RESUMO
BACKGROUND: With the increasing prevalence of antibiotic resistance, real-world data on the optimal empirical second-line therapy for Helicobacter pylori are still limited. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the real-world efficacy of various second-line therapies for H. pylori. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective population-based cohort study of all H. pylori-infected patients who had received the second-line treatment after the failure of primary clarithromycin triple therapy in Hong Kong between 2003 and 2018. The retreatment success rates of different second-line therapies were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 7591 patients who received second-line treatment were included. Notably, the most commonly prescribed regimen was still clarithromycin triple therapy, but the frequency of use had decreased from 59.5% in 2003-06 to 28.7% in 2015-18. Concomitant non-bismuth quadruple therapy had emerged as the commonest regimen (from 3.3% to 43.9%). In a validation analysis, the sensitivity and specificity of retreatment-inferred second-line treatment failure were 88.3% and 97.1%, respectively. The overall success rate of second-line therapies was 73.6%. Bismuth quadruple therapy had the highest success rate of 85.6%, while clarithromycin triple therapy had the lowest success rate of 63.5%. Specifically, bismuth/metronidazole/tetracycline quadruple, metronidazole/tetracycline triple, levofloxacin/metronidazole/tetracycline quadruple, rifabutin/amoxicillin triple and amoxicillin/levofloxacin triple therapies had relatively higher success rates over 80%. Age, treatment duration, baseline conditions and first-line treatment used were associated with success rate. CONCLUSIONS: Bismuth quadruple therapy was the most effective second-line regimen for H. pylori in this real-world study. Despite a very low success rate, clarithromycin-containing triple therapies were still commonly used as second-line regimens.
RESUMO
Impact of air pollution on incident chronic kidney disease (CKD) in diabetic patients is insufficiently studied. We aimed to examine exposure-response associations of PM2.5, PM10, PM2.5-10, NO2, and NOX with incident CKD in diabetic patients in the UK. We also widened exposure level of PM2.5 and examined PM2.5-CKD association in diabetic patients across the entire range of global concentration. Based on data from UK biobank cohort, we applied Cox proportional hazards models and the shape constrained health impact function to investigate the associations between air pollutants and incident CKD in diabetic patients. Global exposure mortality model was applied to combine the PM2.5-CKD association in diabetic patients in the UK with all other published associations. Multiple air pollutants were positively associated with incident CKD in diabetic patients in the UK, with hazard ratios (HRs) of 1.034 (95 %CI: 1.015-1.053) and 1.021 (95 %CI: 1.007-1.036) for every 1 µg/m3 increase in PM2.5 and PM10 concentration, and 1.113 (95 %CI: 1.053-1.177) and 1.058 (95 %CI: 1.027-1.091) for every 10 µg/m3 increase in NO2 and NOX concentration, respectively. For PM2.5-10, associations with CKD in diabetic patients did not reach the statistical significance. Exposure-response associations with CKD in diabetic patients showed a near-linear trend for PM2.5, PM10, NO2, and NOX in the UK, whereas PM2.5-DKD associations in the globe exhibited a non-linear increasing trend. This study supports that air pollution could significantly increase the risk of CKD onset in diabetic patients.