Preliminary content and construct validity of a new model to differentiate research skills from evidence-based practice skills: Core, Evidence Application, Research (CEAR) Model.

BACKGROUND: Research is the scientific basis for the profession of dietetics, as it must be located and applied in evidence-based practice (EBP). EBP is often presented as a foundational skill for research. CEAR - Core, Evidence Application, Research - is a newly proposed model that separates Research and Evidence Application skills into distinct domains, jointly supported by a set of Core skills, thus acknowledging that education and advancement in one domain neither requires nor precipitates education and advancement in the other. The goal was to investigate the content and construct validity of the new CEAR Model. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey of randomly selected dietitians in the United States was used to collect CEAR domain scores, validated measures of research or EBP skills and self-reported characteristics. Exploratory factor analysis, Cronbach's α and Pearson correlation between various tools and CEAR domains were used to assess validity and reliability. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple linear regression between CEAR domains and participant characteristics were used to assess convergent and divergent validity. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-four responses with a valid CEAR score were received and led to a three-factor solution, supporting the theorised differentiation of research from evidence application skills (content validity). Internal reliability for the CEAR Model overall and for each domain was high. The hypothesised correlations between existing research or EBP measurement tools and the relevant CEAR domains were found (construct validity). Known groups analysis demonstrated the expected differences in CEAR domain scores based on participant characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: The CEAR Model demonstrates preliminary validity and internal reliability. It adds to the current literature by acknowledging the separateness of evidence application skills from research skills.

US neonatal intensive care unit registered dietitian nutritionists salary description and correlates: results of a survey.

BACKGROUND: This survey described the compensation of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs) in the United States and examined correlates of higher salaries within this group. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey was completed in 2021 by 143 NICU RDNs from 127 US hospitals who reported hourly wage in US dollars (USD). We used initial bivariate analyses to assess the relationship of selected institution-level and individual-level variables to hourly wage; the rank-sum test for binary variables; bivariate regression and Pearson correlation coefficients for continuous variables; the Kruskal-Wallis test for categorical variables. Variables with a compelling relationship to the hourly wage outcome were considered in model creation. Final model selection was based on comparisons of model fit. RESULTS: Median hourly compensation was USD 33.24 (interquartile range [IQR] 29.81, 38.49). Seven variables had a compelling bivariate relationship with hourly wage: cost of living, employer facility with a paediatric residency, employer facility with a neonatal fellowship, NICU bed: full-time equivalents (FTE) RDN ratio, years in neonatal nutrition, having a certification and order writing privileges. In the final adjusted model (R2 = 0.42), three variables remained associated with increased hourly wage: higher cost of living, longer length of career in neonatal nutrition and fewer NICU beds per NICU RDN FTE. CONCLUSIONS: US NICU RDNs earn similar or slightly higher wages than other US paediatric RDNs; they earn substantially less than other NICU healthcare team members. Employers need to improve compensation for NICU RDNs to incentivise their retention and recognise their additional non-clinical responsibilities.

Survey tools for measuring research or evidence-based practice constructs in dietetics: A narrative review.

BACKGROUND: Exact quantification of research conducted by dietitians and tracking the effectiveness of interventions or training programs to increase either evidence-based practice (EBP) or research behaviours have been hampered by the variety of tools used to measure these constructs. METHODS: In this narrative review, we identified and classified the various tools previously used to measure constructs related to research and/or EBP in the dietetics profession, and to summarise estimates of the constructs measured. RESULTS: We identified and classified 15 scored tools that had been used at least once in the dietetics profession and extracted tool parameter estimates from 22 resulting papers. We also identified six unscored tools and three qualitative studies. The most frequent constructs measured were attitudes and behaviours. Very few tools measured objective knowledge (skills). No objective measures of research outputs were identified. Several tools were closely related to one another. CONCLUSIONS: Even when tools were used across multiple papers, reporting method varied making comparisons difficult. This review should encourage future researchers to utilise existing tools when possible, and encourage the development or adaptation and testing of tools that fill identified gaps. The constructs measured by the tools identified may also provide a starting point for the development of educational interventions aiming to increase research or EBP skills among dietitians. Only by using consistent tools will the dietetics profession be able to track the progress in increasing research conduct and EBP implementation over time.

Changes in US Dialysis Dietitian Responsibilities and Patient Needs During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: This study described the job responsibilities and modalities of care among dialysis dietitians in the United States and their observations regarding the nutrition needs of their patients, during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN AND METHODS: Cross-sectional online survey captures dietitian characteristics and responsibilities, dialysis facility characteristics, and patient needs. We recruited US dialysis dietitians. We used chi-square tests to compare respondent stress and facility-level policies regarding eating/drinking and oral nutrition supplements based on facility ownership type. RESULTS: We received 191 complete or partial survey responses. Sixty-three percent of respondents stated that their center banned eating/drinking during dialysis due to COVID-19 masking policies. DaVita and non-profit facilities were significantly more likely to still allow eating/drinking during dialysis (31% and 29%, respectively) compared to Fresenius facilities (7%). A common theme in open-ended responses regarding nutrition care for COVID-19-positive patients was providing less care to these patients. A majority of respondents admitted to stress from working in healthcare during COVID-19. The majority of respondents indicated that patients were taking precautions such as having a family member or friend grocery shop for them (69%) or going to the store less often (60%). Just over a quarter of respondents indicated that affordability of food was a concern among patients. Seventy-two percent reported that patients were cooking at home more often, 60% had observed an increase in serum phosphorus, and 72% an increase in interdialytic weight gain. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the increased risk of malnutrition and symptoms that can affect dietary intake in COVID-positive patients, and the economic conditions leading to increased rates of food insecurity, dietitians must be proactive in preventing and/or treating malnutrition through adequate protein and energy intake. Eating/drinking bans should not become permanent and dialysis centers should take precautions to allow intradialytic meals and oral nutrition supplement protocols to continue during the pandemic.

Workforce needs and estimated costs/savings for nutrition care in chronic kidney disease-stage 3 through maintenance dialysis.

The role of nutrition in chronic kidney disease (CKD) is well known. However, controversies, misconceptions, and gaps in the literature exist regarding the workforce required to provide nutrition care in CKD. This paper reviews the existing literature on this topic, focusing primarily on the United States. Topics covered in this review include the qualifications and services of the registered dietitian nutritionist (RDN), to which specific patients nutrition care should be provided in CKD and on dialysis, barriers to the utilization of nutrition services, the quantity of nutrition care needed to improve patient outcomes, and the risks of provider burnout. Controversies include whether more staffing is associated with better care and the best measures of staffing. The topics are supported with estimations for the economic impact and practicality of workforce decisions.

Registered Dietitian Staffing in Dialysis: Impact on Quality Ratings in Mandate and Nonmandate States.

OBJECTIVE: Texas is the only state to mandate a patient to full-time equivalent (FTE) registered dietitian (RD) ratio (<125 patients:FTE RD) in dialysis. Little research exists about the relationship between patient:FTE RD ratio and quality. Our objectives were to a) examine the effect of the mandate on patient:FTE RD ratios in Texas facilities compared to similar nonmandated facilities and b) examine the association between patient:FTE RD ratio and the patient rating of staff quality or star rating of the facility. DESIGN AND METHODS: Using data from Dialysis Facility Annual Reports, we excluded facilities with less than 125 patients and matched based on region, chain/profit status, and number of patients, pairing each Texas facility with 2 non-Texas facilities. T-tests for difference of means and chi-square tests were performed to compare facility groups characteristics and assess mandate impact. We used correlation between patient:FTE RD ratio and staff quality linearized score, and ANOVA to compare patient:FTE RD ratios between the star rating levels. RESULTS: The patient:FTE RD ratio was higher in non-Texas than Texas facilities (111.84 ± 40.70 vs 90.80 ± 24.02, P < .01). The Pearson correlation between patient:FTE RD ratio and linearized score rating of the dialysis center staff was essentially nonexistent (r = -0.046). We found a trend of higher patient:FTE RD ratios in facilities with lower star ratings for quality and staff but no statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The mandate effectively lowered the patient:FTE RD ratio in Texas dialysis facilities with over 125 patients, indicating that states considering such a mandate may benefit from implementing it. We found no association between patient:FTE RD staffing and quality, either objectively or via patient assessment. Further research should examine whether dialysis facilities are trending toward smaller patient sizes to circumvent staffing mandates and examine the relationship between other professions' staffing ratios and quality.

Quantifying the Time Used for Renal Dietitian's Responsibilities: A Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to quantify how dialysis dietitians spend their time and whether the activities that were most frequent varied based on the ratio of patient to full-time equivalent (FTE) dietitian. METHODS: This study is a cross-sectional, observational, time-and-motion study carried out using the Work Activity Measurement by Activity Timing software/method for time recording. This study was carried out in 14 dialysis centers in and around Cleveland, Ohio. Fourteen registered dietitian nutritionists participated in this study. The mean time/experience of these nutritionists in dietetics was 26.6 ± 8.5 years. Percent of time in direct care (e.g., patient interaction) versus indirect care (e.g., documentation and plans of care, professional communication) versus other responsibilities (e.g., administrative work, education of self or others). RESULTS: The mean number of tasks recorded per 3-hour observation session was 38.3 ± 14.0, including 18.5 ± 7.7 indirect care tasks, 7.7 ± 6.2 direct care tasks, and 9.7 ± 5.4 other tasks. The mean number of unique patients seen per observation session was 6.9 ± 5.4; the mean direct care time per patient encounter was 6.95 ± 4.05 minutes. Indirect care took the highest proportion of observed time, 56.0 ± 22.2%, followed by direct care, 24.9 ± 18.8%. Increasing the ratio of patient to FTE had a moderate negative correlation with the percent of time spent in direct patient care (r = -0.35, P = .21), but there was no relationship between the ratio of patient to FTE and direct care time per patient (r = 0.02, P = .94). CONCLUSION: About 25% of dietitians' time was available for direct patient care. This is much less than that reported in previous studies and may not be sufficient to improve the nutritional status. Limitations of our study include a small sample size from a single region. Further work is needed to understand the balance of responsibilities among renal dietitians and their impact on patient outcomes.

Structural Equation Modeling to Explore Patient to Staff Ratios as an Explanatory Factor for Variation in Dialysis Facility Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Patient to staff ratios vary based on facility characteristics, and therefore have been proposed as an explanatory factor for the variation in dialysis facility outcomes. This analysis tested that hypothesis. DESIGN AND METHODS: Observational study using Dialysis Facility Report data. Reported staff numbers from the Annual Facility Survey were converted to full time equivalents (FTE). Subsequently, ratios were created for patients per FTE registered dietitian (RD), social worker, nurse, and patient care technician. Bivariate associations and structural equation modeling (SEM) were used to explore relationships between these ratios and patient outcomes: standardized mortality ratio and standardized hospitalization rate, when also considering the impact of non-modifiable facility characteristics (region, chain, profit status). Our focus was on RD staffing; therefore we also included serum phosphorus and normalized protein catabolic ratio in the model, and also conducted a sub-analysis of the 198 facilities that exceeded the KDOQI maximum of 150 patients:FTE RD. SUBJECTS: Dialysis centers in the US with at least 30 adult patients and no pediatric patients. 4035 facilities had complete data for the proposed variables. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Standardized mortality ratio and standardized hospitalization rate were the primary outcomes. RESULTS: The mean and standard deviation for patients per FTE staff were 90.0 ± 34.0, 88.7 ± 32.8, 17.1 ± 20.5 and 11.9 ± 7.0 for RDs, social workers, nurses, and technicians, respectively. Facility characteristics impacted staffing in bivariate analyses and SEM. The only significant paths from staffing ratio to outcomes were for patient:FTE social worker to SMR (standardized beta = -0.09, 95% CI -0.13, -0.04) and Patients:FTE RD to SHR Days (standardized beta = 0.04, 95% CI 0.001, 0.09). In the sub-analysis, there were no significant paths from staffing to outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not provide evidence that patient per staff ratios explain variation in dialysis facility outcomes. While there are some important bivariate relationships, these disappear in more complex models. Future research should investigate the impacts of staffing ratios on individual patients, to overcome the possible ecological fallacy.

Global Prevalence of Protein-Energy Wasting in Kidney Disease: A Meta-analysis of Contemporary Observational Studies From the International Society of Renal Nutrition and Metabolism.

OBJECTIVE: To better define the prevalence of protein-energy wasting (PEW) in kidney disease is poorly defined. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of PEW prevalence from contemporary studies including more than 50 subjects with kidney disease, published during 2000-2014 and reporting on PEW prevalence by subjective global assessment or malnutrition-inflammation score. Data were reviewed throughout different strata: (1) acute kidney injury (AKI), (2) pediatric chronic kidney disease (CKD), (3) nondialyzed CKD 3-5, (4) maintenance dialysis, and (5) subjects undergoing kidney transplantation (Tx). Sample size, period of publication, reporting quality, methods, dialysis technique, country, geographical region, and gross national income were a priori considered factors influencing between-study variability. RESULTS: Two studies including 189 AKI patients reported a PEW prevalence of 60% and 82%. Five studies including 1776 patients with CKD stages 3-5 reported PEW prevalence ranging from 11% to 54%. Finally, 90 studies from 34 countries including 16,434 patients on maintenance dialysis were identified. The 25th-75th percentiles range in PEW prevalence among dialysis studies was 28-54%. Large variation in PEW prevalence across studies remained even when accounting for moderators. Mixed-effects meta-regression identified geographical region as the only significant moderator explaining 23% of the observed data heterogeneity. Finally, two studies including 1067 Tx patients reported a PEW prevalence of 28% and 52%, and no studies recruiting pediatric CKD patients were identified. CONCLUSION: By providing evidence-based ranges of PEW prevalence, we conclude that PEW is a common phenomenon across the spectrum of AKI and CKD. This, together with the well-documented impact of PEW on patient outcomes, justifies the need for increased medical attention.

Comparison of Subjective Global Assessment and Protein Energy Wasting Score to Nutrition Evaluations Conducted by Registered Dietitian Nutritionists in Identifying Protein Energy Wasting Risk in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the 7-point subjective global assessment (SGA) and the protein energy wasting (PEW) score with nutrition evaluations conducted by registered dietitian nutritionists in identifying PEW risk in stage 5 chronic kidney disease patients on maintenance hemodialysis. DESIGN AND METHODS: This study is a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study entitled "Development and Validation of a Predictive energy Equation in Hemodialysis". PEW risk identified by the 7-point SGA and the PEW score was compared against the nutrition evaluations conducted by registered dietitian nutritionists through data examination from the original study (reference standard). SUBJECTS: A total of 133 patients were included for the analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV), positive and negative likelihood ratio (PLR and NLR) of both scoring tools were calculated when compared against the reference standard. RESULTS: The patients were predominately African American (n = 112, 84.2%), non-Hispanic (n = 101, 75.9%), and male (n = 80, 60.2%). Both the 7-point SGA (sensitivity = 78.6%, specificity = 59.1%, PPV = 33.9%, NPV = 91.2%, PLR = 1.9, and NLR = 0.4) and the PEW score (sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 28.6%, PPV = 27.2%, NPV = 100%, PLR = 1.4, and NLR = 0) were more sensitive than specific in identifying PEW risk. The 7-point SGA may miss 21.4% patients having PEW and falsely identify 40.9% of patients who do not have PEW. The PEW score can identify PEW risk in all patients, but 71.4% of patients identified may not have PEW risk. CONCLUSIONS: Both the 7-point SGA and the PEW score could identify PEW risk. The 7-point SGA was more specific, and the PEW score was more sensitive. Both scoring tools were found to be clinically confident in identifying patients who were actually not at PEW risk.

Assessing the Viability of Social Media for Disseminating Evidence-Based Nutrition Practice Guideline Through Content Analysis of Twitter Messages and Health Professional Interviews: An Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Given the high penetration of social media use, social media has been proposed as a method for the dissemination of information to health professionals and patients. This study explored the potential for social media dissemination of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Evidence-Based Nutrition Practice Guideline (EBNPG) for Heart Failure (HF). OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to (1) describe the existing social media content on HF, including message content, source, and target audience, and (2) describe the attitude of physicians and registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs) who care for outpatient HF patients toward the use of social media as a method to obtain information for themselves and to share this information with patients. METHODS: The methods were divided into 2 parts. Part 1 involved conducting a content analysis of tweets related to HF, which were downloaded from Twitonomy and assigned codes for message content (19 codes), source (9 codes), and target audience (9 codes); code frequency was described. A comparison in the popularity of tweets (those marked as favorites or retweeted) based on applied codes was made using t tests. Part 2 involved conducting phone interviews with RDNs and physicians to describe health professionals' attitude toward the use of social media to communicate general health information and information specifically related to the HF EBNPG. Interviews were transcribed and coded; exemplar quotes representing frequent themes are presented. RESULTS: The sample included 294 original tweets with the hashtag "#heartfailure." The most frequent message content codes were "HF awareness" (166/294, 56.5%) and "patient support" (97/294, 33.0%). The most frequent source codes were "professional, government, patient advocacy organization, or charity" (112/277, 40.4%) and "patient or family" (105/277, 37.9%). The most frequent target audience codes were "unable to identify" (111/277, 40.1%) and "other" (55/277, 19.9%). Significant differences were found in the popularity of tweets with (mean 1, SD 1.3 favorites) or without (mean 0.7, SD 1.3 favorites), the content code being "HF research" (P=.049). Tweets with the source code "professional, government, patient advocacy organizations, or charities" were significantly more likely to be marked as a favorite and retweeted than those without this source code (mean 1.2, SD 1.4 vs mean 0.8, SD 1.2, P=.03) and (mean 1.5, SD 1.8 vs mean 0.9, SD 2.0, P=.03). Interview participants believed that social media was a useful way to gather professional information. They did not believe that social media was useful for communicating with patients due to privacy concerns and the fact that the information had to be kept general rather than be tailored for a specific patient and the belief that their patients did not use social media or technology. CONCLUSIONS: Existing Twitter content related to HF comes from a combination of patients and evidence-based organizations; however, there is little nutrition content. That gap may present an opportunity for EBNPG dissemination. Health professionals use social media to gather information for themselves but are skeptical of its value when communicating with patients, particularly due to privacy concerns and misconceptions about the characteristics of social media users.

Renal Dietitians' Perceptions of Roles and Responsibilities in Outpatient Dialysis Facilities.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to determine what job responsibilities renal dietitians working in outpatient dialysis facilities consider as most important and most time-consuming. We hypothesized that more time-consuming activities would not always be considered most important. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: An online survey was sent to 3,382 renal dietitians via professional organization e-mail lists. The survey included 30 activities that renal dietitians perform, grouped into 3 categories (general responsibilities, assessments, and interventions) and based on the National Kidney Foundation-Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative nutrition guidelines. For each category of activities, respondents were asked to rank the 10 activities from 1 (most important or time-consuming) to 10 (least important or time-consuming). For analysis, the rankings were combined into 3 groups: 1 to 3 = most; 4 to 6 = mid; and 7 to 10 = least important or time-consuming. Demographic and professional questions were also included. RESULTS: Four hundred sixty six renal dietitians responded, and represented a broad range of experience in renal dietetics and type of dialysis facility. The mean number of patients per 40 hours full-time equivalent dietitian was 115.5 ± 38.4. There was good agreement between the respondents' ranking of importance and time consumed. Those activities identified as most important were traditional dietitian roles such as diet assessment and nutrition education. Many respondents provided write-in response of other activities they considered important and time-consuming such as communicating with family members or caregivers, enrolling and managing patients in the in-house pharmacy program, and serving as a care coordinator. CONCLUSIONS: It appears that the renal dietitian's role of providing nutrition assessments and counseling in outpatient dialysis facilities is being expanded to include administrative and coordination responsibilities. The impact of these changes on patient outcomes is unclear; however, previous research has indicated that administrative responsibilities take away from patient care time and decrease dietitian job satisfaction.

