Risk factors for mechanical complications after fusion extension surgery for lumbar adjacent segment disease.

PURPOSE: Adjacent segment disease (ASD) is a common complication in fusion surgery. In the event of solid segmental fusion, previous implants can be removed or preserved during fusion extension for ASD. To compare the surgical outcomes of patients with and without implants and analyzes the risk factors for postoperative mechanical complications. METHODS: Patients who underwent fusion extension for lumbar ASD from 2011 to 2019 with a minimum 2 year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Spinopelvic parameters were measured preoperatively and postoperatively. Clinical outcomes and surgical complications were compared between groups with implants preserved and removed. Risk factors for mechanical complications, including clinical, surgical, and radiographic factors were analyzed. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients (mean age, 69.9 ± 6.9 years) were included. The mean numbers of initial and extended fused segments were 2.8 ± 0.7 and 2.7 ± 0.7, respectively. Previous implants were removed in 43 patients (R group) and preserved in 26 patients (P group). Both groups showed an improvement in clinical outcomes without between-group differences. The operation time was significantly longer in R group (260 vs 207 min, p < 0.001). Mechanical complications occurred in 13 patients (12 in R group and 1 in P group) and reoperation was needed in 3 patients (R group). Implant removal, index fusion surgery including L5-S1, and postoperative sagittal malalignment were risk factors for mechanical complications. CONCLUSION: Implant removal was a risk factor for mechanical complications. Index fusion surgery including L5-S1 and postoperative sagittal malalignment were also risk factors for mechanical complications.

Autophagy in an extruded disc compared to the remaining disc after lumbar disc herniation in the same patient.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate autophagy in an extruded disc and to compare this activity with the activity in the remaining disc after lumbar disc herniation in the same patient. METHODS: In total, 12 patients (females 4, males 8) with the extruded type of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) were surgically treated. Their mean age was 54.3 ± 15.8 years (range: 29 ~ 78 years). The mean interval from the occurrence of symptoms to the operation was 9.8 ± 9.4 weeks (range: 2 ~ 24 weeks). The extruded discs were excised, and the remaining disc material removed, to prevent recurrence of herniation. Immediately after specimen collection, all tissues were stored at -70 °C prior to analysis. Autophagy was assessed immunohistochemically and via Western blotting for Atg5, Atg7, Atg12, Atg12L1, and Beclin-1. And the relationship between autophagy and apoptosis was investigated by correlation analysis of caspase-3 with autophagy proteins. RESULTS: The expression levels of autophagic markers were significantly increased in the extruded discs compared to the remaining discs within the same patients. The mean expression levels of Atg5, Atg7, Atg12, and Beclin-1 in extruded discs were statistically significantly higher than those in the remaining discs (P < 0.01, P < 0.001, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The autophagic pathway was more active in extruded disc material than in remaining disc material within the same patient. This may explain spontaneous resorption of the extruded disc after LDH.

Characteristics and standards of severe sagittal imbalance in adult patients with spinal deformities: a retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the characteristics of "severe" dynamic sagittal imbalance (DSI) in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) and establish criteria for them. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 102 patients with ASD presenting four cardinal signs of lumbar degenerative kyphosis. All patients underwent deformity corrective surgery and were divided into three groups according to the diagnostic criteria based on the Oswestry disability index and dynamic features (△Timewalk: time until C7 sagittal vertical axis [C7SVA] reaches ≥ 20 cm after the start of walking) of sagittal imbalance. The paravertebral back muscles were analyzed and compared using T2-weighted axial imaging. We performed a statistically time-dependent spinopelvic sagittal parameter analysis of full standing lateral lumbar radiographs. Lumbar flexibility was analyzed using dynamic lateral lumbar radiography. RESULTS: The patients were classified into the mild (△Timewalk ≥ 180 s, 35 patients), moderate (180 s > △Timewalk ≥ 30 s, 38 patients), and severe (△Timewalk < 30 s, 29 patients) groups. The back muscles in the severe group exhibited a significantly higher signal intensity (533.4 ± 237.5, p < 0.05) and larger area of fat infiltration (35.2 ± 5.4, p < 0.05) than those in the mild (223.8 ± 67.6/22.9 ± 11.9) and moderate groups (294.4 ± 214.7/21.6 ± 10.6). The analysis of lumbar flexibility revealed significantly lower values in the severe group (5.8° ± 2.5°, p < 0.05) than in the mild and moderate groups (14.2° ± 12.4° and 11.4° ± 8.7°, respectively). The severe group had significantly lower lumbar lordosis (LL, 25.1° ± 22.7°, p < 0.05) and Pelvic incidence-LL mismatch (PI-LL, 81.5° ± 26.6°, p < 0.001) than those of the mild (8.2° ± 16.3°/58.7° ± 18.8°) and moderate (14.3° ± 28.6°/66.8° ± 13.4°) groups. On receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, PI-LL was statistically significant, with an area under the curve of 0.810 (95% confidence interval) when the baseline was set at 75.3°. The severe group had more postoperative complications than the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest the following criteria for severe DSI: C7SVA > 20 cm within 30 s of walking or standing, a rigid lumbar curve < 10° on dynamic lateral radiographs, and a PI-LL mismatch > 75.3°.

