research approach, we conducted our study in two non-academic primary care practices in Quebec City (Canada). Patient-experts (patients trained in research) were involved in study design, council recruitment and meeting facilitation. Advisory councils were each to include patients and/or caregivers, clinicians and managers. Over six meetings, councils would identify quality improvement priorities and plan projects accordingly. We assessed acceptability and feasibility of the councils using non-participant observations, audio-recordings and self-administered questionnaires. We used descriptive analyses, triangulated qualitative data and performed inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Between December 2017 and June 2018, two advisory councils were formed, each with 11 patients (36% male, mean age 53.8 years), a nurse and a manager practising as a family physician (25% male, mean age 45 years). The six meetings per practice occurred within the study period with a mean of eight patients per meeting. Councils worked on two projects each: the first council on a new information leaflet about clinic organization and operation, and on communications about local public health programs; the second on methods to further engage patients in the practice, and on improving the appointment scheduling system. Median patient satisfaction was 8/10, and 66.7% perceived councils had an impact on practice operations. They considered involvement of a manager, facilitation by patient-experts, and the fostering of mutual respect as key to this impact. Clinicians and managers liked having patients as facilitators and the respect among members. Limiting factors were difficulty focusing on a single feasible project and time constraints. Managers in both practices were committed to pursuing the councils post-study. CONCLUSION: Our results indicated that embedding advisory councils of clinicians, managers, patients and caregivers to conduct patient-oriented quality improvement projects in primary care practices is both acceptable and feasible. Future research should assess its transferability to other clinical contexts.

9.
CJEM ; 21(4): 464-467, 2019 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30744728

RESUMO

CLINICIAN'S CAPSULEWhat is known about the topic?Literature regarding the impact of incentive spirometry on patients with rib fractures is unclear; there are no recommendations for its use in the emergency department (ED).What did this study ask?The objective of this study was to assess the impact of incentive spirometry on delayed complications in patients with rib fractures in the ED.What did this study find?Unsupervised incentive spirometry use does not have a protective effect against delayed pulmonary complications after a rib fracture.Why does this study matter to clinicians?Clear guidelines for incentive spirometry use for patients with rib fractures and further research to assess its usefulness in other ED populations are needed.


OBJECTIFS: La spirométrie incitative est parfois prescrite en vue d'encourager le rétablissement de la fonction respiratoire. Toutefois, peut de littérature est disponible sur la spirométrie incitative et ses effets chez les patients avec fracture de côtes, et il n'existe pas de recommandation sur son utilisation au département des urgences (DU), tout particulièrement pour les fractures de côtes, qui sont reconnues pour accroître le risque de complications pulmonaires. Cette étude visait donc à évaluer l'utilisation de la spirométrie incitative et à mesurer son impact sur l'incidence de complications tardives chez les patients ayant été libéré de l'urgence après une confirmation de fracture de côtes. MÉTHODE: Il s'agit d'une sous-étude planifiée d'une étude observationnelle de cohorte prospective, qui a eu lieu dans 4 DU au Canada, entre novembre 2006 et mai 2012. Des patients âgés de 16 ans et plus, non hospitalisés, avec au moins une fracture de côte confirmée par radiographie ont été sélectionnés. La décision de prescrire la spirométrie incitative était laissée à la discrétion du médecin traitant. Les principaux résultats consistaient en l'apparition d'une pneumonie, d'atélectasie ou d'un hémothorax dans les 14 jours suivant le traumatisme. Des analyses d'appariement des coefficients de propension ont été réalisées. RÉSULTATS: Un total de 439 patients ont participé à l'étude, dont 182 (41,5%) ont été reçu la spirométrie incitative. 99 cas d'hémothorax (22,6%), 103 cas d'atélectasie (23,5%) et 4 cas de pneumonie (0,9%) ont été observés. Nos résultats indiquent que la spirométrie incitative ne semble pas un moyen de protection contre l'hémothorax (risque relatif [RR] = 1,03 [0,66­1,64]) ni contre l'atélectasie ou la pneumonie (RR = 1,07 [0,68­1,72]). CONCLUSION: Nos résultats suggèrent que la spirométrie incitative non supervisée n'offrirait pas d'effet protecteur contre l'apparition tardive de complications pulmonaires à la suite d'une fracture de côtes. D'autres recherches sont nécessaires afin de valider la pertinence de prescrire la spirométrie incitative au DU, chez certains groupes de blessés plus spécifiques.


Assuntos
Hemotórax/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia/prevenção & controle , Atelectasia Pulmonar/prevenção & controle , Fraturas das Costelas/complicações , Espirometria , Estudos de Coortes , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Hemotórax/etiologia , Humanos , Pneumonia/etiologia , Pontuação de Propensão , Atelectasia Pulmonar/etiologia
10.
Res Involv Engagem ; 4: 30, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30288298

RESUMO

PLAIN ENGLISH SUMMARY: Making primary care clinics more patient-centered is key to improving patients' experience of care. If patients themselves were engaged in helping define priorities and suggesting quality improvements in the clinic, care would respond better to their needs. However, patient engagement is a new phenomenon, particularly in community based primary care clinics. How to engage patients in quality improvement in these clinics, or what effect this might have, is not well known. The involvement of patients needs to be adapted to the way these clinics function. The aim of this study is to create and evaluate a new model of patient engagement for quality improvement in community based primary care clinics. Patients, primary care professionals and researchers will create advisory councils in two primary care clinics in Quebec City (Canada). In each clinic, the advisory council will include 12 patients or caregivers registered at the clinic, a clinician and a clinic manager. The advisory council will meet every 6 weeks for a total of six meetings. Two patient-experts will facilitate meetings. During meetings, members of the council will list their needs in order of importance. Then they will suggest improvements in line with these needs. We will study if our advisory council model is well adapted to community based primary care settings and meets participants' expectations. At the end of the study we will be able to offer guidance about engaging patients with health professionals in quality improvement in primary care clinics. ABSTRACT: Background Involvement of end-users, including patients, managers and clinicians, in identifying quality improvement and research priorities might improve the relevance of projects and increase their impact. Few patient engagement initiatives have taken place in community based primary care practices (CBPCPs) and best practices for engaging patients in such settings are not well defined. The aim of this pilot study is to develop and assess the feasibility of a new collaborative model of advisory council involving clinicians, managers, patients and caregivers in CBPCP to strengthen their capacity to conduct quality improvement and patient-oriented research projects. Methods We will conduct a participatory action research project in two non-academic CBPCPs in Quebec City (Canada). In each CBPCP, the advisory council will include 12 patients or caregivers, a clinician and a clinic manager. Patients or their caregivers will be identified by clinicians and contacted by patient-experts. They will be eligible if they are registered at the practice, motivated, and available to attend meetings. The council will meet every 6 weeks for a total of six meetings. Two patient-experts will guide council members to identify quality improvement priorities and patient-oriented research questions based on their experience in the clinic. They will then be supported to plan actions to target these priorities. Analysis of meetings will be based on feasibility criteria, notes by non-participant observers in log books, audio-recording of the meetings and questionnaires to evaluate council members' perceptions and the likelihood they would engage in such councils. Discussion The results of this study will  be a model of patient engagement and a discussion of factors to improve the model to fit the needs of primary care patients and professionals. This will lay the foundation for a sustainable structure for long-term patient engagement and contribute to the development of a patient-centered and quality-improvement culture in CBPCPs.

11.
CMAJ Open ; 5(2): E444-E453, 2017 Jun 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28611156

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: About 75% of patients with minor thoracic injury are discharged after an emergency department visit. However, complications such as delayed hemothorax can occur. We sought to derive and validate a clinical decision rule to predict hemothorax in patients discharged from the emergency department. METHODS: We conducted a 6-year prospective cohort study in 4 university-affiliated emergency departments. Patients aged 16 years or older presenting with a minor thoracic injury were assessed at 5 time points (initial visit and 7, 14, 30 and 90 d after the injury). Radiologists' reports were reviewed for the presence of hemothorax. We used log-binomial regression models to identify predictors of hemothorax. RESULTS: A total of 1382 patients were included: 830 in the derivation phase and 552 in the validation phase. Of these, 151 (10.9%) had hemothorax at the 14-day follow-up. Patients 65 years of age or older represented 25.3% (210/830) and 23.7% (131/552) of the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. The final clinical decision rule included a combination of age (> 70 yr, 2 points; 45-70 yr, 1 point), fracture of any high to mid thorax rib (ribs 3-9, 2 points) and presence of 3 or more rib fractures (1 point). Twenty (30.8%) of the 65 high-risk patients (score ≥ 4) experienced hemothorax during the follow-up period. The clinical decision rule had a high specificity (90.7%, 95% confidence interval 87.7%-93.1%) in this high-risk group, thus guiding appropriate post-emergency care. INTERPRETATION: One patient out of every 10 presented with delayed hemothorax after discharge from the emergency department. Implementation of this validated clinical decision rule for minor thoracic injury could guide emergency discharge plans.

12.
CJEM ; 19(3): 213-219, 2017 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27748231

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The main objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of emergency department (ED) point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) for rib fracture diagnosis in patients with minor thoracic injury (mTI). Secondary objectives were to 1) evaluate patients' pain during the PoCUS procedure, 2) identify the limitations of the use of PoCUS technique, and 3) compare the diagnosis obtained with PoCUS to radiography results. METHODS: Adult patients who presented with clinical suspicion of rib fractures after mTI were included. All patients underwent PoCUS performed by emergency physicians (EPs) prior to a rib view X-ray. A visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 100 was used to ascertain feasibility, patients' pain and clinicians' degree of certitude. Feasibility was defined as a score of more than 50 on the VAS. We documented the radiologists' interpretation of rib view X-ray. Radiologists were blinded to the PoCUS results. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients were included. A majority (65%) of EPs concluded that the PoCUS technique to diagnose rib fracture was feasible (VAS score > 50). Median score for feasibility was 63. Median score was 31 (Interquartile range [IQR] 5-57) for patients' pain related to the PoCUS. The main limiting factor of the PoCUS technique was pain during patient examination (15%). CONCLUSION: PoCUS examination appears to be a feasible technique for a rib fracture diagnosis in the ED.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito/estatística & dados numéricos , Fraturas das Costelas/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia Doppler , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Quebeque , Radiografia Torácica/métodos , Fraturas das Costelas/epidemiologia , Fraturas das Costelas/terapia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Traumatismos Torácicos/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos Torácicos/fisiopatologia , Traumatismos Torácicos/terapia
13.
Am J Public Health ; 96(8): 1436-43, 2006 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16809603

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated whether cumulative exposure to job strain increases blood pressure. METHODS: A prospective study of 8395 white-collar workers was initiated during 1991 to 1993. At follow-up, 7.5 years later, 84% of the participants were reassessed to estimate cumulative exposure to job strain. RESULTS: Compared with men who had never been exposed, men with cumulative exposure and those who became exposed during follow-up showed significant systolic blood pressure increments of 1.8 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.1, 3.5) and 1.5 mm Hg (95% CI=0.2, 2.8), respectively, and relative risks of blood pressure increases in the highest quintile group of 1.33 (95% CI = 1.01, 1.76) and 1.40 (95% CI = 1.14, 1.73). Effect magnitudes were smaller among women. Effects tended to be more pronounced among men and women with low levels of social support at work. CONCLUSIONS: Among these white-collar workers, exposure to cumulative job strain had a modest but significant effect on systolic blood pressure among men. The risk was of comparable magnitude to that observed for age and sedentary behavior. Men and women with low levels of social support at work appeared to be at higher risk for increases in blood pressure.


Assuntos
Emprego/psicologia , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Hipertensão/psicologia , Saúde Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Apoio Social , Estresse Psicológico/complicações , Adolescente , Adulto , Determinação da Pressão Arterial , Exercício Físico , Feminino , Órgãos Governamentais , Humanos , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Hipertensão/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ocupações/classificação , Estudos Prospectivos , Quebeque/epidemiologia , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Estresse Psicológico/epidemiologia
14.
CJEM ; 18(6): 437-442, 2016 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27780500

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess adverse events associated with diagnostic urethral catheterization (UC) in young children and to determine their impact on the patient and their family. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study conducted in the emergency department of a tertiary-care pediatric hospital. All 3- to 24-month-old children with fever who had a diagnostic UC were eligible. Parents who consented to participate were contacted by phone within 7 to 10 days after the UC to answer a standardized questionnaire inquiring about complications. The primary outcome was the occurrence of an unfavourable event in the seven days following UC, defined as painful urination, genital pain, urinary retention, hematuria or secondary urinary tract infection. Secondary outcomes included the need for further medical care and the need for parents to miss school or work. RESULTS: Of the 199 patients who completed the study, 41 (21%) reported a complication: painful urination in 19 (10%) children, genital pain in 16 (8%), urinary retention in 11 (6%), gross hematuria in 9 (5%), and secondary urinary tract infection in 1 (0.5%). Three (1%) parents reported the need for further medical care and three (1%) missed work. Two independent variables (male sex and age 12-23 months) were associated with a higher risk of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Urethral catheterization is associated with adverse events in 21% of young children in the week following the procedure. Accordingly, this procedure should be used judiciously in children, considering its potential to cause unfavourable events.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Cateterismo Urinário/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Urinário/métodos , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , Fatores Etários , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Masculino , Pediatria , Estudos Prospectivos , Quebeque , Medição de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Infecções Urinárias/diagnóstico , Doenças Urológicas/diagnóstico
15.
CJEM ; 18(5): 349-57, 2016 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27346634

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of delayed complications, specifically hemothorax, and functional outcome in patients with isolated sternal fracture discharged from the emergency department (ED) compared to patients with other minor thoracic trauma. METHODS: This prospective cohort study was conducted in four university-affiliated Canadian EDs. Patients ages 16 and older discharged from the ED with an isolated minor thoracic injury were included and categorized as isolated sternal fracture, rib fracture, or no fracture. A standardized clinical and radiological follow-up was performed at 7 and 14 days as well as a phone follow-up at 30 and 90 days post-injury. Functional outcome was determined using the Medical Outcome Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12). RESULTS: A total of 969 patients were included, of whom 32 (3.3%) had an isolated sternal fracture, 304 (31.3%) had rib fracture, and 633 (65.3%) had no fracture. Within 14 days, 112 patients presented with a delayed hemothorax: 12.5% of sternal fracture patients, 23% of rib fracture(s) patients, and 6% of minor thoracic injury patients without fracture (p<0.05). At 90 days, 57.1% of patients with sternal fracture had moderate to severe disability compared to 25.4% and 21.2% for both of the other groups, respectively (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: In this prospective study, we found that 12.5% (n=4, p<0.05) of patients with sternal fracture developed a delayed hemothorax, but the clinical significance of this remains questionable. The proportion of patients with sternal fracture who had moderate to severe disability was significantly higher than that of patients with other minor thoracic trauma.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Fraturas Ósseas/complicações , Hemotórax/fisiopatologia , Esterno/lesões , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Adolescente , Adulto , Canadá , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Estudos de Coortes , Diagnóstico Tardio , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Consolidação da Fratura/fisiologia , Fraturas Ósseas/diagnóstico , Hemotórax/etiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Prospectivos , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Fraturas das Costelas/complicações , Fraturas das Costelas/diagnóstico , Medição de Risco , Traumatismos Torácicos/complicações , Traumatismos Torácicos/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Torácicos/terapia
16.
Can Respir J ; 11(7): 480-6, 2004 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15505701

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: French versions of the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) and the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) have largely been used in Canada, although the process by which they were translated remains unknown and the psychometric properties of these translated versions have not been assessed in a properly designed study. OBJECTIVE: To translate and evaluate the psychometric properties of the French-Canadian versions of the CRQ and the SGRQ. METHODS: The questionnaires were translated according to standardized guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation. Measurements were made at baseline and again after two weeks in 27 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients known to have stable disease. Measurements were also taken pre- and post-treatment in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD (33 patients) or in pulmonary rehabilitation (32 patients). RESULTS: The CRQ showed high test-retest reliability (the majority above 0.70), although it was slightly lower for the dyspnea dimension (0.58 to 0.65). The SGRQ also showed high test-retest reliability (above 0.80), although it was lower for the symptoms dimension (0.54 to 0.58). The internal consistency reliability coefficients ranged from 0.73 to 0.90 for the CRQ and above 0.80 for the SGRQ, except for the symptoms dimension. The Pearson's correlation coefficients were low (less than 0.30) between most of the translated questionnaire dimension scores and forced expiratory volume in 1 s, 6 min walking test and dyspnea measures. The correlation was generally high (greater than 0.50) between the two questionnaires and the 36-item short form health survey, and for those domains that measured the same construct. The changes in the total and subscale scores of the CRQ and the SGRQ (except for the symptoms domain) were all largely above the variability of the score in the stable disease group. CONCLUSION: The present study confirms that the French-Canadian translated versions of the CRQ and the SGRQ perform well with respect to their psychometric properties. They are both suitable for their intended purpose, ie, to detect change in health status in patients with COPD when assessing if a treatment is beneficial. However, the symptoms domain of the SGRQ cannot be used to assess acute change with respect to a given therapy.


Assuntos
Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/diagnóstico , Qualidade de Vida , Inquéritos e Questionários , Idoso , Canadá , Feminino , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Psicometria , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/terapia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
18.
CJEM ; 16(2): 136-43, 2014 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24626118

