In Vitro Activity of Ceftibuten-Avibactam against ß-Lactamase-Positive Enterobacterales from the ATLAS Global Surveillance Program.

Ceftibuten is an established, oral, third-generation cephalosporin in early clinical development in combination with an oral prodrug of avibactam for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections, including acute pyelonephritis. We evaluated the in vitro activity of ceftibuten-avibactam against 1,165 Enterobacterales isolates selected from the 2016-2020 ATLAS global surveillance program based upon their ß-lactamase genotype, ß-lactam-susceptible phenotype, species identification, and specimen source (95.8% urine). MICs were determined by CLSI broth microdilution. Avibactam was tested at a fixed concentration of 4 µg/mL. Molecular methods were used to identify ß-lactamase genes. Ceftibuten-avibactam inhibited 90% (MIC90) of ESBL-producing (n = 645), KPC-producing (n = 60), chromosomal AmpC-positive (n = 100), OXA-48-like-producing (n = 50), and acquired AmpC-producing (n = 110) isolates at concentrations of 0.12, 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 µg/mL, respectively. At concentrations of ≤1 and ≤8 µg/mL, ceftibuten-avibactam inhibited 98.4 and 99.2% of ESBL-positive isolates; 96.7 and 100% of KPC-positive isolates; 91.0 and 99.0% of chromosomal AmpC-positive isolates; 86.0 and 96.0% of OXA-48-like-positive isolates; and 85.5 and 91.8% of acquired AmpC-positive isolates. Against ESBL-producing, KPC-producing, chromosomal AmpC-positive, OXA-48-like-producing, and acquired AmpC-producing isolates, ceftibuten-avibactam was 256-, 128-, >64-, >32-, and > 16-fold more potent than ceftibuten alone. The potency of ceftibuten-avibactam was 4-fold greater than ceftazidime-avibactam against ESBL-producing (ceftibuten-avibactam MIC90, 0.12 µg/mL; ceftazidime-avibactam MIC90, 0.5 µg/mL) and KPC-producing (0.5 µg/mL; 2 µg/mL) isolates, equivalent to ceftazidime-avibactam (MIC90, 2 µg/mL) against OXA-48-like-producing isolates, 2-fold less active than ceftazidime-avibactam (1 µg/mL; 0.5 µg/mL) against chromosomal AmpC-positive isolates, and 4-fold less active than ceftazidime-avibactam (4 µg/mL; 1 µg/mL) against acquired AmpC-producing isolates. Continued development of ceftibuten-avibactam appears justified.

In vitro and in vivo activity of cefiderocol against Achromobacter spp. and Burkholderia cepacia complex, including carbapenem-non-susceptible isolates.

Achromobacter spp. and Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) are rare but diverse opportunistic pathogens associated with serious infections, which are often multidrug resistant. This study compared the in vitro antibacterial activity of the siderophore antibiotic cefiderocol against Achromobacter spp. and Bcc isolates with that of other approved antibacterial drugs, including ceftazidime-avibactam, ciprofloxacin, colistin, imipenem-relebactam, and meropenem-vaborbactam. Isolates were collected in the SIDERO multinational surveillance program. Among 334 Achromobacter spp. isolates [76.6% from respiratory tract infections (RTIs)], cefiderocol had minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)50/90 of 0.06/0.5 µg/mL overall and 0.5/4 µg/mL against 52 (15.6%) carbapenem-non-susceptible (Carb-NS) isolates. Eleven (3.3%) Achromobacter spp. isolates overall and 6 (11.5%) Carb-NS isolates were not susceptible to cefiderocol. Among 425 Bcc isolates (73.4% from RTIs), cefiderocol had MIC50/90 of ≤0.03/0.5 µg/mL overall and ≤0.03/1 µg/mL against 184 (43.3%) Carb-NS isolates. Twenty-two (5.2%) Bcc isolates overall and 13 (7.1%) Carb-NS isolates were not susceptible to cefiderocol. Cumulative MIC distributions showed cefiderocol to be the most active of the agents tested in vitro against both Achromobacter spp. and Bcc. In a neutropenic murine lung infection model and a humanized pharmacokinetic immunocompetent rat lung infection model, cefiderocol showed significant bactericidal activity against two meropenem-resistant Achromobacter xylosoxidans strains compared with untreated controls (P < 0.05) and vehicle-treated controls (P < 0.05), respectively. Meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, and ciprofloxacin comparators showed no significant activity in these models. The results suggest that cefiderocol could be a possible treatment option for RTIs caused by Achromobacter spp. and Bcc.

