Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Front Physiol ; 15: 1337754, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38699145

RESUMO

Purpose: Sacroiliac joint dysfunction (SIJD), while being the primary contributor to low back pain, is still disregarded and treated as low back pain. Mulligan's Mobilization with Movement (MWM) Techniques and Core Stability Exercises (CSE) are often used to treat low back pain. There is not much evidence that it is effective in SIJD. To evaluate the effectiveness of CSE coupled with MWM (CSE + MWM) in the treatment of SIJD. Methods: 39 patients with SIJD were recruited and randomly divided into distinct groups as follows: control group (n = 13), CSE group (n = 13) and CSE + MWM group (n = 13). The Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), the Range of Motion (ROM), the Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) and the pelvic tilt angle asymmetry ratio in the sagittal plane (PTAR) were used to gauge the intervention's success both before (M0) and after (M1) it. All experimental data were statistically analyzed. Results: The SIJ-related pain metric significantly decreased in both the CSE + MWM group and the CSE group between M0 and M1, as determined by the NPRS and RMDQ. Between M0 and M1, The CSE group's left axial rotation ROM and lumbar flexion ROM were significantly decreased. The CSE + MWM group's extension ROM and left lateral flexion ROM both significantly increased between M0 and M1. In the difference variable (M1-M0), the CSE + MWM group substantially outperformed control group in the left lateral flexion ROM and outperformed the CSE group in the left axial rotation ROM. Conclusion: In individuals with SIJD, CSE + MWM is beneficial in lowering pain, disability, and function. Treatment with CSE and MWM approaches for SIJ appears to boost this efficacy.

2.
Front Bioinform ; 4: 1403826, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39077754

RESUMO

The identification of cancer subtypes plays a very important role in the field of medicine. Accurate identification of cancer subtypes is helpful for both cancer treatment and prognosis Currently, most methods for cancer subtype identification are based on single-omics data, such as gene expression data. However, multi-omics data can show various characteristics about cancer, which also can improve the accuracy of cancer subtype identification. Therefore, how to extract features from multi-omics data for cancer subtype identification is the main challenge currently faced by researchers. In this paper, we propose a cancer subtype identification method named CAEM-GBDT, which takes gene expression data, miRNA expression data, and DNA methylation data as input, and adopts convolutional autoencoder network to identify cancer subtypes. Through a convolutional encoder layer, the method performs feature extraction on the input data. Within the convolutional encoder layer, a convolutional self-attention module is embedded to recognize higher-level representations of the multi-omics data. The extracted high-level representations from the convolutional encoder are then concatenated with the input to the decoder. The GBDT (Gradient Boosting Decision Tree) is utilized for cancer subtype identification. In the experiments, we compare CAEM-GBDT with existing cancer subtype identifying methods. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed CAEM-GBDT outperforms other methods. The source code is available from GitHub at https://github.com/gxh-1/CAEM-GBDT.git.

3.
Front Aging Neurosci ; 14: 935176, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35978948

RESUMO

Background/objectives: Aerobic and resistance training are common complementary therapies to improve motor symptoms in people with Parkinson's disease (PD), and there is still a lack of advice on which intensity and period of aerobic or resistance training is more appropriate for people with PD. Therefore, a network meta-analysis was conducted to assess the comparative efficacy of aerobic and resistance training of different intensities and cycles on motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease. Methods: Based on several biomedical databases, a search strategy system was conducted to retrieve randomized controlled trials (RCTs) without language restrictions. A network meta-analysis with a frequentist approach was conducted to estimate the efficacy and probability rankings of aerobic and resistance training on Parkinson's patients. What's more, a range of analyses and assessments, such as routine meta-analyses and risk of bias, were performed as well. Results: Twenty trials with 719 patients evaluating 18 different therapies were identified. Through the Unified Parkinson's Disease Motor Rating Scale, (UPDRS III); 6-minute walk test, (6MWT); 10-meter walk test, (TWM); and time up and go (TUG) and Quality of Life Scale-39 (PDQ-39), to explore the effects of different intensity resistance and aerobic exercise on PD. As a result, short period high intensity resistance movement (standard mean difference (SMD) = -0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.68 to -0.22) had significantly decreased the Unified Parkinson's Disease Motor Rating Scale (UPDRS III). Short period high intensity resistance exercise showed similar superiority in other indices; also, aerobic and resistance training of different cycle intensities produced some efficacy in PD patients, both in direct and indirect comparisons. Conclusion: For patients with moderate to mild Parkinson's symptoms, short periods high intensity resistance training may provide complementary therapy for PD, and aerobic or resistance training of varying intensity and periodicity may be recommended as exercise prescription for PD patients. However, more large scale and high quality clinical trials are needed to confirm the effectiveness of this exercise therapy in the future. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier: CRD42022324824.

4.
Front Physiol ; 13: 934511, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36262252

RESUMO

Background: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a common degenerative disease. Recommended first-line management includes exercise. However, there is still no standard recommendation for the appropriate exercise program for patients with KOA. Purpose: This study aims to compare the effects of a land-based exercise program with high vs. uncertain compliance with recommendations among people with KOA in pain, function, and stiffness. Methods: From January 2000 to January 2022, PubMed, EBSCO, Sport-discuss, Medline, and Web of Science were searched. A comprehensive review of meta-analyses of land-based exercise programs with exercise prescriptions was done in symptomatic individuals with KOA. The Cochrane Collaboration's standards were followed for study selection, eligibility criteria, data extraction, and statistics, and the Cochrane Collaboration's tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Review Manager 5 software was used to extract the baseline mean and follow-up values, as well as the accompanying standard deviation, to calculate the standardized mean difference (SMD). In meta-analyses, SMD was calculated for pain outcomes, self-reported physical function, and stiffness. The effects of the outcomes on the subgroups of studies were compared. A fixed- or random-effects model was used in group research studies with comparable outcomes. Results: There were 15 studies with a total of 1,436 participants. Compliance with the ACSM recommendations was categorized as "high" in five cases and "uncertain" in nine others. The SMD for pain was -0.31 (95% CI -0.47, -0.14) in the subgroup with a high ACSM compliance ratio and -0.55 (95% CI -0.69, -0.41) in the subgroup with uncertain ACSM compliance. For physical function, in the high-compliance group, the SMD was -0.21 (95% CI -0.38, -0.05), while in the uncertain-compliance group, it was -0.61 (95 % CI -0.82, -0.40). The SMD was -0.40 (95 % CI -0.61, -0.19) for stiffness and high compliance with ACSM. The SMD was -0.29 (95% CI -0.66, 0.07) for study interventions with uncertain compliance. Conclusion: The results showed that the land-based training program significantly improved pain, physical function, and stiffness in KOA patients compared to controls. Exercise interventions with high adherence to ACSM recommendations differed significantly only in stiffness measures compared with the uncertain-compliance group. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails, identifier PROSPERO (ID CRD42022311660).

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa