Pyloric gland adenoma: case report.

Pyloric gland adenoma (PGA), also called adenoma with gastric differentiation, is a rare neoplasm of the gastric mucosa that can appear as gastric heterotopia in several organs. A 49-year-old woman presented with gastric reflux and chronic elevation of liver enzymes. She had a history of type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism and an unspecified allergy treated with deflazacor, and a family history of autoimmune diseases. A liver biopsy showed macro- and microvesicular steatohepatitis. Hepatitis B and virus serum tests were negative. Autoimmune hepatitis was suspected and investigated. As an evaluation for dyspeptic symptoms an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed, showing diffuse gastroduodenitis. A few polyps were found and resected from the gastric fundus; histopathology revealed a pyloric gland adenoma. There is very few clinical data on this tumor type because it is frequently underdiagnosed and reported as dysplasia. Further research is needed on the pathophysiology of this disease.

The Mexican consensus on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. / Consenso mexicano de la enfermedad por hígado graso no alcohólico.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) affects nearly one third of the population worldwide. Mexico is one of the countries whose population has several risk factors for the disease and its prevalence could surpass 50%. If immediate action is not taken to counteract what is now considered a national health problem, the medium-term panorama will be very bleak. This serious situation prompted the Asociación Mexicana de Gastroenterología and the Asociación Mexicana de Hepatología to produce the Mexican Consensus on Fatty Liver Disease. It is an up-to-date and detailed review of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical forms, diagnosis, and treatment of the disease, whose aim is to provide the Mexican physician with a useful tool for the prevention and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

The Mexican consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of ulcerative colitis. / Consenso mexicano para el diagnóstico y tratamiento de la colitis ulcerosa crónica idiopática.

The guidelines presented herein are an updated version of the recommendations published in 2007. Since then, there has been a rapid advance in the knowledge about the pathophysiology of ulcerative colitis and its therapeutic options. New drugs have been approved, novel targeted therapies have emerged, and new strategies have been developed to improve the previously available approaches to the disease. The aim of the present consensus is to promote the current knowledge of and Mexican perspective on the epidemiology, diagnosis, and medical and surgical treatment of chronic idiopathic ulcerative colitis. The final vote on the statements and their ultimate modifications were carried out at the consensus working group meeting. Evidence was evaluated through the GRADE classification.

Update on biosimilars in inflammatory bowel disease: Position and recommendations in Mexico. / Actualización sobre los medicamentos biocomparables en la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal: posición y recomendación en México.

The biotechnology-derived medicines known as biosimilars are defined as non-originator treatments that have demonstrated quality, efficacy, and safety comparable to the reference biologic drug. Clinical trials have shown that the infliximab biosimilar, CT-P13, and the candidates for the adalimumab biosimilars, ABP 501 and ZRC 3197, are not significantly different, with respect to efficacy and safety, from the originator drugs in patients with other autoimmune diseases. However, controversy has arisen over the use of biosimilars in inflammatory bowel disease, due to the incipient evidence not only in patients with no previous biotechnology treatment, but also in patients in remission, that could be switched to a biosimilar for non-medical reasons. The present review is the first critical analysis by different specialists in the area of gastroenterology on the use of biosimilars in inflammatory bowel disease, the evidence on interchangeability, the extrapolation of indications, efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, and the clinical impact of the Mexican health regulations. The aim of our review was to make the positioning and recommendations of these new therapeutic options known, given that they have a potential cost-benefit for both patients and healthcare institutions.

Less liver fibrosis in metabolically healthy compared with metabolically unhealthy obese patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

AIM: This cross-sectional study evaluated liver fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and compared the characteristics of metabolically healthy obese (MHO) with metabolically unhealthy obese (MUHO) patients. METHODS: The study was nested within a randomized clinical trial (RCT) and included obese patients with NAFLD, as determined by liver ultrasonography. Fibrosis was assessed by transient elastography, and AST-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) and NAFLD score. Patients were compared according to obesity phenotype using various accepted criteria. RESULTS: The RCT included 1024 patients with NAFLD, of whom 428 (41.7%) were included in the present study. The prevalence of MHO ranged from 1.2% to 63%, depending on the criteria used. According to various criteria for metabolic health, obese patients had less liver fibrosis. MHO patients, as defined by all criteria, showed a significantly lower prevalence of advanced liver fibrosis (F3-F4) than MUHO on transient elastography (16.5% vs. 28%, respectively; P≤0.05). CONCLUSION: MUHO patients are at higher risk of liver fibrosis and, therefore, the identification of obese patients with 'healthy' characteristics is imperative as their entire clinical work-ups are likely to differ.