Coronal vertical fracture of vertebral body following minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion: risk factor analysis in consecutive case series.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the incidence and risk factors of coronal vertical vertebral body fracture (CV-VBF) during lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) for degenerative lumbar disease. METHODS: Clinical data, including age, sex, body mass index, and bone mineral density, were reviewed. Radiological assessments, such as facet joint arthrosis, intervertebral disc motion, index disc height, and cage profiles, were conducted. Posterior instrumentation was performed using either a single or staged procedure after LLIF. Demographic and surgical data were compared between patients with and without VBF. RESULTS: Out of 273 patients (552 levels), 7 (2.6%) experienced CV-VBF. Among the 552 levels, VBF occured in 7 levels (1.3%). All VBF cases developed intraoperatively during LLIF, with no instances caused by cage subsidence during the follow-up period. Sagittal motion in segments adjacent to VBF was smaller than in others (4.6° ± 2.6° versus 6.5° ± 3.9°, P = 0.031). The average grade of facet arthrosis was 2.5 ± 0.7, indicating severe facet arthrosis. All fractures developed due to oblique placement of a trial or cage into the index disc space, leading to a nutcracker effect. These factors were not related to bone quality. CONCLUSIONS: CV-VBF after LLIF occurred in 2.6% of patients, accounting for 1.3% of all LLIF levels. A potential risk factor for VBF involves the nutcracker-impinging effect due to the oblique placement of a cage. Thorough preoperative evaluations and surgical procedures are needed to avoid VBF when considering LLIF in patients with less mobile spine.

The Effects of Longer Use of Teriparatide on Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes after Spinal Fusion in Geriatric Patients.

Background: Teriparatide is an anabolic agent for osteoporosis and is believed to improve the bone healing process. Previous studies showed that teriparatide could enhance not only fracture healing but also spine fusion. It has been reported that use of teriparatide could promote the spine fusion process and decrease mechanical complications. However, there was no consensus regarding optimal treatment duration. The purpose of this study was to compare surgical outcomes between short-duration and long-duration teriparatide treatment after lumbar fusion surgery in elderly patients. Materials and Methods: All consecutive patients older than 60 years who underwent 1-level lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative diseases between January 2015 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Based on the duration of teriparatide treatment (daily subcutaneous injection of 20 µg teriparatide), patients were subdivided into two groups: a short-duration (SD) group (<6 months) and a long-duration (LD) group (≥6 months). Mechanical complications, such as screw loosening, cage subsidence, and adjacent vertebral fractures, were investigated. Postoperative 1-year union rate was also evaluated on computed tomography. Clinical outcomes were recorded using visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Between-group differences for these radiographic and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Results: Ninety-one patients were reviewed in this study, including sixty patients in the SD group and thirty-one patients in the LD group. Their mean age was 72.3 ± 6.2 years, and 79 patients were female. Mean T-score was -3.3 ± 0.8. Cage subsidence (6.7% vs. 3.2%), screw loosening (28.3% vs. 35.5%), and adjacent vertebral fracture (6.7% vs. 9.7%) were not significantly different between the SD and LD groups. Union rate at 1-year postoperative was 65.0% in the SD group and 87.1% in the LD group (p = 0.028). Both groups showed improvement in VAS and ODI after surgery. However, the differences of VAS from preoperative to 6 months and 1 year postoperative were significantly higher in the LD group. Conclusions: Longer teriparatide treatment after lumbar fusion surgery resulted in a higher union rate at 1-year postoperative than the shorter treatment. Also, it could be more beneficial for clinical outcomes.

The neuro-protective role of telomerase via TERT/TERF-2 in the acute phase of spinal cord injury.

PURPOSE: To investigate the interaction of telomerase activity and telomere length on neuro-protection or neuro-degeneration effects after spinal cord injury (SCI). METHODS: A contusive SCI model was developed using 56 Sprague-Dawley rats. Seven rats were allocated into acute injury phase groups (1, 3, 8, 24, and 48 h), and sub-acute and chronic injury phase groups (1, 2, and 4 weeks). Telomerase activity was assessed by telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) and telomeric repeat binding factor-2 (TERF-2). Differentiation of activated neural stem cells was investigated by co-expression of neuronal/glial cell markers. Apoptosis expression was also investigated by caspase-3, 8, and 9 using terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labelling staining. Immunofluorescence staining and western blotting were performed for quantitative analyses. RESULTS: Expression of TERT increased gradually until 24 h post-injury, and was decreased following SCI (P < 0.05). TERF-2 also was increased following SCI until 24 h post-injury and then decreased with time (P < 0.05). Co-localization of TERT and TERF-2 was higher at 24 h post-injury. High expression of TERT was seen in neurons (Neu N Ab), however, expression of TERT was relatively lower in astrocytes and oligodendrocytes. Apoptosis analysis showed persistent high expression of caspases-3, -9, and -8 during the observation period. CONCLUSIONS: Increased TERT and TERF-2 activity were noted 24 h post-injury in the acute phase of SCI with TERF-2 maintaining telomeric-repeat length. Our results suggest that increased activity of telomere maintenance may be related to neuro-protective mechanisms against subsequent apoptosis resulting from DNA damage after acute SCI.

Are the Choice of Frame and Intraoperative Patient Positioning Associated With Radiologic and Clinical Outcomes in Long-instrumented Lumbar Fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity?

BACKGROUND: Previous studies of patient positioning during spinal surgery evaluated intraoperative or immediate postoperative outcomes after short-instrumented lumbar fusion. However, patient positioning during long-instrumented fusion for an adult spinal deformity (ASD) might be associated with differences in intraoperative parameters such as blood loss and longer-term outcomes such as spine alignment, and comparing types of surgical tables in the context of these larger procedures and evaluating longer-term outcome scores seem important. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Do blood loss and the number of transfusions differ between patients who underwent multi-level spinal fusion with a Wilson frame and those with a four-poster frame? (2) Does restoration of lumbar lordosis and the sagittal vertical axis differ between patients who underwent surgery with the use of one frame or the other? (3) Do clinical outcomes as determined by Numeric Rating Scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores differ between the two groups of patients? (4) Are there differences in postoperative complications between the two groups? METHODS: Among 651 patients undergoing thoracolumbar instrumented fusion between 2015 and 2018, 129 patients treated with more than four levels of initial fusion for an ASD were identified. A total of 48% (62 of 129) were eligible; 44% (57 of 129) were excluded because of a history of fusion, three-column osteotomy, or surgical indications other than degenerative deformity, and another 8% (10 of 129) were lost before the minimum 2-year follow-up period. Before January 2017, one surgeon in this study used only a Wilson frame; starting in January 2017, the same surgeon consistently used a four-poster frame. Forty patients had spinal fusion using the Wilson frame; 85% (34 of 40) of these had follow-up at least 2 years postoperatively (mean 44 ± 13 months). Thirty-two patients underwent surgery using the four-poster frame; 88% (28 of 32) of these were available for follow-up at least 2 years later (mean 34 ± 6 months). The groups did not differ in terms of age, gender, BMI, type of deformity, or number of fused levels. Surgical parameters such as blood loss and the total amount of blood transfused were compared between the two groups. Estimated blood loss was measured by the amount of suction drainage and the amount of blood that soaked gauze. The decision to transfuse blood was based on intraoperative hemoglobin values, a protocol that was applied equally to both groups. Radiologic outcomes including sagittal parameters and clinical outcomes such as the Numerical Rating Scale score for back pain (range 0-10; minimal clinically important difference [MCID] 2.9) and leg pain (range 0-10; MCID 2.9) as well as the Oswestry Disability Index score (range 0-100; MCID 15.4) were also assessed through a longitudinally maintained database by two spine surgeons who participated in this study. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare selected radiologic outcomes between the two groups over time. RESULTS: Blood loss and the total amount of transfused blood were greater in the Wilson frame group than in the four-poster frame group (2019 ± 1213 mL versus 1171 ± 875 mL; mean difference 848 [95% CI 297 to 1399]; p = 0.003 for blood loss; 1706 ± 1003 mL versus 911 ± 651 mL; mean difference 795 [95% CI 353 to 1237]; p = 0.001 for transfusion). Lumbar lordosis and the sagittal vertical axis were less restored in the Wilson frame group than in the four-poster frame group (7° ± 10° versus 18° ± 14°; mean difference -11° [95% -17° to -5°]; p < 0.001 for lumbar lordosis; -22 ± 31 mm versus -43 ± 27 mm; mean difference 21 [95% CI 5 to 36]; p = 0.009 for the sagittal vertical axis). Such differences persisted at 2 years of follow-up. The proportion of patients with the desired correction was also greater in the four-poster frame group than in the Wilson frame group immediately postoperatively and at 2 years of follow-up (50% versus 21%, respectively; odds ratio 3.9 [95% CI 1.3 to 11.7]; p = 0.02; 43% versus 12%, respectively; odds ratio 5.6 [95% CI 1.6 to 20.3]; p = 0.005). We found no clinically important differences in postoperative patient-reported outcomes including Numeric Rating Scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores, and there were no differences in postoperative complications at 2 years of follow-up. CONCLUSION: The ideal patient position during surgery for an ASD should decrease intra-abdominal pressure and induce lordosis as the abdomen hangs freely and hip flexion is decreased. The four-poster frame appears advantageous for long-segment fusions for spinal deformities. Future studies are needed to extend our analyses to different types of spinal deformities and validate radiologic and clinical outcomes with follow-up for more than 2 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE LEVEL: III, therapeutic study.

Surgical sequence in anterior column realignment with posterior osteotomy is important for degree of adult spinal deformity correction: advantages and indications for posterior to anterior sequence.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that posterior osteotomy prior to ACR (Anterior column realignment) through P-A-P surgical sequence would permit a greater correction for deformity corrective surgery than the traditional A-P sequence without posterior osteotomy. This study aimed to determine the impact of the P-A-P sequence on the restoration of lumbar lordosis (LL) compared to the A-P sequence in deformity corrective surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients and to identify the characteristics of patients who require this sequence.  METHODS: Between 2017 and 2019, 260 ASD patients who had undergone combined corrective surgery were reviewed retrospectively. This study included 178 patients who underwent posterior osteotomy before the ACR (P-A group) and 82 patients who underwent the A-P sequence (A-P group). Sagittal spinopelvic parameters were determined from pre- and postoperative whole-spine radiographs and compared between the groups. To find better indications for the P-A-P sequence, we conducted additional analysis on postoperative outcomes of patients in the A-P group.  RESULTS: The P-A group showed a significantly higher change in LL (53.7° vs. 44.3°, p < 0.001), C7 sagittal vertical axis (C7 SVA: 197.4 mm vs. 146.1 mm, p = 0.021), segmental lordosis (SL) L2/3 (16.2° vs. 14.4°, p = 0.043), SL L3/4 (16.2° vs. 13.8°, p = 0.004), and SL L4/5 (15.1° vs. 11.3°, p = 0.001) compared to the A-P group. At the final follow-up, pelvic incidence (PI) minus LL mismatch (PI - LL mismatch) was significantly higher in the A-P group (13.4° vs. 2.9°, p < 0.001). Stepwise logistic regression analysis showed that age ≥ 75 years (odds ratio [OR] = 2.151; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.414-3.272; p < 0.001), severe osteoporosis (OR = 2.824; 95% CI, 1.481-5.381; p = 0.002), rigid lumbar curve with dynamic changes in LL < 10° (OR = 5.150; 95% CI, 2.296-11.548; p < 0.001), and severe facet joint osteoarthritis (OR = 4.513; 95% CI, 1.958-10.402; p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for PI - LL mismatch ≥ 10° after A-P surgery. CONCLUSION: P-A-P sequence for deformity corrective surgery in ASD offers greater LL correction than the A-P sequence. Indications for the procedure include patients aged ≥ 75 years, severe osteoporosis, rigid lumbar curve with dynamic change in LL < 10°, or more than four facet joints of Pathria grade 3 in the lumbar region.

Surgical correction for adult spinal deformity increases acetabular lateral coverage of femoral heads.

BACKGROUND: Studies explaining the relationship between hip and spine reported that spinal corrective surgery affected acetabular orientation and changes in pelvic tilt were capable of influencing radiographic measures of acetabular coverage. This study aimed to assess the change in coronal parameters for acetabular coverage as a result of adult spinal deformity (ASD) correction and to analyze the relationship between the postoperative changes in sagittal spinopelvic parameters and coronal acetabular coverage parameters. METHODS: Fifty-two consecutive patients who had undergone multilevel spinal surgical correction were enrolled and evaluated. Coronal acetabular coverage parameters included Tönnis angle (TA), lateral center edge angle (LCEA), and the angle of Sharp (SA). All radiographic parameters were evaluated at the preoperative and the postoperative 1 year. Paired t test was used to determine whether there were significant changes between the time points. Bivariate correlation and linear regression analysis were used to assess the relationship between the postoperative changes of spinal alignment and acetabular orientation. RESULTS: The surgical correction resulted in significant decrease of TA, increase of LCEA and SA, respectively (p < 0.001). The changes in pelvic tilt (PT) demonstrated weak correlation on TA (ß = 0.117, p < 0.001 for right; ß = 0.111, p < 0.001 for left). CONCLUSIONS: Although the surgical correction of ASD significantly changed PT resulting in increased acetabular lateral coverage parameters, the correlation between the changes of PT following sagittal correction of ASD and acetabular coverage parameters was low. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was retrospectively registered with approval by the institutional review board (IRB) of our institution (approval number: KHNMC-2020-10-010).

Use of iliac screw associated with more correction of lumbar lordosis than S2-alar-iliac screw for adult spinal deformity.

BACKGROUND: To date, there is a paucity of reports clarifying the change of spinopelvic parameters in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) who underwent long segment spinal fusion using iliac screw (IS) and S2-alar-iliac screw (S2AI) fixation. METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent deformity correction surgery for ASD between 2013 and 2017 was performed. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether IS or S2AI fixation was performed. All radiographic parameters were measured preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and the last follow-up. Demographics, intraoperative and clinical data were analyzed between the two groups. Additionally, the cohort was subdivided according to the postoperative change in pelvic incidence (PI): subgroup (C) was defined as change in PI ≥5° and subgroup (NC) with change < 5°. In subgroup analyses, the 2 different types of postoperative change of PI were directly compared. RESULTS: A total of 142 patients met inclusion criteria: 111 who received IS and 31 received S2AI fixation. The IS group (65.6 ± 26°, 39.8 ± 13.8°) showed a significantly higher change in lumbar lordosis (LL) and upper lumbar lordosis (ULL) than the S2AI group (54.4 ± 17.9°, 30.3 ± 9.9°) (p < 0.05). In subgroup (C), PI significantly increased from 53° preoperatively to 59° postoperatively at least 50% of IS cohort, with a mean change of 5.8° (p < 0.05). The clinical outcomes at the last follow-up were significantly better in IS group than in S2AI group in terms of VAS scores for back and leg. The occurrence of sacroiliac joint pain and pelvic screw fracture were significantly greater in S2AI group than in IS group (25.8% vs 9%, p < 0.05) and (16.1% vs 3.6%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the S2AI technique, the IS technique usable larger cantilever force demonstrated more correction of lumbar lordosis, and possible increase in pelvic incidence. Further study is warranted to clarify the clinical impaction of these results.

Surgical strategy for revisional lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy to correct fixed sagittal imbalance: The effect of the osteotomy level and iliac screw fixation.

BACKGROUND: More caudal osteotomy is believed to lead to greater sagittal correction; however, the osteotomy level and whether or not to use iliac screw fixation (ISF) are topics of on-going debate. The aim of this study was to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes after revisional lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) for fixed sagittal imbalance (FSI) according to the osteotomy level and ISF. METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent revisional PSO (at L3 or L4) for FSI in a single institute from July 2006 to January 2014 were investigated retrospectively. Thirty-eight patients with at least 2-year follow-up were finally included. Clinical outcomes including the visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were investigated. Radiographic spinopelvic parameters were analyzed according to the level of PSO, the degree of correction, and the use of ISF. RESULTS: The mean number of fused segments after PSO was 6.6 ± 1.8. Sagittal vertical axis (SVA) was restored after the surgery (12, 2.5, and 5.2 cm at preoperative, postoperative, and the last follow-up, respectively). PSO was performed at L3 in 16 patients and at L4 in 22 patients. The osteotomy level was not associated with any changes of spinopelvic parameters (pelvic tilt [PT] or lumbar lordosis) or sagittal alignment (T1-pelvic angle [TPA] or SVA). However, better TPA restoration was achieved with more osteotomy resection angle (P = 0.031). ISF group showed significant improvement in postoperative pelvic orientation (PT and ratio of PT to pelvic incidence) which was maintained until the last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Although postoperative sagittal alignment was different in FSI patients according to the osteotomy level, pelvic orientation improved in ISF group. Also, the degree of correction showed significant associations with sagittal alignment. When performing revisional PSO for FSI, spine surgeon should carefully consider how to correct rather than where to do the osteotomy, and the role of ISF.

Relationship between iliac screw loosening and proximal junctional kyphosis after long thoracolumbar instrumented fusion for adult spinal deformity.

PURPOSE: Authors assumed that the stability of iliac screw (IS) fixation could affect the development of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK). The purpose of this study was to analyze the relationship between IS loosening and PJK after long fusion surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD). METHODS: Sixty-eight ASD patients (6 males, 62 females; mean age, 68.1 years) who underwent long fusion surgery with IS fixation were reviewed. The incidence and risk factors of IS loosening were investigated. The relationship between IS loosening and PJK was also analyzed. RESULTS: IS loosening and PJK appeared in 33 and 19 patients, respectively. The median time for IS loosening and PJK to develop was 6.0 months (range 1.3-59.2) and 9.1 months (range 1.3-73.2), respectively. PJK developed in patients without IS loosening more frequently than in patients with IS loosening. PJK did not develop in 28 patients who presented with IS loosening first. IS loosening developed 5 months postoperatively in those 28 patients, whereas IS loosening was present 11 months postoperatively in 4 patients who presented with PJK first. Preoperative PT (OR = 1.091) and IS loosening (OR = 0.343) were significantly related with the development of PJK. IS loosening was significantly associated with postoperative PI-LL > 10° (OR = 0.957), postoperative SVA (OR = 1.023), and postoperative PT (OR = 1.072). CONCLUSION: Postoperative sagittal malalignment should be avoided to prevent IS loosening and PJK. IS loosening occurred earlier than PJK and seemed to affect the development of PJK. This relationship supports the hypothesis that distal stability of long constructs may increase proximal junctional stress. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Radiographic and clinical evidence: osteoarthritic knee can change surgical result for lumbar degenerative disease patient undergone surgery for 3-year follow-up: a retrospective comparative clinical study.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of reports clarifying the implication of knee osteoarthritis (OA) on spinal sagittal alignment of patients undergone surgery for lumbar spine. This study aimed to analyze how osteoarthritic knee affects radiographic and clinical results of degenerative lumbar disease patients undergone lumbar fusion. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records and radiographs of 74 consecutive degenerative lumbar disease patients who underwent posterior instrumentation and fusion surgery between May 2016 and June 2017 and were followed up for minimum 3 years postoperatively. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the severity of knee OA by Kellgren-Lawrence grading (KLG) scale (group I, KLG 1 or 2 [n = 39]; group II, KLG 3 or 4 [n = 35]). Patient demographic data, comorbidities, spinal sagittal parameters and clinical scores were extracted and compared at preoperative, postoperative 1 month and the ultimate follow-up between the groups. In radiographic assessment, sagittal alignment parameters and sagittal balance were used. In clinical assessment, the scores of Oswestry disability index (ODI) and Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire (SRS-22) were used. For the frequency analysis of categorical variables across the groups, chi-square test was used and student t tests was used to compare the differences of continuous variables. RESULTS: In radiographic assessment, TLK (thoracolumbar kyphosis), LL (lumbar lordosis), PT (pelvic tilt), C7 SVA (sagittal vertical axis) in both groups improved significantly after surgery (p <  0.05). However, LL, PT, C7SVA improved at postoperative 1 month in the group II were not maintained at the ultimate postoperative follow-up. In clinical assessment, preoperative Oswestry disability index (ODI, %) and all SRS-22 subscores of the group I and II were not different (p > 0.05). There were significant differences between the groups at the ultimate follow-up in ODI (- 25.6 vs - 12.1, p <  0.001), SRS total score (%) (28 vs 20, p = 0.037), function subscore (1.4 vs 0.7, p = 0.016), and satisfaction subscore (1.6 vs 0.6, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Osteoarthritic knee with KLG 3 or 4 have a negative influence on maintaining postoperative spinal sagittal alignment, balance, and the clinical outcomes achieved immediately by posterior instrumentation and fusion for lumbar degenerative disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was retrospectively registered with approval by the institutional review board (IRB) of our institution (approval number: 2018-11-007).

Incidence and Risk Factors of Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Complications after Spinal Fusion Surgery: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Spinal surgery holds a higher chance of unpredicted postoperative medical complications among orthopedic surgeries. Several studies have analyzed the risk factors for diverse postoperative medical complications, but the majority investigated incidences of each complication qualitatively. Among gastrointestinal complications, reports regarding postoperative ileus were relatively frequent. However, risk factors or incidences of hepatobiliary complications have yet to be investigated. The purpose of this study was to examine the incidence of gastrointestinal complications after spinal surgery, quantitatively analyze the risk factors of frequent complications, and to determine cues requiring early approaches. METHODS: In total, 234 consecutive patients who underwent spinal fusion surgery performed by one senior doctor at our institute in one-year period were retrospectively enrolled for analyses. The primary outcomes were presence of paralytic ileus, elevated serum alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) levels, and elevated total bilirubin levels. Univariate logistic regression analyses of all variables were performed. In turn, significant results were reanalyzed by multivariate logistic regression. The variables used were adjusted with age and gender. RESULTS: Gastrointestinal complications were observed in 15.8% of patients. Upon the risk factors of postoperative ileus, duration of anesthesia (odds ratio [OR], 1.373; P = 0.015), number of fused segments (OR, 1.202; P = 0.047), and hepatobiliary diseases (OR, 2.976; P = 0.029) were significantly different. For elevated liver enzymes, men (OR, 2.717; P = 0.003), number of fused segments (OR, 1.234; P = 0.033), and underlying hepatobiliary (OR, 2.704; P = 0.031) and rheumatoid diseases (OR, 5.021; P = 0.012) had significantly different results. Lastly, risk factors for total bilirubin elevation were: duration of anesthesia (OR, 1.431; P = 0.008), number of fused segments (OR, 1.359; P = 0.001), underlying hepatobiliary diseases (OR, 3.426; P = 0.014), and thoracolumbar junction involving fusions (OR, 4.134; P = 0.002) compared to lumbar spine limited fusions. CONCLUSION: Patients on postoperative care after spinal surgery should receive direct attention as soon as possible after manifesting abdominal symptoms. Laboratory and radiologic results must be carefully reviewed, and early consultation to gastroenterologists or general surgeons is recommended to avoid preventable complications.

Pure distraction injury of T1-2 with quad fever.

INTRODUCTION: We report a pure distraction injury of the upper thoracic spine and uncontrolled hyperthermia without an infectious cause. Quad fever appears in the first several weeks to months after a cervical or upper thoracic SCI and is characterized by an extreme elevation in body core temperature beyond 40 °C without an infectious cause. Discriminating between infectious and noninfectious causes is important, and a thorough clinical assessment is required. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 52-year-old male visited the emergency room complaining of back pain with complete paralysis [American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) A] of both lower extremities after a pedestrian-motor vehicle accident. He had trouble breathing due to a hemothorax and flail chest caused by fractures of the right second to eleventh and left fourth to seventh ribs. A computed tomography scan revealed severe distraction of the T1-2 intervertebral space. A magnetic resonance image showed signal changes in the spinal cord and a clean-cut margin between the T1-2 disc and T2 body. The neurological level of injury was C8 upon the initial neurological assessment. Emergency surgery was performed. C6-T3 posterior instrumentation and an autologous iliac bone graft were performed. RESULTS: After surgery, the core temperature increased gradually to above 38.0 °C on post-trauma day 4 and increased to 40.8 °C on post-trauma day 7. None of the repeated aerobic, anaerobic, or fungal cultures of the blood, tracheal aspirate, line tips, urine, or stool was positive until post-trauma day 21, when Candida tropicalis was identified in the urine culture. On post-trauma day 63, the blood pressure, pulse, and body temperature stabilized and the patient was transferred to the general ward. At post-trauma year 6, the injury state was still complete and the neurological level of injury was changed to C4. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the Grand Round case and relevant literature, we discuss the case of pure distraction injury of T1-2 with quad fever. Spinal surgeons should be knowledgeable regarding quad fever as well as the differential diagnoses and treatment strategies.

Rheumatoid arthritis-associated spinal neuroarthropathy with double-level isthmic spondylolisthesis.

INTRODUCTION: To the best of our knowledge, there has been no report regarding rheumatoid arthritis associated with spinal neuroarthropathy and combined double-level isthmic spondylolisthesis. Here, we report a rare case of spinal neuroarthropathy with double-level isthmic spondylolisthesis in a rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patient. A 56-year-old female patient under medical treatment for RA during the last 13 years presented aggravating radiating pain to her right lower extremity and a limping gait developed 4 months ago. The disease activity of RA had remained low for a long time. Serial radiographs during last 8-year follow-up showed progressive dislocation at L4-L5 and L5-S1 with double-level isthmic spondylolisthesis and severe destructive status at the last follow-up. The patient underwent decompression and circumferential fusion with sacropelvic fixation and acceptable reduction was obtained. CONCLUSION: A RA patient with double-level isthmic spondylolisthesis showed a progressive destructive lesion. In addition to clinical presentations, the imaging findings were very similar to ones of spinal neuroarthropathy. The authors conclude that this Grand Round case probably had SNA secondary to RA and that this, combined with two-level isthmic spondylolisthesis, resulted in her rapidly progressing destructive lumbar lesion.

Bone Mineral Density and Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures in Traditional, Unassisted, Free-Diving Women (Haenyeos).

BACKGROUND: Water pressure and muscle contraction may influence bone mineral density (BMD) in a positive way. However, divers experience weightlessness, which has a negative effect on BMD. The present study investigated BMD difference in normal controls and woman free-divers with vertebral fracture and with no fracture. METHODS: Between January 2010 and December 2014, traditional woman divers (known as Haenyeo in Korean), and non-diving women were investigated. The study population was divided into osteoporotic vertebral fracture and non-fracture groups. The BMD of the lumbar spine and femoral neck was measured. The radiological parameters for global spinal sagittal balance were measured. RESULTS: Thirty free-diving women and thirty-three non-diving women were enrolled in this study. The mean age of the divers was 72.1 ± 4.7 years and that of the controls was 72.7 ± 4.0 years (P = 0.61). There was no statistical difference in BMD between the divers and controls. In divers, cervical lordosis and pelvic tilt were significantly increased in the fracture subgroup compared to the non-fracture subgroup (P = 0.028 and P = 0.008, respectively). Sagittal vertical axis was statistically significantly correlated with cervical lordosis (Spearman's rho R = 0.41, P = 0.03), and pelvic tilt (Spearman's rho R = 0.46, P = 0.01) in divers. CONCLUSION: BMD did not differ significantly between divers and controls during their postmenopausal period. When osteoporotic spinal fractures develop, compensation mechanisms, such as increased cervical lordosis and pelvic tilt, was more evident in traditional woman divers. This may be due to the superior back muscle strength and spinal mobility of this group of women.

Long-term management of congenital lordoscoliosis of the thoracic spine.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to report the progression of congenital hyperlordoscoliosis in a 2-year-old patient and the use of multiple surgical interventions in the treatment of hyperlordoscoliosis of the thoracic spine. METHODS: A 2-year-old patient with thoracic hyperlordosis underwent observation for 1 year. To halt the progression of hyperlordosis, a posterior laminectomy was carried out to remove all the fused segments. Despite surgery, lordosis progressed via spontaneous autofusion with development of scoliosis with unilateral unsegmented bar. At the age of 9 years, the patient underwent posterior osteotomy at the fused segments, which was unsuccessful in the correction of hyperlordosis, but was successful in the correction of scoliosis. At the age of 12 years, the patient complained of mild breathing difficulties resulting from hyperlordosis of the thoracic spine, and underwent posterior multilevel vertebral osteotomy (PMVO) again to correct lordoscoliosis. RESULTS: Follow-up in the 3 years after PMVO showed that correction of the deformity was well maintained, with a good clinical outcome and a well-balanced spine. CONCLUSIONS: PMVO is a potential intervention to manage rigid and severe congenital lordoscoliosis of the thoracic spine.

Late onset of progressive neurological deficits in severe angular kyphosis related to tuberculosis spondylitis.

PURPOSE: To investigate the causes of late-onset, progressive neurological deficits in patients with severe angular kyphosis caused by spondylitis secondary to tuberculosis (TB spondylitis). METHODS: From 2000 to 2011, 36 patients with severe angular kyphosis secondary to TB spondylitis (TB kyphosis) were enrolled in the study. All patients had late-onset, progressive neurological deficits. The causes of these deficits were classified with respect to the level of the causative lesion. Group A (n = 25, 69.4%) comprised patients whose neurological deficits resulted from the kyphosis itself. Patients in group B (n = 11, 30.6%) had developed neurological symptoms related to a lesion cephalad or caudal from the kyphosis. Surgical intervention was performed in 23 patients; 13 patients were treated conservatively. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale. RESULTS: The late onset of neurological deficits was attributed to cord compression, pure cord distraction, stenosis, and instability above or below the level of the angular kyphosis. An improvement of the neurological symptoms at the cord level after surgical intervention, as indicated by a change from a non-ambulatory (ASIA impairment scale A/C) to an ambulatory (ASIA D/E) status, occurred in four of nine (44.4%) surgically treated patients. However, only 2 of 10 (20.0%) patients treated conservatively showed cord level improvement, as assessed using the ASIA impairment scale. CONCLUSIONS: In their evaluation of paraplegic patients, spine surgeons should consider the many potential causes of late-onset neurological deficits in TB spondylitis to avoid performing unnecessary surgery. A simpler procedure may yield equivalent results.

Preemptive multimodal analgesia for postoperative pain management after lumbar fusion surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of a novel preemptive multimodal analgesic regimen for reducing postoperative pain and complications after primary lumbar fusion surgery. Preemptive multimodal analgesia is revealed to be an effective alternative to conventional morphine administration providing improved postoperative pain control with diminished side effects. However, an optimal regimen for spinal fusion surgery remains unknown. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval, 80 patients who underwent primary lumbar 4-5 fusion surgery were randomly assigned to receive either only intravenous morphine or a preemptive multimodal (celecoxib, pregabalin, extended-release oxycodone, and acetaminophen) analgesic regimen. Postoperative pain and functional levels were measured by the visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), respectively, and intraoperative blood loss, postoperative Hemovac drain output, and nonunion rates were evaluated for complications. RESULTS: No differences were observed in the patient demographics, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative Hemovac drain output, or nonunion rate between two groups. The VAS and ODI were lower at all postoperative time points, except the ODI on postoperative day 1 in patients randomized to receive the preemptive multimodal analgesic regimen. No major identifiable postoperative complications were observed in either treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: The preemptive multimodal analgesic combination in this study appears to be safe and effective after lumbar fusion surgery.