Using a web-based nutrition algorithm in hemodialysis patients.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to test the ability of a newly developed nutrition algorithm on (1) clinical utility and (2) ability to capture patient outcomes. RESEARCH DESIGN: This was a prospective observational study, using a practice based research network structure, involving renal dietitians and hemodialysis [HD] patients. SETTING: This study took place in HD outpatient units in five different countries. SUBJECTS: Hundred chronic HD patients were included in this study. To select subjects, dietitians screened and consented patients in their facilities until 4 patients "at nutrition risk" based on the algorithm screening tool were identified. Inclusion criteria were patients aged older than 19 years, not on hospice or equivalent, able to read the informed consent and ask questions, and receiving HD. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The ability of the algorithm screening tool is to identify patients at nutrition risk, to guide clinicians in logical renal-modified nutrition care process chains including follow-up on relevant parameters, and capture change in outcomes over 3 months. Statistics were performed using SPSS version 20.0 and significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS: One hundred patients on HD, enrolled by 29 dietitians, were included in this analysis. The average number of out-of-range screening parameters per patient was 3.7 (standard deviation 1.5, range 1-7), and the most prevalent risk factors were elevated parathyroid hormone (PTH; 62.8%) and low serum cholesterol (56.5%). At the initial screening step, 8 of the 14 factors led to chains with nonrandom selection patterns (by χ(2) test with P < .05). In the subsequent diagnosis step, patients diagnosed within the insufficient protein group (n = 38), increased protein intake by 0.11 g/kg/day (P = .022). In patients with a diagnosis in the high PTH group, PTH decreased by a mean of 176.85 pg/mL (n = 19, P = .011) and in those with a diagnosis in the high phosphorous group, serum phosphorous decreased by a mean of 0.91 mg/dL (n = 33, P = .006). Finally, the relative likelihood of each assessment being completed after making the related diagnosis at the previous visit compared with those for whom that diagnosis was not made was assessed, including the likelihood of a patient's protein intake assessed after a diagnosis in the insufficient protein group was made (odds ratio = 4.08, P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the clinical utility of a web-based HD-specific nutrition algorithm, including the ability to track changes in outcomes over time. There is potential for future research to use this tool and investigate the comparative impact of nutrition interventions.

SGA scores have poor correlation with serum albumin in obese hemodialysis patients: a secondary analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between serum albumin and the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) in a sample of obese hemodialysis (HD) patients. DESIGN AND METHOD: Study subjects (N = 253) included patients who were categorized into well-nourished (68%, SGA score 6-7) and malnourished (score 1-5) groups, and, on the basis of the body mass index (BMI), into obese (BMI > 30 kg/m(2); 35%) and nonobese (BMI < 30 kg/m(2)). The mean baseline data (±standard deviation) were as follows: age, 63.5 ± 14.3 years; BMI, 29 ± 8 kg/m(2); and serum albumin, 3.8 ± 0.4 mg/dL (bromocresol green). The secondary analysis of data from the SGA Validation Project and Nutrition Algorithm Preliminary Report determined the relationship between the 7-point SGA and serum albumin concentrations in a sample of obese HD patients. Data were analyzed at Case Western Reserve University from a total of 253 HD patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The SGA scores in the BMI groups were compared with serum albumin as an objective measure of nutrition and inflammation risk. RESULTS: By using analysis of variance, the obese and nonobese populations showed statistically significant differences in SGA scores (obese: P < .3468, nonobese: P < .0080) and serum albumin values (obese, P < .0943; nonobese, P < .0183) between well-nourished and malnourished groups. A multivariable nominal logistic fit was used to predict SGA group with age and gender as covariates. Serum albumin values (P < .0057) and BMI values greater than 30 (P < .0090) predicted SGA group. CONCLUSION: The secondary analysis showed that SGA does not correlate well with serum albumin; thus, it may not be a valid nutrition assessment tool among obese HD patients.

Self-reported health parameters compared with clinician measurements: methods in practice-based research.

CONTEXT: Self-reported health data are used by health insurance companies to assess risk. Most studies show underreporting compared with clinical measurements. OBJECTIVE: To compare self-reported height, weight, blood pressure, waist circumference, and dietary intake with registered dietitian's (RD's) measures of the same parameters. DESIGN: This is a secondary analysis of data collected in a larger study on the benefits of Medical Nutrition Therapy from an RD for overweight and obese patients when provided free of charge through an insurance benefit. SETTING: Participants completed a health risk assessment survey at home, from which the self-reported measures were extracted. The clinical measurements were taken by an RD in the office during a visit for Medical Nutrition Therapy. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were 81.4% female, with a mean body mass index of 35.0. All were insured and had a least 1 visit with an RD. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Main outcomes were correlation between self-reported and RD-measured height, weight, body mass index, blood pressure, and waist circumference. Blood pressure was categorized as normal or high and the κ statistic was used to examine category agreement between the 2 measures. Servings of food groups were compared between the 2 measures by examining cumulative percent within 0, 1, or 2 servings of the RD-measured value. RESULTS: The 2 measures of height and weight were highly correlated (0.974 and 0.986, respectively). Blood pressure was more weakly correlated and when categorized had low κ scores, as did servings of food groups. CONCLUSIONS: Height and weight were more closely correlated than in previous studies. In an insured population enrolled in a weight management program, self-reported measures may be accurate for determining program impact. Blood pressure may be better collected categorically than continuously. The necessity of food intake assessment on a risk assessment should be reconsidered.

Role of the neonatal registered dietitian nutritionist in Canada: A description of staffing and a comparison to practices in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Neonatal registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs) are critical members of the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) team. Ideal RDN staffing levels are unknown. Current staffing levels of neonatal RDNs in Canadian NICUs have not been recently reported. The objective of this study was to describe neonatal RDN staffing and responsibilities in Canada and contrast these findings with those of neonatal RDNs in the United States. METHODS: An online cross-sectional neonatal RDN survey was performed in the Fall of 2021 to collect hospital-level and individual-RDN-level data. Descriptive statistics were performed to summarize Canadian neonatal RDN staffing levels and responsibilities and compared with US findings. RESULTS: Canadian RDNs reported a median staffing ratio of 25.3 NICU beds per RDN full-time equivalent, with neonatal RDNs reporting a desired 31% increase in staffing. The majority of Canadian NICUs (n = 20/24) reported having a dedicated space to prepare infant feeds away from bedside. Canadian neonatal RDNs reported wanting to expand their responsibilities in research, administration, and education. Canadian neonatal RDNs reported a higher rate of order writing privileges as compared with that of US neonatal RDNs. CONCLUSION: Canadian neonatal RDNs reported a desired increase in their staffing levels. Neonatal RDNs have the potential to expand their professional role but require additional staffing, dedicated time, and compensation to support this. Further research determining the optimal neonatal RDN staffing ratio to maximize patient outcomes is required.

Renal dietitians lack time and resources to follow the NKF KDOQI guidelines for frequency and method of diet assessment: results of a survey.

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to determine how often renal dietitians assess patients' diets and what methods they use to collect and analyze the data. DESIGN AND METHODS: Data were collected through an anonymous online survey. The survey was distributed to renal dietitians during the winter of 2012. SUBJECTS: Currently practicing renal dietitian members of the International Society for Renal Nutrition and Metabolism, the National Kidney Foundation Council on Renal Nutrition, the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Renal Practice Group, and the RenalRD listserve were invited to participate. Of 599 usable responses received, 91% worked in the United States. The main outcome measure was dietitian compliance with Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) nutrition assessment guidelines. RESULTS: Most dietitians collect dietary intake data when certain laboratory results are abnormal (70%) whereas 6.5% biannually collect dietary intake data (recommended by KDOQI). The most common reasons for not collecting dietary intake data more frequently were lack of time (42%) and software (25%). Most dietitians determine the frequency of dietary intake assessment on their own (60%) whereas 10% follow the KDOQI guidelines. The most common method of dietary intake data collection was a typical day recall (50%), although 8% reported using a 3-day food record as recommended by KDOQI. The most common method for analyzing dietary intake data was "estimate in my head" (62%) followed by calculate by hand (24.5%). CONCLUSION: Renal dietitians do not follow the KDOQI guidelines for diet assessment because of time constraints. Research must explore which nutrition assessment tools may improve patient outcomes and can also be completed within the time allotted for nutrition care.

The Role of the Neonatal Registered Dietitian Nutritionist: Past, Present, and Future.

