Unrecognized myocardial scar by late-gadolinium-enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Insights from the population-based Hamburg City Health Study.

BACKGROUND: The presence of myocardial scar is associated with poor prognosis in several underlying diseases. Late-gadolinium-enhancement (LGE) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging reveals clinically silent "unrecognized myocardial scar" (UMS), but the etiology of UMS often remains unclear. This population-based CMR study evaluated prevalence, localization, patterns, and risk factors of UMS. METHODS: The study population consisted of 1064 consecutive Hamburg City Health Study participants without a history of coronary heart disease or myocarditis. UMS was assessed by standard-phase-sensitive-inversion-recovery LGE CMR. RESULTS: Median age was 66 [quartiles 59, 71] years and 37% (388/1064) were females. UMS was detected in 244 (23%) participants. Twenty-five participants (10%) had ischemic, and 217 participants (89%) had non-ischemic scar patterns, predominantly involving the basal inferolateral left-ventricular (LV) myocardium (75%). Two participants (1%) had coincident ischemic and non-ischemic scar. The presence of any UMS was independently associated with LV ejection fraction (odds ratios (OR) per standard deviation (SD) 0.77 (confidence interval (CI) 0.65-0.90), p = 0.002) and LV mass (OR per SD 1.54 (CI 1.31-1.82), p < 0.001). Ischemic UMS was independently associated with LV ejection fraction (OR per SD 0.58 (CI 0.39-0.86), p = 0.007), LV mass (OR per SD 1.74 (CI 1.25-2.45), p = 0.001), and diabetes (OR 4.91 (CI 1.66-13.03), p = 0.002). Non-ischemic UMS was only independently associated with LV mass (OR per SD 1.44 (CI 1.24-1.69), p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: UMS, in particular with a non-ischemic pattern, is frequent in individuals without known cardiac disease and predominantly involves the basal inferolateral LV myocardium. Presence of UMS is independently associated with a lower LVEF, a higher LV mass, and a history of diabetes.

[Non-utilisation of medical services during the COVID-19 pandemic among persons with chronic diseases]. / Nichtinanspruchnahme medizinischer Leistungen in der COVID-19-Pandemie bei Personen mit chronischen Erkrankungen.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic is also impacting the medical care for other diseases. The extent to which people with chronic diseases are affected by the suspension of medical services is investigated-differentiating between patient and provider perspectives. METHOD: A cross-sectional study was conducted based on data from the longitudinal Hamburg City Health Study (HCHS). The study population was all HCHS participants (a sample of the population of Hamburg, 45-74 years) between April 2020 and November 2021. Utilisation of medical services was collected via the "COVID-19-module" of the HCHS. The chronic conditions included cardiovascular disease, kidney and lung disease, cancer and diabetes mellitus; analyses were descriptive and multivariate. RESULTS: Of the 2047 participants, 47.9% had at least one previous illness. Of those with pre-existing conditions, 21.4% had at least one healthcare service suspended or an appointment cancelled. In addition, 15.4% stated that they decided by themselves not to attend a doctor's appointment. Specialist care services (43.8% of all cancellations) were cancelled more frequently than general practitioner care (16.6%). After adjustment for age, gender and education, lung disease (OR 1.80; p < 0.008) and cancer (OR 2.33; p < 0.001) were found to be independent risk factors for appointment cancellations by healthcare providers. Of cancellations by patients, 42.2% were due to their fear of an infection with the coronavirus SARS-CoV­2. DISCUSSION: Health policy and the media are faced with the challenge of dealing with fears of infection in the population in such a way that they do not lead to an avoidance of necessary care services.

Evaluating REDCap as the Central Data Collection Tool for the Hamburg City Health Study.

INTRODUCTION: The collection of examination data for large clinical studies is often done with proprietary systems, which are accompanied by several disadvantages such as high cost and low flexibility. With the use of open-source tools, these disadvantages can be overcome and thereby improve data collection as well as data quality. Here we exemplary use the data collection process of the Hamburg City Health Study (HCHS), carried out at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE). We evaluated how the recording of the examination data can be converted from an established, proprietary electronic healthcare record (EHR) system to the free-to-use Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) software. METHODS: For this purpose, a technical conversion of the EHR system is described first. Metafiles derived from the EHR system were used for REDCap electronic case report form (eCRF) building. The REDCap system was tested by HCHS study assistants via completion of self-developed tasks mimicking their everyday study life. Usability was quantitatively evaluated via the IBM Computer System Usability Questionnaire (CSUQ) and qualitatively assessed with a semi-structured interview. RESULTS: With the IBM CSUQ, the study assistants rated the usage of the basic REDCap system for HCHS examination data collection with an overall score of 4.39, which represents a medium acceptance. The interview feedback was used to formulate user stories to subsequently increase the administrative sovereignty and to conceptualize a REDCap HCHS information technology (IT) infrastructure. CONCLUSION: Our work aims to serve as a template for evaluating the feasibility of a conversion from a proprietary to a free-to-use data collection tool for large clinical studies such as the HCHS. REDCap has great potential, but extensions and an integration to the current IT infrastructure are required.

Correlation of systolic and diastolic blood pressure with echocardiographic phenotypes of cardiac structure and function from three German population-based studies.

Arterial hypertension is considered a risk factor for the development of heart failure. Here we investigate cross-sectional associations of systolic and diastolic blood pressure with subtle functional and morphological changes of left ventricular echocardiographic parameters representing early dysfunction in three representative German population-based studies. We assessed 26,719 individuals without symptomatic heart failure from the Hamburg City Health Study (HCHS, n = 7396, derivation cohort), the Gutenberg Health Study (GHS, 14,715, validation cohort) and the Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP, 4608, validation cohort). Multivariable linear regression analyses with systolic and diastolic blood pressure as continuous exposure variables were adjusted for common cardiovascular risk factors and antihypertensive medication. Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure were consistently associated with measures of left ventricular hypertrophy (ß per standard deviation (SD) for LV mass (g) and systolic blood pressure: 5.09 (p < 0.001); diastolic blood pressure: 2.29 (p < 0.001) in HCHS). Systolic blood pressure correlated with declining diastolic function (ß per SD for E/e': 0.29, p < 0.001 in HCHS) and diastolic blood pressure with declining systolic function (ß per SD for LVEF, in %: - 0.15; p = 0.041 in HCHS) in all cohorts. Pending further validation, our results from three independent German population samples suggest differential effects of systolic versus diastolic blood pressure on left ventricular structure and function.