In Vitro Activity of Cefepime-Taniborbactam and Comparators against Clinical Isolates of Gram-Negative Bacilli from 2018 to 2020: Results from the Global Evaluation of Antimicrobial Resistance via Surveillance (GEARS) Program.

Taniborbactam is a novel cyclic boronate ß-lactamase inhibitor in clinical development in combination with cefepime. We assessed the in vitro activity of cefepime-taniborbactam and comparators against a 2018-2020 collection of Enterobacterales (n = 13,731) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 4,619) isolates cultured from infected patients attending hospitals in 56 countries. MICs were determined by CLSI broth microdilution. Taniborbactam was tested at a fixed concentration of 4 µg/mL. Isolates with cefepime-taniborbactam MICs of ≥16 µg/mL underwent whole-genome sequencing. ß-lactamase genes were identified in meropenem-resistant isolates by PCR/Sanger sequencing. Against Enterobacterales, taniborbactam reduced the cefepime MIC90 value by >64-fold (from >16 to 0.25 µg/mL). At ≤16 µg/mL, cefepime-taniborbactam inhibited 99.7% of all Enterobacterales isolates; >97% of isolates with multidrug-resistant (MDR) and ceftolozane-tazobactam-resistant phenotypes; ≥90% of isolates with meropenem-resistant, difficult-to-treat-resistant (DTR), meropenem-vaborbactam-resistant, and ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant phenotypes; 100% of VIM-positive, AmpC-positive, and KPC-positive isolates; 98.7% of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-positive; 98.8% of OXA-48-like-positive; and 84.6% of NDM-positive isolates. Against P. aeruginosa, taniborbactam reduced the cefepime MIC90 value by 4-fold (from 32 to 8 µg/mL). At ≤16 µg/mL, cefepime-taniborbactam inhibited 97.4% of all P. aeruginosa isolates; ≥85% of isolates with meropenem-resistant, MDR, and meropenem-vaborbactam-resistant phenotypes; >75% of isolates with DTR, ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant, and ceftolozane-tazobactam-resistant phenotypes; and 87.4% of VIM-positive isolates. Multiple potential mechanisms, including carriage of IMP, certain alterations in PBP3, permeability (porin) defects, and possibly, upregulation of efflux were present in most isolates with cefepime-taniborbactam MICs of ≥16 µg/mL. We conclude that cefepime-taniborbactam exhibited potent in vitro activity against Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa and inhibited most carbapenem-resistant isolates, including those carrying serine carbapenemases or NDM/VIM metallo-ß-lactamases (MBLs).

Multicenter Clinical Performance Evaluation of Omadacycline Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacterales on VITEK 2 Systems.

We present the first performance evaluation results for omadacycline on the VITEK 2 and VITEK 2 Compact Systems (bioMérieux, Inc.). The trial was conducted at four external sites and one internal site. All sites were in the United States, geographically dispersed as follows: Indianapolis, IN; Schaumburg, IL; Wilsonville, OR; Cleveland, OH; and Hazelwood, MO. In this multisite study, omadacycline was tested against 858 Enterobacterales on the VITEK 2 antimicrobial susceptibility test (AST) Gram-negative (GN) card, and the results were compared to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution (BMD) reference method. The results were analyzed and are presented as essential agreement (EA), category agreement (CA), minor error (mE) rates, major error (ME) rates, and very major error (VME) rates following the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and International Standards Organization (ISO) performance criteria requirements. Omadacycline has susceptibility testing interpretive criteria (breakpoints) established by the FDA only; nevertheless, the analysis was also performed using the ISO acceptance criteria to satisfy the registration needs of countries outside the United States. The analysis following FDA criteria (including only Klebsiella pneumoniae and Enterobacter cloacae) showed the following performance: EA = 97.9% (410/419), CA = 94.3% (395/419), VME = 2% (1/51), with no ME present. The performance following ISO criteria (including all Enterobacterales tested) after error resolutions was EA = 98.1% (842/858) and CA = 96.9% (831/858). No ME or VME were observed. The VITEK 2 test met the ISO and FDA criteria of ≥ 95% reproducibility, and ≥ 95% quality control (QC) results within acceptable ranges for QC organisms. In June 2022, the omadacycline VITEK 2 test received FDA 510(k) clearance (K213931) FDA as a diagnostic device to be used in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections caused by E. cloacae and K. pneumoniae, and for treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia caused by K. pneumoniae. The new VITEK 2 AST-GN omadacycline test provides an alternative to the BMD reference method testing and increases the range of automated diagnostic tools available for determining omadacycline MICs in Enterobacterales.

In vitro activity of cefiderocol against MBL-producing Gram-negative bacteria collected in North America and Europe in five consecutive annual multinational SIDERO-WT surveillance studies (2014-2019).

