Efficacy and safety of oral nalbuphine extended release in prurigo nodularis: results of a phase 2 randomized controlled trial with an open-label extension phase.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of prurigo nodularis (PN) is challenging and new treatment options are needed. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of two oral doses of the kappa opioid agonist and mu opioid antagonist nalbuphine extended release (NAL-ER) tablets in a phase 2, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with an open-label, 50-week extension phase. METHODS: Subjects with moderate-to-severe PN were randomized to NAL-ER 81 mg (NAL-ER81) or 162 mg (NAL-ER162) tablets twice-daily or placebo for 8 weeks of stable dosing following a 2-week titration period. Subjects completing Week 10 with a Worst Itch Numerical Rating Scale (WI-NRS) score ≥5 at the time of rollover (or during the observation period) were eligible for open-label treatment. RESULTS: Of 63 randomized subjects, 62 were treated and comprised the modified intent-to-treat population (MITT), 50 completed 10 weeks of treatment. In the MITT analysis, 8 subjects (44.4%) treated with NAL-ER162 (P = 0.32) and 6 (27.3%) treated with NAL-ER81 (P = 0.78) achieved ≥30% reduction from baseline in 7-day WI-NRS at Week 10 (primary efficacy endpoint) vs. 8 (36.4%) in the placebo group. Itch reduction was significant among 8/12 (66.7%) subjects completing Week 10 treated with NAL-ER162 vs. placebo (8/20, 40.0%; P = 0.03). Additionally, 6 subjects (33.3%) treated with NAL-ER162 and 3 (13.6%) treated with NAL-ER81 achieved ≥50% reduction from baseline in 7-day WI-NRS at Week 10 (coprimary endpoint). Extended open-label treatment was associated with further improvements in itch reduction and favourable changes in PN lesion activity as assessed by Prurigo Activity Score. Adverse events occurred predominantly during dose titration and were of mild-to-moderate severity. The safety profile did not change with extended open-label treatment. CONCLUSION: In adult subjects with PN, oral treatment with NAL-ER 162 mg twice daily provided measurable anti-pruritic efficacy in subjects completing ≥10 weeks of treatment and was well tolerated (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02174419).

Anti-ischemic effects of atenolol versus nifedipine in patients with coronary artery disease and ambulatory silent ischemia.

The anti-ischemic effects of atenolol and nifedipine were compared in a randomized double-blind crossover manner in 24 patients with stable exertional angina and transient silent ischemia during ambulatory electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring. Both atenolol and nifedipine were effective (p less than 0.005) in reducing the average number and duration of transient ischemic events, but therapy with atenolol was associated with a significantly greater reduction in the mean number (p less than 0.05) and duration (p less than 0.01) of silent ischemic events. Analyses of the silent ischemic activity during the morning hours revealed that only therapy with atenolol produced a significant reduction in the average duration per patient (139 +/- 54 vs. 1,609 +/- 468 s, p less than 0.01) and in the average duration of silent ischemia per event between 6 AM and 12 noon (62 +/- 21 vs. 208 +/- 24 s, p less than 0.005). There were fewer adverse experiences during therapy with atenolol. These results show that although both atenolol and nifedipine are effective in reducing silent ischemic events, treatment with atenolol is associated with significantly greater efficacy, particularly on the morning surge of silent myocardial ischemia.

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of squalamine, a novel antiangiogenic agent, in patients with advanced cancers.

PURPOSE: A Phase I study of squalamine, a novel antiangiogenic agent originally isolated from the dogfish shark Squalus acanthias, was conducted in patients with advanced cancers to: (a) determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and pharmacokinetics of squalamine lactate when given as a 120-h continuous i.v. infusion every two weeks; and (b) to obtain information on prolonged (>120-h) continuous i.v. infusions in patients who have tolerated 120-h infusions. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A rapid dose escalation scheme was used that permitted intrapatient dose escalation. Three or more patients were treated at each dose, of which at least one patient started treatment de novo at that dose. Once DLT was encountered, the dose was decreased by one dose level, and the duration of infusion was prolonged from 10 up to 30 days in 5-day increments. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were treated at eight squalamine dose levels; the number of patients/dose level who received 120-h infusions were [expressed as dose in mg/m(2)/day (number of patients initiated de novo at that dose/total number of patients treated at that dose)]: 6 (3/3), 12 (3/6), 24 (1/5), 48 (2/6), 96 (4/10), 192 (2/6), 384 (3/8), and 538 (1/5). DLT was encountered at 384 mg/m(2)/day (1/3 de novo patients, 5/8 total patients) and 538 mg/m(2)/day (1/1 de novo patients, 4/5 total patients) and consisted of hepatotoxicity, characterized by grade 3 transaminase elevations that resolved 3-11 days after ceasing squalamine infusion. Three patients did not experience hepatotoxicity when first treated at 384 mg/m(2)/day but developed DLT at the same dose when de-escalated from 538 mg/m(2)/day. Other toxicities included grade 1-3 fatigue, grade 1-2 nausea, anorexia, and neuromuscular symptoms. The maximum duration of continuous i.v. infusion was 20 days at a dose rate of 192 mg/m(2)/day in one patient without adverse effects. Pharmacokinetic calculations revealed a linear relationship between area under the curve or Cmax and squalamine dose rate up to 384 mg/m(2)/day, with a prolonged terminal squalamine persistence in patient plasma (median t(1/2) = 18 h; range, 8-48 h). Transient tumor responses were observed in a patient with synovial cell sarcoma and a patient with breast carcinoma with cutaneous metastases. CONCLUSIONS: The best tolerated dose rate of squalamine when administered as a 120-h continuous i.v. infusion was 192 mg/m(2)/day; however, patients without prior exposure to squalamine appeared to tolerate a dose rate of 384 mg/m(2)/day without DLT. On the basis of preclinical evidence of synergy with cytotoxic agents and demonstration of human safety from this trial, additional clinical trials have been initiated with squalamine in combination with chemotherapy for patients with late stage lung cancer and ovarian cancer.

