Deep learning-enhanced R-loop prediction provides mechanistic implications for repeat expansion diseases.

R-loops play diverse functional roles, but controversial genomic localization of R-loops have emerged from experimental approaches, posing significant challenges for R-loop research. The development and application of an accurate computational tool for studying human R-loops remains an unmet need. Here, we introduce DeepER, a deep learning-enhanced R-loop prediction tool. DeepER showcases outstanding performance compared to existing tools, facilitating accurate genome-wide annotation of R-loops and a deeper understanding of the position- and context-dependent effects of nucleotide composition on R-loop formation. DeepER also unveils a strong association between certain tandem repeats and R-loop formation, opening a new avenue for understanding the mechanisms underlying some repeat expansion diseases. To facilitate broader utilization, we have developed a user-friendly web server as an integral component of R-loopBase. We anticipate that DeepER will find extensive applications in the field of R-loop research.

Comparison of deep learning systems and cornea specialists in detecting corneal diseases from low-quality images.

The performance of deep learning in disease detection from high-quality clinical images is identical to and even greater than that of human doctors. However, in low-quality images, deep learning performs poorly. Whether human doctors also have poor performance in low-quality images is unknown. Here, we compared the performance of deep learning systems with that of cornea specialists in detecting corneal diseases from low-quality slit lamp images. The results showed that the cornea specialists performed better than our previously established deep learning system (PEDLS) trained on only high-quality images. The performance of the system trained on both high- and low-quality images was superior to that of the PEDLS while inferior to that of a senior corneal specialist. This study highlights that cornea specialists perform better in low-quality images than the system trained on high-quality images. Adding low-quality images with sufficient diagnostic certainty to the training set can reduce this performance gap.