Presentation of oropharyngeal dysphagia and rehabilitative intervention following esophagectomy: a systematic review.

No study has systematically reviewed the evidence on presentation of oropharyngeal dysphagia and swallowing rehabilitation following esophagectomy. The purposes of this systematic review are to 1) qualitatively synthesize the current findings on oropharyngeal swallowing abnormalities identified by instrumental swallowing evaluations, 2) describe the reported health-related outcomes in relation to swallowing abnormality following esophagectomy, and 3) examine the efficacy of reported rehabilitative interventions for oropharyngeal dysphagia in patients who underwent esophagectomy. Publications were searched using five electronic databases. No language or publication date restrictions were imposed. Two authors performed a blind review for published or unpublished studies that reported swallowing biomechanics and dysphagic symptoms using instrumental evaluation of swallowing, specifically the videofluoroscopic swallowing study and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing, and/or health-related outcomes in relation to swallowing abnormalities, and/or therapeutic interventions for oropharyngeal dysphagia following esophagectomy. Twelve studies out of 2,193 studies including 458 patients met the inclusion criteria. Reported abnormal swallowing biomechanics included vocal fold immobility, delayed onset of swallowing, reduced hyolaryngeal elevation, and reduced opening of the upper esophageal sphincter. Aspiration (0-81%) and pharyngeal residue (22-100%) were prevalent. Those abnormal swallowing biomechanics and swallowing symptoms were commonly reported following both transhiatal and transthoracic esophagectomy. Pneumonia presented in 5-25% of the study patients. One quasi-experimental study examined the effectiveness of swallowing exercises for postoperative oropharyngeal dysphagia; three case series reported a benefit of the chin-tuck maneuver in reducing aspiration and residue. This review revealed distinct swallowing impairments and increased pneumonia risks following esophagectomy. This review also found that evidence on the efficacy of therapeutic interventions was limited. Future studies are warranted to develop effective rehabilitative interventions for postesophagectomy patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia.

ACVR1 (587T>C) mutation in a variant form of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: second report.

Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is a rare, congenital disorder caused by heterozygous mutation of the bone morphogenetic protein type I receptor ACVR1. Various forms of atypical FOP have recently been identified, and a novel mutation, ACVR1 (587T>C), was reported in 2011. We report on the second patient worldwide with ACVR1 (587T>C) mutation. A 22-year-old Japanese male with no family history of heterotopic ossification did not show any malformation of the great toes and showed normal development from birth to the age of 17 years, when heterotopic ossification appeared in the lumbar area. The clinical symptoms were similar to those reported previously: the delayed onset with a slower and mild clinical course and little finger camptodactyly. Gene analysis revealed that the patient was heterozygous for ACVR1 (587T>C) mutation, the same one as reported in 2011, suggesting a correlation between the location of the mutation and the clinical symptoms. This second report of ACVR1 (587T>C) mutation worldwide is particularly meaningful in that it highlights the difference between clinical symptoms of the first reported patient with ACVR1 (587T>C) mutation and those of classic FOP.

Self-monitoring has potential for home exercise programmes in patients with haemophilia.

Haemophiliacs who have had to keep a physically inactive lifestyle due to bleeding during childhood are likely to have little motivation for exercise. The purpose of this study is to clarify the effectiveness of the self-monitoring of home exercise for haemophiliacs. A randomized controlled trial was conducted with intervention over 8 weeks at four hospitals in Japan. Subjects included 32 male outpatients aged 26-64 years without an inhibitor who were randomly allocated to a self-monitoring group and a control group. Individual exercise guidance with physical activity for improvement of their knee functions was given to both groups. The self-monitoring materials included an activity monitor and a feedback system so that the self-monitoring group could send feedback via the Internet and cellular phone. The self-monitoring was performed by checking exercise adherence and physical activity levels, bleeding history and injection of a coagulation factor. Both groups showed significant improvements in exercise adherence (P < 0.001) and physical function such as the strength of knee extension (P < 0.001), range of knee extension (P < 0.001), range of ankle dorsiflexion (P < 0.01), a modified Functional Reach (P < 0.05) and 10 metre gait time (P < 0.01). In particular, improvements in exercise adherence (P < 0.05), self-efficacy (P < 0.05), and strength of knee extension (P < 0.05) were significant in the self-monitoring group compared with those in the control group. No increase in bleeding frequency and pain scale was noted. The self-monitoring of home exercise for haemophilic patients is useful for the improvement of exercise adherence, self-efficacy and knee extension strength.

Impact of hepatic lymph node metastasis on survival of patients with synchronous resectable or unresectable liver metastases of colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The goals of this retrospective study were to comprehensively evaluate the impact of hepatic lymph node (HLN) involvement on survival in patients with synchronous resectable or unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer and to highlight how to deal with such cases in the light of recent advances in chemotherapy. METHODS: The impact of HLN involvement on survival, along with various clinical, pathological, and therapeutic factors, was retrospectively evaluated in 61 patients with synchronous liver metastases from colorectal cancer (resectable, 26; unresectable, 35), undergoing resection of the primary tumor and histopathological evaluation between July 2000 and April 2008. RESULTS: The proportion with HLN metastasis was 11.5 % in resectable cases and 28.6 % in unresectable cases. On multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model, HLN metastasis (P < 0.001), along with non-resection of hepatic lesions (P < 0.001), larger metastatic tumor volume (P < 0.001), non-use of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (P < 0.001), involvement of 4 or more regional lymph nodes (P < 0.001), and excessive lymphatic invasion (P = 0.02), was identified as an independent risk factor for shorter survival. CONCLUSIONS: To establish a new therapeutic strategy for synchronous liver metastasis of colorectal cancer, the HLNs should be examined histologically in patients undergoing resection of their primary colon and rectal cancer.

