Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 170(1): 1-12, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37473440

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study is to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of computed tomography (CT) scans in the diagnosis of foreign body aspiration (FBA) in children, and to determine whether chest CT scans would reduce the need for diagnostic rigid bronchoscopies. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases were searched for relevant articles and conference proceedings that were published in English through November 1, 2022. REVIEW METHODS: We included prospective and retrospective studies comparing chest CT scans and rigid bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of FBA in pediatric patients (<16 years old). The pooled estimates of the sensitivity and specificity of the chest CT scan in the diagnosis of FBA were calculated using a fixed- or common-effects analysis and a random-effects analysis that accounts for heterogeneity if present. Forest plots were constructed to combine the evidence identified during the systematic review. RESULTS: Eighteen articles (4178 patients) were included. The average age of the children was 2.26 (±0.75) years, and 65% (±5.64%) of them were boys. Cough was the most prevalent symptom upon presentation. The pooled analysis showed that the sensitivity of chest CT scan in detecting a foreign body in children was 99% (95% confidence interval, CI [97, 100]; I2 = 72%, τ2 = 0.0065, p < .01). The false negative rate was 1.8% (95% CI [0.3, 2.7]; I2 = 72%, p < .01). The specificity of chest CT scan was 92% (95% CI [83, 98]; I2 = 83%, τ2 = 0.0437, p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Chest CT scan is a sensitive and specific test for the diagnosis of FBA in the pediatric population. Its use can help to reduce unnecessary rigid bronchoscopies, especially in patients with a low clinical suspicion of aspiration. It should not be a replacement for the gold standard bronchoscopy, particularly in cases where there is a clear history and symptoms suggestive of aspiration.


Assuntos
Corpos Estranhos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Masculino , Criança , Humanos , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Adolescente , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos Prospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Broncoscopia/métodos , Aspiração Respiratória/diagnóstico por imagem , Corpos Estranhos/diagnóstico por imagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa