Expanded conventional first trimester screening.

OBJECTIVE: The study aims to determine the performance of a five (5) serum marker plus ultrasound screening protocol for T21, T18 and T13. METHOD: Specimens from 331 unaffected, 34 T21, 19 T18 and 8 T13 cases were analyzed for free Beta human chorionic gonadotropin, pregnancy-associated plasma protein A, alpha-fetoprotein, placental growth factor and dimeric inhibin A. Gaussian distributions of multiples of the median values were used to estimate modeled false positive and detection rates (DR). RESULTS: For T21, at a 1/300 risk cut-off, DR of screening with all five serum markers along with nuchal translucency and nasal bone was 98% at a 1.2% false positive rate (FPR). Using a 1/1000 cut-off, the DR was 99% with a 2.6% FPR. For T18/13 with free Beta human chorionic gonadotropin, pregnancy-associated plasma protein A, placental growth factor and nuchal translucency at a 1/150 cut-off, DR was 95% at a 0.5% FPR while at a 1/500 risk cut-off, DR was 97% at a 1.2% FPR. CONCLUSION: An expanded conventional screening test can achieve very high DRs with low FPRs. Such screening fits well with proposed contingency protocols utilizing cell-free DNA as a secondary or reflex but also provides the advantages of identification of pregnancies at risk for other adverse outcomes such as early-onset preeclampsia. © 2017 Eurofins NTD, LLC. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

First-trimester screening in triplets.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the performance of Down syndrome screening in triplet pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: Nuchal translucency (NT; n = 794), nasal bone (n = 219), and biochemistry (n = 198) were evaluated in triplet pregnancy. Screening performance was evaluated with the use of delta and Gaussian models. RESULTS: The median multiples of the median values for free beta human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy-associated plasma protein A were 2.86 and 3.48, respectively. A significant correlation in delta NT within pregnancy was observed (0.46-0.68). The modeled false-positive rates were 11.7%, 7.4%, and 8.9% with the delta model and 11.9%, 6.6%, and 12.0% with the Gaussian model for NT, NT + nasal bone, and NT + biochemistry. Based on simulation, the detection rate at 12 weeks' gestation was 78%, 93%, and 80% for NT, NT + nasal bone, and NT + biochemistry at a 10% false-positive rate using either the delta or Gaussian models. CONCLUSION: In triplet pregnancy, the addition of nasal bone lowers the false-positive rate of nuchal translucency screening. More data are required on the effectiveness of biochemistry.

Meta-analysis of first trimester Down syndrome screening studies: free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin significantly outperforms intact human chorionic gonadotropin in a multimarker protocol.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare free beta and intact human chorionic gonadotropin in first trimester screening with pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A and nuchal translucency. STUDY DESIGN: A Monte Carlo simulation trial was conducted based on a literature review of the PUBMED database (1966 to November 2005). RESULTS: In younger patients (< 35 years), detection of Down syndrome increased by 4, 5, 6, and 7 percentage points when free beta was added to pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A and nuchal translucency compared with 0, 0, 2, and 4 percentage points for intact human chorionic gonadotropin at 9-12 weeks' gestation, respectively. In advanced maternal age patients (> or = 35), inclusion of free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin reduced the false-positive rate by 2.5, 3.1, 3.8, and 4.4 percentage points compared with 0.1, 0.3, 1.0, and 2.2 percentage points for intact human chorionic gonadotropin at 9-12 weeks, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of our analysis suggest that in a first-trimester Down syndrome screening protocol free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin achieves higher sensitivity and lower false-positive results than intact human chorionic gonadotropin . Moreover, intact human chorionic gonadotropin does not add substantially to screening performance until the end of the first trimester.

Screening for Open Neural Tube Defects.

Biochemical prenatal screening was initiated with the use of maternal serum alpha fetoprotein to screen for open neural tube defects. Screening now includes multiple marker and sequential screening protocols involving serum and ultrasound markers to screen for aneuploidy. Recently cell-free DNA screening for aneuploidy has been initiated, but does not screen for neural tube defects. Although ultrasound is highly effective in identifying neural tube defects in high-risk populations, in decentralized health systems maternal serum screening still plays a significant role. Abnormal maternal serum alpha fetoprotein alone or in combination with other markers may indicate adverse pregnancy outcome in the absence of open neural tube defects.