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are to determine the prevalence, risk factors, and time to onset of delayed hemothorax and pneumothorax in adults who experienced a minor blunt thoracic trauma. METHOD: A prospective cohort of 450 consecutive patients was recruited. Eligible patients had to be over 16 years of age, consulted within 72 hours for a trauma, and available for outpatient follow-up at 2, 7, and 14 days posttrauma. The clinical outcome investigated was the presence of delayed pneumothorax or hemothorax on the follow-up chest x-ray. OUTCOMES: Delayed hemothorax occurred in 11.8% (95% CI 8.8-14.8), and delayed pneumothorax occurred in 0.9% (95% CI 0.2-2.3) of participants. During the 14-day follow-up period, 87.0% of these delayed complications developed in the first week. In the multivariate analysis, the only statistically significant risk factor for delayed complications was the location of fractures on the x-ray of the hemithorax. The adjusted odds ratio was 1.52 (95% CI 0.62-3.73) for the lower ribs (tenth to twelfth rib), 3.11 (95% CI 1.60-6.08) for the midline ribs (sixth to ninth rib), and 5.05 (95% CI 1.80-14.19) for the upper ribs (third to fifth rib) versus patients with no fractures. CONCLUSION: The presence of at least one rib fracture between the third and ninth rib on the x-ray of the hemithorax is a significant risk factor for delayed hemothorax and pneumothorax.


Assuntos
Hemotórax/epidemiologia , Pneumotórax/epidemiologia , Traumatismos Torácicos/complicações , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/complicações , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hemotórax/diagnóstico por imagem , Hemotórax/etiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumotórax/diagnóstico por imagem , Pneumotórax/etiologia , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Quebeque/epidemiologia , Radiografia Torácica , Fatores de Risco , Traumatismos Torácicos/diagnóstico , Fatores de Tempo , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico
19.
Acad Emerg Med ; 20(11): 1139-45, 2013 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24238316

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The objective was to identify the risk factors of clinically significant pain at 90 days in patients with minor thoracic injury (MTI) discharged from the emergency department (ED). METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, cohort study was conducted in four Canadian EDs from November 2006 to November 2010. All consecutive patients aged 16 years or older with MTI were eligible at discharge from EDs. They underwent standardized clinical and radiologic evaluations at 1 and 2 weeks, followed by standardized telephone interviews at 30 and 90 days. A pain trajectory model characterized groups of patients with different pain evolutions and ascertained specific risk factors in each group through multivariate analysis. RESULTS: In this cohort of 1,132 patients, 734 were eligible for study inclusion. The authors identified a pain trajectory that characterized 18.2% of the study population experiencing clinically significant pain (>3 of 10) at 90 days after a MTI. Multivariate modeling found two or more rib fractures, smoking, and initial oxygen saturation below 95% to be predictors of this group of patients. CONCLUSIONS: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first prospective study of trajectory modeling to detect risk factors associated with significant pain at 90 days after MTI. These factors may help in planning specific treatment strategies and should be validated in another prospective cohort.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Dor/epidemiologia , Traumatismos Torácicos/complicações , Traumatismos Torácicos/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Medição da Dor , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Quebeque/epidemiologia , Fraturas das Costelas/complicações , Fatores de Risco , Síndrome
20.
CJEM ; 15(6): 337-44, 2013 Nov.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24176457

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are to determine the prevalence, risk factors, and time to onset of delayed hemothorax and pneumothorax in adults who experienced a minor blunt thoracic trauma. METHOD: A prospective cohort of 450 consecutive patients was recruited. Eligible patients had to be over 16 years of age, consulted within 72 hours for a trauma, and available for outpatient follow-up at 2, 7, and 14 days posttrauma. The clinical outcome investigated was the presence of delayed pneumothorax or hemothorax on the follow-up chest x-ray. OUTCOMES: Delayed hemothorax occurred in 11.8% (95% CI 8.8-14.8), and delayed pneumothorax occurred in 0.9% (95% CI 0.2-2.3) of participants. During the 14-day follow-up period, 87.0% of these delayed complications developed in the first week. In the multivariate analysis, the only statistically significant risk factor for delayed complications was the location of fractures on the x-ray of the hemithorax. The adjusted odds ratio was 1.52 (95% CI 0.62-3.73) for the lower ribs (tenth to twelfth rib), 3.11 (95% CI 1.60-6.08) for the midline ribs (sixth to ninth rib), and 5.05 (95% CI 1.80-14.19) for the upper ribs (third to fifth rib) versus patients with no fractures. CONCLUSION: The presence of at least one rib fracture between the third and ninth rib on the x-ray of the hemithorax is a significant risk factor for delayed hemothorax and pneumothorax.


Assuntos
Hemotórax/epidemiologia , Pneumotórax/epidemiologia , Fraturas das Costelas/complicações , Traumatismos Torácicos/complicações , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/complicações , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hemotórax/diagnóstico , Hemotórax/etiologia , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumotórax/diagnóstico , Pneumotórax/etiologia , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Quebeque/epidemiologia , Radiografia Torácica , Fraturas das Costelas/diagnóstico , Fatores de Risco , Traumatismos Torácicos/diagnóstico , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa