Challenging the Status Quo: Debunking the Necessity of 5-Year to 10-Year Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasties.

BACKGROUND: In the current shift toward value-based healthcare, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have become essential to assess the effectiveness of medical interventions. However, elucidation of the optimal timeframe for PROMs evaluation remains crucial. This study aimed to (1) determine the proportion of patients who experienced clinically meaningful improvements in PROMs scores at each follow-up visit after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and (2) calculate and apply the clinical relevance ratio (CRR) for these long-term PROM collections postoperatively. METHODS: A total of 12 independent studies reporting THA (n = 8 studies) and TKA (n = 4 studies) postoperative PROM data with up to 10 years of follow-up in Europe or the United States were aggregated. A distribution-based minimal clinically important difference threshold and CRR were used to determine which patients had clinically meaningful improvements in PROMs at 1, 5, and 10 years. RESULTS: The proportion of patients who had clinically meaningful improvements in PROM scores stabilized after 1 year following both THA and TKA. Overall, the CRR decreased over time for all PROMs, with the CRR beginning to decrease at 1-year follow-up, bringing into question the robustness and clinical relevance of long-term PROMs data. CONCLUSIONS: The present study challenges the utility of requiring PROMs with a minimum follow-up of 2 years for THA and TKA. Research efforts should be focused on registries evaluating implant survivorship at longer-term follow-up, while PROMs should be better assessed up to 1-year follow-up. Reconsidering the long-term PROMs assessment would lead to more efficient and cost-effective research in orthopedic outcomes, without compromising data quality.

Can Robotic-Arm Assistance Decrease Iatrogenic Soft-Tissue Damage During Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty?

INTRODUCTION: Manual techniques for total hip arthroplasty (THA) have been widely utilized and proven to be clinically successful. However, the use of advanced computed tomography (CT) scan-based planning and haptically-bounded reamers in robotic-arm assisted total hip arthroplasty (RTHA) holds promise for potentially limiting surrounding soft-tissue damage. This cadaver-based study aimed to compare the extent of soft-tissue damage between a robotic-arm assisted, haptically-guided THA (RTHA) and a manual, fluoroscopic-guided THA (MTHA) direct anterior approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: There were six fresh-frozen torso-to-toe cadaver specimens included, with two surgeons each performing three RTHA and three MTHA procedures. One hip underwent an RTHA and the other hip received an MTHA in each cadaver. Postoperatively, one additional surgeon, blinded to the procedures, assessed and graded damage to nine key anatomical structures using a 1 to 4 grading scale: (1) complete soft-tissue preservation to <5% of damage; (2) 6 to 25% of damage; (3) 26 to 75% of damage; and (4) 76 to 100% of damage. Kruskal-Wallis hypothesis tests were used to compare soft-tissue damage between RTHA and MTHA cases and adjusted for ties. RESULTS: Pooled analysis of the gluteus minimus, sartorius, tensor fascia lata, and vastus lateralis muscle grades demonstrated that cadaver specimens who underwent RTHA underwent less damage to these structures than following MTHA (median, IQR: 1.0, 1.0 to 2.0 vs. 3.0, 2.0 to 3.0; p=0.003). Pooled analysis of the calculated volumetric damage (mm3) for the gluteus minimus, sartorius, tensor fascia lata, and vastus lateralis muscles demonstrated that the cadaver specimens that underwent RTHA underwent less damage to these structures than those that followed MTHA (median, IQR: 23, 2 to 586 vs. 216, 58 to 3,050; p=0.037). CONCLUSION: This cadaver-based study suggests that utilizing RTHA may lead to reduced soft-tissue damage compared with MTHA, likely due to enhanced preoperative planning with robotic-arm assisted software, real-time intraoperative feedback, haptically-bounded reamer usage, reduced surgical steps, as well as ease of use with reaming. These findings should be carefully considered when evaluating the utilization of robotic-arm assisted THA in practice.

Using Software to Implant Orthopaedic Hardware: Surgeon Intraoperative Confidence Increased with Latest Technological Updates.

BACKGROUND: Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been associated with improved accuracy and precision of implant placement, protection of soft tissue, and improved patient-reported postoperative outcomes when compared to manual TKA techniques. Previous studies have highlighted the importance of surgical confidence throughout the learning curve when adopting robotic-assisted platforms. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the confidence and efficiencies of surgeons when utilizing computed tomography (CT)-based robotic TKA technology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study was conducted with 20 arthroplasty-trained surgeons with prior experience in both manual TKA and robotic-assisted TKA techniques. The surgeons completed an initial learning period, with new software, during various stages of their experience. The new TKA software upgrade builds on the prior software version with new features. A Net Promoter Score (NPS), the measurement of a respondent's likelihood to recommend a product or service to others, was used during the analysis of survey questions. A NPS over 50 indicates a positive score. RESULTS: When compared to manual TKA techniques, 95% of surgeons reported that their overall intraoperative confidence increased with the new software upgrade for CT-based robotic technology and had an average rating of 8.9 out of 10 for their intraoperative confidence with the new software upgrade. Additionally, 100% of surgeons reported that they were more confident when performing intraoperative implant adjustments with the new software upgrade when compared to manual TKA. Surgeons determined that the overall use of the new software upgrade was intuitive (8.4 of 10 average rating) and were satisfied with the overall use of the new software upgrade (9 of 10 average rating). Also, surgeons reported that they would recommend the new software upgrade for CT-based robotic technology to colleagues (NPS of 85), as well as being used as a research tool (NPS of 85) or for a training and education tool in a fellowship program (NPS of 90). CONCLUSION: As new technology continues to enter the field of orthopedics, it is important to ensure upgrades and advancements continue to serve surgeons and provide efficiencies in the operating room. For established robotic surgeons, the new robotic technology assessed in this study provided increased confidence when compared to manual TKA. Based on these results, the new software upgrade demonstrated value during various stages of a TKA procedure and is highly recommended for use by others in the field of orthopedics.

A New Hinge Prosthesis Offers Ease of Use and the Ability to Retain the Revision Tibial Baseplate.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a widely practiced surgical procedure, with its efficacy underscored by the increasing number of patients benefiting from it. As primary TKAs rise, the orthopaedic community must prepare for a surge in complex primary and revision knee arthroplasties in the future. While most revisions use non-constrained or semi-constrained prostheses, certain scenarios require a fully constrained (hinge) prosthesis to address major ligamentous and/or bone loss. Over time, hinge designs have evolved, but outcomes with these designs have been mixed. To help address challenges seen with some earlier designs, a new modular revision solution has been designed for both primary and revision surgeries. This system has a new revision baseplate that has compatibilities with varying distal femoral components and introduces an enhanced hinge mechanism. This paper aims to explore the evolution of hinge designs, elaborate on the surgical workflows and intended compatibilities of this new revision hinge system in six different scenarios, and discuss its various potential advantages.

Comparison of Iatrogenic Soft Tissue Trauma in Robotic-Assisted versus Manual Partial Knee Arthroplasty.

Partial knee arthroplasty (PKA) is performed to treat end-stage osteoarthritis in a single compartment. There are minimal data characterizing soft-tissue injuries for PKA with robotic and manual techniques. This cadaver study compared the extent of soft-tissue trauma sustained through robotic-arm assisted PKA (RPKA) and manual PKA (MPKA). Five surgeons prepared 24 cadaveric knees for medial PKA, including six MPKA controls and 18 RPKA assigned into three different workflows: RPKA-LB (six knees) - RPKA with legacy burr; RPKA-NB (six knees) - RPKA with new burr design; and RPKA-NBS (six knees) - RPKA with new burr design and oscillating saw. Two surgeons estimated trauma to the patellar tendon, quadriceps tendon, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), medial collateral ligament (MCL), medial capsule, posterior capsule, and posterior cruciate ligament (PCLs) using a five-grade system: Grade 1 - complete soft tissue preservation; Grade 2 - ≤25%; Grade 3 - 26 to 50%; Grade 4 - 51 to 75%; and Grade 5 - ≥76% trauma. A total trauma grade was assigned by summing the grades. Kruskal-Wallis statistical tests were used to assess outcomes. When compared to the MPKA group, all RPKA subgroups had lower total trauma grading (p<0.01), lower posterior capsular damage (p<0.01), and less severe ACL damage (p<0.01). The analysis demonstrated no significant difference between the three RPKA workflows. As this study was performed using cadaveric specimens, additional investigations are necessary to determine associations between robotic or manual-assisted technique, observed soft tissue damage, and postoperative clinical outcomes following PKA.

Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Demonstrated Soft Tissue Protection.

INTRODUCTION: While total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures have demonstrated clinical success, occasionally intraoperative complications can occur. Collateral or posterior cruciate ligament injury, instability, extensor mechanism disruption, and tibiofemoral or patellofemoral dislocation are among a few of the intraoperatively driven adverse events prevalently ranked by The Knee Society. Robotic-arm assisted TKA (RATKA) provides a surgeon the ability to three-dimensionally plan a TKA and use intraoperative visual, auditory, and tactile feedback to ensure that only the desired bone cuts are made. The potential benefits of soft tissue protection in these surgeries need to be further evaluated. The purpose of this cadaver study was to assess the a) integrity of various knee soft tissue structures (medial collateral ligament [MCL], lateral collateral ligament [LCL], posterior cruciate ligament [PCL], and the patellar ligament), as well as b) the need for tibial subluxation and patellar eversion during RATKA procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six cadaver knees were prepared using RATKA by a surgeon with no prior clinical robotic experience. These were compared to seven manually performed cases as a control. The mean Kellgren-Lawrence score was 2.8 (range, 0 to 4) in RATKA and 2.6 (range, 1 to 4) in the manual cohort. The presence of soft tissue damage was assessed by having an experienced surgeon perform a visual evaluation and palpation of the PCL, MCL, LCL, and the patellar ligament after the procedures. In addition, leg pose and retraction were documented during all bone resections. The amount of tibial subluxation and patellar eversion was recorded for each case. RESULTS: For all RATKA-assisted cases, there was no visible evidence of disruption of any of the ligaments. All RATKA cases were left with a bone island on the tibial plateau, which protected the PCL. Tibial subluxation and patella eversion were not required for visualization in any RATKA cases. In two of the seven MTKA cases, there was slight disruption noted of the PCL, although this did not lead to any apparent change in the functional integrity of the ligament. All MTKA cases required tibial subluxation and patellar revision to achieve optimal visualization. DISCUSSION: Several aspects of soft tissue protection were noted during the study. During bone resections, the tibia in RATKA procedures did not require subluxation, which may reduce ligament stretching or decrease complication rates. Potential patient benefits for short-term recovery and decreased morbidity to reduce operative complications should be studied in a clinical setting. Since RATKA uses a stereotactic boundary to constrain the sawblade, which is generated based on the implant size, shape, and plan, and does not have the ability to track the patient's soft tissue structures, standard retraction techniques during cutting are recommended. Therefore, the retractor placement and potential for soft tissue protection needs to be further investigated. RATKA has the potential to increase soft tissue protection when compared to manual TKA.

Robotic-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Technology Provides a Repeatable and Reproducible Method of Assessing Soft Tissue Balance.

Soft-tissue balancing is an important factor in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), with 30 to 50% of TKA revisions attributed to technical operative factors including soft-tissue balancing. Robotic-assisted TKA (RATKA) offers opportunities for improved soft-tissue balancing methods. This study aimed to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of ligamentous laxity assessments during RATKA using a digital tensioner.Three experienced RATKA surgeons assessed preresection and trialing phases of 12 human cadaveric knees with varying degrees of arthritis. Ligamentous laxity was assessed with manual varus and valgus stresses in extension and flexion, with a digital tensioner providing feedback on the change of laxity displacement. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analyses were used to determine the repeatability within a single surgeon and reproducibility between the three surgeons.The results showed excellent repeatability and reproducibility in ligamentous laxity assessment during RATKA. Surgeons had excellent repeatability for preresection and trialing assessments, with median ICC values representing excellent reproducibility between surgeons. Surgeons were repeatable within 1 or 1.5 mm for preresection and trialing assessments. On average, the variation within a surgeon was 0.33 ± 0.26 mm during preresection and 0.29 ± 0.28 mm during trialing. When comparing surgeons to each other, they were reproducible within an average of 0.69 ± 0.33 mm for preresection and 0.65 ± 0.31 mm for trialing.This study demonstrated the reliability of robotic-assisted soft-tissue balancing techniques, providing control over ligamentous laxity assessments, and potentially leading to better patient outcomes. The digital tensioner used in this study provided excellent repeatability and reproducibility in ligamentous laxity assessment during RATKA, highlighting the potential benefits of incorporating robotics in TKA procedures.

Short-term Comparison of Survivorship and Functional Outcomes for Metaphyseal Cones with Short and Long Stems in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Printed porous titanium metaphyseal cones have become a mainstay for managing bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). A short or long stem is routinely used when implanting a cone to augment fixation and offload stresses. This retrospective analysis compared the short-term survivorships and functional outcomes for use of a short or long stem with a metaphyseal cone.A total of 179 cases using metaphyseal cones and stems with median follow-up of 1.95 years (interquartile range, 1.00-2.14) were compared based on stem type. There were 55 cases with long stem(s) and 124 cases with short stem(s). Cases with both long and short stems were excluded. Demographics, Kaplan-Meier survivorships, and preoperative and 1-year postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs; 2011 Knee Society Score [KSS] objective knee score, function, and satisfaction scores; EuroQol five-dimension scale; and Short Form Survey Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary scores) were compared using t-tests with a significance level of α = 0.05. There were no significant differences in body mass index (mean ± standard deviation) or sex (men [%]) between the short and long stem cohorts (32.3 ± 5.3, 36.3% and 31.5 ± 5.5, 38.2%, respectively; p > 0.05). Patients who had short stems were younger (65.9 ± 8.8 vs. 69.0 ± 9.4, p = 0.0323).Revision-free survivorship for the femoral or tibial component was 100% for long stems and 98.2% for short stems at 1 and 2 years, respectively (log-rank p = 0.6330). The two revisions in the short group were for infection, thus the survivorship for aseptic loosening was 100% at 2 years for both cohorts. There were no significant differences in preoperative or postoperative PROMs.This study demonstrated that highly porous printed metaphyseal cones provided rTKA with excellent early survivorship and similar PROMs whether a short or long stem was used. Additional studies will be needed to discern longer term differences.

The Association of Patient and Procedural Factors on Improved Outcomes: A Cluster Analysis on 853 Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients.

Many studies involving robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RATKA) have demonstrated superiority regarding soft tissue balance and consistency with alignment target achievement. However, studies investigating whether RATKA is associated with improved patient outcomes regarding physical function and pain are also important. Therefore, we performed a cluster analysis and examined factors that contributed to differences in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Specifically, we analyzed: (1) reduced WOMAC (rWOMAC) scores regarding pain and function; (2) usage of RATKA; (3) common patient comorbidities; as well as (4) patient demographic factors. The rWOMAC score is an abbreviated PROM that includes pain and physical function domains. This study analyzed 853 patients (95 conventional and 758 robotic-assisted) who had completed preoperative, 6-month, and 1-year postoperative rWOMAC surveys. Two clusters were constructed using rWOMAC pain and function scores at 1 year. Cluster 1 included 753 patients who had better outcomes at 1 year (mean rWOMAC pain = 0.9, mean rWOMAC function = 1.4), and cluster 2 included 100 patients who had worse outcomes at 1 year (mean rWOMAC pain = 7.7, mean rWOMAC function = 10.4). The clusters were compared to determine (1) how scores improved and (2) what patient characteristics were significantly different between clusters. Cluster 1 demonstrated greater improvement from preoperative to 6 months or 1 year (p = 0.0013 for pain preoperative to 6 months, p< 0.0001 for other measures) and 6 months to 1 year (p< 0.0001). Comparisons demonstrated that cluster 1 had older patients (67 vs. 65 years, p = 0.0479) who had lower body mass index or BMIs (31.8 vs. 33.9 kg/m2, p = 0.0042) and no significant differences in sex (p = 0.7849). Cluster 1 also had a significantly higher percentage of RATKA patients (90 vs. 79%, p< 0.001). Cluster analyses provided differentiating factors which were associated with improved postoperative rWOMAC pain and function scores at 1 year. Patients undergoing robotic-assisted TKA were associated with better rWOMAC pain and function scores from preoperative to 6 months and 1 year.