Screening for open neural tube defects.

Maternal serum screening for congenital anomalies began over 30 years ago with the advent of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) screening for open neural tube defects. It was from these screening programs that the more complex multiple marker Down syndrome screening programs developed. However, today open neural tube defect screening remains a relatively simple approach. In recent times, questions arise about the validity of the risk assessment associated with neural tube defect screening because of the impact of folate acid enrichment in diets and lack of outcome ascertainment. However, it still remains true that those with elevated AFP levels are at higher risk for having a pregnancy affected with open neural tube defect.

Undermeasurement of nuchal translucencies: implications for screening.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the maximum nuchal translucency from 327 centers to determine whether a more-than-expected number of centers had maximum nuchal translucency of 2.5 mm or less (approximately 4% of nuchal translucency values should be 2.5 mm or higher). METHODS: We analyzed data from 182,669 nuchal translucency cases at centers in which at least 100 nuchal translucency examinations were performed from July 2008 through June 2009 and investigated the appropriateness of the distribution of values. We then investigated the likelihood of the skewing of the distribution seen using a 100 simulations of such modeled data. RESULTS: Based on a binomial distribution, the chance that a center would have no nuchal translucency values above 2.5 mm is 1.7% for 100 patients per center, and 0.2% for 150 patients per center. Additionally, the median multiples of the median should shift by approximately 2.5% if all nuchal translucency values higher than 2.5 mm are excluded from the population. Our data show that 7.3% of centers had a maximum nuchal translucency of to 2.5 mm or less, and more than 20% have never reported an nuchal translucency of greater than 3 mm. The maximum nuchal translucency at a center correlated positively with its median multiple of the median. Centers with no nuchal translucency values greater than 2.5 mm also have nearly 50% of their ultrasonographers with excessive low nuchal translucency (greater than 10% of cases less than fifth percentile). CONCLUSION: Too many centers have a maximum nuchal translucency of 2.5 mm or lower, low median nuchal translucency, and excessive low nuchal translucency, indicating that data from these centers are not representative of the expected distribution of nuchal translucencies. Our data suggest a systematic undermeasurement of nuchal translucency. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Maternal weight and ethnic adjustment within a first-trimester Down syndrome and trisomy 18 screening program.

OBJECTIVE(S): To estimate weight and ethnic group correction factors for first-trimester screening markers. METHODS: Ethnic-specific median MoM free beta hCG and pregnancy associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) and delta nuchal translucency values were calculated for cohorts of maternal weight (20 lb each) using data from 51,206 patients undergoing first-trimester screening. False-positive rates for Down syndrome and trisomy 18 were evaluated both prior to and after weight and ethnicity adjustment. RESULTS: Free beta hCG and PAPP-A significantly decreased with increasing maternal weight while nuchal translucency increased by a clinically insignificant amount. For free beta hCG the regression formula indicated that after accounting for maternal weight MoM values were 16% higher for African Americans, 6% higher for Asians and 9% lower for Hispanics compared to Caucasians (p < 0.001, p = 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively) but there was no significant difference for Asian Indians. For PAPP-A, MoM values were 35% higher for African Americans (p < 0.001) but were not significantly different for the other ethnic groups compared to Caucasians. Down syndrome false-positive rates did not vary with maternal weight prior to (p = 0.291) or after weight adjustment of biochemistry (p = 0.054). Trisomy 18 false-positive rates varied significantly with weight both before (OR = 1.455 per 20-pound increase, p < 0.001) and after (OR = 1.066 per 20-pound increase, p = 0.01) weight adjustment of biochemistry; however, the odds ratio was greatly reduced after weight adjustment. CONCLUSION(S): The first-trimester screening markers, free beta hCG, PAPP-A and nuchal translucency vary with maternal weight and ethnicity. Adjustment of free beta hCG and PAPP-A is indicated but adjustment of nuchal translucency results may not be necessary.

First-trimester screening for trisomy-21 using a simplified method to assess the presence or absence of the fetal nasal bone.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the benefit of including nasal bone assessment in addition to standard first-trimester markers (nuchal translucency, free beta human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy-associated plasma protein A) as a screening test for Down syndrome, using a strict criterion for classification of nasal bone absence. STUDY DESIGN: Nasal bone assessment was conducted in 2411 patients with crown-rump length between 45 and 84 mm, including 15 patients with Down syndrome. A patient was considered to have an absent nasal bone only if there was no evidence of present nasal bone. Unlike other studies, nasal bone was classified as present when there was evidence of a thin echogenic line under the skin. Simulation studies were conducted to assess the detection rate and false-positive rate of a combined first-trimester screening protocol including nasal bone assessment. RESULTS: There were 9 of 2396 (0.4%) unaffected cases with absent nasal bone (95% confidence interval 0.2%, 0.7%) and 8 of 15 (53.3%) Down syndrome cases (95% confidence interval 26.6%, 78.7%). Using a 1 in 250 risk cut-off, the detection rate of standard first-trimester screening was 87%, with a false-positive rate of 4.3%. Incorporating nasal bone measurement improved the detection rate of Down syndrome to 90% and reduced the false-positive rate to 2.5%. CONCLUSION: The use of a strict criterion to determine nasal bone absence leads to fewer cases classified as absent and may simplify the implementation of nasal bone as a marker for first-trimester screening, resulting in lower false-positives and higher detection, compared with other current screening protocols.

Combined first-trimester versus second-trimester serum screening for Down syndrome: a cost analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of combined first-trimester screening for fetal Down syndrome with second-trimester maternal serum triple screening. STUDY DESIGN: A first-trimester screening approach that used nuchal translucency measurement and maternal serum screening was evaluated against second-trimester maternal serum triple screening in a hypothetic population. Screening sensitivities and screen-positive rates were 91% and 5% for the first-trimester approach and 70% and 7.5% for the second-trimester approach, respectively. The costs of fetal Down syndrome, live-born Down syndrome cost, and total costs (screening plus live-born costs) were calculated for each screening program. RESULTS: First-trimester screening was associated with lower screening and live-born Down syndrome costs versus second-trimester serum screening. Total Down syndrome screening costs were 29.1% lower with first-trimester screening. CONCLUSION: In this hypothetic model, combined first-trimester screening for fetal Down syndrome was more cost-effective than universal second-trimester triple serum screening.

Association of extreme first-trimester free human chorionic gonadotropin-beta, pregnancy-associated plasma protein A, and nuchal translucency with intrauterine growth restriction and other adverse pregnancy outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the association between first-trimester trisomy 21 screening markers (free human chorionic gonadotropin-beta [hCG], pregnancy-associated plasma protein A [PAPP-A], and nuchal translucency) and adverse pregnancy outcome. STUDY DESIGN: This was a cohort study of 8012 patients enrolled in a National Institute of Child Health and Human Development-sponsored study of first-trimester trisomy 21 and 18 screening. Trisomy 21 and 18 risk results and individual marker levels in unaffected pregnancies and pregnancies with adverse outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: PAPP-A <1st percentile (OR 5.4, 95% CI 2.8-10.3) and PAPP-A <5th percentile (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.9-3.9) and free beta-hCG <1st percentile (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.3-5.9) were associated with increased risk of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) with positive predictive values of 24.1%, 14.1%, and 14.3%, respectively. PAPP-A <5th percentile (OR 2.3 95% CI 1.1-4.7) and nuchal translucency >99th percentile (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.1-11.3) were associated with increased risk of preterm delivery before 34 weeks. Increased risk at screening for trisomy 21 and 18 identified 16 of the 29 other chromosomal abnormalities (55%). Low free beta-hCG, low PAPP-A, and increased nuchal translucency were all associated with an increased rate of fetal abnormality. CONCLUSION: Extreme values of first-trimester free beta-hCG, PAPP-A, and nuchal translucency are all associated with adverse outcomes. The especially high predictive value for IUGR of PAPP-A levels below the 1st percentile suggests that patients within this group may benefit from increased surveillance for this condition.