Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 306(1): 259-265, 2022 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35224652

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This pilot study aimed to evaluate the potential synergistic role of three-dimensional power Doppler angiography ultrasound and the expression of Leukemia Inhibitory Factor (LIF) protein in predicting the endometrial receptivity of fresh In-Vitro Fertilization (IVF) cycles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prognostic cohort study involved 29 good prognosis women who underwent fresh IVF cycles with fresh blastocysts transfer. Serial measurements of sub-endometrial parameters including vascularity index (VI), flow index (FI), and vascularization flow index (VFI) were conducted consecutively via power Doppler angiography on the day of oocyte maturation trigger, oocyte retrieval, and blastocyst transfer. Aspiration of endometrial secretion was performed on the day of embryo transfer. RESULTS: The mean index of VI and VFI on the trigger and oocyte retrieval day and also LIF protein concentration at the window of implantation were significantly higher in clinically pregnant women than that of the non-pregnant women (p < 0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) of VI and VFI was shown to have a powerful predictive value to forecast receptive endometrium on either trigger day (0.788 and 0.813, respectively) or oocyte retrieval day (0.813 and 0.818). Likewise, LIF concentration on the day of embryo transfer was adequate to become a predictor for endometrial receptivity (AUC 0.874). A combination of the VI and VFI on the trigger day and LIF concentration at specific cut-off values (VI > 5.381, VFI > 1.483, LIF 703.5 pg/mL) produced an algorithm with high AUC (0.881) and high specificity (94.4%) for an adequate prediction of non-receptive endometrium. CONCLUSION: VI and VFI index assessed on maturation trigger day and the expression of LIF protein concentration at the window of implantation provided sufficient information to predict endometrial receptivity. A large randomized control trial is needed to validate these findings.


Assuntos
Endométrio , Fertilização in vitro , Angiografia , Estudos de Coortes , Endométrio/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Fertilização in vitro/métodos , Humanos , Fator Inibidor de Leucemia , Projetos Piloto , Ultrassonografia Doppler/métodos
2.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 163(3): 1018-1023, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37703057

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We provide an overview of the safety of messenger RNA and inactivated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine and monitoring of pregnant women after COVID-19 vaccination. The vaccine safety outcome profile is beneficial for further recommendations of COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy. METHODS: This research was conducted as descriptive research. Sampling was performed using an online questionnaire to be filled out voluntarily and distributed to all pregnant women in Indonesia who received the COVID-19 vaccination. Data collection was performed and descriptive statistics were obtained. RESULTS: Among 31 977 pregnant women, 24 212 (75.7%) received the first dose, 7619 (23.8%) received the second dose, and 146 (4.5%) received the third dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Sinovac vaccine is the most administered vaccine to pregnant women (27 122 [84%]). Most pregnant women (78.7%) who were vaccinated had no adverse effects after immunization, while the most reported adverse effects were mild symptoms. CONCLUSION: The current study contributed evidence that COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy has minimal adverse effects. These findings may help pregnant women and healthcare providers to make informed decisions regarding vaccination.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Indonésia/epidemiologia , Gestantes , Vacinação
3.
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther ; 11(3): 145-149, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36158287

RESUMO

This article aims to explain about outpatient hysteroscopy, where this procedure is currently being carried out. However, this procedure is also widely chosen by patients, because of its convenience, fast procedure, minimal complications, and of course more economical than day-case hysteroscopy. Before taking the procedure, it is important to explain to the patient about the disease, therapy, and the procedure to be carried out. Consent needs to be obtained voluntarily. We searched related publications using "patient safety" and "office hysteroscopy" and "informed consent" and "medical procedure" and "patient safety" and "injury" and "operative hysteroscopy" as keywords. This search had considered articles that had been published between 2002 and 2021. The conclusion from this library is that patient's convenient and safety is the top priority of outpatient hysteroscopy. Outpatient hysteroscopy showed higher satisfaction results than day-case hysteroscopy. Because it is more comfortable, faster, patients can immediately return to their activities and of course more efficient.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa