Can Lumbosacral Magnetic Resonance Imaging be Performed Safely in Patients with a Sacral Neuromodulation Device? An In Vivo Prospective Study.

PURPOSE: We sought to determine the safety of sacral neuromodulation in patients during lumbosacral 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively recruited patients with a sacral neuromodulation implant who required lumbosacral 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging. Before imaging the patients completed validated urinary symptom questionnaires and a survey regarding the usual sacral neuromodulation sensation. The implantable pulse generator was interrogated, and impedances, battery life and stimulus amplitude sensory thresholds were assessed before and after magnetic resonance imaging. Devices were switched off before the patient entered the scanner. Patients were monitored during the study and magnetic resonance imaging related adverse events questionnaires were completed after imaging. Validated questionnaires were repeated 1 month after magnetic resonance imaging to assess for changes in sacral neuromodulation therapeutic efficacy. RESULTS: A total of 11 patients were enrolled in the study. Lower back pain, which was noted by 6 of the 11 patients (55%), was the most common indication for imaging. Immediately after magnetic resonance imaging only 1 patient reported mild discomfort during imaging at the site of the implantable pulse generator. This discomfort was present only during the scan and not afterward. Two patients reported warmth at the implantable pulse generator site during the scan, which was also present only during scanning. Patients did not report any other adverse events. There were no major changes in impedance or battery life after magnetic resonance imaging. Stimulus amplitude sensory thresholds and stimulation localization were unchanged. Validated questionnaires 1 month after imaging did not show worsening scores compared to scores before imaging. CONCLUSIONS: No significant adverse events occurred in patients implanted with a Medtronic InterStim™ II device who underwent a 1.5 Tesla lumbosacral magnetic resonance imaging scan. Therapeutic efficacy of sacral neuromodulation was unchanged 1 month after imaging.

Feasibility of same day discharge after robotic assisted pelvic floor reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Robotic surgical procedures have become more common in female pelvic reconstruction. Purported benefits of robotic assisted pelvic floor reconstruction (RAPFR) procedures include shorter hospital stay, faster recovery, lower blood loss, and decreased postoperative pain. Following RAPFR procedures, the current accepted practice is discharge after a one-night hospitalization. We assessed whether same day discharge (SDD) affects the short term safety of and patient satisfaction with robotic assisted pelvic floor reconstructive procedures, relative to those who remain hospitalized overnight. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of women who underwent RAPFR procedures between October 2015 and October 2016. A same day discharge protocol for RAPFR was initiated in July 2016. To date, 10 patients have undergone SDD. These patients were compared to the consecutive patients from the prior 9 months who stayed overnight. To evaluate short term safety, we reviewed the medical record for any unscheduled Cleveland Clinic emergency department (ED) and/or office visits within 30 days of the RAPFR procedure. We then sent a mailed survey to all patients, querying their pelvic organ prolapse-related PGI-I and also offering a postoperative satisfaction questionnaire. Demographic, perioperative, postoperative data and survey results were compared using Student's t test and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: In our series, 38 patients (95%) underwent robotic assisted sacrocolpopexy (RASC). Only 2 (5%) had a different RAPFR procedure, a robotic assisted vaginal mesh excision. Concomitant robotic assisted supracervical hysterectomy (SCH) was performed in 9 patients (30%) in the overnight group, whereas 1 of the SDD patients underwent SCH (10%). Demographics and operative characteristics did not differ between groups. Ultimately, patients in the SDD group were no more likely than the overnight group to require an unscheduled ED or office visit in the early postoperative period. With respect to satisfaction, no significant differences were observed between groups, with both groups noting substantial improvement in POP symptoms following surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, same day discharge after RAPFR procedures appears to be safe and feasible. RAPFR procedures were well-tolerated, with no difference in ED or non-urology office visits occurring during the early post-operative period in our series, regardless of length of stay. Patient satisfaction was equivalent between groups and universally high.

New Devices and Technologies for the Management of Overactive Bladder.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Overactive bladder (OAB) affects millions of people in the USA and has a significant impact on their quality of life. Despite having a number of safe and effective ways of managing refractory OAB patients, there are many promising new technologies actively being studied and developed for the treatment of this population. This review examines current new devices and technologies under study for the treatment of OAB. RECENT FINDINGS: Modifications to already established therapies such as sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) or tibial nerve stimulation (TNS) are currently being studied for refractory OAB. On the SNS front, a newly rechargeable, smaller neurostimulator has been developed and has shown promising results for the treatment of refractory OAB. There are two newly implantable TNS devices actively being studied for the treatment of refractory OAB. These implanted TNS systems will allow the patient to receive treatment from the comfort of their home without the need for frequent office visits. Most recently, radiofrequency ablation intravesical therapy has been proposed as a newer technology with the potential to reduce OAB symptoms. There are many new technologies actively being studied and developed for the management of refractory OAB patients. If shown to be safe and efficacious, these therapies may one day alter our current management of patients with OAB.

Management of Overactive Bladder in the Face of High Grade Prolapse.

Patients with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) may present with a large combination of symptoms including overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms such as urgency, frequency, and urgency incontinence. The explanation as to why these symptoms are more prevalent in POP patients is not clearly understood, but there seems to be an overall agreement that prolapse-induced bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) may trigger bladder changes resulting in OAB symptoms. Presuming this to be true, many of the studies managing OAB in POP patients have focused on the surgical management of prolapse and its aftermath, which in many of the patients leads to improvement of OAB symptoms. This review presents the most recent studies and evidence looking at management of OAB in the face of POP and seeks to evaluate if there is any association between prolapse severity and OAB symptoms.

Sacral Neuromodulation Lead Twisting Causes Migration and Loss of Efficacy.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to present 2 cases with unusual lead complications in InterStim devices implanted in patients with refractory overactive bladder symptoms. MATERIALS: Two patients with InterStim implants presented with loss of efficacy. Both patients required lead revision surgery with findings of a twisted lead with associated lead migration. RESULTS: In both cases, revision surgery revealed twisting of the InterStim lead causing retrograde lead displacement. Patients were managed with lead removal and placement of a new lead. At the time of revision, one patient had a seroma within a large pocket of the implantable pulse generator (IPG) site, which was managed with closure and development of a new IPG pocket. In both cases, revision with new lead placement resulted in significant symptom improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Sacral neuromodulation lead complications are known to be among the most consequential adverse events. We report the first 2 cases, to our knowledge, of patients presenting with an InterStim device that lost efficacy due to lead twisting and subsequent retrograde lead migration, likely due to rotation of the IPG within the gluteal pocket. This finding is easily remedied with IPG pocket revision and lead replacement.

Posterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse: Suture-Based Repair.

Pelvic organ prolapse is common in parous women, although few report symptoms. The incidence of posterior compartment prolapse, or rectocele, is less well-reported. Posterior vaginal wall prolapse is associated with pain, constipation, and splinting. Surgery is the mainstay of therapy for symptomatic rectoceles. Though several surgical techniques have been described, no clear indications for type of repair have emerged. This article reviews the management strategies and draws conclusions about suture-based and site-specific techniques.

Transvaginal Cystolithotomy: A Novel Approach.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a novel surgical option for cystolithiasis management in female patients with no urethral access and prior abdominal surgeries. We present a 51-year-old female with a history of traumatic spinal cord injury with pelvic fractures and resultant neurogenic bladder. She underwent transabdominal bladder neck closure and bladder augmentation with continent diversion 2 years prior. CT abdomen/pelvis demonstrated a 3 cm stone and significant amount of bowel anterior to the bladder. METHODS: Pouchoscopy was performed via ureteroscope through the catheterizable stoma to assess stone location and mobility. A 14F-Foley was inserted for intraoperative decompression. An inverted-U incision was made on the anterior vaginal wall overlying the bladder base. Sharp and blunt dissection was performed in an avascular plane to dissect the vagina off of the bladder. Electrocautery was utilized to open perivesical tissue and the detrusor layer transversely. Further sharp dissection of perivesical tissue was achieved using Metzenbaum scissors. The bladder was filled via stoma Foley to improve visualization of bladder mucosa. Cystotomy was made and the 3 cm stone was removed, intact, using a Babcock. The bladder was closed in 2 layers with absorbable suture in running fashion. The bladder was refilled and the closure was watertight. The outer detrusor layer was closed with running locking 2-0 Polysorb, and a separate layer of perivesical tissue was closed over our 2-layer bladder closure using simple interrupted stitches. The vaginal flap was closed with running-locking 2-0 Polysorb. RESULTS: Operative time was 55 minutes. Estimated blood loss was 25 cc. The patient was discharged on postoperative-day 0 with a 14F-Foley in the catheterizable channel. The Foley was removed at the 3-week postoperative visit and patient resumed self-catheterization. No postoperative imaging was required. No complications were reported within 1 year. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate the feasibility of transvaginal cystolithotomy in females with bowel overlying bladder and no urethral access.

Fluoro-urodynamic Image Interpretation Is Not Altered by Using Dilute Intravesical Contrast.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if using one 250 mL bottle of intravesical contrast followed by sterile saline alters interpretation of fluoroscopic images during fluoro-urodynamics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects were randomized to receive 250 mL of intravesical contrast followed by sterile saline until maximal cystometric capacity vs non-dilute intravesical contrast alone during fluoro-urodynamics. Interpreters, blinded to study group, graded images on an ordinal rank scale rating confidence in image interpretation. Primary endpoint was differences in image interpretation between the two groups using visual grading characteristics curves and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR). Secondary endpoints were obtaining anthropometric data such as body mass index and waist circumference to determine predictors of CNR in a multivariate multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: 26 subjects were randomized to receive dilute intravesical contrast and 22 non-dilute contrast; two subjects were unable to complete the study. There was no difference in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Visual grading characteristics demonstrated no difference in readability of the fluoroscopic images between groups and CNR was not statistically different between the two groups. No correlation was identified between CNR and waist circumference or body mass index. CONCLUSION: Interpretation of fluoro-urodynamic images and image quality was not altered with using of 250 mL of contrast followed by saline. Expert reviewers did not perceive a difference in their confidence to distinguish between the two groups. Fluoro-urodynamics can be reliably performed using only 250 mL of contrast without compromising the ability to read the fluoroscopic images.