Mastectomies for breast cancer: Comparison between peri-operative morbidity after simple mastectomy or after immediate breast reconstruction in a unicentric serie of 210 patients.

BACKGROUND: In breast cancer surgery, IBR (immediate breast reconstruction) is widely proposed to patients without indications of adjuvant treatments and without risk factors of surgical complications. New INCa's guidelines (2022) allow the expansion of IBR indications. OBJECTIVE: A retrospective, unicentric and safety study: post-operative complication rate after IBR in comparison with simple mastectomy (SM, reference treatment). MATERIEL AND METHOD: This retrospective study has included all major patients who have received mastectomy for breast cancer between 2016 and 2020 before application of new guidelines, in Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Lyon (France). They were distributed in two groups according to their surgery : IBR and SM. Usual risk factors of post-operative complications were collected (tabacco, obesity…). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of an early post-operative complication (within 3 months after surgery). Two secondary analysis focused on the impact of preoperative risk factors on complications, and the proportion of patients eligibled for an IBR among SM based on new INCA's guidelines. RESULTS: The study included 185 mastectomies: 153 SM, 32 mastectomies IBR.  IBR's patients presented less risk factors, and few indications of adjuvant treatments. The rate of major complications was identical in the two groups (14 % in SM group, 12 % in IBR group), and there were more minor complications in the SM group than in the IBR group (p 0,01). According to our study, the raw proportion of initially possible IBR was 68 % (36 % of breast reconstruction in this study). CONCLUSION: This analyse approve IBR in selected patients. In this context, INCa's guidelines (2022) can generalize IBR's proposal to patients. However, the analysis of pre-operative risk factors stay essential in medical care.

Sex-related shape dimorphism in the human radiocarpal and midcarpal joints.

Previous research has revealed significant size differences between human male and female carpal bones but it is unknown if there are significant shape differences as well. This study investigated sex-related shape variation and allometric patterns in five carpal bones that make up the radiocarpal and midcarpal joints in modern humans. We found that many aspects of carpal shape (76% of all variables quantified) were similar between males and females, despite variation in size. However, 10 of the shape ratios were significantly different between males and females, with at least one significant shape difference observed in each carpal bone. Within-sex standard major axis regressions (SMA) of the numerator (i.e., the linear variables) on the denominator (i.e., the geometric mean) for each significantly different shape ratio indicated that most linear variables scaled with positive allometry in both males and females, and that for eight of the shape ratios, sex-related shape variation is associated with statistically similar sex-specific scaling relationships. Only the length of the scaphoid body and the height of the lunate triquetrum facet showed a significantly higher SMA slope in females compared with males. These findings indicate that the significant differences in the majority of the shape ratios are a function of subtle (i.e., not statistically significant) scaling differences between males and females. There are a number of potential developmental, functional, and evolutionary factors that may cause sex-related shape differences in the human carpus. The results highlight the potential for subtle differences in scaling to result in functionally significant differences in shape.