Discriminating Circulatory Problems From Deconditioning: Echocardiographic and Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Discriminating circulatory problems with reduced stroke volume (SV) from deconditioning, in which the muscles cannot consume oxygen normally, by gas exchange parameters is difficult. METHODS: We performed combined stress echocardiography (SE) and cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPET) in 110 patients (20 with normal effort capacity, 54 with attenuated SV response, and 36 with deconditioning) to evaluate multiple hemodynamic parameters and oxygen content difference (A-V.o2 Diff) in four predefined activity levels to assess which of the gas measures may help in the discrimination. RESULTS: Reduced anaerobic threshold (AT), low unchanging peak oxygen pulse, periodic breathing, shallow Δ peak oxygen consumption (V.o2)/Δwork rate (WR) ratio, and high expired volume per unit time/carbon dioxide production (V.e/V.co2) slope were all associated with abnormal SV response (P < .05 for all). The best discriminator was V.e/V.co2 slope to V.o2 ratio (≥ 2.7; area under the curve [AUC], 0.79; P < .0001). The optimal gas exchange model included ΔV.o2/ΔWR < 8.6; V.e/V.co2 slope to peak V.o2 ratio ≥ 2.7, and periodic breathing (AUC of 0.84; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: The best single gas exchange parameter to discriminate between circulatory problems and deconditioning is V.e/V.co2 slope to peak V.O2 ratio. Combining it with ΔV.o2/ΔWR and periodic breathing improves the discriminative ability.

Mechanisms of Effort Intolerance in Patients With Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis: Combined Echocardiography and Cardiopulmonary Stress Protocol.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate mechanisms of effort intolerance in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis (MS). BACKGROUND: Combined stress echocardiography and cardiopulmonary testing allows assessment of cardiac function, hemodynamics, and oxygen extraction (A-Vo2 difference). METHODS: Using semirecumbent bicycle exercise, 20 patients with rheumatic MS (valve area 1.36 ± 0.4 cm2) were compared to 20 control subjects at 4 pre-defined activity stages (rest, unloaded, anaerobic threshold, and peak). Various echocardiographic parameters (left ventricular volumes, ejection fraction, stroke volume, mitral valve gradient, mitral valve area, tissue s' and e') and ventilatory parameters (peak oxygen consumption [Vo2] and A-Vo2 difference) were measured during 8 to 12 min of graded exercise. RESULTS: Comparing patients with MS to control subjects, significant differences (both between groups and for group by time interaction) were seen in multiple parameters (heart rate, stroke volume, end-diastolic volume, ejection fraction, s', e', Vo2, and tidal volume). Exercise responses were all attenuated compared to control subjects. Comparing patients with MS and poor exercise tolerance (<80% of expected) to other subjects with MS, we found attenuated increases in tidal volume (p = 0.0003), heart rate (p = 0.0009), and mitral area (p = 0.04) in the poor exercise tolerance group. These patients also displayed different end-diastolic volume behavior over time (group by time interaction p = 0.05). In multivariable analysis, peak heart rate response (p = 0.01), tidal volume response (p = 0.0001), and peak A-Vo2 difference (p = 0.03) were the only independent predictors of exercise capacity in patients with MS; systolic pulmonary pressure, mitral valve gradient, and mitral valve area were not. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with rheumatic MS, exercise intolerance is predominantly the result of restrictive lung function, chronotropic incompetence, limited stroke volume reserve, and peripheral factors, and not simply impaired valvular function. Combined stress echocardiography and cardiopulmonary testing can be helpful in determining mechanisms of exercise intolerance in patients with MS.

Mechanisms of Effort Intolerance in Patients With Heart Failure and Borderline Ejection Fraction.

Combining echocardiography and cardiopulmonary stress testing allows noninvasive assessment of hemodynamics, and oxygen extraction (A-VO2 difference). We evaluated mechanisms of effort intolerance in patients with heart failure with borderline (40% to 49%) left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) (HF and Borderline Ejection fraction). We included 89 consecutive patients with HF and Borderline Ejection fraction (n = 25; 63.6 ± 14 years, 64% men), control subjects (n = 22), patients with HF with preserved EF (n = 26; EF ≥50%), and patients with HF with reduced EF (n = 16; <40%). Various echo parameters (left ventricular volumes, EF, stroke volume, mitral regurgitation [MR] volume, e', right ventricle end-diastolic area, and right ventricle end-systolic area), and ventilatory or combined parameters (peak oxygen consumption [VO2] and A-VO2 difference) were measured at 4 predefined activity stages. Effort-induced functional MR was frequent and more prevalent in HF and Borderline Ejection fraction than in all the other types of HF. In multivariable analysis heart rate response (p <0.0001), A-VO2 difference (p = 0.02), stroke volume (p = 0.002), and right ventricle end-systolic area were the only independent predictors of exercise capacity in HF and Borderline Ejection fraction but peak EF was not. In HF and Borderline Ejection fraction exercise intolerance is predominantly due to chronotropic incompetence, peripheral factors, and limited stroke volume reserve, which are related to right ventricle dysfunction and functional MR but not to left ventricular ejection fraction. Combined testing can be helpful in determining mechanisms of exercise intolerance in HF and Borderline Ejection fraction.