Challenges and Opportunities in Titrating Disease-Modifying Therapies in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction and Chronic Kidney Disease.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is highly prevalent in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), representing a major factor of adverse outcomes. In clinical practice, it is one of the main reasons for not initiating, not titrating, and even withdrawing efficient heart failure drug therapies in patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Despite limited data, studies show that HFrEF therapies maintain their benefits on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with CKD. Most HF drugs cause acute renal haemodynamic changes, but with stabilisation or even improvement after the acute phase, thus with no long-term worsening of the renal function. In this expert opinion-based paper, we challenge the pathophysiology misunderstandings that impede HF disease-modifying therapy implementation in this setting and propose a strategy for HF drug titration in patients with moderate, severe, and end-stage chronic kidney disease.

Sequencing and titrating approach of therapy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction following the 2021 European Society of Cardiology guidelines: an international cardiology survey.

AIMS: In symptomatic patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), recent international guidelines recommend initiating four major therapeutic classes rather than sequential initiation. It remains unclear how this change in guidelines is perceived by practicing cardiologists versus heart failure (HF) specialists. METHODS AND RESULTS: An independent academic web-based survey was designed by a group of HF specialists and posted by email and through various social networks to a broad community of cardiologists worldwide 1 year after the publication of the latest European HF guidelines. Overall, 615 cardiologists (38 [32-47] years old, 63% male) completed the survey, of which 58% were working in a university hospital and 26% were HF specialists. The threshold to define HFrEF was ≤40% for 61% of the physicians. Preferred drug prescription for the sequential approach was angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors first (74%), beta-blockers second (55%), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists third (52%), and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (53%) fourth. Eighty-four percent of participants felt that starting all four classes was feasible within the initial hospitalization, and 58% felt that titration is less important than introducing a new class. Age, status in training, and specialization in HF field were the principal characteristics that significantly impacted the answers. CONCLUSION: In a broad international cardiology community, the 'historical approach' to HFrEF therapies remains the preferred sequencing approach. However, accelerated introduction and uptitration are also major treatment goals. Strategy trials in treatment guidance are needed to further change practices.