Effect of Manual versus Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty on Cervical Spine Static and Dynamic Postures.

This study compared surgeon cervical (C) spine postures and repetitive motions when performing traditional manual total knee arthroplasty (MTKA) versus robotic-assisted TKA (RATKA). Surgeons wore motion trackers on T3 vertebra and the occiput anatomical landmarks to obtain postural and repetitive motion data during MTKA and RATKA performed on cadavers. We assessed (1) flexion-extension at T3 and the occiput anatomical landmarks, (2) range of motion (ROM) as the percentage of time in the flexion-extension angle, (3) repetition rate, defined as the number of the times T3 and the occiput flexion-extension angle exceeded ±10°; and (4) static posture, where T3 or occiput postures exceed 10° for more than 30 seconds. The average T3 flexion-extension angle for MTKA cases was 5-degree larger than for RATKA cases (19 ± 8 vs. 14 ± 8 degrees). The surgeons who performed MTKA cases spent 15% more time in nonneutral C-spine ROM than those who performed RATKA cases (78 ± 25 vs. 63 ± 36%, p < 0.01). The repetition rate at T3 was 4% greater for MTKA than RATKA (14 ± 5 vs. 10 ± 6 reps/min). The percentage of time spent in static T3 posture was 5% greater for overall MTKA cases than for RATKA cases (15 ± 3 vs. 10 ± 3%). In this cadaveric study, we found differences in cervical and thoracic ergonomics between manual and robotic-assisted TKA. Specifically, we found that RATKA may reduce a surgeon's ergonomic strain at both the T3 and occiput locations by reducing the time the surgeon spends in a nonneutral position.

Physical and Mental Demand During Total Hip Arthroplasty.

This study compared differences in (1) task duration; (2) biometric parameters (ie, caloric energy expenditure, heart rate); and (3) subjective measures of mental as well as physical demand of robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) and manual THA. A total of 12 THAs were performed on 6 cadaveric specimens by two surgeons using a wearable technology to track biometric parameters and taking a questionnaire to compare the physical and mental demands. The results of our study suggest that as compared with manual techniques, robotic assistance for THA may reduce mental and physical fatigue.

How Does Robotic-Arm Assisted Technology Influence Total Knee Arthroplasty Implant Placement for Surgeons in Fellowship Training?

Implant malalignment during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may lead to suboptimal postoperative outcomes. Accuracy studies are typically performed with experienced surgeons; however, it is important to study less experienced surgeons when considering teaching hospitals where younger surgeons operate. Therefore, this study assessed whether robotic-arm assisted TKA (RATKA) allowed for more accurate and precise implant position to plan when compared with manual techniques when the surgery is performed by in-training orthopaedic surgical fellows. Two surgeons, currently in their fellowship training and having minimal RATKA experience, performed a total of six manual TKA (MTKA) and six RATKAs on paired cadaver knees. Computed tomography scans were obtained for each knee pre- and postoperatively. These scans were analyzed using a custom autosegmentation and autoregistration process to compare postoperative implant position with the preoperative planned position. Mean system errors and standard deviations were compared between RATKA and MTKA for the femoral component for sagittal, coronal, and axial planes and for the tibial component in the sagittal and coronal planes. A 2-Variance testing was performed using an α = 0.05. Although not statistically significant, RATKA was found to have greater accuracy and precision to plan than MTKA for: femoral axial plane (1.1° ± 1.1° vs. 1.6° ± 1.3°), coronal plane (0.9° ± 0.7° vs. 2.2° ± 1.0°), femoral sagittal plane (1.5° ± 1.3° vs. 3.1° ± 2.1°), tibial coronal plane (0.9° ± 0.5° vs. 1.9° ± 1.3°), and tibial sagittal plane (1.7° ± 2.6° vs. 4.7° ± 4.1°). There were no statistical differences between surgical groups or between the two surgeons performing the cases. With limited RATKA experience, fellows showed increased accuracy and precision to plan for femoral and tibial implant positions. Furthermore, these results were comparable to what has been reported for an experienced surgeon performing RATKA.

Less iatrogenic soft-tissue damage utilizing robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty when compared with a manual approach: A blinded assessment.

OBJECTIVES: The use of the haptically bounded saw blades in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RTKA) can potentially help to limit surrounding soft-tissue injuries. However, there are limited data characterizing these injuries for cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA with the use of this technique. The objective of this cadaver study was to compare the extent of soft-tissue damage sustained through a robotic-assisted, haptically guided TKA (RATKA) versus a manual TKA (MTKA) approach. METHODS: A total of 12 fresh-frozen pelvis-to-toe cadaver specimens were included. Four surgeons each prepared three RATKA and three MTKA specimens for cruciate-retaining TKAs. A RATKA was performed on one knee and a MTKA on the other. Postoperatively, two additional surgeons assessed and graded damage to 14 key anatomical structures in a blinded manner. Kruskal-Wallis hypothesis tests were performed to assess statistical differences in soft-tissue damage between RATKA and MTKA cases. RESULTS: Significantly less damage occurred to the PCLs in the RATKA versus the MTKA specimens (p < 0.001). RATKA specimens had non-significantly less damage to the deep medial collateral ligaments (p = 0.149), iliotibial bands (p = 0.580), poplitei (p = 0.248), and patellar ligaments (p = 0.317). The remaining anatomical structures had minimal soft-tissue damage in all MTKA and RATKA specimens. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that less soft-tissue damage may occur when utilizing RATKA compared with MTKA. These findings are likely due to the enhanced preoperative planning with the robotic software, the real-time intraoperative feedback, and the haptically bounded saw blade, all of which may help protect the surrounding soft tissues and ligaments.Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2019;8:495-501.

Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Demonstrated Greater Accuracy and Precision to Plan Compared with Manual Techniques.

This study determined if robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty (RATKA) allows for more accurate and precise bone cuts and component position to plan compared with manual total knee arthroplasty (MTKA). Specifically, we assessed the following: (1) final bone cuts, (2) final component position, and (3) a potential learning curve for RATKA. On six cadaver specimens (12 knees), a MTKA and RATKA were performed on the left and right knees, respectively. Bone-cut and final-component positioning errors relative to preoperative plans were compared. Median errors and standard deviations (SDs) in the sagittal, coronal, and axial planes were compared. Median values of the absolute deviation from plan defined the accuracy to plan. SDs described the precision to plan. RATKA bone cuts were as or more accurate to plan based on nominal median values in 11 out of 12 measurements. RATKA bone cuts were more precise to plan in 8 out of 12 measurements (p ≤ 0.05). RATKA final component positions were as or more accurate to plan based on median values in five out of five measurements. RATKA final component positions were more precise to plan in four out of five measurements (p ≤ 0.05). Stacked error results from all cuts and implant positions for each specimen in procedural order showed that RATKA error was less than MTKA error. Although this study analyzed a small number of cadaver specimens, there were clear differences that separated these two groups. When compared with MTKA, RATKA demonstrated more accurate and precise bone cuts and implant positioning to plan.