[Errors in Medicine: perceptions of nursing students in Rome]. / Errori in medicina: la percezione degli studenti in Infermieristica di Roma.

INTRODUCTION: The error in medicine has long been discussed in scientific debates. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the degree knowledge, attitude and behavior of students in Nursing for the failure in the health sector. METHODS: It was administered to 231 students of Nursing of the Sapienza University of Rome (171 females and 60 males), aged between 21 and 45 years, a structured questionnaire in three questions that explore the experiences and opinions about the errors found in medical practice, the causes underlying them and the mistakes that should never be committed. Data were collected, stratified by sex, age, marital status, and analyzed using the χ2 test. Significance was set at p≤0.05. RESULTS: The 5 errors found more frequently in clinical practice by the students were the following: Errors that favors the onset of hospital infections (58.9%); Non adherence to protocols (50.2%); Patient care (45.9%); Errors due to the administration of therapies and drugs (45.9%); Errors relating to the execution of withdrawals (35.9%). The five cases considered most frequently responsible for such errors were: the rush (70.1%), followed by neglect / superficial (55%); disorganization (51.5%); not hygienically / infertility (50.6%) and inattention (42.9%). With regard to the errors that you should never commit, students have shown more frequently: the errors of administration of therapies / medications (69.3%); errors of prescription therapies / medications (58.9%); errors related to surgery (52.8%); the exchange of patient or misidentification of the patient (50.6%); errors that favor the occurrence of hospital infections (48.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study shows the importance of a culture of error in medicine, also as part of undergraduate education, in order to train and educate future health professionals to this issue in order to promoting patient safety and quality of health.

Improving quality through clinical risk management: a triage sentinel event analysis.

"Triage" is a useful tool used in emergency departments (EDs) to prioritize the care of patients. Through a methodical process of different sequential steps, the triage nurse assigns a color code which goes from red-critical patient with immediate access to medical examination-to a white code that represents no urgency. Clinical studies have shown that patients can be victims of errors during the process of care, especially in complex systems such as EDs. To reduce errors it is essential to map the risks in order to identify the causes (both individual and organizational); the introduction of corrective changes cannot be postponed. The incorrect assessment at triage represents one of the major errors in EDs. By monitoring this activity, through the analysis of sentinel events we can reduce adverse consequences. Missed recognition of a red code indicates a sentinel event. We used a "root cause analysis" to explain an episode of missed recognition of red code at triage. A nurse without specific training in triage and inexperienced in critical care was identified as the "root cause" of the sentinel event. To make improvements we planned a triage training course (for newly employed nurses and a refresher course for existing staff) and created a team of dedicated triage nurses.