In vitro susceptibility to pexiganan of bacteria isolated from infected diabetic foot ulcers.

During two clinical trials involving the treatment of 835 outpatients with infected diabetic foot ulcers, 2515 bacterial isolates, including 2337 aerobes and 178 anaerobes, were grown from cultures of the ulcers. The in vitro susceptibility of these isolates was determined to pexiganan, a peptide anti-infective evaluated in these clinical trials, and to other classes of antibiotics. Pexiganan demonstrated broad spectrum antimicrobial activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerobes and anaerobes. The MIC90 values for the most common species among 1735 Gram-positive aerobes isolated, such as Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci, Group A streptococci, and Group B streptococci, were 16 micrograms/mL or less. Of 602 Gram-negative aerobes tested, the MIC90 values for pexiganan were 16 micrograms/mL or less for Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas, Stenotrophomonas, Citrobacter, Enterobacter, Escherichia, Klebsiella, and Flavobacterium species. Pexiganan had a MIC90 of 4 to 16 micrograms/mL against the anaerobic isolates of Bacteroides, Peptostreptococcus, Clostridium, and Prevotella species. Importantly, pexiganan did not exhibit cross-resistance with other commonly used antibiotics, including beta-lactams, quinolones, macrolides, and lincosamides. The broad spectrum in vitro antimicrobial activity of pexiganan against clinical isolates from infected diabetic foot ulcers supports its potential as a local therapy for infected diabetic foot ulcers.

Once-daily lisinopril compared with twice-daily captopril in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension: assessment of office and ambulatory blood pressures.

This multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group study compared the antihypertensive effects of two angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, lisinopril and captopril, in 70 patients (35 lisinopril, 35 captopril) with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. Doses of 10, 20, and 40 mg once-daily lisinopril or 25, 50, and 100 mg bid captopril were increased at biweekly intervals until patients responded to treatment, as defined by a decrease in office diastolic pressure to less than 90 mm Hg or at least a 10 mm Hg decrease from baseline. Patients who responded to a 2-week titration dose remained at that dose for another 2 weeks. Blood pressure assessments were made using both office and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Area under the curve analysis of ambulatory blood pressure reductions showed significant differences between treatment groups for both systolic (P = .023) and diastolic (P = .007) blood pressures, with lisinopril-treated patients showing the most significant reduction in pressure. Greater reductions (P less than .05) were also noted in patients receiving lisinopril at hours 10 to 12, suggesting two blood pressure troughs for those receiving captopril. Both drugs were well tolerated, and no patients withdrew from either treatment group. The authors concluded that after at least 4 weeks of therapy, once-daily lisinopril administration was more effective than twice-daily captopril administration in reducing blood pressure, when measured by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Patients' choice of treatment in stage D prostate cancer.

Given the current preference of many patients for an active role in decision-making regarding their care, the feasibility of patients making their own treatment choices was investigated, and the reasons for their selections were studied. Subjects comprised previously untreated Stage D prostate cancer patients for whom hormonal therapy was indicated. Thirteen institutions entered 159 patients into the study. After discussing treatment choices with their physicians, the patients took home a two-page letter explaining two options: surgical castration and therapy with Zoladex (goserelin acetate), a depot luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogue injected subcutaneously every twenty-eight days. Patients were encouraged to discuss the treatment choices with their families. After selecting a treatment approach, patients completed a "decision questionnaire" and then treatment was initiated. Of the 147 patients who completed baseline questionnaires, 78 percent selected Zoladex and 22 percent selected orchiectomy. The primary reason for selecting Zoladex included avoidance of surgery (36%), success of treatment (18%), convenience of the drug (10%), and physician's advice (10%). Patients chose surgery primarily because of convenience (32%) and success of treatment (29%). Three months later, patients and their wives completed another questionnaire, which assessed their satisfaction with their treatment choices. Ninety-three percent of patients and 91 percent of patients' wives indicated that they would select the same treatment again.

A longitudinal study of blood pressure in a national survey of children.

Blood pressure changes over a three- to four-year period were studies in a cohort of 2,168 children examined during the US Heath Examination Survey. The sample used is a representative subset of a national probability sample. Significant positive correlations between initial and follow-up blood pressures were observed. In addition, relatively obese children tended to demonstrate higher blood pressures within age-race-sex specific subgroups.