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the in vitro antibacterial activity of cefiderocol, a siderophore cephalosporin against MBL-producing clinical isolates. METHODS: MBL-producing strains were selected from clinical isolates of Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii complex collected in North America and Europe in five consecutive annual multinational SIDERO-WT surveillance studies from 2014 to 2019. MICs of cefiderocol and comparator agents were determined by the broth microdilution method according to the CLSI guideline. RESULTS: A total of 452 MBL-producing strains consisting of 200 Enterobacterales, 227 P. aeruginosa and 25 A. baumannii complex were identified. The highest number of MBL-producing Enterobacterales strains were detected in Greece. MBL-producing strains of both P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii complex were isolated most frequently in Russia. For Enterobacterales, 91.5% or 67.5% of MBL-producing strains had cefiderocol MIC values ≤4 mg/L (CLSI susceptibility breakpoint) or ≤2 mg/L (EUCAST susceptibility breakpoint), respectively. All MIC values of cefiderocol for MBL-producing P. aeruginosa strains were ≤4 mg/L (CLSI susceptibility breakpoint), and 97.4% of them had cefiderocol MIC values ≤2 mg/L (EUCAST susceptibility breakpoint). For A. baumannii complex, 60.0% or 44.0% of MBL-producing strains had cefiderocol MIC values ≤4 mg/L (CLSI susceptibility breakpoint) or ≤2 mg/L (EUCAST pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic susceptibility breakpoint), respectively. Against all types of MBL-producing strains, MIC distribution curves of cefiderocol were located in the lowest numerical values, compared with other ß-lactams and ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations tested and ciprofloxacin. CONCLUSIONS: Although the types of MBL-producing strains isolated by country varied, cefiderocol showed potent in vitro activity against all types of MBL-producing Gram-negative bacteria regardless of the bacterial species.

Relebactam restores susceptibility of resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacterales and enhances imipenem activity against chromosomal AmpC-producing species: analysis of global SMART 2018-2020.

BACKGROUND: Carbapenem-resistant bacteria are an increasing problem in clinical practice; thus, it is important to identify ß-lactamase inhibitors (e.g., relebactam) that can restore carbapenem susceptibility. We report analyses of relebactam enhancement of imipenem activity against both imipenem-nonsusceptible (NS) and imipenem-susceptible (S) Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacterales. Gram-negative bacterial isolates were collected for the ongoing Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends global surveillance program. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute-defined broth microdilution minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were used to determine the imipenem and imipenem/relebactam antibacterial susceptibilities of P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales isolates. RESULTS: Between 2018 and 2020, 36.2% of P. aeruginosa (N = 23,073) and 8.2% of Enterobacterales (N = 91,769) isolates were imipenem-NS. Relebactam restored imipenem susceptibility in 64.1% and 49.4% of imipenem-NS P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales isolates, respectively. Restoration of susceptibility was largely observed among K. pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales and carbapenemase-negative P. aeruginosa. Relebactam also caused a lowering of imipenem MIC among imipenem-S P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales isolates from chromosomal Ambler class C ß-lactamase (AmpC)-producing species. For both imipenem-NS and imipenem-S P. aeruginosa isolates, relebactam reduced the imipenem MIC mode from 16 µg/mL to 1 µg/mL and from 2 µg/mL to 0.5 µg/mL, respectively, compared with imipenem alone. CONCLUSIONS: Relebactam restored imipenem susceptibility among nonsusceptible isolates of P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales and enhanced imipenem susceptibility among susceptible isolates of P. aeruginosa and isolates from Enterobacterales species that can produce chromosomal AmpC. The reduced imipenem modal MIC values with relebactam may result in a higher probability of target attainment in patients.

In Vitro Activity of Ceftibuten/VNRX-5236 against Urinary Tract Infection Isolates of Antimicrobial-Resistant Enterobacterales.

Ceftibuten/VNRX-7145 is a cephalosporin/boronate ß-lactamase inhibitor combination under development as an oral treatment for complicated urinary tract infections caused by Enterobacterales producing serine ß-lactamases (Ambler class A, C, and D). In vivo, VNRX-7145 (VNRX-5236 etzadroxil) is cleaved to the active inhibitor, VNRX-5236. We assessed the in vitro activity of ceftibuten/VNRX-5236 against 1,066 urinary isolates of Enterobacterales from a 2014-2016 global culture collection. Each isolate tested was preselected to possess a multidrug-resistant (MDR) phenotype that included nonsusceptibility to amoxicillin-clavulanate and resistance to levofloxacin. MICs were determined by CLSI broth microdilution. VNRX-5236 was tested at a fixed concentration of 4 µg/ml. Ceftibuten/VNRX-5236 inhibited 90% of all isolates tested (MIC90) at 2 µg/ml; MIC90s for ESBL- (n = 566), serine carbapenemase- (n = 116), and acquired AmpC-positive (n = 58) isolate subsets were ≤0.25, >32, and 8 µg/ml, respectively. At concentrations of ≤1, ≤2, and ≤4 µg/ml, ceftibuten/VNRX-5236 inhibited 89.1, 91.7, and 93.1% of all isolates tested; 96.5, 97.7, and 98.4% of ESBL-positive isolates; 75.9, 81.9, and 81.9% of serine carbapenemase-positive isolates; and 70.7, 81.0, and 87.9% of acquired AmpC-positive isolates. Ceftibuten/VNRX-5236 at concentrations of ≤1, ≤2, and ≤4 µg/ml inhibited 85-89, 89-91, and 91-92% of isolates that were not susceptible (defined by CLSI and EUCAST breakpoint criteria) to nitrofurantoin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and/or fosfomycin, (as part of their MDR phenotype), oral agents commonly prescribed to treat uncomplicated urinary tract infections. The potency of ceftibuten/VNRX-5236 (MIC90, 2 µg/ml) was similar (within one doubling-dilution) to intravenous-only agents ceftazidime-avibactam (MIC90 2 µg/ml) and meropenem-vaborbactam (MIC90 1 µg/ml). Continued investigation of ceftibuten/VNRX-5236 is warranted.

In Vitro Activity of Sulbactam-Durlobactam against Global Isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus Complex Collected from 2016 to 2021.

Sulbactam-durlobactam is a ß-lactam-ß-lactamase inhibitor combination designed to treat serious Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex (ABC) infections, including carbapenem-non-susceptible and multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates. The current study characterized the in vitro activity of sulbactam-durlobactam against a collection of 5,032 ABC clinical isolates collected in 33 countries across the Asia/South Pacific region, Europe, Latin America, the Middle East, and North America from 2016 to 2021. The sulbactam-durlobactam MIC50 and MIC90 were 1 and 2 µg/mL, respectively, for all ABC isolates tested. The addition of durlobactam (at a fixed concentration of 4 µg/mL) to sulbactam decreased its MIC50 by 8-fold (from 8 to 1 µg/mL) and its MIC90 by 32-fold (from 64 to 2 µg/mL) for all ABC isolates. The in vitro activity of sulbactam-durlobactam was maintained across individual ABC species, years, global regions of collection, specimen sources, and resistance phenotypes, including MDR and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) isolates. At 4 µg/mL (preliminary sulbactam-durlobactam susceptible MIC breakpoint), sulbactam-durlobactam inhibited 98.3% of all ABC isolates and >96% of sulbactam-, imipenem-, ciprofloxacin-, amikacin-, and minocycline-non-susceptible isolates; as well as colistin-resistant, MDR, and XDR isolates. Most imipenem-non-susceptible ABC isolates (96.8%, 2,488/2,570) were carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB); 96.9% (2,410/2,488) of CRAB isolates were sulbactam-durlobactam-susceptible. More than 80% of ABC isolates had sulbactam-durlobactam MIC values that were ≥2 doubling-dilutions (4-fold) lower than sulbactam alone. Only 1.7% (84/5,032) of ABC isolates from 2016 to 2021 had sulbactam-durlobactam MIC values of >4 µg/mL. Of the 84 isolates, 94.0% were A. baumannii, 4.8% were A. pittii, and 1.2% were A. nosocomialis. In summary, sulbactam-durlobactam demonstrated potent antibacterial activity against a 2016 to 2021 collection of geographically diverse clinical isolates of ABC isolates, including carbapenem-non-susceptible and MDR isolates.

In Vitro Susceptibility of Gram-Negative Pathogens to Cefiderocol in Five Consecutive Annual Multinational SIDERO-WT Surveillance Studies, 2014 to 2019.

We report in vitro susceptibility data from five consecutive annual SIDERO-WT surveillance studies (2014 to 2019) for cefiderocol and comparators tested against Gram-negative clinical isolates from North America and Europe. CLSI broth microdilution was used to determine MICs for Enterobacterales (n = 31,896), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 7,700), Acinetobacter baumannii complex (n = 5,225), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n = 2,030), and Burkholderia cepacia complex (n = 425). MICs were interpreted by CLSI-approved clinical breakpoints (February 2021). Cefiderocol inhibited 99.8, 96.7, 91.6, and 97.7% of all Enterobacterales, meropenem-nonsusceptible, ceftazidime-avibactam-nonsusceptible, and ceftolozane-tazobactam-nonsusceptible isolates, respectively, at ≤4 µg/mL (susceptible breakpoint). Cefiderocol inhibited 99.9, 99.8, 100, and 99.8% of all P. aeruginosa, meropenem-nonsusceptible, ceftazidime-avibactam-nonsusceptible, and ceftolozane-tazobactam-nonsusceptible isolates, respectively, at ≤4 µg/mL (susceptible breakpoint). Cefiderocol inhibited 96.0% of all A. baumannii complex isolates and 94.2% of meropenem-nonsusceptible isolates at ≤4 µg/mL (susceptible breakpoint) and 98.6% of S. maltophilia isolates at ≤1 µg/mL (susceptible breakpoint). B. cepacia complex isolates were tested with a MIC50 of ≤0.03 µg/mL and MIC90 of 0.5 µg/mL. Annual cefiderocol percent susceptible rates for Enterobacterales (North America range, 99.6 to 100%/year; Europe range, 99.3 to 99.9%/year) and P. aeruginosa (North America range, 99.8 to 100%; Europe range, 99.9 to 100%) were unchanged from 2014 to 2019. Annual percent susceptible rates for A. baumannii complex demonstrated sporadic, nondirectional differences (North America range, 97.5 to 100%; Europe range, 90.4 to 97.5%); the wider range for Europe (∼7%) was due to isolates from Russia. Annual percent susceptible rates for S. maltophilia showed minor, nondirectional differences (North America range, 96.4 to 100%; Europe range, 95.6 to 100%). We conclude that clinical isolates of Enterobacterales (99.8% susceptible), P. aeruginosa (99.9%), A. baumannii (96.0%), and S. maltophilia (98.6%) collected in North America and Europe from 2014 to 2019 were highly susceptible to cefiderocol.

In Vitro Activity of Gepotidacin against Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Anaerobes.

Gepotidacin (formerly GSK2140944) is a first-in-class triazaacenaphthylene antibacterial currently in phase III clinical trials. When tested against Gram-negative (n = 333) and Gram-positive (n = 225) anaerobes by agar dilution, gepotidacin inhibited 90% of isolates at concentrations of 4 and 2 µg/mL, respectively. Given gepotidacin's in vitro activity against the anaerobic isolates tested, further study is warranted to better understand the utility of gepotidacin in the treatment of infections caused by clinically relevant anaerobic organisms.

Ceftibuten-Ledaborbactam Activity against Multidrug-Resistant and Extended-Spectrum-ß-Lactamase-Positive Clinical Isolates of Enterobacterales from a 2018-2020 Global Surveillance Collection.

Ceftibuten-ledaborbactam etzadroxil is a cephalosporin-boronate ß-lactamase inhibitor prodrug combination under development as an oral treatment for complicated urinary tract infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Enterobacterales producing serine ß-lactamases (Ambler class A, C, and D). In vivo, ledaborbactam etzadroxil (formerly VNRX-7145) is cleaved to the active inhibitor ledaborbactam (formerly VNRX-5236). To more completely define the breadth of ceftibuten-ledaborbactam's activity against important antimicrobial-resistant pathogens, we assessed its in vitro activity against phenotypic and genotypic subsets from a 2018-2020 global culture collection of 3,889 clinical isolates of Enterobacterales, including MDR organisms, extended-spectrum-ß-lactamase (ESBL)-positive organisms, and organisms that are nonsusceptible and resistant to other antimicrobials. MICs were determined by CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted using both CLSI and EUCAST breakpoints. Ledaborbactam was tested at a fixed concentration of 4 µg/mL. ß-Lactamase genes were characterized by PCR followed by Sanger sequencing or whole-genome sequencing for selected ß-lactam-resistant isolate subsets. At ≤1 µg/mL, ceftibuten-ledaborbactam (MIC90, 0.25 µg/mL) inhibited 89.7% of MDR isolates, 98.3% of isolates with a presumptive ESBL-positive phenotype, and 92.6% of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-nonsusceptible, 91.7% of levofloxacin-nonsusceptible, 88.1% of amoxicillin-clavulanate-nonsusceptible, 85.7% of ceftibuten-resistant (MIC >1 µg/mL), and 54.1% of carbapenem-nonsusceptible isolates. Against specific ESBL genotype-positive isolates (AmpC negative, serine carbapenemase negative, and metallo-ß-lactamase negative), ceftibuten-ledaborbactam inhibited 96.3% of CTX-M-9 group (MIC90, 0.25 µg/mL), 91.5% of CTX-M-1 group (MIC90, 0.5 µg/mL), and 88.2% of SHV-positive (MIC90, 2 µg/mL) isolates at ≤1 µg/mL. Against specific serine carbapenemase genotype-positive isolates, ceftibuten-ledaborbactam inhibited 85.9% of KPC-positive (MIC90, 2 µg/mL) and 82.9% of OXA-48-group-positive (MIC90, 2 µg/mL) isolates at ≤1 µg/mL. Continued development of ceftibuten-ledaborbactam appears warranted.

