Detection of T-wave beat-by-beat variations prior to ventricular arrhythmias onset in ICD-stored intracardiac electrograms: the Endocardial T-Wave Alternans Study (ETWAS).

BACKGROUND: The aim of the Endocardial T-Wave Alternans Study was to prospectively assess the presence of T-wave alternans (TWA) or beat-to-beat repolarization changes on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD)-stored electrograms (EGMs) immediately preceding the onset of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF). METHODS: Thirty-seven VT/VF episodes were compared to 116 baseline reference EGMs from the same 57 patients. A Bayesian model was used to estimate the T-wave waveform in each cardiac beat and a set of 10 parameters was selected to segment each detected T wave. Beat-by-beat differences in each T-wave parameter were computed using the absolute value of the difference between each beat and the following one. Fisher criterion was used for determining the most discriminant T-wave parameters, then top-M ranked parameters yielding a normalized cumulative Fisher score > 95% were selected, and analysis was applied on these selected parameters. Simulated TWA EGMs were used to validate the algorithm. RESULTS: In the simulation study, TWA was detectable even in the case of the smallest simulated alternans of 25 µV. In 13 of the 37 episodes (35%) occurring in nine of 16 patients, significant larger beat-to-beat variations before arrhythmia onset were detected compared to their respective references (median one positive episode per patient). Parameters including the T-wave apex amplitude seem the more discriminant parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Detection of beat-by-beat repolarization variations in ICD-stored EGMs is feasible in a significant subset of cases and may be used for predicting the onset of ventricular arrhythmias.

First prospective, multi-centre clinical experience with a novel left ventricular quadripolar lead.

AIMS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is sometimes complicated by elevated pacing thresholds and phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS), both of which may require that the coronary sinus lead be repositioned. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of a novel quadripolar electrode lead and cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) device that enables electrical repositioning, potentially obviating a lead reposition procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients indicated for CRT were enrolled and received a quadripolar electrode lead and CRT-D device (Quartetmodel 1458Q and Promote Q; St Jude Medical, Sylmar, CA, USA). Electrical data, and the presence of PNS during pacing from each left ventricular (LV) configuration, were documented at pre-hospital discharge and at 1 month. Seventy-five patients were enrolled and 71 were successfully implanted with a Quartetlead. Electrical measurements were stable over the follow-up period. Ninety-seven per cent (64 of 66) of patients had one or more programmable configurations with a threshold < 2.5 V and no PNS vs. 86% (57 of 66) if only conventional bipolar configurations were considered. Physicians were able to use the increased programming options to manage threshold changes and PNS. CONCLUSION: The new quadripolar electrode LV lead provides more programming options to address common problems faced when managing CRT patients. Electrical measurements from new vectors are comparable with conventional configurations. Furthermore, 11% of patients in the study suffered PNS on all conventional bipolar vectors.

Dynamic ventricular overdrive stimulation in atrial fibrillation: effects on ventricular rate irregularity, ventricular pacing, and fusion beats.

AIMS: In pacemaker patients with preserved atrio-ventricular (AV) conduction, atrial fibrillation (AF) can lead to symptomatic ventricular rate irregularity and loss of ventricular stimulation. We tested if dynamic ventricular overdrive (DVO) as a potentially pacemaker-integrated algorithm could improve both aspects. METHODS AND RESULTS: Different settings of DVO and ventricular-ventricular-inhibited-pacing (VVI) with different base rates were tested in two consecutive phases during electrophysiological studies for standard indications. Mean heart rate (HR), HR irregularity and percentage of ventricular pacing were evaluated. A fusion index (FI) indicative of the proportion of fusion beats was calculated for each stimulation protocol. Dynamic ventricular overdrive from the right ventricular apex was acutely applied in 38 patients (11 females, mean age 62.1 ± 11.5 years) with sustained AF and preserved AV conduction. Dynamic ventricular overdrive at LOW/MEDIUM setting increased the amount of ventricular pacing compared with VVI pacing at 60, 70, and 80 beats per minute (bpm; to 81/85% from 11, 25, and 47%, respectively; P < 0.05). It also resulted in a maximum decrease in interval differences (to 48 ± 18 ms from 149 ± 28, 117 ± 38, and 95 ± 46 ms, respectively; P < 0.05) and fusion (to 0.13 from 0.41, 0.42, and 0.36, respectively; P < 0.05) compared with VVI pacing at 60, 70, and 80 bpm. However, the application of DVO resulted in a significant increase in HR compared with intrinsic rhythm and VVI pacing at 80 bpm (to 97 bpm from 89 and 94 bpm, respectively; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Dynamic ventricular overdrive decreases HR irregularity and increases ventricular pacing rate compared with VVI pacing at fixed elevated base rates and spontaneous rhythm. Fusion index might help to refine information on pacing percentages provided by device counters.