Neonatal registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs) are critical members of the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) team due to their unique skillset of growth assessment, nutrition evaluation, and implementation of nutrition best practices. There is a paucity of data on appropriate staffing of neonatal RDNs in NICUs to promote improved patient outcomes. Here, the authors describe current neonatal RDN staffing and responsibilities in the US NICUs.

A preliminary report on the functioning and data collection capabilities of a web-based nutrition algorithm for patients with chronic kidney disease.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to test the functional and data collection capabilities of an online nutrition algorithm for patients with chronic kidney disease by comparing dietitian-selected nutrition diagnoses, etiologies, and interventions in hemodialysis (HD) patients with and without diabetes mellitus (DM). DESIGN: Data were collected using an online nutrition screening tool and algorithm for HD patients based on the American Dietetic Association's Nutrition Care Process. SETTING: Data were collected by dietitians in the United States, New Zealand, Australia, and Brazil. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing HD under the care of a participating dietitian and who were deemed at nutrition risk at visit 1 were eligible to participate. Other inclusion criteria included age >19 years, able to speak and write English, and not receiving hospice care or the international equivalent. Data were available on 26 patients (50% males, 39% with DM). Mean baseline values were as follows: age, 56.3 years; body mass index, 28.2 kg/m(2); and serum albumin (bromocresol green), 36.8 g/L (3.68 g/dL). There were no statistically significant differences between DM and non-DM patients except in mean hemoglobin A1C. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Differences in the frequency of selection of diagnoses, etiology, and intervention categories were compared. RESULTS: The algorithm is under continuous development using input from participating dietitians, but its use was generally considered feasible. The initial data analysis showed that the algorithm is an effective method for collecting data on HD patients. In this small cohort, patients with and without DM had similar dietitian-selected nutrition diagnoses and etiologies, but had statistically significant differences in the dietitian-selected nutrition interventions that were selected most frequently. Health Care Team Referral was selected more often in DM patients (P < .003) and Recommendation of Specific Foods was selected more often in non-DM patients (P < .0170). CONCLUSION: This preliminary analysis shows that the algorithm can be used as both a clinical and a data collection tool. The test analysis, although small in sample size, showed interesting differences in the care of DM and non-DM HD patients.

Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Nutrition Research Network: Rationale and Protocol for a Study to Validate the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics/American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Consensus-Derived Diagnostic Indicators For Adult And Pediatric Malnutrition and to Determine Optimal Registered Dietitian Nutritionist Staffing in Acute Care Hospital Settings.

No systematic, universally accepted method of diagnosing malnutrition in hospitalized patients exists, which may contribute to underdiagnosis, undertreatment, and poorer patient outcomes. To address this issue, the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics is conducting a cohort study to: assess the predictive validity of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics/American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition indicators for the diagnosis of adult and pediatric malnutrition in hospital settings; assess the interrater reliability of the indicators for the diagnosis of adult and pediatric malnutrition; and quantify the level of registered dietitian nutritionist care needed to improve patient outcomes. Up to 60 adult and 60 pediatric hospital sites will collect data to estimate level of registered dietitian nutritionist care, along with patient medical history and Malnutrition Screening Tool (adult) or STRONGkids (pediatric) results. A subset of 600 adult and 600 pediatric patients (∼1:1 screened as high- or low-risk for malnutrition) will be randomly selected for the indicators for the diagnosis of adult and pediatric malnutrition and Nutrition Focused Physical Exam data collection; 100 adult and 100 pediatric patients in this group will also undergo a bioelectrical impedance analysis measurement. Additional nutrition care and medical outcomes (eg, mortality and length of stay) will be collected for a 3-month period after the initial nutrition encounter. Multilevel linear, logistic, Poisson, or Cox regression models will be used to assess indicators for the diagnosis of adult and pediatric malnutrition validity and registered dietitian nutritionist staffing levels as appropriate for each medical outcome. Validation results will allow US clinicians to standardize the way they diagnose malnutrition in hospitalized patients, and the staffing data will support advocacy for available registered dietitian nutritionist-delivered malnutrition treatment to improve patient outcomes.