Antimicrobial activity of ceftazidime-avibactam and comparators against levofloxacin-resistant Escherichia coli collected from four geographic regions, 2012-2018.

BACKGROUND: Increases in resistance to fluoroquinolones have been correlated with the use of levofloxacin in the treatment of infections caused by Escherichia coli. The analysis presents the in vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam and comparator agents against 10,840 levofloxacin-resistant E. coli isolates collected from four geographic regions (Africa/Middle East, Europe, Asia/South Pacific, Latin America) between 2012 and 2018. METHODS: Non-duplicate clinical isolates of E. coli were collected from participating centres and shipped to IHMA, Inc., (Schaumburg, IL, USA). Susceptibility testing was performed with frozen broth microdilution panels manufactured by IHMA, according to CLSI guidelines. Levofloxacin-resistance was defined at a minimum inhibitory concentration of ≥ 2 mg/L. Isolates collected between 2012 and 2015 were tested for extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL) activity by determining susceptibility to cefotaxime, cefotaxime-clavulanate, ceftazidime, and ceftazidime-clavulanate as recommended by CLSI guidelines. Isolates collected between 2016 and 2018 were identified as ESBL-positive by genotype using multiplex polymerase chain reaction assays. RESULTS: A total of 74.8% of levofloxacin-resistant E. coli isolates in the analysis were from three culture sources: urinary tract infections (N = 3229; 29.8%), skin and skin structure infections (N = 2564; 23.7%) and intra-abdominal infections (N = 2313; 21.3%). Susceptibility rates to ceftazidime-avibactam were consistently high in all regions against both ESBL-positive (97.0% in Asia/South Pacific to 99.7% in Africa/Middle East and Latin America) and ESBL-negative isolates (99.4% in Asia/South Pacific to 100% in Latin America). Susceptibility was also high in each region among ESBL-positive and ESBL-negative isolates to colistin (≥ 98.5%), imipenem (≥ 96.5%), meropenem (≥ 96.5%) and tigecycline (≥ 94.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Antimicrobial susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam among levofloxacin-resistant E. coli isolates, including ESBL-positive isolates, collected from four geographical regions between 2012 and 2018 was consistently high. Susceptibility to the comparator agents colistin, tigecycline, imipenem and meropenem was also high.

Prevalence of RND efflux pump regulator variants associated with tigecycline resistance in carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii from a worldwide survey.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the most common tigecycline resistance mechanisms in carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates obtained during the global Tigecycline Evaluation Surveillance Trial (TEST). METHODS: Tigecycline MICs were determined by broth microdilution. WGS was used to screen for the previously identified tigecycline resistance mechanisms, as well as mutations in resistance-nodulation-cell division (RND)-type efflux pump regulators. RESULTS: From a total 313 isolates, 113 genetically unique tigecycline-resistant isolates were analysed. The most frequent and worldwide distributed mechanism associated with tigecycline resistance was disruption of adeN, which encodes the repressor of the RND efflux pump AdeIJK, either by IS elements or nucleotide deletions causing premature stop codons. However, mutations leading to amino acid substitutions and disruption by IS elements within the two-component regulatory system adeRS, which regulates expression of the AdeABC efflux pump, correlate with higher tigecycline MICs, but these were found less frequently and were mainly restricted to Southern European countries. Furthermore, an altered version of tviB was identified in several tigecycline-resistant isolates that did not have putative resistance mutations within RND-type regulators. The resistance determinants tet(A) and tet(X), as well as resistance mutations in putative resistance determinants trm, plsC, rrf, msbA and genes encoding 30S ribosomal proteins, were not identified in any isolate. CONCLUSIONS: The most prevalent tigecycline resistance mechanisms were caused by alterations in the regulators of RND-type efflux pumps. These data provide the basis for further characterization of regulator alterations and their contribution to increased efflux and tigecycline resistance, and also should be taken into account in drug discovery programmes to overcome the contribution of efflux pumps.

In Vitro Activity of WCK 5222 (Cefepime-Zidebactam) against Worldwide Collected Gram-Negative Bacilli Not Susceptible to Carbapenems.