Should isolated peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer be sub-classified into stage IVB in era of modern chemotherapy?

BACKGROUND: According to the 7th edition of the TNM staging system, stage IV metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) at the time of initial diagnosis is sub-classified into stage IVA or IVB disease. Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC), considered to have a dismal prognosis, is exclusively sub-classified into stage IVB, even though other metastases to a sole organ are sub-classified into stage IVA, which is considered to be associated with better survival. This retrospective study was undertaken to investigate the overall survival in metastatic CRC patients, focusing on PC patients. METHODS: We reviewed data on patients with metastatic CRC at initial diagnosis surgically treated between January 2006 and June 2011. A survival analysis was performed paying special attention to PC and sub-classifying patients with PC into three categories according to metastatic sites. RESULTS: There were 69 stage IVA patients (IVA group) and 83 stage IVB. Among stage IVB patients, 20 had isolated PC (PC-I group), 28 had PC with one or more other sites of metastasis (PC-II group), and 35 had at least 2 metastatic without peritoneal involvement (NPC group). Of 152 stage IV patients, 132 (87 %) underwent resection of the primary tumor and 19 (12 %) underwent radical resection of metastatic disease with microscopic free margins (R0 resection) including 5/20 (25 %) patients in the PC1 group. A total of 139 patients received oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in a palliative (n = 125), neoadjuvant (n = 3), or adjuvant setting after R0 resection (n = 11). Compared with 36.6 months in the PC-I group, median survival was 32.5 months (P = 0.48) in the IVA group, 14.7 months (P = 0.07) in the PC-II group, and 12.9 months (P < 0.01) in the NPC group. CONCLUSIONS: The sub-classification of isolated PC into stage IVA instead of IVB might be more appropriate in the era of modern chemotherapy. Further investigation is warranted.

Phase II multi-institutional prospective randomised trial comparing S-1+paclitaxel with S-1+cisplatin in patients with unresectable and/or recurrent advanced gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: A combination of S-1 and cisplatin has been shown to be effective with acceptable safety for the first-line treatment of far-advanced gastric cancer in Japan. This is the first randomised phase II trial to compare S-1+paclitaxel with S-1+cisplatin in this setting. METHODS: Patients with unresectable and/or recurrent advanced gastric cancer were randomly assigned to receive one of the two regimens: S-1 (40 mg m(-2) twice daily) on days 1-14 plus paclitaxel (60 mg m(-2)) on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 4-week cycle (S-1+paclitaxel) or S-1 (40 mg m(-2) twice daily) on days 1-21 plus cisplatin (60 mg m(-2)) on day 8 of a 5-week cycle (S-1+cisplatin). The primary end point was the response rate (RR). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: A total of 83 patients were eligible for safety and efficacy analyses. In the S-1+paclitaxel and S-1+cisplatin groups, RRs (52.3% vs 48.7%; P=0.74) and median PFS (9 vs 6 months; P=0.50) were similar. The median OS was similar in the S-1+paclitaxel and S-1+cisplatin groups (16 vs 17 months; P=0.84). The incidence of grade 3 or higher haematological toxicity was 19.0% with S-1+paclitaxel and 19.5% with S-1+cisplatin. The incidence of grade 3 or higher non-haematological toxicity was 14.2% with S-1+paclitaxel and 17.1% with S-1+cisplatin. CONCLUSION: S-1+paclitaxel was suggested to be a feasible and effective non-platinum-based regimen for chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Our results should be confirmed in multicenter, phase III-controlled clinical trials.

Inter-observer reliability of three different radiographic scores for adult haemophilia.

To evaluate the inter-observer reliability of radiological assessment systems for haemophilic arthropathy, three senior orthopaedic surgeons with expertise in haemophilia independently evaluated a total of 527 joint radiographs of adult haemophilia patients, without any knowledge of the clinical data. This study was the largest study to evaluate the reliability of radiological assessment systems. As for the results, the Arnold-Hilgartner staging system showed moderate reliability (kappa value: κ = 0.44, P = 0.000), and the De Palma grading system and the Pettersson scoring system showed fair reliability (κ = 0.40, P = 0.000) and slight reliability (κ = 0.12, P = 0.000) respectively. As for the reliability of the eight findings in the Pettersson scoring system, three findings, which were 'narrowing of joint space' (κ = 0.70 P = 0.000), 'irregular subchondral surface' (κ = 0.58, P = 0.000) and 'erosion of joint margins' (κ = 0.56, P = 0.000), showed substantial or moderate reliability. Other findings showed fair or less reliability. The traditional radiological assessment systems showed poor inter-observer reliability. Both progressive scales showed higher reliability than the additive scale, and the three findings in the Pettersson scoring system showed good reliability. These results suggested that the progressive scale, including the three reliable radiological findings, might be a more reliable radiological assessment system.