WCK 5222 (cefepime-zidebactam, 2 g + 1g, every 8 h [q8h]) is in clinical development for the treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant and multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacilli. We determined the in vitro susceptibility of 1,385 clinical isolates of non-carbapenem-susceptible Enterobacterales, MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa (also non-carbapenem susceptible), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Burkholderia spp. collected worldwide (49 countries) from 2014 to 2016 to cefepime-zidebactam (1:1 ratio), ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, and colistin using the CLSI broth microdilution method. Cefepime-zidebactam inhibited 98.5% of non-carbapenem-susceptible Enterobacterales (n = 1,018) at ≤8 µg/ml (provisional cefepime-zidebactam-susceptible MIC breakpoint). Against the subset of metallo-ß-lactamase (MBL)-positive Enterobacterales (n = 214), cefepime-zidebactam inhibited 94.9% of isolates at ≤8 µg/ml. Further, it inhibited 99.6% of MDR P. aeruginosa (n = 262) isolates at ≤32 µg/ml (proposed cefepime-zidebactam-susceptible pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic MIC breakpoint), including all MBL-positive isolates (n = 94). Moreover, cefepime-zidebactam was active against the majority of isolates of Enterobacterales (≥95%) and P. aeruginosa (99%) that were not susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, imipenem-relebactam, and colistin. Most isolates (99%) of S. maltophilia (n = 101; MIC50, 8 µg/ml; MIC90, 32 µg/ml) and Burkholderia spp. (n = 4; MIC range, 16 to 32 µg/ml) were also inhibited by cefepime-zidebactam at ≤32 µg/ml. The activity of cefepime-zidebactam against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria is ascribed to its ß-lactam enhancer mechanism of action (i.e., zidebactam binding to penicillin binding protein 2 [PBP2] and its universal stability to both serine ß-lactamases and MBLs). The results from this study support the continued development of cefepime-zidebactam as a potential therapy for infections caused by Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa, and other nonfermentative Gram-negative bacilli where resistance to marketed antimicrobial agents is a limiting factor.

In Vitro Activity of Sulbactam-Durlobactam against Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus Complex Isolates Collected Globally in 2016 and 2017.

Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex (ABC) organisms cause severe infections that are difficult to treat due to preexisting antibiotic resistance. Sulbactam-durlobactam (formerly sulbactam-ETX2514) (SUL-DUR) is a ß-lactam-ß-lactamase inhibitor combination antibiotic designed to treat serious infections caused by ABC organisms, including multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains. The in vitro antibacterial activities of SUL-DUR and comparator agents were determined by broth microdilution against 1,722 clinical isolates of ABC organisms collected in 2016 and 2017 from 31 countries across Asia/South Pacific, Europe, Latin America, the Middle East, and North America. Over 50% of these isolates were resistant to carbapenems. Against this collection of global isolates, SUL-DUR had a MIC50/MIC90 of 1/2 µg/ml compared to a MIC50/MIC90 of 8/64 µg/ml for sulbactam alone. This level of activity was found to be consistent across organisms, regions, sources of infection, and subsets of resistance phenotypes, including MDR and extensively drug-resistant isolates. The SUL-DUR activity was superior to those of the tested comparators, with only colistin having similar potency. Whole-genome sequencing of the 39 isolates (2.3%) with a SUL-DUR MIC of >4 µg/ml revealed that these strains encoded either the metallo-ß-lactamase NDM-1, which durlobactam does not inhibit, or single amino acid substitutions near the active site of penicillin binding protein 3 (PBP3), the primary target of sulbactam. In summary, SUL-DUR demonstrated potent antibacterial activity against recent, geographically diverse clinical isolates of ABC organisms, including MDR isolates.

In vitro activity of sulbactam/durlobactam against clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii collected in China.

BACKGROUND: Durlobactam is a broad-spectrum inhibitor of class A, C and D ß-lactamases. Sulbactam is a generic ß-lactam most commonly used as a ß-lactamase inhibitor in combination with ampicillin; however, it has a unique property in that it has selective intrinsic activity against Acinetobacter baumannii. Currently, there is widespread resistance caused by multiple ß-lactamases including class A carbapenemases and class C and class D enzymes. The addition of durlobactam to sulbactam restores in vitro activity against MDR A. baumannii that possess multiple ß-lactamases. OBJECTIVES: Previously, susceptibility data for sulbactam/durlobactam were limited to isolates from patients in Western countries. This study was undertaken to determine the activity of sulbactam/durlobactam against A. baumannii isolated from patients in mainland China. METHODS: Nine hundred and eighty-two recent A. baumannii clinical isolates were collected from 22 sites across mainland China during 2016-18. The isolates were collected from lower respiratory tract, intra-abdominal, urinary tract and skin and skin structure infections. The in vitro activities of sulbactam/durlobactam and comparators were determined by broth microdilution. RESULTS: The addition of durlobactam restored the activity of sulbactam against the majority of the strains tested. The MIC90 of sulbactam/durlobactam was 2 mg/L for all A. baumannii, compared with 64 mg/L for sulbactam alone. The MIC90 of sulbactam/durlobactam of 2 mg/L remained unchanged for 831 carbapenem-resistant isolates. Colistin was the only comparator with comparable activity (MIC90 = 1 mg/L). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the potential utility of sulbactam/durlobactam for the treatment of infections caused by A. baumannii in China.

Potent LpxC Inhibitors with In Vitro Activity against Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

New drugs with novel mechanisms of resistance are desperately needed to address both community and nosocomial infections due to Gram-negative bacteria. One such potential target is LpxC, an essential enzyme that catalyzes the first committed step of lipid A biosynthesis. Achaogen conducted an extensive research campaign to discover novel LpxC inhibitors with activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa We report here the in vitro antibacterial activity and pharmacodynamics of ACHN-975, the only molecule from these efforts and the first ever LpxC inhibitor to be evaluated in phase 1 clinical trials. In addition, we describe the profiles of three additional LpxC inhibitors that were identified as potential lead molecules. These efforts did not produce an additional development candidate with a sufficiently large therapeutic window and the program was subsequently terminated.

In Vitro Activity of the Siderophore Cephalosporin, Cefiderocol, against Carbapenem-Nonsusceptible and Multidrug-Resistant Isolates of Gram-Negative Bacilli Collected Worldwide in 2014 to 2016.

The in vitro activity of the investigational siderophore cephalosporin, cefiderocol (formerly S-649266), was determined against a 2014-2016, 52-country, worldwide collection of clinical isolates of carbapenem-nonsusceptible Enterobacteriaceae (n = 1,022), multidrug-resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 368), MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 262), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n = 217), and Burkholderia cepacia (n = 4) using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) standard broth microdilution method. Iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (ID-CAMHB), prepared according to a recently approved (2017), but not yet published, CLSI protocol, was used to test cefiderocol; all other antimicrobial agents were tested using CAMHB. The concentration of cefiderocol inhibiting 90% (MIC90) of isolates of carbapenem-nonsusceptible Enterobacteriaceae was 4 µg/ml; cefiderocol MICs ranged from 0.004 to 32 µg/ml, and 97.0% (991/1,022) of isolates demonstrated cefiderocol MICs of ≤4 µg/ml. The MIC90s for cefiderocol for MDR A. baumannii, MDR P. aeruginosa, and S. maltophilia were 8, 1, and 0.25 µg/ml, respectively, with 89.7% (330/368), 99.2% (260/262), and 100% (217/217) of isolates demonstrating cefiderocol MICs of ≤4 µg/ml. Cefiderocol MICs for B. cepacia ranged from 0.004 to 8 µg/ml. We conclude that cefiderocol demonstrated potent in vitro activity against a 2014-2016, worldwide collection of clinical isolates of carbapenem-nonsusceptible Enterobacteriaceae, MDR A. baumannii, MDR P. aeruginosa, S. maltophilia, and B. cepacia isolates as 96.2% of all (1,801/1,873) isolates tested had cefiderocol MICs of ≤4 µg/ml.

In Vitro Activity of Meropenem-Vaborbactam against Clinical Isolates of KPC-Positive Enterobacteriaceae.

Vaborbactam (formerly RPX7009) is a novel inhibitor of serine ß-lactamases, including Ambler class A carbapenemases, such as KPCs. The current study evaluated the in vitro activity of the combination agent meropenem-vaborbactam against a global collection of 991 isolates of KPC-positive Enterobacteriaceae collected in 2014 and 2015 using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) standard broth microdilution method. The MIC90 of meropenem (when tested with a fixed concentration of 8 µg/ml of vaborbactam) for isolates of KPC-positive Enterobacteriaceae was 1 µg/ml, and MIC values ranged from ≤0.03 to >32 µg/ml; 99.0% (981/991) of isolates had meropenem-vaborbactam MICs of ≤4 µg/ml, the U.S. FDA-approved MIC breakpoint for susceptibility to meropenem-vaborbactam (Vabomere). Vaborbactam lowered the meropenem MIC50 from 32 to 0.06 µg/ml and the MIC90 from >32 to 1 µg/ml. There were no differences in the activity of meropenem-vaborbactam when the isolates were stratified by KPC variant type. We conclude that meropenem-vaborbactam demonstrates potent in vitro activity against a worldwide collection of clinical isolates of KPC-positive Enterobacteriaceae collected in 2014 and 2015.